All sittings← 2018-09-262018-09-28 →
Thursday, September 27, 2018 · sitting No. 327
Commons defers vote on NDP housing motion to October 2
The House spent most of the day debating an NDP opposition motion that calls on the government to recognize the right to housing as a human right and to advance half the national housing strategy funding before the next election. NDP MP Sheri Benson moved the motion. The House gave unanimous consent to defer the vote until October 2 after oral questions.
During question period Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer asked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau why he had not met U.S. President Donald Trump in New York and whether he had assurances against new auto tariffs if no NAFTA deal is reached by next week. Trudeau replied that negotiators are working for a deal that benefits Canada. Scheer also pressed Trudeau to reverse the Correctional Service of Canada decision that moved Tori Stafford's killer to medium security. Trudeau said the move occurred in 2014 under the previous Conservative government and that the minister has asked for a review.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2018-09-27
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Veterans Affairs
Conservative MP Erin O'Toole said Veterans Affairs Minister Seamus O'Regan should apologize to veteran Sean Bruyea for publicly attacking his credibility over the new pension for life program.
Read the exchangeIndigenous Affairs
NDP MP Romeo Saganash asked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to have cabinet meet indigenous knowledge keepers to learn the meaning of free prior and informed consent after the government decided to proceed with the Trans Mountain pipeline.
Read the exchangeNatural Resources
Bloc Québécois MP Guy Caron asked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to confirm he has no intention of reviving the Energy East pipeline project.
Read the exchangeForestry Industry
Liberal MP Kent Hehr asked Natural Resources Minister Amarjeet Sohi to update the House on measures to promote Canada's forest industry.
Read the exchangeOrgan and Tissue Donation
Liberal MP Ramez Ayoub moved a private member's motion urging federal provincial and territorial cooperation to raise organ and tissue donation rates through education and information sharing.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedInternational TradeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates negotiating goals without addressing the missed meeting.
Our negotiators are tough because they are doing their job.
- deflectedInternational TradeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats objectives and ends by attacking the opposition instead of providing tariff assurances.
The Conservatives want to sign any old deal quickly at any time.
- deflectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes prior Conservative action and a review request but avoids committing to reversing the decision.
the minister has asked that the commissioner of Correctional Service of Canada review this decision to ensure that it was taken properly and in accordance with long-standing policy.
- deflectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer reiterates the 2014 timeline and review without using the authority to reverse the placement.
The Conservatives should know that the minister does not control the security classification of individual prisoners because that is exactly what the member for Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis confirmed in the past.
- deflectedJusticeAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer dismisses the question as word games and restates facts without addressing use of authority.
I will let Canadians determine who is playing word games with talks of condos.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer states the project was cancelled and outlines review criteria if re-proposed.
If people want to propose projects, we will always review them.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer cites an investigation and court proceedings rather than addressing the timeline for changing approach.
Of course, as this case is currently before the courts, we cannot comment further at this time.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms consultation and UNDRIP support without committing to the requested cabinet session.
We will continue to listen to all voices, those in favour of projects and those opposed to projects, to make sure that we work together to get the right path for Canada.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts focus to who should be consulted rather than committing to cabinet meeting with knowledge keepers.
Several indigenous communities have signed agreements concerning this pipeline and support it.
- deflectedJusticeCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.Answer recounts history and review process without addressing reversal request.
I have asked the commissioner of the Correctional Service to review every dimension of this case
- deflectedJusticeCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats review by commissioner without committing to immediate policy change or reversal.
she is also examining the question of whether those policies are in fact the right ones
- deflectedJusticeMs. Leona Alleslev (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.Answer states lack of ministerial authority and points to commissioner review instead of reversal.
the legislation does not give the minister or the government the authority to intervene
- deflectedJusticeMs. Leona Alleslev (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.Answer again defers entirely to commissioner examination without addressing the transfer reversal.
the very issues that have been referred to by this hon. member in her question are issues that will be very carefully examined by the commissioner
- deflectedJusticeMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.Answer denies trivialization and restates review request, avoiding apology or revocation.
no member of the House has ever trivialized the circumstances that we are dealing with
- misdirectedJusticeMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.Answer turns to criticize previous government's 2014 decision rather than addressing current transfer or apology.
that description applied in 2014 when the decision was taken by the previous government
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges issues and promises support for treatment centre but does not address funding, meeting refusal or river cleanup.
I have promised to support them in the development of a treatment centre for the people who have suffered from contamination
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.The answer commits to looking into special education funding and references Jordan's principle but does not address the claimed cut or refusal to fund.
I am surprised to hear what the member is saying about special education and I will look into that immediately.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsErin O'Toole (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses town halls and benefit explanations without addressing the request for an apology or the alleged public attack.
That is why I have hosted over 40 veteran town halls across the country.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsErin O'Toole (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer states a general policy on court cases and declines to comment further due to an appeal, avoiding the apology request.
