All sittings← 2018-09-242018-09-26 →
Tuesday, September 25, 2018 · sitting No. 325
Conservatives move to strip benefits from killer of officer
The House spent most of the day on a Conservative supply motion that calls on the government to revoke Veterans Affairs Canada benefits extended to Chris Garnier, who is serving a sentence for second-degree murder and interfering with the body of police officer Catherine Campbell. Conservative MP Phil McColeman moved the motion and said the case is a one-off that requires immediate action. Liberal MP Robert-Falcon Ouellette defended the department's approach and noted past Conservative cuts to veterans programs.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the same case, with Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer and MP Lisa Raitt pressing Minister Seamus O'Regan to cancel the benefits. O'Regan said he had directed a review but would not discuss a veteran's family member's file. The House also heard clashes over the Trans Mountain pipeline, with Scheer asking when promised legislation would be introduced and Minister Amarjeet Sohi replying that the government is consulting indigenous groups and protecting the marine environment.
Decided that day
- Opposition motion on veterans failed
- Bills S-254 and C-414 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2018-09-25
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Committees of the House
Liberal MP Bill Casey presented the health committee's 19th report on organ donation in Canada and said every party had taken an interest in the seven recommendations.
Read the exchangeJobs and Economic Growth Act
NDP MP Daniel Blaikie introduced Bill C-414 to amend the Jobs and Economic Growth Act and extend a grace period for Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Ltd. pensioners after privatization.
Read the exchangePetitions
Conservative MP Garnett Genuis presented a petition calling on the government to stop imposing a values test on applicants to the Canada summer jobs program.
Read the exchangePetitions
NDP MP Brian Masse supported a petition urging the government to adopt Motion No. 117 for a pan-Canadian strategy on eating disorders that includes prevention and research.
Read the exchangeNew Brunswick Election
Liberal MP Matt DeCourcey thanked New Brunswickers and poll workers for participating in the provincial election and noted the role of volunteers.
Read the exchangeStatus of Women
NDP MP Sheila Malcolmson asked why the government had not yet introduced promised proactive pay equity legislation after 42 years, and Minister Patty Hajdu said consultations are complete and a bill will come later this year.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- partly answeredVeterans AffairsAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.Answer addresses the specific case by ordering a policy review but does not confirm cancellation of benefits.
I am directing the department to immediately address its policy of providing treatment to family members under extenuating circumstances, such as conviction of such a serious crime.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.Answer ignores the question on legislation timing and instead attacks the opposition's past record.
what we heard yesterday from the Leader of the Opposition was the failed policies of the Harper era.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.Answer again pivots to Harper record instead of addressing the request for legislation introduction.
let us talk about the failed record of the Harper government to build a single pipeline to expand our global non-U.S. markets.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.Answer explains the approach but provides no date for start of work as requested.
we are moving forward on this project in the right way, making sure that we are respecting our obligations to meaningfully consult with indigenous peoples
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). loaded question.Answer avoids the declaratory power proposal and restates consultation talking points.
for years the previous government cut corners, disregarded environmental regulations and ignored the indigenous people's right to be meaningfully consulted.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges consultation concerns and references NEB review but offers no new commitments beyond prior statements.
We have instructed the NEB to undertake the review that was denied by the previous Conservative government to factor in the impact of the marine shipping on the marine environment.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts focus to market expansion rather than addressing meaningful consultation standards.
the issue that the member from the NDP is not focused on is that we need to make sure we are expanding our global market for our natural resources.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). rhetorical question.Question expresses frustration without seeking specific information; answer restates general respect for indigenous peoples.
we have a tremendous amount of respect for indigenous Canadians from coast to coast to coast.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Rachel Blaney (NDP) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). loaded question.The answer acknowledges diverse indigenous views and benefit agreements but sidesteps the core claim about respect for the relationship.
A number of first nations communities have signed benefit agreements because they see the value of this project.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the benefits question entirely by invoking privacy and attacking the opposition's past record.
It played with veterans health records like it was playing cards.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer refuses to address retroactive payments by again citing privacy and pivoting to general veteran support.
I cannot discuss this case without infringing upon the privacy of a veteran.
- misdirectedVeterans AffairsMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the specific request to end benefits and instead lists unrelated government actions on veterans.
We have increased services. We have reopened offices. We have increased staff.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer concedes outrage exists but refuses to act on the benefits issue by appealing to abstract principles.
Our outrage should not factor into justice and into laws.
