All sittings← 2017-06-202017-09-18 →
Wednesday, June 21, 2017 · sitting No. 199
Preclearance legislation takes most time as taxes dominate question period
The House devoted the largest share of its time to debate on the Preclearance Act 2016 at third reading. Liberal MP Mark Holland said the bill would expand preclearance to rail marine and other modes and that all committee amendments had been accepted. He noted 12 million travellers already use the system at airports.
In question period Conservative MP Andrew Scheer pressed the government on an escalator tax on beer and wine and on other tax measures that he said burden middle-class families. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau replied that the government had lowered taxes for the middle class and raised them on the wealthiest one per cent in its first week in office.
New Democratic Party MP Thomas Mulcair questioned the prime minister on indigenous issues and access-to-information practices. Trudeau defended the government's record on boil-water advisories and on transparency measures.
Decided that day
- Bill C-23 passed third reading
- Bill C-25 report-stage concurrence passed
- Bill S-3 report-stage concurrence passed
- Bill C-311 passed third reading
- Multiple bills received royal assent
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2017-06-21
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Official Languages
New Democratic Party MP Rachel Blaney said the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages had been left without a commissioner for four days and could not sign papers or begin investigations. Trudeau said a merit-based process was under way and an announcement would come shortly.
Read the exchangeForeign Investment
Conservative MP Diane Finley said the sale of Norsat to a Chinese firm posed a security risk. Trudeau replied that national-security agencies had assessed the transaction and found no concerns after consulting allies.
Read the exchangePersons with Disabilities
Conservative MP Andrew Scheer said the government had rejected the Canadian autism partnership despite families mortgaging homes for early intervention. Trudeau said more than $39 million had been invested in autism research over five years.
Read the exchangeIndigenous Affairs
New Democratic Party MP Thomas Mulcair said the government was still taking first nations to court and had failed to end boil-water advisories. Trudeau said 20 long-term advisories had ended and all would be resolved by 2021.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- partly answeredPublic SafetyMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer expresses openness to amendments but avoids committing to expert-driven changes on the bill.
we are very open to suggestions, amendments, and improvements to national security.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer discusses general balance and future talks without addressing the specific request on proactive disruption powers.
I look forward to robust discussions with all parties in the House, all members in the House, hearing from experts, as we move forward on getting that balance right
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts to unrelated middle-class tax cuts and attacks the opposition instead of addressing the beer and wine tax.
Unfortunately, the members opposite voted against the tax hike for the wealthiest 1% and against lowering taxes for the middle class.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats prior tax actions and criticizes Conservatives rather than responding to the listed new tax hikes.
For 10 years, the Conservatives gave boutique tax cuts and advantages to the wealthiest alone.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer ignores the sarcastic premise and lists platform achievements instead of addressing the listed controversies.
On that, as the member will see as he looks through those pages, we delivered.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges some progress on boil water advisories but does not address the court cases or UNDRIP points.
We have ended 20 long-term boil water advisories, but we know full well there is much more to do.
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to past proactive disclosure efforts and criticizes other parties instead of addressing broken promises.
The NDP was never interested in proactive disclosure.
- answeredInfrastructureThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer directly rebuts the claim by stating the infrastructure bank was in the election platform.
quite the opposite, it was very clearly written in our election platform that we were going to create an infrastructure bank
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer promotes Liberal transparency measures and urges opposition to match without addressing cash-for-access or illegal lobbying claims.
Canadians expect any government and any political party to follow the strong rules we have in place, and that is exactly what we are doing.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks Conservatives' voting record on tax cuts instead of addressing the escalator tax on alcohol.
It is just a shame that the member and his party voted against lowering taxes on the middle class and raising them on the wealthiest 1%.
- misdirectedTaxationMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer pivots to criticizing the prior Conservative government's record rather than responding to the escalator tax question.
Instead, they gave plenty of opportunities and tax cuts to the wealthy, rather than invest in the middle class and those working hard to join it.
- misdirectedTaxationMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats praise for middle-class tax cuts and criticizes opposition vote instead of addressing the escalator tax.
They voted against our plan to put more money in the pockets of nine million Canadians by asking the wealthiest one per cent to pay a bit more.
- deflectedTaxationMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to defending carbon pricing and climate policy without addressing the escalator tax or other listed taxes.
the member opposite mentioned the price on carbon, and that is an extremely important part of our vision for how to strengthen the future in meaningful ways.
