All sittings← 2017-06-142017-06-16 →
Thursday, June 15, 2017 · sitting No. 195
Commons debates elections financing changes amid cash-for-access concerns
The House spent the largest share of its time on second reading of Bill C-50, which would require parties to advertise fundraisers costing more than $200 and attended by leaders, ministers or leadership candidates. Conservative MP John Brassard said the bill does nothing to end cash-for-access practices, while NDP MP Nathan Cullen cited the Prime Minister’s own pledge against preferential access.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the sale of defence technology to China. Conservative MP Candice Bergen said the United States had not been consulted, while Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains replied that the government followed the multi-step national-security review under the Investment Canada Act.
Other oral questions touched on internet and streaming taxes, Bill C-51 privacy provisions and the Sixties Scoop litigation, with ministers defending their records on each file.
Decided that day
- Time allocation for Bill C-49 passed
- Bill C-50 passed second reading
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2017-06-15
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Committees of the House
Liberal MP Mark Eyking tabled the international trade committee’s seventh report on the Canadian steel industry’s ability to compete internationally and asked for a government response under Standing Order 109.
Read the exchangeInfrastructure
Conservative MP Dianne L. Watts said the Prime Minister’s special adviser on the infrastructure bank had dismissed concerns about user fees and project defaults, while Infrastructure Minister Amarjeet Sohi pointed to the $1.2-billion Montreal transit investment.
Read the exchangeHealth
NDP MP Don Davies cited departmental spending documents showing no new money for the federal HIV initiative and asked Health Minister Jane Philpott to apologize for claiming an extra $30 million had been added.
Read the exchangePort of Churchill
NDP MP Niki Ashton called the shutdown of the port and rail line a national disgrace and urged re-nationalization, while Transport Minister Marc Garneau said Ottawa was monitoring supplies and stood ready to assist Manitoba.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedForeign InvestmentCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends the review process without addressing the claim about U.S. dissatisfaction or consultation.
we have enormous confidence in our national security agencies to do their work properly.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to economic statistics after briefly restating the process, avoiding the ambassador and ally relationship issues.
It is why, since we formed government, the unemployment rate has gone from 7.1% to 6.6%, which is 250,000 good-quality full-time jobs over the past six months.
- answeredTaxationCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly denies any internet tax and addresses the commitment requested.
let me be clear, our government will not be introducing a tax on the Internet.
- partly answeredTaxationMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.The answer denies an internet tax but does not address the streaming tax specifically raised in the question.
let us be clear: the government will not be implementing a tax on Internet services.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates the priority of national security and the review process without addressing U.S. officials or the lack of review.
All transactions reviewed under the Investment Canada Act are subject to a multi-stage security review process.
- partly answeredPrivacyMr. Matthew Dubé (NDP) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.The answer describes upcoming legislation on safety and rights but does not confirm repeal of Bill C-51.
That legislation will accomplish two things.
- deflectedPrivacyMr. Matthew Dubé (NDP) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.The answer accuses the opposition of innuendos rather than assuring no warrantless access to data.
it is a frequent opposition tactic to try to spook people with innuendos and questions.
- misdirectedForeign InvestmentMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to unrelated job investments in Windsor instead of addressing the Norsat sale or security review.
When we were in Windsor, through the strategic investment fund and the automotive innovation fund, Ford Motor Company of Canada invested $1 billion.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer expresses sympathy but redirects to forwarding information without addressing the specific request for action.
I invite the member to forward all the relevant information to my department so that families and workers can get the services and benefits they need.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The response defends the process but accuses the asker of creating allegations instead of directly addressing the consultation issue.
The member opposite is creating allegations and innuendo.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats the same process defense without engaging the new details about CSIS or the US committee.
it is clear that Canada's national security agencies examined the deal.
- misdirectedForeign InvestmentDiane Finley (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The response ignores the prior warning and instead pivots to general national-interest language while avoiding the China criticism.
we are always focused on advancing our national interests.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentDiane Finley (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates adherence to process and agencies without addressing the IP-theft lawsuit or innovation credibility.
They did exactly that. They followed the process.
- misdirectedForeign InvestmentMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The reply repeats the security-agency line and sidesteps the specific betrayal and China-admirer accusation.
We never have and we never will compromise our national security.
- misdirectedForeign InvestmentMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the asker for questioning the agencies rather than addressing the call for a full review.
I do not know why the member opposite is attacking our national security agencies.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Georgina Jolibois (NDP) asked Carolyn Bennett (Liberal). substantive question.The response outlines negotiation plans but does not explain why court proceedings continue despite the earlier statement.
