Liberals move time allocation on access to information bill

Other moments

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

1. deflected
   TaxationLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer restates talking points on fairness and consultation without addressing the timing or lack of details for implementation.
2. deflected
   TaxationLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.Answer avoids providing the requested plan details and instead repeats general fairness claims and notes budget timing.budgetary measures are not announced until the Minister of Finance stands in this place with the budget.
3. partly answered
   TaxationLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer addresses the tax rate reduction but deflects on full details and timing of other changes.they will in fact be paying lower small business taxes, thanks to the changes our government made.
4. deflected
   TaxationMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer focuses on lower taxes but does not address the absence of implementation details before the deadline.if there is one thing they can count on, that is paying less taxes next year
5. misdirected
   TaxationMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the question on details and pivots to unrelated economic statistics and job creation.the Canadian economy created nearly 600,000 jobs over the past two years
6. deflected
   International TradeMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.Answer discusses general trade benefits but does not confirm or clarify the purpose of the China trip or negotiations.
7. answered
   International TradeMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly addresses how human rights are raised in dialogue with China.We raise the issue of human rights in China at every opportunity and we will continue to encourage China to respect its international commitments through open and frank dialogue.
8. partly answered
   International TradeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.Answer affirms commitment to values but does not commit to transparency before launching talks.we are committed to pursuing trade that benefits everyone, puts people first, reflects Canadian values, especially when it comes to the environment, labour, and gender.
9. deflected
   International TradeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Patty Hajdu (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general benefits of trade without addressing steel dumping or the specific job loss report.trade is vital to a growing economy. It is important that we have markets to sell our products to.
10. deflected
    EthicsMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.The answer confirms shares were sold but immediately pivots to unrelated tax policy achievements.One of our election promises was to raise taxes for the wealthiest 1% and lower them for nine million Canadians.
11. deflected
    EthicsMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates the sale occurred but questions the link instead of confirming details about the specific shares.Is he suggesting that the measure we announced on December 7 to raise individual income taxes in Canada affected the price of gas or share prices on the New York Stock Exchange?
12. misdirected
    EthicsCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the opposition for a smear campaign rather than addressing the minister's ethical issues or blind trust.
13. deflected
    EthicsCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.The answer emphasizes working with the Ethics Commissioner but ignores calls for the minister to step aside and other specific allegations.The Minister of Finance is working with her and has done so from the start to make sure that he is in full compliance with the rules that guide and govern us.
14. misdirected
    EthicsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). loaded question.The answer insults the asker about demagoguery and pivots to small business tax cuts instead of addressing the minister's own tax minimization actions.I know that the member opposite knows a lot about demagoguery, so I will not put that in the answer.
15. partly answered
    TaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mr. Joël Lightbound (Liberal). substantive question.The answer states that new proposals will be announced shortly and addresses family business concerns but provides no timeline or specifics.we are reviewing the submissions we have received from Canadians. We have consulted from coast to coast, and the new proposals will be announced very shortly.
16. answered
    TaxationMs. Cheryl Hardcastle (NDP) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly reassures that eligibility criteria have not changed and outlines plans to consult on concerns.I would like to reassure all Canadians who receive the disability tax credit that the eligibility criteria have not changed.
17. deflected
    TaxationMr. Pierre-Luc Dusseault (NDP) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the specific email incident and request for an apology by restating general accessibility measures.Anyone who wishes to dispute the agency's decisions can do so by providing new medical information and requesting a review or appeal of a decision.
18. answered
    Persons with DisabilitiesMrs. Karen Vecchio (Conservative) asked Kent Hehr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the quoted remark with an explanation and confirmation of an apology.as soon as I learned that my comments were felt to be offensive, I immediately called the organization directly and apologized.
19. answered
    Persons with DisabilitiesMrs. Karen Vecchio (Conservative) asked Kent Hehr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the quoted remark with an explanation and confirmation of an apology.as soon as I learned that my comments were felt to be offensive, I immediately called the organization directly and apologized.