- partly answeredTaxationMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly explains who pays the carbon tax and revenue handling but ignores the escalator tax on alcohol.
The fact is that people who continue to pollute, who do not realize that being more efficient is better for our economy, will end up paying a little bit more
- deflectedTaxationMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer highlights Canada 150 parks and child benefit instead of addressing the escalator tax on alcohol.
Furthermore, families will be able to do that with a little more money in their pockets, because we have lowered taxes on the middle class, raised them on the wealthiest one per cent, and delivered a Canada child benefit
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Sheila Malcolmson (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer cites budget investments and the inquiry but does not address the specific request for more shelters or funding to end violence.
we invested in our very first budget $8.4 billion toward indigenous peoples, but we know there is much more to do, which we followed up with in budget 2017.
- deflectedFinanceMr. Ron Liepert (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to tax cuts and investments without addressing the timeline for balancing the budget.
We actually delivered that middle-class tax cut by raising taxes on the wealthiest one per cent.
- deflectedFinanceMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses growth and investments but avoids naming any year for a balanced budget.
Our infrastructure investments will help families get to work and come home more efficiently.
- deflectedFinanceMs. Rachael Harder (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to youth investments and student aid without providing a budget balance year.
The fact is, we know that what young people want in this country are investments in our future that both build the economy and protect us from climate change
- deflectedFinanceMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats tax policy points and avoids any reference to a balanced budget timeline.
We lowered taxes on the middle class and raised them on the wealthiest one per cent.
- answeredOfficial LanguagesMs. Rachel Blaney (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains the appointment process and states an announcement will come shortly.
An announcement will be made shortly.
- partly answeredOfficial LanguagesMr. François Choquette (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms commitment to the process and notes work continues but does not address the request for an apology.
- answeredForeign InvestmentDiane Finley (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer states the security assessment outcome and confirms no concerns were found.
Our national security experts assessed the deal and the technology, and concluded there were no national security concerns.
- partly answeredForeign InvestmentMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends the review process and transparency but does not address canceling the transaction.
That is why, for the first time, our government has published the number of national security reviews that cabinet has considered under the law.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer focuses on general investment policy and provincial oversight without addressing potential future control by the PRC.
Cedar Tree has confirmed its strong commitment to the ongoing quality of operations in Canada and to its health care workers.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMrs. Cathy McLeod (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer reiterates openness to investment and provincial regulation but avoids the question of PRC control if the company dissolves.
We recognize that B.C. and all provinces have a strong regulatory regime that oversees and ensures that the care our seniors receive is of top quality.
- answeredHealthMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly thanks jurors and references federal mental health funding to support provinces.
it gives me great pleasure to be able to stand and thank all Canadians who have served on juries
- deflectedSteel IndustryMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses defending Canadian interests in trade talks but does not commit to implementing the specific NDP recommendations.
We need to ensure that Initiative 232 excludes Canada.
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsMrs. Kelly Block (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer accepts the apology and emphasizes project support without addressing whether Duncan will be fired.
Mr. Duncan has apologized. We have accepted his apology.
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer reiterates bridge support and notes the apology but avoids any decision on firing Duncan.
With respect to Mr. Duncan, he has apologized.
- deflectedGovernment AccountabilityMr. Glen Motz (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer justifies travel needs in general terms without explaining specific government business during the partisan events.
as has always been the practice, whenever the Prime Minister travels anywhere, he needs to be connected to the work the government is doing
- partly answeredPersons with DisabilitiesMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer acknowledges the impact of autism but the provided text cuts off before fully addressing the rejected partnership or reversing the decision.
we recognize that autism spectrum disorder has a significant lifelong impact on individuals and families.
- deflectedPersons with DisabilitiesThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights existing funding and programs but avoids any mention of the autism partnership initiative raised in the question.
Our government will continue to support their efforts through our programs.
- deflectedPersons with DisabilitiesMs. Elizabeth May (Green) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The response acknowledges stakeholder efforts and meetings but provides no commitment or direct response on supporting the Canadian autism partnership.
My staff has also met repeatedly with the member for Edmonton—Wetaskiwin to talk about how we can move forward in concrete ways that will make a difference in the lives of so many Canadians.