Commons debates bill to join arms trade treaty

Other moments

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

1. deflected
   Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses climate actions but avoids addressing the Ontario election result or canceling the tax.The impact of climate change does not stop with a change in government, and Canadians expect us to take serious action to address climate change and to grow our economy.
2. deflected
   Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to general economic achievements and avoids the Ontario verdict on carbon tax.Since we formed government, the Canadian economy has created over 60% more full-time jobs than the Harper Conservatives did over the same time period.
3. deflected
   Carbon PricingPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer reiterates climate policy without addressing the Ontario election message or cost increases.I certainly wish for the sake of our children and grandchildren that the Conservatives were not making climate change a partisan argument.
4. deflected
   Carbon PricingMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates climate actions but does not address imposing the tax against Ontario wishes.a new government does not mean we will stop feeling the impact of climate change.
5. deflected
   Carbon PricingMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to job creation and avoids stating the cost of the carbon tax to families.Our government will continue to invest in Canadians in order to grow the middle class—
6. answered
   Natural ResourcesMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains the priority as securing jobs and balancing economy with environment via the pipeline deal.During the construction season we are securing more than 15,000 jobs, including 9,000 jobs in British Columbia.
7. misdirected
   Natural ResourcesMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP's consistency and questions the member instead of addressing investment alternatives or job creation.the NDP cannot seem to decide if it is a party that supports responsible resource development or if it is still the party of the Leap Manifesto.
8. partly answered
   EmploymentMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.The answer confirms meetings with industries and support measures but does not specify when meetings with labour and industry will occur.We are in meetings with those industries.
9. deflected
   International TradeMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Mr. Jean-Claude Poissant (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates general support without addressing Trump's attacks or the call for full protection.our government strongly supports the supply management system and is committed to maintaining it.
10. deflected
    Carbon PricingDiane Finley (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights provincial growth but avoids stating the carbon tax cost or committing to stop it.the four provinces that price carbon pollution in Canada are B.C., Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec, which led the country in growth last year.
11. misdirected
    Carbon PricingMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to unrelated tax cuts and child benefits instead of addressing the Ontario election or carbon tax.Our government has cut taxes for nine million middle-class Canadians, while raising them on the richest 1%.
12. deflected
    Carbon PricingMrs. Karen Vecchio (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer promotes business benefits of carbon pricing but does not say when or if the tax will be scrapped.putting a price on carbon pollution is just good business.
13. misdirected
    Carbon PricingMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks Conservative climate beliefs rather than addressing transparency on costs or abandoning the tax.the Conservatives do not have a plan to address climate change.
14. deflected
    Carbon PricingMr. Harold Albrecht (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses emission reductions but ignores the request to stop the tax due to Ontario's vote.A recent study released showed that by 2030, a price on carbon will reduce 80 to 90 megatonnes of carbon emissions
15. deflected
    Carbon PricingMr. Arnold Viersen (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats the plan for pricing pollution without saying it will be abandoned after Ontario's vote.a thoughtful approach to addressing climate change includes measures that are regulatory measures.
16. misdirected
    The EnvironmentMr. Richard Cannings (NDP) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends Alberta's plan and attacks NDP instead of addressing pipeline risks or ocean protection.members of the NDP indeed applauded Premier Notley's plan to protect the environment, but it seems they forgot what that plan contained.
17. deflected
    The EnvironmentMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses general environmental policies but avoids addressing the pipeline investment or renewable energy promise directly.It is simply not the case that we believe that one cannot be done with the other.
18. deflected
    Carbon PricingMrs. Kelly Block (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes carbon pricing benefits but ignores the Ontario result and refuses to address scrapping the tax.Canadians know that we can fight climate change and grow our economy at the same time.
19. deflected
    Carbon PricingMrs. Cathay Wagantall (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats the pan-Canadian framework talking points without engaging the Ontario election or the demand to scrap the tax.That is what the pan-Canadian framework is about that we negotiated with the provinces and territories.
20. deflected
    Carbon PricingMr. Robert Kitchen (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer lists climate measures but sidesteps the Ontario rejection and the call to axe the carbon tax.It also includes putting a price on pollution to ensure that we are trying to address what we do not want and accelerating the innovation that we do.