- misdirectedVeterans AffairsMr. Phil McColeman (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition's record instead of addressing leadership or resignation demands.
for 10 years, the House was used as a place where people on that side of the House cut benefits, cut services, closed offices, cut staff and took away an ID card from veterans.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Phil McColeman (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer again invokes privacy of the veteran and refuses to discuss ending benefits.
we cannot discuss the details of this case without discussing the case of the veteran, and we will not.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses environmental work on spills and species but does not respond to the 60-day ultimatum or timeline.
We have done an enormous amount of work on ensuring we are protecting the coast, preventing spills.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer lists government actions on marine protection without addressing the specific Washington state concerns or the purchase rationale.
We have done the work to ensure that the process can be handled in an environmentally sustainable way.
- misdirectedVeterans AffairsMs. Rachael Harder (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the question as political expediency rather than addressing veterans benefits eligibility.
It should not have to endure this case being brought up for political expediency.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Richard Martel (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights spending and services without addressing ending benefits for the named individual.
We have spent $10 billion in three years on our veterans and their families.
- misdirectedVeterans AffairsMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to criticizing the prior government's record instead of responding to the benefits question.
those on the other side of the House had 10 years to do better by our veterans
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer reframes around supporting veterans broadly without addressing payments to the non-veteran.
Even in the most extenuating of circumstances, we will stand with that veteran
- partly answeredInternational TradeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Andrew Leslie (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms commitment to affordable drugs and NAFTA talks but offers no explicit commitment on the requested point.
We will continue to work with the provinces, territories and our partners to lower drug prices and provide timely access to medicines.
- deflectedIntergovernmental AffairsMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer states a general position on the clause but does not address the request for a study.
our government has been very clear. We think the notwithstanding clause should only be considered in the most exceptional of circumstances.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Jamie Schmale (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). loaded question.The answer criticizes the opposition's past record instead of addressing adoption of the proposed plan.
after a decade of failure, the official opposition is still repeating the same thing it has done for a decade
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMrs. Cathy McLeod (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates government policy on consultation and environment without addressing the timeline or plan request.
We recognize there is a diversity of opinions among indigenous peoples.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Conservative record instead of addressing when the minister will act on the pipeline.
what the Conservatives announced yesterday was a dissertation on a decade of failure
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses past NEB decisions but does not answer when the pipeline will move forward.
The record has been very clear that that was the wrong decision to make.
- deflectedHealthMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses the opioid crisis generally but avoids the NAFTA or war-on-drugs premise.
Substance abuse is an international problem and the global call for action will help us move forward.
- deflectedHealthMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Liberal). loaded question.The answer focuses on the opioid crisis and international action without addressing the request to condemn Trump.
An international call to action will help us to move forward.
- misdirectedVeterans AffairsMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pivots to supporting the veteran rather than answering whether benefits to Garnier will be rescinded.
I will stand by that veteran even under the most excruciating of circumstances
- misdirectedVeterans AffairsMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats support for the veteran and does not address rescinding benefits for Garnier.
Our support for that veteran is unwavering.
- misdirectedVeterans AffairsMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the prior government's record instead of answering whether Garnier must repay benefits.
I know the cost of 10 years of not just neglect but malice toward our veterans and their families.
- answeredPublic Services and ProcurementSteven Blaney (Conservative) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly confirms use of original stones and regulatory compliance for any additions.
We will repair the fort using original Citadelle stones.
- answeredStatus of WomenMs. Sheila Malcolmson (NDP) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.The answer explicitly states the government will introduce the promised legislation later this year.
Consultations have been done and we will be moving forward with pay equity legislation later this year.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMike Lake (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). loaded question.The answer asserts confidence in meeting targets but immediately pivots to attacking the questioner and his party.
I invite the hon. member to get on board instead of taking money out of his constituents' pockets so that he can make pollution free again.
- deflectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Mario Beaulieu (Bloc) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer discusses general facts and priorities without addressing who holds authority or knowledge of the files.
As a government, we make evidence-based decisions, and the data show that the number of border crossers intercepted is lower than it was last year.
- answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer opens by confirming authority and acknowledges the reimbursement obligation to Quebec.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Elizabeth May (Green) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). loaded question.The answer lists general climate policies but never addresses whether the NEB will be instructed to assess the pipeline's climate impacts.
This means we are going to take steps to get our resources to new markets while we still take steps to protect our environment and meet our Paris Agreement commitments.