All sittings← 2017-03-212017-03-23 →
Wednesday, March 22, 2017 · sitting No. 155
Commons debates Liberal plan to change standing orders
The House spent the largest share of its time on a Liberal discussion paper proposing changes to the standing orders. Conservative MP Rona Ambrose said the plan would let the Prime Minister answer questions only once a week and would shut down debate. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the proposals aimed to improve House efficiency and work-life balance for members with young families.
Question period featured several sharp exchanges. New Democratic Party Leader Thomas Mulcair asked what penalty would apply to ministers who violate the Conflict of Interest Act. Prime Minister Trudeau replied that Canadians expect the highest ethical standards from all parliamentarians.
Decided that day
- The House agreed to proceed to the Orders of the Day
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2017-03-22
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Attack on the Parliament of the United Kingdom
Conservative MP Peter Kent said the attack on the U.K. Parliament was an attack on democracy and would bring back dark memories for members who were present during the 2014 Ottawa shootings.
Read the exchangeImmigration, Refugees and Citizenship
Conservative MP Rona Ambrose asked whether the Prime Minister would tell prospective immigrants they must follow the rules. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Canada maintains a rigorous process and protected borders.
Read the exchangeSoftwood Lumber
New Democratic MP Karine Trudel asked the government to offer loan guarantees to the forestry sector ahead of a possible U.S. trade action. Minister Jim Carr said Ottawa is in dialogue with affected provinces and will protect jobs.
Read the exchangeSocial Development
New Democratic MP Sheri Benson said many families in her riding struggle to claim the benefit. Minister Jean-Yves Duclos said the benefit is the most important social-policy innovation in a generation and helps nine families in ten.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
Conservative MP James Bezan said the defence minister had cut danger pay for troops fighting ISIS. Minister Harjit S. Sajjan said the government reviewed the rules in February 2016 and sent recommendations to the finance minister.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- answeredIncident at U.K. ParliamentRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly condemns the attack and affirms support as requested.
Today's attack on the United Kingdom Parliament is an attack on the world's democracies.
- answeredImmigration, Refugees and CitizenshipRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer affirms that laws and borders are enforced and resources provided.
That is why we are ensuring that all Canadian laws are being followed.
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer reframes changes as improvements rather than addressing the motive of avoiding accountability.
we were pleased to put out a broad discussion paper on how we can make improvements to the functioning of this House of Commons
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer dismisses the question as easy while pivoting to the discussion paper.
I am always pleased to be here in this House to answer tough questions, and easy ones like the member just asked me.
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer contrasts with previous government instead of addressing the hypothetical about Harper.
the previous government would not have put out an open discussion paper nor would it have engaged with the opposition
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer again emphasizes open discussion without addressing the hypothetical posed.
the way we are going about this is by opening a discussion, having an open conversation with the members opposite
- misdirectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to welcoming students and budget rather than addressing committee composition or democratic concerns.
I am very pleased to welcome all the young people in the gallery.
- partly answeredEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer states general expectation of high standards but does not specify any penalty.
Canadians expect all parliamentarians to have the highest ethical standards and behaviour that is beyond reproach.
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the question on penalties for breaches by shifting focus to RCMP decisions and past customs.
The other fact is the RCMP makes determinations on how to protect the prime minister and we will not second-guess the decisions that the RCMP makes.
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsMr. Scott Reid (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). substantive question.The answer promotes a discussion paper and conversation without committing to the requested unanimous consent practice.
All we are asking is let us have a constructive conversation to really modernize the way this place works.
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsMr. Blake Richards (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the dictatorship accusation and instead restates goals of the discussion paper without addressing accountability concerns.
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsMr. Joël Godin (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids committing to unanimous consent and instead promotes modernization goals from the election campaign.
During the election campaign, we vowed to modernize Parliament and turn it into a 21st-century workplace.
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer claims the question misrepresents the paper and calls for conversation without addressing the predictability or accountability issues raised.
The member opposite is misrepresenting the document, as there are many ideas being shared.
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes reading the discussion paper and broadening committee scope without agreeing to unanimous consent before changes.
We know that many ideas have already been presented.