21. deflected
    Carbon PricingMrs. Stephanie Kusie (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends carbon pricing with data references but does not address the Ontario vote or the demand to stop the tax.One of those is putting a price on carbon pollution.
22. partly answered
    MarijuanaMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the Senate amendments and states they will be considered, addressing the core request for the government's plan.We will carefully consider the amendments that the other House has put forward as we move toward a comprehensive legalized framework and strict regulation of cannabis.
23. partly answered
    MarijuanaMr. François Choquette (NDP) asked Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Liberal). substantive question.The answer explains the government's approach and notes it will examine Senate amendments, partially addressing the call for immediate decriminalization.Our government will carefully examine the amendments they made.
24. deflected
    International TradeMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Mr. Jean-Claude Poissant (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends supply management in general but avoids confirming or denying specific concessions to the US.This government will only sign a deal that is good for all Canadians.
25. deflected
    International TradeMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Mr. Jean-Claude Poissant (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates general support for supply management without addressing the specific offer or alleged contradiction mentioned.We have said many times that the proposals from our American partners about supply management are unacceptable.
26. misdirected
    Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Mr. Serge Cormier (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Conservatives' past record and the opposition leader instead of addressing the G7 agenda question.If I were an immigration officer or a border services officer, I would refuse to attend and send the Leader of the Opposition packing.
27. partly answered
    Public SafetyMr. Joël Godin (Conservative) asked Mr. Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms commitment to safe workplaces but does not address the specific cuts to fire brigades or Phoenix pay issues raised.We are working closely with the new interim commissioner of correctional services, who is taking significant measures to ensure a safe and healthy workplace for all corrections workers in this country.
28. answered
    Foreign AffairsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Mr. Matt DeCourcey (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states the government's actions and disappointment regarding the arrests of activists.The minister raised these concerns with the Saudi foreign affairs minister.
29. deflected
    The EnvironmentMr. Wayne Stetski (NDP) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends the project approval and conditions but avoids explaining how ecological integrity is protected in the parks.It includes incorporating the emissions in the pan-Canadian framework, it includes an oceans protection plan, and it includes a range of measures to ensure that the pipeline construction is done safely and in accordance with the ecological integrity of Canada's national parks.
30. misdirected
    TaxationMrs. Cathy McLeod (Conservative) asked Mr. Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general disaster response coordination instead of addressing the specific tax treatment request for salvaged wood.Our government will always stand ready to help any province or territory that requests federal assistance to respond to any natural disaster, including wildland and urban interface fires.
31. misdirected
    EmploymentMrs. Cathy McLeod (Conservative) asked Mr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the Conservatives' past cuts rather than addressing the attestation requirement's impact on the museum.She should maybe talk to her seatmate, because when the member for Carleton was minister, he cut $20 million out of the youth employment strategy.
32. deflected
    EmploymentMr. Kelly McCauley (Conservative) asked Mr. Marc Miller (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights infrastructure spending in Alberta but does not address the specific job-killing tax credit cancellation.Working with our Alberta partners, we have improved transit, roads, bridges, and water systems all over Alberta.
33. deflected
    Foreign AffairsMr. David Sweet (Conservative) asked Mr. Matt DeCourcey (Liberal). substantive question.Answer states general opposition to Iran but avoids addressing the specific claim about normalizing relations.Our position on Iran is clear.
34. deflected
    Canada Revenue AgencyMr. Pat Kelly (Conservative) asked Ms. Kamal Khera (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts blame to prior government and cites court proceedings to avoid confirming employment status.I would remind my hon. colleague that this case dates to 2008, under the previous Conservative government.
35. misdirected
    International TradeMr. Gabriel Ste-Marie (Québec debout) asked Mr. Jean-Claude Poissant (Liberal). substantive question.Answer pivots to attacking Conservative members instead of answering whether supply management will be fully protected.Who wants to end supply management?
36. deflected
    Public SafetyMrs. Marilène Gill (Bloc) asked Mr. Matt DeCourcey (Liberal). substantive question.Answer notes meetings and prior policy without committing to full compensation for affected parties.the compensation policies for affected local businesses are the same as when the Conservatives hosted the event—
37. answered
    Marine TransportationMrs. Marilène Gill (Bloc) asked Mrs. Karen McCrimmon (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly affirms priority and commitment to completing necessary work promptly.We will ensure that the necessary work is completed as quickly as possible to fix this situation.