Parliament AIIndependent · non-official

All sittings← 2017-10-242017-10-26 →

Wednesday, October 25, 2017 · sitting No. 222

House debates amendments to transportation modernization act

The House spent the largest share of its sitting on report stage of Bill C-49, the transportation modernization act. Conservative MP Kelly Block moved to delete clause 14 and several later clauses including 69, 73 and 74. NDP MP Robert Aubin moved to delete clauses 61 through 67 and 70 through 72.

In question period, Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer asked when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau learned of Finance Minister Bill Morneau's personal interest in the Bombardier financing agreement. Trudeau replied that there was no conflict of interest and that the government stood by aerospace workers.

Scheer also pressed Trudeau on the decision to end a tax benefit for people with type 1 diabetes, while Liberal MP Sean Fraser asked about enhancements to the Canada child benefit.

Decided that day

  • Bill C-344 passed second reading

From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard

No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.

Who held the floor · 2017-10-25

Government (Liberal)OppositionOver the day: government 40%, opposition 60% of the words spokenQuestion PeriodGovernment business▲ Government side held the floor▼ Opposition held the floorOpened 14:0015:0016:0017:0018:00Last speech 19:20Time of day, Ottawa · the House sat 5 h 20 min · each dot is a stretch of debate, placed at the minute it began
62One bill advances, many others stallThe House devoted most of its time to substantive debate on ethics and transportation, advancing one private member's bill to second reading. Several other bills failed at the same stage while Question Period answers were largely deflected.AI-rated Score out of 100; the verdict and the answer ratings behind it are a model’s reading. How the AI rates this

AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this

Other moments

Indigenous Affairs

NDP MP Georgina Jolibois asked why the government had not addressed housing shortfalls in northern Saskatchewan after census data showed higher rates of major repairs needed in indigenous communities.

Read the exchange

Canadian Heritage

Bloc Québécois MP Pierre Nantel said the heritage minister's expert panel had been kept in the dark about the Netflix agreement and questioned the absence of francophone funding.

Read the exchange

Bankruptcy

NDP MP Scott Duvall called for a parliamentary investigation into the Sears liquidation and changes to bankruptcy law to protect workers and retirees.

Read the exchange

Foreign Affairs

Conservative MP Peter Kent asked when Canada would follow the United States and Israel in withdrawing from UNESCO over its treatment of Jewish heritage sites.

Read the exchange

Public Safety

Conservative MP Pierre Paul-Hus asked why the government had not informed Canadians about the return of 60 ISIS fighters and what measures were in place for public safety.

Read the exchange

Judicial Accountability Through Sexual Assault Law Training Act

Bloc Québécois MP Rhéal Fortin obtained unanimous consent for a motion urging the Senate to pass Bill C-337 on judicial training for sexual assault cases.

