All sittings← 2018-05-312018-06-04 →
Friday, June 1, 2018 · sitting No. 306
Commons debates sustainable development bill at third reading
Environment Minister Catherine McKenna moved third reading of Bill C-57 to amend the Federal Sustainable Development Act. She said the legislation would raise standards for sustainable development and require government decisions to consider impacts on future generations. NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice said Canada is not on track to meet its 2020 or 2030 greenhouse gas targets or the 17 sustainable development goals.
Question period opened with Conservative MP Candice Bergen asking how the government would respond to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum. Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland said Canada would challenge the measures at the WTO and under NAFTA while defending Canadian workers. Conservative MPs also pressed the government on the cancellation of the Energy East pipeline and on indigenous education outcomes.
Decided that day
- Bill C-405 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2018-06-01
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
International Trade
Conservative MP Candice Bergen said the government had no plans in the budget to deal with an unpredictable U.S. administration. Minister Freeland replied that officials had prepared comprehensive lists of responsive measures for weeks.
Read the exchangeNatural Resources
Conservative MP Jamie Schmale said the government equated 15,000 jobs and $55 billion in economic activity to old news. Parliamentary Secretary Kim Rudd said the proponent withdrew the project on market grounds and that the same review process approved Trans Mountain and Line 3.
Read the exchangeIndigenous Affairs
NDP MP Charlie Angus said the Auditor General described a 76 per cent failure rate in first nations education that officials had covered up. Parliamentary Secretary Don Rusnak said the government is working with first nations partners on an outcome-based framework.
Read the exchangePublic Safety
Conservative MP Sylvie Boucher asked whether special constables and customs officers would be adequately trained and equipped for the G7 summit. Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale said preparations involving federal, provincial and municipal agencies have been thorough and seamless.
Read the exchangeStatus of Women
NDP MP Irene Mathyssen said the government has shown no legislation or funding for pay equity despite a recent court victory for rural mail carriers. Labour Minister Patty Hajdu said budget 2018 committed to introducing proactive pay equity legislation.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedInternational TradeCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer thanks supporters and expresses solidarity but does not outline any plan to resolve the trade issues.
- partly answeredInternational TradeCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer states measures are being taken to defend workers but provides no specifics on mitigating pain for steel towns.
we are taking strong responsive measures to defend our workers and our industry.
- partly answeredInternational TradeCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses preparation but ignores the premise of failure and does not explain worker suffering.
from the very beginning, the government has been absolutely prepared for any possible action from the U.S.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates unacceptability of tariffs and WTO action without providing a plan for Saguenay workers.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer thanks cross-party supporters and offers general solidarity without addressing any plan.
I would like to start by thanking the Canadians who have come out in support of our strong plan to defend our workers.
- answeredInternational TradeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains the immediate response and rationale for consultation timing.
Canada did respond immediately, yesterday.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes ongoing contact with unions and workers but does not commit to a new support package or meeting.
our government has been, throughout, and again this week and yesterday, in very close contact with workers and with businesses
- partly answeredInternational TradeMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer asserts a solid plan exists but gives no details on protecting specific aluminum jobs.
we have announced a solid plan to stand up for our industry and its workers.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.Answer discusses retaliatory tariffs instead of any worker protection program.
Canada will impose trade restrictions on American imports of up to $16.6 billion.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesMr. Jamie Schmale (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Conservative record and reframes as absurd comparison rather than addressing pipeline decisions.
It is shocking that the Conservatives cannot tell the difference between a project that is facing provincial political interference and a project that a company withdrew based on its own market decision.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). loaded question.Answer repeats approval process claim without addressing why Energy East faced different treatment or roadblocks.
had the energy east proposal not been withdrawn by the proponent, our government would have used the exact same process that saw both the Trans Mountain expansion and the Line 3 pipeline approved.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesMr. Pat Kelly (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks Conservatives and pivots to investment rhetoric instead of explaining how to rebuild investor confidence.
we will take no lessons from the Conservatives on how to promote energy in this country.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Blake Richards (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). substantive question.Answer cites external quotes on regulatory certainty but avoids addressing private sector exit or taxpayer costs.
We think obviously this is very constructive...for Canada and clearly for Canadian producers in particular because it creates a lot of regulatory certainty over the time that the Trans Mountain expansion can get done.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks Conservative ideology and ownership focus instead of addressing failure to champion private investment.
The Conservatives continue to focus on ownership, and we will continue to focus on workers.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). loaded question.Answer lists past Conservative failures without addressing current taxpayer costs or private investment loss.
the Conservatives had 10 years to build a new pipeline to ship Canada's resources to new markets.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMs. Sheila Malcolmson (NDP) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.Answer explains climate plan fit but does not address buying old pipeline or risks to Canadians.
the investment in the twinning of the Trans Mountain pipeline fits within that climate plan.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Mr. Don Rusnak (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to past Conservative failures instead of addressing the pipeline purchase or indigenous water issues.
