All sittings← 2018-09-192018-09-21 →
Thursday, September 20, 2018 · sitting No. 322
Commons extends firearms bill debate with division set for Monday
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on third reading of Bill C-71, an act to amend certain acts and regulations in relation to firearms. Minister Ralph Goodale moved the bill at third reading and described its measures as supporting public safety and law enforcement while respecting law-abiding owners. A motion moved by Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux at routine proceedings deemed all questions necessary to dispose of the stage put and the recorded division deferred until Monday, September 24.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on Veterans Affairs. Conservative MP John Brassard asked whether convicted killer Christopher Garnier should receive benefits, noting Garnier had never served in the Canadian Armed Forces or the RCMP. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Conservatives had cut benefits and offices for veterans while the government was taking a serious approach to supporting families of serving members.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2018-09-20
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
The Economy
Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre said higher taxes and blocked pipelines had sent investment and jobs south of the border and asked when the Prime Minister would stop handing Canadian jobs to the United States. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau replied that the government had created the strongest economic growth in the G7 last year and more than half a million full-time jobs.
Read the exchangeInfrastructure
NDP MP Guy Caron said the infrastructure bank had spent more than $11 million on operations while advancing only one project, a loan already announced before the bank existed. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the government had flowed billions of dollars to communities and established new ways to deliver infrastructure.
Read the exchangeImmigration, Refugees and Citizenship
Conservative MP Pierre Paul-Hus said more than 65 per cent of the 31,000 people who entered Canada since the Prime Minister's tweet had legal status in the United States and asked where the Liberal plan was. Minister Diane Lebouthillier said the government was working with provinces and municipalities to manage claims in accordance with international law.
Read the exchangeNatural Resources
NDP MP Nathan Cullen said a National Energy Board report showed it had learned of hundreds of faulty pipeline parts three years ago that could expand or break under pressure. Parliamentary Secretary Paul Lefebvre said the 2016 Pipeline Safety Act and new funding for the board would maintain the highest safety standards.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedThe EconomyPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes Liberal economic record without addressing specific claims on pipelines, taxes or NAFTA.
Our unemployment rate is the lowest it has been in 40 years.
- deflectedThe EconomyPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to past Conservative tax policy instead of addressing current job and investment numbers.
The Conservatives voted against the middle-class tax break.
- misdirectedThe EconomyPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer accuses Conservatives of playing politics rather than addressing the pipeline and tax claims.
It is a shame that the Conservatives are choosing to play politics on relations with the United States.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks Conservative record on veterans instead of addressing the specific Garnier benefits question.
They nickelled and dimed those veterans.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer explicitly refuses to address the question on Garnier benefits.
I will not answer that question.
- deflectedInfrastructureMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general infrastructure investment without explaining the bank's operating expenses or single project.
The NDP made a very different choice.
- deflectedInfrastructureMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights past spending but does not address the delay in new projects or the CEO's timeline.
we have flowed billions of dollars to communities across this country for real investments now
- deflectedInfrastructureMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer contrasts NDP and Liberal paths without explaining the bank's expenses or lack of projects.
Billions of dollars have been earmarked specifically for them
- deflectedInfrastructureMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses past Liberal investments but avoids specifying uses of infrastructure bank funds.
Over the past three years, billions of dollars have been invested in our communities from coast to coast to coast, but yes, more investment is needed.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Richard Martel (Conservative) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights investments and retention efforts but does not address pilot shortages or the Australian plane purchase.
We are taking action to boost retention of our women and men in uniform, including the tax-free allowance for international operations and more than $6 million a year to support military families.
- deflectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks Conservatives and notes lower crossings but does not outline a plan for deportations or eligibility checks.
The Harper Conservatives continue to politicize the issue by fearmongering and spreading false information.
- deflectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.The answer references a plan involving other governments but avoids addressing processing or deportation of ineligible claimants.
Our government is working with provincial and municipal governments to manage the asylum claims compassionately and in accordance with international law and Canada's humanitarian values.
- misdirectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Bob Saroya (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to criticizing the question about American citizen crossers instead of addressing border pressure or backlogs.
Surely the member opposite is not suggesting that we tear these infants from their mothers' arms and incarcerate them in cages.
- misdirectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends compassion but attacks the question's premise rather than addressing the safe third country loophole.
To suggest for a moment that people should be removed simply because, as toddlers, they happened to hold American citizenship by virtue of where they were born, is—
- partly answeredVeterans AffairsMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer acknowledges discomfort with the case but cites privacy and does not directly state whether benefits should be received.
For privacy reasons, I cannot get into the case.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Lefebvre (Liberal). substantive question.The answer confirms review of the court decision and duty to consult but does not address whether the process meets reconciliation standards.
We are currently examining it.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Carolyn Bennett (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer restates general commitment and cites a judge's remark on counsel instead of addressing the $2.3 million spend or broken word.