20. deflected
    Canada Revenue AgencyMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the accusation of targeting groups and instead highlights reinstatement of a committee.On November 23, I proudly announced the reinstatement of the disability advisory committee, which the former Conservative government disbanded in 2006.
21. deflected
    Canada Revenue AgencyMr. Pat Kelly (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids addressing targeting of vulnerable groups and instead restates the $25 billion recovery goal.We are on track to recoup $25 billion as a result of audits conducted over the past two years, something that a former Conservative finance minister, Mr. Blackburn, said was not even a priority for the Conservative government.
22. answered
    Veterans AffairsMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly confirms the announcement will occur before the House rises as requested.we will be announcing our pension-for-life option before this House rises.
23. answered
    PrivacyMr. Matthew Dubé (NDP) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly explains the pre-clearance process and Charter protections in response to the powers concern.They can do that in the conventional manner in the United States after they have crossed the border—get in line and take their chances—or they can do it in a pre-clearance environment, before they cross the border, where they have the overall umbrella and protection of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
24. deflected
    TaxationMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the specific emails and misleading claim by restating that criteria are unchanged and promising future consultation.If any changes need to be made to the agency's processes, we will consult with the experts on the disability advisory committee that we are creating.
25. deflected
    TaxationMaxime Bernier (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates no change in criteria but ignores the direct question about conflicting statements from officials.I want to reassure all Canadians who receive the disability tax credit that the eligibility criteria have not changed.
26. deflected
    TaxationMr. Dan Albas (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses the advisory committee and past actions instead of confirming whether the minister approved the memo.On November 23, we reinstated the disability advisory committee.
27. misdirected
    TaxationMr. Dan Albas (Conservative) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to attacking the previous Conservative government rather than addressing the minister's competence or complicity.I want to point out to my colleague that it was the Conservatives who disbanded the disability advisory committee, and we are reinstating it.
28. partly answered
    Public Services and ProcurementMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the priority and criticizes the prior government but provides no specific actions taken in the past two years.We are currently taking steps that the previous government did not take.
29. deflected
    Public Services and ProcurementMr. Erin Weir (NDP) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats that it is a top priority and lists general efforts without committing to a timeline for fixing Phoenix.I can assure the House that we are leaving no stone unturned.
30. misdirected
    Veterans AffairsMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer lists government actions on veterans but avoids justifying the Khadr payment versus fighting veterans in court.We have done more substantially on this file in two years than those members did in 10.
31. answered
    Veterans AffairsMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly commits to delivering a monthly pension option for life by the end of the current session.we will have an option on a monthly pension for life by the time that this House rises.
32. misdirected
    Veterans AffairsMr. Phil McColeman (Conservative) asked Seamus O'Regan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer blames the prior government and the Veterans Charter instead of clarifying whether a lifetime pension will be restored as promised.It was that previous government that took Equitas to court.
33. deflected
    Innovation, Science and Economic DevelopmentMr. Matt Jeneroux (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms net neutrality support but ignores the specific blocking proposal and lack of court oversight.we support the principle of net neutrality, where Canadians have access to the content of their choice in accordance with Canadian laws.
34. deflected
    Fisheries and OceansMr. Fin Donnelly (NDP) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses ongoing reviews and collaboration but does not address removing the farms or set any timeline.we understand the concern that people have, British Columbians have, with respect to wild Pacific salmon stocks.
35. partly answered
    Foreign AffairsMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.The answer covers evidence collection at the G7 but does not address expediting ICC prosecutions for Yazidi victims.we all needed to work very carefully together to collect and preserve all of the evidence from the battlefield
36. deflected
    Employment InsuranceMr. Simon Marcil (Bloc) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer expresses sympathy and suggests using MPs but does not address cancelling the EI debts or stopping collections.I invite all of them to use every available resource, including their MPs, to ensure they are fully respected.
37. partly answered
    Public Services and ProcurementMr. Michel Boudrias (Bloc) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer confirms Davie is filling the interim gap but does not address the accusation of sacrificing security or shipyard capability claims.Davie shipyard is building that interim capability gap, and we thank them for that service.