All sittings← 2018-06-112018-06-13 →
Tuesday, June 12, 2018 · sitting No. 313
NDP clean-energy motion leads commons debate as Liberals defend pipeline purchase
The House devoted the largest share of its sitting to an NDP opposition motion on building a clean-energy economy through investments in renewables and worker retraining. Alexandre Boulerice moved the motion, which calls on the government to avoid spending billions on the Trans Mountain pipeline. Debate continued through the day with the recorded division deferred to the following afternoon.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the NAFTA talks. Conservative MP Lisa Raitt pressed the Prime Minister on whether the United States had withdrawn its five-year sunset clause demand. Justin Trudeau replied that Canada would not accept any automatic expiry provision.
Decided that day
- Opposition motion on Iran passed
- Bill C-408 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2018-06-12
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Business of Supply
Mr. Harold Albrecht told Mr. Boulerice he agreed the $4.5-billion purchase of the 60-year-old pipeline without parliamentary input was a travesty, though he noted New Democrats also support the carbon tax.
Read the exchangeBusiness of Supply
Ms. Linda Duncan asked Mr. Boulerice whether the government would support unions calling for retraining programs so workers need not choose between jobs and a healthy environment.
Read the exchangeCarbon Pricing
Pierre Poilievre asked Finance Minister Bill Morneau how much the new carbon tax would cost the average Canadian family after noting 80 per cent of middle-class taxpayers now pay more.
Read the exchangeHousing
Jean-Yves Duclos announced Reaching Home, a plan to double federal investment and reduce chronic homelessness by at least 50 per cent over ten years.
Read the exchangeEmployment
Patty Hajdu defended the requirement that recipients of Canada summer jobs funding adhere to program terms after Conservative members raised concerns about one approved organization.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedInternational TradeLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer thanks participants and restates positions without confirming the report.
On this specific issue, I can say that we are continuing to discuss modernizing and improving NAFTA.
- deflectedInternational TradeLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Avoids direct yes or no by discussing ongoing engagement.
We have continued to impress upon him how important it is to modernize and improve NAFTA.
- misdirectedInternational TradeLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The response clarifies the sunset issue but ignores the carbon tax question entirely.
As far as we know, the U.S. has not removed its demand for some sort of sunset clause.
- partly answeredThe EconomyMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Provides counterpoints on growth but does not address the specific statistics mentioned.
We are creating economic growth. In fact, we enjoyed the highest rate of economic growth among all G7 countries in 2017.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Shifts focus to child benefits instead of addressing deficits, taxes, or investments.
like the Fraser Institute, the Conservatives do not want to talk about the Canada child benefit.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Defends the consultation process without addressing the failure claim directly.
Our government has completed the deepest consultations with rights holders ever on a major project in this country
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Highlights the included elements of the plan but sidesteps direct reconciliation with pipeline purchase.
That is what you call leadership on climate change.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Defends the balanced approach and mentions renewable investments without directly justifying the pipeline expenditure.
With respect to investing in renewable energy and a greener economy, we are investing $8 billion because we understand that it is important for Canadians.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMs. Jenny Kwan (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer sidesteps the CPP risk question by stressing arm's length status after pivoting to Notley's plan.
As for the CPPIB, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board operates at arm's length, with a mandate to invest in the best interest of its members, and that is something we respect.
- misdirectedThe EconomyPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks prior government record instead of addressing how policies aid Trump on jobs and pipelines.
Therefore, we will not listen to the Harper Conservatives when they talk about jobs.
- deflectedCarbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.Answer opens with condolences and general statements on youth and jobs without addressing carbon tax suspension.
Speaking of youth, they care about the environment.
- misdirectedCarbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer disputes the questioner's facts on taxes rather than stating carbon tax cost to families.
we need to call out the member for Carleton on incorrect facts.
- deflectedCarbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts to riding-specific benefits and ignores the carbon tax cost question.
For example, for the member for Carleton , what has happened is that there is about $48 million in Canada child benefits going to that riding.
- partly answeredThe EconomyMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer rebuts cherry-picking with investment and growth numbers but does not address U.S.-Canada investment imbalance.
Every family is better off, and our economic growth leads the G7.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer repeats child benefit and tax cut claims without addressing deficit size or tax burden increase.
Thanks to the Canada child benefit, nine out of 10 families are better off.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Linda Duncan (NDP) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.Answer covers clean tech investments and coal transition but omits broader just transition funding commitment.