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The incomplete answer begins by referencing the election rather than addressing the dictatorship comparison or vacation suggestion.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Alistair MacGregor (NDP) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer cites independence of the prosecution service and pivots to unrelated justice reforms instead of addressing resources or the specific case decision.
decisions such as this are made by the Public Prosecution Service, which is independent of government.
- partly answeredSoftwood LumberMs. Karine Trudel (NDP) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer promises a plan but ignores the specific request for loan guarantees.
We will absolutely have a plan to work together to protect jobs in this country.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts to tax policy and RCMP protocol instead of addressing vacation expenses.
it was this government that lowered taxes on middle-class Canadians by increasing taxes on the wealthiest 1% of Canadians.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats tax cuts and consultations while avoiding the vacation cost question.
it is this government that lowered taxes on middle-class Canadians by increasing taxes on the wealthiest 1% of Canadians.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Alupa Clarke (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses past protocols rather than addressing the principle of honour or current spending.
The RCMP always accompanies the Prime Minister when he travels, whether for business or pleasure.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Marilyn Gladu (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to job creation statistics instead of addressing vacation costs or the ethics investigation.
Over the last six months, almost 220,000 jobs were created, the majority of which were full-time jobs.
- partly answeredSocial DevelopmentMs. Sheri Benson (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer explains the benefit's design but does not provide numbers on eligible parents yet to receive it.
It is because we are not sending benefits and cheques to families of millionaires anymore that we are able to help nine families out of 10
- deflectedSocial DevelopmentMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer promises future budget measures without responding to the urgent request for action on the specific organization.
With that in mind, today's budget will introduce an even more solid program to make our society more inclusive
- misdirectedNational DefenceMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner's past record instead of addressing the danger pay cut or the signed document.
I understand that the member opposite might be feeling a bit of guilt from the time when he was the parliamentary secretary sending our troops overseas without the tax exemption.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the specific accusations and instead highlights the minister's military service.
I am proud of my service in the Canadian Armed Forces as a reservist.
- deflectedGovernment AdvertisingMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Mr. Matt DeCourcey (Liberal). substantive question.The response avoids answering the cost question by stating the item won't be used anymore and shifts to government values.
the promotional item in question was at the discretion of our missions in the United States.
- deflectedGovernment AdvertisingMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked Mr. Matt DeCourcey (Liberal). loaded question.Avoids the cost and authorization by repeating previous statement and pivoting to values.
The use of the promotional item in question was at the discretion of our Canadian missions in the United States.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Wayne Stetski (NDP) asked Carla Qualtrough (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses the process but does not directly address whether expansion in the park will be rejected.
Any bid from any city and province will definitely be looked at within the context of this submission
- answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Gord Johns (NDP) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The minister states the ship owner is responsible and the government will ensure cleanup occurs.
we have made it clear to the owner of the ship that it is responsible for the cleanup, and we will make sure that it does happen.
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsTony Clement (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The response focuses on the discussion paper instead of addressing the Prime Minister's conduct or promises.
An important conversation needs to take place.
- deflectedStanding Orders of the House of CommonsMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.Avoids apologizing or addressing the specific incident by emphasizing empowerment and need for conversation.
It is clear that this House needs modernization.
- partly answeredCanadian HeritageMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights themes and future equitable distribution without explaining the criteria change.
My colleagues and Canadians know that the celebrations will feature four main themes: youth, the environment, inclusiveness and diversity, and reconciliation with indigenous peoples.
- deflectedHealthMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general support for the fund but does not address the specific organization mentioned.
The Public Health Agency of Canada is making sure that all programs that are doing this good and important work have the resources necessary for them and is working with the provinces and territories in that regard.
- deflectedOfficial LanguagesMrs. Sylvie Boucher (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates the importance of official languages without addressing enforcement or timeline.
Airport security is important and CATSA does good work, but it must also do so by providing service in both languages with courtesy and respect, of course.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Elizabeth May (Green) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses carbon pricing and infrastructure spending but ignores the question on fossil fuel subsidies.
The commitments that were made included $81 billion over 11 years in public transit, green infrastructure, transportation, and smart cities.
- partly answeredPoints of OrderMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). substantive question.The answer denies the comment and offers dialogue but does not address the request for the Speaker to investigate the privilege matter.