However, they have ignored Jordan's principle, which was passed by Parliament in 2007, and refused calls for a national inquiry.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Dane Lloyd (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). substantive question.Answer defends the project and criticizes Conservatives but does not address when Liberals will stand up for energy investment without taxpayer purchase.
The Trans Mountain expansion project is in the national interest.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. David Yurdiga (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). substantive question.Answer lists other pipelines and jobs but ignores the specific question on construction progress in the last three days.
Let us talk about the pipelines that have been approved, many of them in Alberta: expanded export capacity for the Alberta Clipper, the Nova Gas pipeline, the Line 3 replacement project, the Trans Mountain expansion, and Keystone XL.
- answeredPublic SafetyMrs. Sylvie Boucher (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly confirms meticulous preparations and seamless cooperation for G7 security.
yes, absolutely, there have been meticulous preparations involving, of course, the RCMP and other national police and security agencies, as well as the local and provincial authorities in Quebec.
- answeredPublic SafetyMrs. Sylvie Boucher (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly reassures that preparations are thorough and public can have confidence in safety measures.
the public can have absolute confidence in the police and security agencies of both Canada and Quebec, and the local municipal authorities in the communities affected.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMs. Linda Duncan (NDP) asked Mr. Don Rusnak (Liberal). loaded question.Answer highlights investments and partnerships but avoids explaining opposition to the specific amendments on UNDRIP rights.
Unlike the former government, which ripped up the Kelowna accord and imposed top-down solutions on first nations, we are making significant investments in health, education, housing, water, child and family services, and economic prosperity.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Don Rusnak (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to mental health investments and community teams instead of addressing falsified graduation rates or education failures.
We have invested in 45 community-led mental health wellness teams, serving 326 communities, up from 11 in 2015, and dedicated first nation and Inuit hope and wellness lines.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Kevin Waugh (Conservative) asked Mr. Andy Fillmore (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends the ad ban rules and criticizes prior government spending but does not address the pre-election period changes or abuse of democracy claim.
Canadians were fed up with tax dollars being wasted blatantly on partisan ads by the previous government.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Joël Godin (Conservative) asked Mr. Andy Fillmore (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to government advertising ban instead of addressing political parties' advertising rights.
Canadians were sick of seeing their money wasted by the previous government on partisan advertising.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Tom Kmiec (Conservative) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.Answer gives general housing market commitments but ignores request for mortgage stress test review.
We have taken steps to address pockets of risk and ensure a healthy dynamic housing market.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Tom Kmiec (Conservative) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats housing protection pledges without addressing rule changes' impact or relaxing them.
We are keeping a close eye on the situation with our provincial and municipal partners to protect the interests of the middle class
- partly answeredStatus of WomenMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.Answer confirms upcoming legislation but provides no timeline or budget details beyond the commitment.
in budget 2018, we made the commitment to introduce proactive pay equity legislation.
- answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Sheri Benson (NDP) asked Mr. Don Rusnak (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly outlines funding and co-development process for indigenous housing strategy.
our government remains committed to co-developing a distinction-based indigenous housing strategy with our first nation, Inuit, and Métis partners.
- deflectedCarbon PricingMrs. Kelly Block (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.Answer avoids evidence on farmer support and pivots to general climate plan and opposition criticism.
What is the Conservatives' plan?
- deflectedCarbon PricingMrs. Karen Vecchio (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.Answer sidesteps farmer cost concerns and asks about Conservative plan instead of addressing carbon tax.
What Canadians really want to know, what my kids want to know, what future generations want to know is what is the plan of the Conservative Party?
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Colin Carrie (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.Answer discusses tariffs and innovation spending but ignores request to drop carbon tax for competitiveness.
our government has invested massively in innovation.
- answeredVeterans AffairsMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Mrs. Sherry Romanado (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly confirms development of a veterans identification card in response to the request.
We are exploring options with the Department of National Defence to develop a veterans identification card that will be an official Government of Canada ID card for veterans.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Ziad Aboultaif (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.The response highlights job creation and general support instead of addressing tax exemptions.
I speak as a member of this government that has created 600,000 jobs, most of them full time, since we took office two and a half years ago.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Gabriel Ste-Marie (Québec debout) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). loaded question.The answer emphasizes economic benefits and jobs but avoids stating any cost to Quebeckers.
we reached an agreement with Kinder Morgan to purchase the existing pipeline as well as the Trans Mountain expansion project.
- partly answeredAgriculture and AgrifoodMs. Monique Pauzé (Québec debout) asked Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses the ongoing review and risk reduction but does not address listening to scientists over companies.
Health Canada is currently conducting a scientific review of these pesticides and has already taken steps to reduce the risk to bees.
- answeredOfficial LanguagesMr. Mario Beaulieu (Bloc) asked Mr. Marc Miller (Liberal). loaded question.The answer affirms compliance with the Official Languages Act and notes the bilingual CEO as action taken.
The Canada Infrastructure Bank must comply with the Official Languages Act.