We set up a just transition workforce so that we can support workers in the coal sector so they can transition.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. François Choquette (NDP) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.Answer lists green investments but does not address stopping pipeline spending or timeline for future energy shift.
I would remind the hon. members of the House that we have invested $2 billion in the low-carbon economy fund, $200 million to support clean technology in the natural resource sectors, $220 million to get rural and remote communities off diesel, $20 billion for public transit, and $21.9 billion in green infrastructure to improve energy efficiency and to help Canadians save money.
- misdirectedInternational TradeMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Conservatives and a specific MP instead of addressing concessions or the Prime Minister's positions.
Unlike the Conservatives, our government fully supports Canadian dairy farmers and our supply management system.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.Answer restates support for supply management without confirming or denying concessions or market share details.
We created the system, and we will defend it.
- misdirectedInternational TradeMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks the Conservative critic's past statements rather than clarifying the Prime Minister's position or concessions.
Unfortunately, the Conservative critic, the opposition critic for economic development, has indicated quite clearly that he called for the end of supply management.
- misdirectedInternational TradeMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer criticizes opposition language on dairy farmers instead of answering about market access offered to the US.
However, when we have the economic development critic in the Conservative Party indicating quite clearly that supply management is nefarious and dairy farmers are nefarious paper millionaires, that is inappropriate language.
- deflectedInternational TradeMs. Karine Trudel (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer affirms support for supply management but does not confirm no compromises or address specific industries listed.
we have been clear. We will stand up for supply management.
- partly answeredAutomotive IndustryMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). substantive question.Answer highlights past auto investments but does not specify new actions against potential US tariffs.
Since we formed government, there has been a total investment of $5.6 billion in the automotive sector, and that is because we have stepped up in a big way to support the sector and to support the workers.
- answeredNatural ResourcesMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states the CPP Investment Board is independent and government would not be involved in any acquisition decision.
the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board operates as an independent entity at arm's length from government.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes project benefits without addressing pension buyout or overpayment claims.
We know this is in the best interests of Canadians.
- partly answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges RCMP work and notes ongoing US contact but does not confirm negotiation start.
As far as our relations with the U.S. are concerned, we are in constant contact with our neighbours to the south.
- answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states discussions have begun though nothing is official yet.
We have initiated certain discussions, but there is nothing official.
- deflectedHousingMs. Sheri Benson (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer points to the strategy announcement without committing to specific homeless housing measures requested.
I would invite her to look very closely at the national housing strategy and the important announcement we made yesterday
- deflectedHousingMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer refers to the announced plan and stakeholder praise without confirming a dedicated poverty reduction strategy.
I invite her to consult the stakeholders across Canada, especially those in Quebec, who were thrilled not only with the significant result we announced yesterday
- misdirectedEmploymentSteven Blaney (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to program size and terms without addressing funding approval or condemnation of the statements.
If the member has concerns, he can speak to my office afterward.
- deflectedEmploymentPeter Kent (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates adherence to terms without confirming whether the organization violated the attestation.
If the member is concerned about that organization, then he can bring it to my attention.
- deflectedEmploymentMrs. Kelly Block (Conservative) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights increased job numbers in Nova Scotia without addressing the museum's funding denial or attestation issue.
Clearly, young people in Nova Scotia will have more opportunities than ever to have excellent job experiences this summer.
- deflectedAir TransportationErin O'Toole (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer praises ICAO generally but ignores the Taiwan code issue raised.
We have been very involved with ICAO in all of the good work it does to adopt international standards with respect to aviation.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Carolyn Bennett (Liberal). substantive question.Addresses costs against lawyers but does not address the specific promise mentioned.
Canada has not, and will not, seek costs against individual claimants.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMr. Garnett Genuis (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Gives a general human rights statement without specific condemnation or call to allies.
We raise the human rights situation in China with Chinese officials at every opportunity.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMr. Gabriel Ste-Marie (Québec debout) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Mentions defending industry but does not announce support for aluminum SMEs.
Our government will defend our workers and our industry.
- answeredMarine TransportationMrs. Marilène Gill (Bloc) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Directly addresses monitoring, cooperation, and working toward a solution for the community.
We are working in co-operation with the community and Relais Nordik, which serves the community.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Erin Weir (Independent) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Discusses the retaliation list and welcomes ideas but does not address targeting the Trump organization.
we welcome ideas from all Canadians on what should and should not be in our retaliation list.