There are a few cases that, as the member knows, were difficult to settle.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Todd Doherty (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to attack a different Conservative member rather than addressing the Ethics Commissioner's finding on the fisheries minister.
We cannot say the same about the conduct of the member for Haldimand—Norfolk who, when in cabinet, gave preferential treatment by funding a project connected with the Conservative Party after her own department had ruled it was ineligible for federal funding.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer repeats that no preferential treatment occurred then shifts to Harper-era example instead of addressing consequences for the current minister.
However, since the Conservatives have a short memory, I will remind my colleague opposite that Prime Minister Harper's chief of staff was found guilty by the commissioner after writing a personal cheque for $90,000 to a senator to try to hide their corruption.
- deflectedCarbon PricingMrs. Rosemarie Falk (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). loaded question.Answer cites a National Post report and attacks the member's constituents instead of addressing the carbon tax's impact on small businesses or Saskatchewan's plan.
It is disappointing in the extreme that the member opposite would dip into the pockets of her constituents so they can make pollution free again.
- deflectedCarbon PricingMr. Harold Albrecht (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Fraser (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats net-benefit claim and job numbers but does not address affordability concerns or the request to stop raising taxes on families.
Since we were elected and came into office, the economy has added half a million jobs and emissions are going down.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Lefebvre (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses pipeline safety investments and oversight but does not answer when faulty parts will be replaced or confirm knowledge of their location in the purchased pipeline.
We have also invested $17.4 million in the National Energy Board to enhance pipeline oversight and monitoring activities.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Lefebvre (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer states the government's process has not changed and avoids promising never to revive Energy East.
Our government would have used the same assessment process for the energy east pipeline as it did for other major projects that were approved.
- answeredVeterans AffairsMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.Answer directly acknowledges discomfort with the decision and states a review has been requested, addressing the core question about benefits.
In this case, I have asked that the department go back and review the decision for me to look at.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer diverts to PTSD treatment statistics without addressing whether Garnier should receive benefits.
If people raise their hand and need treatment for PTSD, they will receive that treatment in 96% of cases.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Jamie Schmale (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer cites privacy issues and refuses to engage further on the benefits question.
there are privacy issues around this case and I am not going to take it any further.
- partly answeredVeterans AffairsMr. Colin Carrie (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer states a review of the judgment was requested but does not address the core question on benefits.
once again, I have asked my officials to go back to review the judgment and to come back to me with that review.
- answeredForeign AffairsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Andrew Leslie (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains the arms export policy and prior contract commitments in response to the human rights query.
our government is fully committed to creating a stronger and more rigorous arms export control system through Bill C-47
- partly answeredPublic Services and ProcurementMs. Karine Trudel (NDP) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.The answer commits to investigating the unpaid invoice but provides no immediate resolution or details.
I will be sure to look into this problem and get back to the House with an answer.
- deflectedSmall BusinessMr. Dean Allison (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses general small business support measures without addressing the exclusion criteria or tariff relief fund.
we have put in place measures with our neighbour to the south during these challenging times, to aid small businesses in a variety of different industries.
- misdirectedVeterans AffairsMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to the government's gender-based violence strategy and attacks the opposition's sincerity rather than addressing the benefits question.
It is wonderful to see that colleagues from the opposite side are on board with our plan.
- misdirectedVeterans AffairsMr. Phil McColeman (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer accuses the opposition of playing political games instead of addressing the timeline for reviewing the benefits decision.
At one point, Canadians are going to help the Conservatives understand that they should not play these disgusting political games the way they do.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer requests to let the debate rest instead of addressing whether non-veterans should receive benefits.
out of respect for the family of Constable Campbell, can we simply let this debate rest for now?
- partly answeredTransportMr. Alistair MacGregor (NDP) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the anchorage issue and ongoing study but does not commit to immediate removal.
We are in a period of a one-year interim study to find a better solution.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Garnett Genuis (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer states a review was requested without addressing whether non-veterans should receive benefits.
I have asked the department to get back to me with a review of the decision.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Gabriel Ste-Marie (Bloc) asked Mr. Paul Lefebvre (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general support for infrastructure without explaining the Muskrat Falls investment decision.
We have announced loan guarantees for Newfoundland and Labrador to ensure that this project moves ahead.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Luc Thériault (Bloc) asked Mr. Paul Lefebvre (Liberal). substantive question.The answer reiterates working with provinces but does not disclose details of behind-the-scenes transactions.
We have worked with Newfoundland and Labrador to ensure that this project is sustainable and creates good jobs.
- answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Elizabeth May (Green) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly addresses collaboration and ongoing work on relocation options for the community.
This work is ongoing and includes an action plan that reflects the community's culture, priorities and options for relocation.
- answeredBusiness of the HouseMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). substantive question.The answer provides the schedule for upcoming bills as requested.