Read the exchange

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

  1. deflected
    EthicsAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer dismisses the premise without addressing the timeline question and pivots to general praise for workers.the opposition's misleading insinuations are baseless.
  2. deflected
    EthicsAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the personal interest question and shifts to discussing Airbus jobs and economic benefits.The proposed deal with Airbus, that we are certainly looking at under the Investment Canada Act, potentially has good jobs for Canadians at Mirabel and across the country beyond 2041.
  3. misdirected
    EthicsAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the opposition's motives and pivots to election talking points instead of addressing the Bombardier benefits question.I can understand why the opposition has nothing more to do than sling mud today, because the economic news from this country is better than it has been in a long time.
  4. misdirected
    TaxationAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer deflects the diabetes tax question by attacking past Conservative policies rather than explaining the decision.We would never do anything as mean as, I do not know, cancelling health benefits for refugees or closing nine offices for veterans across this country.
  5. deflected
    TaxationAndrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids explaining the diabetes benefit cancellation and instead highlights unrelated child benefit achievements.That is why we stopped sending child benefit cheques to millionaires and instead are sending them to the nine out of 10 Canadians who actually need them.
  6. partly answered
    EthicsMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly states there is no conflict and that advice was followed, though it does not address the specific controlling interest examples.The minister took all of the commissioner's advice, including creating a screen, which the commissioner felt was the most effective measure.
  7. deflected
    EthicsMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question as mudslinging and pivots to economic talking points without addressing loopholes.Mudslinging is all they have left, because the economic news is positive and we are currently helping the most vulnerable Canadians
  8. deflected
    EthicsMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the ethical loopholes and two-sets-of-rules claim, shifting to unrelated policy achievements.The people who were talking with me were grateful for the Canada child benefit that helps nine out of 10 Canadian families, grateful that the first thing we did was lower taxes on the middle class and raise them on the wealthiest 1%
  9. deflected
    EthicsMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer praises the finance minister's policies without addressing the ethics committee invitation or testimony request.He has lowered taxes for the middle class and raised them for the wealthiest 1%.
  10. deflected
    EthicsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to local conversations and attacks the Conservatives instead of addressing Bombardier funding or Morneau Shepell ties.the Conservative Party is once again showing itself to be completely out of touch with the priorities of Canadians.
  11. deflected
    EthicsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer points to the Ethics Commissioner but avoids confirming disclosure of numbered companies or trust funds.The Minister of Finance worked with the Ethics Commissioner, followed her advice, and is willing to go above and beyond what she recommended two years ago.
  12. deflected
    EthicsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer again references the Ethics Commissioner without committing to full disclosure of the finance minister's holdings.That does not take away from the opposition's responsibility to try to make partisan attacks, but it should reassure Canadians that the finance minister worked with the commissioner and followed her recommendations.
  13. deflected
    EthicsPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends trust in the Ethics Commissioner but does not address the call for revealing contents of numbered companies.All the rest is just partisan noise from the opposition.
  14. deflected
    EthicsMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pivots to the economic update and past promises instead of addressing asset disclosure or ethical lapses.Our actions delivered the desired results: we have created economic growth for everyone.
  15. deflected
    EthicsMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer contrasts Liberal tax policy with the prior Conservative government without addressing the minister's private income or disclosure.We chose to raise taxes for the wealthiest and to lower them for the middle class.
  16. partly answered
    Indigenous AffairsMs. Georgina Jolibois (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer lists investments and actions on indigenous issues but does not directly explain why housing shortfalls persist.We have eliminated long-term drinking water advisories.
  17. deflected
    Indigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to general reconciliation rhetoric without addressing court fights, provincial blame, or underfunding specifics.We are working very hard to fix that relationship, to move forward on a true path of reconciliation with indigenous peoples.
  18. deflected
    EthicsLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer avoids naming any assets or companies and instead defers entirely to the Ethics Commissioner.I can assure this House the finance minister worked with the commissioner, and followed her advice.
  19. misdirected
    EthicsLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the questioner's characterization of the commissioner rather than disclosing the numbered companies.leaving aside that unfortunate characterization of the wardrobe of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner
  20. deflected
    EthicsMaxime Bernier (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to praising tax policy and attacking Conservatives instead of addressing disclosure of assets.the first thing he did was raise taxes on the wealthiest Canadians and cut taxes for the middle class.
  21. deflected
    EthicsMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer again invokes the commissioner and pivots to criticizing the opposition's economic record rather than demanding asset disclosure.I understand the members opposite have nothing to do but attack, because they have been shown the economic growth we have created over the past two years.
  22. deflected
    Canadian HeritageMr. Pierre Nantel (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer celebrates cultural exports without addressing whether the advisory panel was consulted on the Netflix deal.attracting investors from around the world to invest in our productions, our creativity, and our cultural community is exactly what it takes to be competitive in the 21st century
  23. deflected
    Canadian HeritageMr. Pierre-Luc Dusseault (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats praise for creators and investors while ignoring the claim that the panel was kept in the dark.this committee told us that Canadian producers and creators are extraordinary and that they deserve more platforms to share their productions around the world in the digital age.
  24. deflected
    EthicsMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer asserts no conflict exists and cites the commissioner without addressing the timing of Bill C-27 and Morneau Shepell profits.There is no conflict of interest. The minister acted on all of the commissioner's recommendations, which included setting up an ethical screen
  25. deflected
    EthicsMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question assumes benefit to company and asks about awareness; answer avoids it by attacking opposition and praising economy.I understand that by trying to attack the government, the opposition is just doing its job.
  26. deflected
    EthicsCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question demands timeline of knowledge; answer shifts to trusting the commissioner without addressing when PM learned of benefit.on the contrary, I am not trying to blame the Ethics Commissioner, I am trying to trust the Ethics Commissioner.
  27. misdirected
    EthicsCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question presses on responsibility and knowledge; answer attacks Conservatives' past economic plan instead of responding.I feel bad for the Conservatives right now.
  28. partly answered
    TradeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Question asks why revive TPP; answer explains preference for progressive trade deals and ongoing Pacific efforts.Yes, we continue to look for opportunities to increase trade with the Pacific, but we look to do so in a progressive way that works for everyone.
  29. partly answered
    BankruptcyMr. Scott Duvall (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Question asks for investigation and law changes; answer addresses support for affected workers but omits investigation commitment.We are making every effort to connect Sears' employees and pensioners with programs and services that will help them through this tough time.
  30. deflected
    TaxationMr. Pat Kelly (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question challenges denial of benefits; answer pivots to defending spending priorities without addressing diabetes tax credit changes.Is it putting more money in the pockets of the middle class?
  31. deflected
    TaxationMr. Dan Albas (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Question demands halt to revenue measures on diabetics; answer defends accessibility efforts and blames prior government without stopping the policy.On the contrary, Mr. Speaker, we are focused on helping and supporting the most vulnerable Canadians.
  32. partly answered
    TaxationSteven Blaney (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Question asks why protect minister over constituent; answer commits to follow-up on specific case while defending overall approach.I will be happy to to make sure that the Minister of Health and the Minister of National Revenue follow up on this case should we be asked to do so.
  33. answered
    Foreign AffairsPeter Kent (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly rebuts the premise by stating a stand has been taken and explains the rationale for remaining in UNESCO.We believe that doing that from within organizations rather than from without is, in many cases, the best way to go.
  34. partly answered
    PovertyMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses child poverty and the working poor via new indexing and funding but ignores first nations, refugees, and other groups listed.We are in the process of ensuring that the Canada child benefit is indexed to the cost of living.
  35. misdirected
    Public SafetyMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to praising a new committee and attacking the prior Conservative government instead of detailing mechanisms or public information steps.That is the kind of initiative our government is taking and that the Conservative government never wanted to take.
  36. deflected
    Canadian HeritageMr. Xavier Barsalou-Duval (Bloc) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer counters the zero-funding claim with Quebec-specific spending but does not address the demand for a $133-million francophone commitment.under the deal we signed with Netflix, it will invest $25 million in the development of projects in Quebec.
  37. deflected
    Judicial Accountability Through Sexual Assault Law Training ActMr. Colin Carrie (Conservative) asked Mr. Mark Holland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer explains prior contacts and one flight statistic but neither corrects the record nor apologizes as requested.Our officials talked to his department beforehand.