However, it would not be appropriate for me to comment further on this specific case because it is currently being appealed.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Richard Martel (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats talking points on town halls and benefit explanations without engaging the call to apologize or listen to officials.
That is why I hosted more than 40 town halls with veterans and why we are working so hard to explain the pension for life as clearly as possible.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMrs. Cathay Wagantall (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends communication efforts and counters 'misleading rhetoric' but sidesteps the specific accusation of attacking the veteran.
When I see an article that has misleading rhetoric, saying that we are trying to make people swallow our programs or that the $10 billion we are investing is flim-flam, it is my responsibility to say no, it is not.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Mr. Marc Miller (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer affirms recognition of rights and a new framework but does not commit to the requested cabinet meeting with knowledge keepers.
The framework will ensure that Canada moves from a denial of rights approach to one that recognizes and affirms those rights, and we will be glad to work further with the member opposite in perfecting those rights.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMs. Sheila Malcolmson (NDP) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses marine shipping and killer whale concerns raised in the question but does not respond to the call to cancel the pipeline.
We focused on the plight of the killer whales.
- partly answeredVeterans AffairsMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer outlines a policy review on benefits to family members but does not confirm whether payments to the specific individual have stopped.
I directed them to, first of all, ensure that the services received by a family member of a veteran are related to the veteran's service, and where they are not, that the case be reviewed by a senior official
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.Answer avoids the specific motion and payments by citing privacy and pivoting to general mental health policy.
For privacy reasons, we cannot comment on the specifics of this case.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Phil McColeman (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.Answer repeats privacy refusal and shifts to family supports and office reopenings instead of addressing benefits eligibility.
For privacy reasons, we cannot comment on the specifics of this case, but I will say that unlike the Harper Conservatives, we understand that when a veteran serves, his family serves with him.
- misdirectedVeterans AffairsMr. Phil McColeman (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the comparison of rights and instead promotes town halls and pension explanations.
That is why I have hosted over 40 veterans town halls across the country.
- answeredInternational TradeMs. Karine Trudel (NDP) asked Andrew Leslie (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly lists concrete support measures for workers facing NAFTA-related job risks.
That is why we have made up to $2 billion available to defend and protect their interests.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Andrew Leslie (Liberal). substantive question.Answer affirms no bad deal and ongoing talks but does not detail a contingency plan for auto tariffs.
We are going to remain firm on that principle, because Canadians expect us to stand up for them.
- misdirectedInternational TradeMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to small-business tax cuts and clean economy instead of addressing investment declines or Trump assistance.
In particular, I note the support we are giving to small businesses by lowering the small-business tax to 9%, the lowest in the G7.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer counters with recession history and recent growth stats rather than tackling the investment and Trump claims.
We found ourselves with the fastest growth among G7 countries in 2017.
- partly answeredPublic Services and ProcurementSteven Blaney (Conservative) asked Mr. Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.Answer highlights existing Davie contracts but does not address awarding the Obelix supply ship.
This summer, I had the pleasure of visiting Davie shipyard and announcing a $610-million contract for the acquisition of three interim icebreakers for our Coast Guard.
- deflectedInternational DevelopmentMr. Ziad Aboultaif (Conservative) asked Ms. Kamal Khera (Liberal). substantive question.Answer promotes a funding initiative without addressing pension investment trust or domestic investment failures.
That is why we will contribute $20 million to the global infrastructure hub that will bring together public and private investors to develop critical infrastructure projects that will benefit everyone, including women and girls, strengthen their communities and connect global markets.
- partly answeredCanadian HeritageMr. Pierre Nantel (NDP) asked Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges urgency indirectly by referencing upcoming legislation but restates prior investments without new timeline.
We are going to receive their recommendations and pass legislation with a very clear provision: Everyone who participates in the system has to contribute to it, and there will be no free passes.
- answeredJusticeMr. Michael Cooper (Conservative) asked Mr. Arif Virani (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly apologizes to the widow while explaining the underlying position on torture.
I apologize for not being more sensitive at the standing committee to Mrs. Basnicki, a 9/11 widow, about her loss.
- deflectedRail TransportationMs. Monique Pauzé (Bloc) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer cites existing TSB recommendations and prior actions instead of addressing a new commission of inquiry.
the Transportation Safety Board has carefully examined the tragedy that took place in Lac-Mégantic and made many recommendations, which we are currently implementing.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsMr. Gabriel Ste-Marie (Bloc) asked Andrew Leslie (Liberal). substantive question.Answer notes Parliament could reflect on citizenship but pivots to aid spending without committing to revocation action.
Aung San Suu Kyi's honorary citizenship is something that Parliament could reflect on.
- deflectedInternational TradeMaxime Bernier (Independent) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends supply management without engaging the NAFTA tariff or auto industry risk question.
The fact of the matter is that we are the party that implemented supply management and we are the government that will support supply management.
- answeredBusiness of the HouseCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). substantive question.Answer lists the planned House business for the requested weeks in direct response.
this afternoon, we will continue debate on the NDP opposition motion.