I have a mandate to negotiate with all sixties scoop plaintiffs.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Carolyn Bennett (Liberal). substantive question.Answer commits to negotiations instead of explicitly confirming withdrawal of appeal.
We have been given the mandate to negotiate, and that is what we want to do.
- deflectedInfrastructureMs. Dianne L. Watts (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.Answer shifts to unrelated Quebec investment announcement without addressing taxpayer protections.
Today, we made a $1.2 billion investment in the Province of Quebec to build Montreal's public transit service
- deflectedInfrastructureMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats praise for Quebec project and ignores request to split the bill or pause the bank.
It is the largest infrastructure project, largest public transit project in the recent history of the City of Montreal.
- deflectedTaxationMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Liberal). loaded question.Question assumes intent to ruin Canada Day fun; answer ignores alcohol tax and lists unrelated tax policies.
Our government's first action that we took when we formed government was to increase taxes on the wealthiest 1%
- deflectedTaxationMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Ginette Petitpas Taylor (Liberal). substantive question.Answer again lists middle-class benefits without addressing craft alcohol tax or job impacts.
Our government has cut taxes for nine million middle-class Canadians.
- answeredHealthMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly confirms new funding amount and reversal of cuts for HIV organizations.
There will be an additional $35 million in the Canadian federal initiative of HIV and hepatitis C prevention.
- partly answeredHealthMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.Answer asserts expansion exists and offers clarification meeting but does not apologize or reconcile spending documents.
I will be very happy at some point to sit down with the member opposite and clarify to him that in fact the federal initiative on HIV/AIDS is expanding in the order of over $30 million.
- partly answeredForeign InvestmentMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses due diligence via Investment Canada Act but does not revisit Anbang chairman imprisonment concerns.
Under the Investment Canada Act, when we reviewed it, we made sure that we were able to obtain strong commitments on employment levels
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to general seniors spending and BC oversight without addressing Anbang or China control.
With respect to the specific transactions, we did our due diligence and we followed the process.
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsMr. Todd Doherty (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer rejects premise and pivots to diversity and merit without addressing donor pattern.
I totally reject the premise of that question.
- partly answeredStatus of WomenMs. Sheila Malcolmson (NDP) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.Answer references upcoming strategy and northern investment but gives no concrete commitments on shelters or access.
we will be announcing very soon the gender-based violence strategy, which aims to do exactly what the member opposite wishes it to do.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Mr. Steven MacKinnon (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states RFP timing, contract award, and start of work in fall.
The RFP will be posted by the end of June.
- deflectedImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Mr. Serge Cormier (Liberal). loaded question.Answer highlights process improvements but ignores cost, backlog, and visa policy questions.
The board recently introduced new measures, including shorter hearings for simple cases, which would make the process more efficient
- partly answeredForeign AffairsPeter Kent (Conservative) asked Mr. Matt DeCourcey (Liberal). substantive question.Answer notes monitoring and travel advice but offers no position on the blockade demands.
We strongly encourage all parties to work together to resolve disagreements.
- partly answeredAgricultureMr. Larry Maguire (Conservative) asked Mr. Jean-Claude Poissant (Liberal). substantive question.Answer affirms support for Manitoba but does not confirm restoration of truck wash protocol.
Our government supports Manitoba in its efforts to manage the current outbreak of porcine epidemic diarrhea and will continue to do so.
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Mr. Jean Rioux (Liberal). substantive question.Answer confirms policy restores degree-granting status and notes student enrollment.
it says right there in black and white that we are restoring the Collège militaire royal de Saint-Jean as a full degree-granting institution.
- deflectedPort of ChurchillMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer discusses flooding aid and supply plans but ignores the request to address the crisis or re-nationalize the port and rail.
From the Transport Canada point of view, we are developing a plan to make sure that both the Port of Churchill and the airport are capable of addressing the needs with respect to supplies for the people of Churchill.
- partly answeredOfficial LanguagesMr. Bernard Généreux (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.Answer affirms priority on languages and lists past actions but does not address the rise in complaints or the English-only letter.
When it comes to bilingualism, we know that there is always room for improvement.
- partly answeredCanadian Radio-television and Telecommunications CommissionMs. Monique Pauzé (Bloc) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.Answer notes the CRTC decision and legal recourse but does not commit to reviewing it or state a position on protecting Quebec television.
The CRTC issued its decision and there is legislation that allows for recourse.
- answeredInfrastructureMr. Gabriel Ste-Marie (Bloc) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states that projects must follow provincial and municipal rules including Quebec's agricultural land laws.
any project undertaken by the Canada infrastructure bank will have to abide by all the rules and regulations of every province and municipality