Parliament AIIndependent · non-official

All sittings← 2016-11-292016-12-01 →

Wednesday, November 30, 2016 · sitting No. 118

Commons debates Canada Pension Plan enhancements at second reading

The House spent much of the sitting on second reading of Bill C-26 to enhance the Canada Pension Plan. Liberal MP François-Philippe Champagne said the changes would strengthen retirement security for middle-class Canadians while noting the government's recent consultations across the country. Conservative MP Luc Berthold objected to the use of time allocation for the ninth time this Parliament.

In Question Period the main exchanges concerned the government's pipeline decisions. Conservative Leader Rona Ambrose said the rejection of the Northern Gateway project denied jobs and opportunity to 31 First Nations communities. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau replied that the approvals balanced economic growth with environmental protection in a way the previous government had failed to achieve.

Decided that day

  • Bill passed third reading
  • House agreed to proceed to orders of the day
  • S-212 advanced to second reading
  • C-26 advanced in first chamber

From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard

No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.

Who held the floor · 2016-11-30

Government (Liberal)OppositionOver the day: government 46%, opposition 54% of the words spokenQuestion PeriodRoutine proceedingsGovernment businessPrivate members▲ Government side held the floor▼ Opposition held the floorOpened 14:0515:0016:0017:0018:00Last speech 19:10Time of day, Ottawa · the House sat 5 h 5 min · each dot is a stretch of debate, placed at the minute it began
67Bills Advance While Answers EvadeThe House devoted most of its time to substantive debate on resources and pensions, advancing two bills through stages and passing two recorded votes. Question period produced mostly deflected replies, yet procedural interruptions remained few.AI-rated Score out of 100; the verdict and the answer ratings behind it are a model’s reading. How the AI rates this

AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this

Other moments

Ethics

Conservative MP Alexander Nuttall asked whether the marijuana task force report had been leaked after Canopy Growth shares doubled on November 16. Health Minister Jane Philpott said the report would be delivered later that day.

Read the exchange

Softwood Lumber

Conservative MP Denis Lebel pressed the government on the lack of a renewed softwood lumber agreement. International Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland said Canada would defend its industry vigorously in ongoing talks.

Read the exchange

CBC/Radio-Canada

Conservative MP Peter Van Loan criticized the public broadcaster's request for an additional $400 million annually. Heritage Minister Mélanie Joly defended the earlier $675 million reinvestment after previous cuts.

Read the exchange

Housing

NDP MP Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet urged the government to maintain federal investment in social housing as operating agreements expire. Liberal MP Terry Duguid said budget 2016 provided $574 million over two years for repairs.

Read the exchange

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

  1. deflected
    Natural ResourcesRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to general achievements instead of addressing aboriginal benefits or consultations on northern gateway.We were elected on the solemn commitment to both grow the economy and protect the environment at the same time, and that is exactly what we have done.
  2. deflected
    Natural ResourcesRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Response attacks Conservatives' understanding rather than justifying the decision on jobs for aboriginal Canadians.the fact of the matter is the party opposite has never understood that the way to build a strong future is by both protecting the environment and creating good jobs.
  3. partly answered
    EmploymentRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses diversification away from US market but does not detail a full plan for job protection under Trump.The fact that we can now diversify to a greater degree and reduce our dependence on the U.S. market is a key thing.
  4. deflected
    Natural ResourcesRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Response reiterates national interest without addressing how to win over BC opponents of the pipeline.We made a decision based on national interest to create good jobs and to make sure that we are consistent with reducing climate emissions by reducing the amount of oil by rail, for example.
  5. deflected
    CBC/Radio-CanadaRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer pivots to cultural importance of CBC instead of committing on extra funding or deficit impact.The fact is that investing in the stories that bind us together as a nation, in both official languages, ensuring that Canadians understand each other's lives and experiences, is at the heart of the mandate of the CBC.
  6. partly answered
    Natural ResourcesThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer cites signed agreements with some communities but does not address the 59 not consulted.The fact that 39 different indigenous communities signed agreements worth over $300 million in benefits to them from the Kinder Morgan pipeline, and the fact that a number of indigenous communities are disappointed that we turned down the northern gateway process, shows that both sides have been listened to.
  7. deflected
    Natural ResourcesThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Response lists policy differences but evades direct comparison to Harper's process and approval likelihood.By imposing a carbon tax across the country, by establishing an ocean protection plan that is unprecedented in Canada and elsewhere in the world, and by demonstrating that we understand the importance of working constructively with the provinces to meet our greenhouse gas emissions targets, we have shown that we understand that the environment and the economy must go hand in hand.
  8. deflected
    Indigenous AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer emphasizes general reconciliation efforts without addressing the specific court appeal on residential school survivors.The fact is that the investments we have made, the work we are doing to support indigenous communities, to protect children and to keep doing the good work that Canadians expect of us and that indigenous communities expect of us, to partner in respect and in a positive approach, is what we are going to continue to do.
  9. deflected
    Democratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates the commitment and process but avoids confirming whether 2015 was the last election under first-past-the-post.we made a commitment to ensure that 2015 would be the last election under first past the post.
  10. deflected
    Softwood LumberDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts focus to past government failures and ongoing talks without addressing whether the issue will be resolved now.Canada is prepared for any eventuality, and we will fiercely and proudly defend the interests of Canadian workers and producers.
  11. deflected
    Softwood LumberDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer emphasizes consultations and commitment to Quebec but does not confirm if an agreement will be signed.we remain committed to protecting the Quebec and Canadian forestry regimes, and we will continue to include them in all our negotiations.
  12. answered
    Natural ResourcesMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains that northern gateway failed to meet environmental standards and community consultation criteria unlike Trans Mountain.The Government of Canada has directed the National Energy Board to dismiss the application for the northern gateway pipeline.
  13. deflected
    Natural ResourcesMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pivots to general accomplishments on environment and economy without addressing the NEB process or job impacts.as we have said, we accomplished more in one year than they did in a decade.
  14. misdirected
    Natural ResourcesCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the request for specific scientific reports and instead promotes general environmental policy.Canadians know that strong action on the environment is good for our economy.
  15. deflected
    Natural ResourcesMrs. Cathy McLeod (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). substantive question.The answer highlights indigenous consultation but does not address the loss of economic benefits for the 31 First Nations partners.We have had the opportunity to meet many of the indigenous chiefs, including in the Lower Mainland, affected by these projects to hear their concerns first-hand.
  16. partly answered
    Natural ResourcesMs. Linda Duncan (NDP) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the science on whale impacts and outlines mitigation plans but does not explain why the project was approved despite the NEB findings.I am prepared to tell the House and all Canadians that the Minister of Transport and I have a very ambitious plan to more than mitigate all of these measures to ensure that this iconic species survives.
  17. deflected
    Natural ResourcesMr. Fin Donnelly (NDP) asked Ms. Kate Young (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes the oceans plan without addressing the pipeline approval or MPs' actions.That is why the Prime Minister announced our new $1.5 billion national oceans protection plan.
  18. deflected
    EthicsMr. Alexander Nuttall (Conservative) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). loaded question.The answer describes the task force timeline but avoids the leak allegation entirely.We look forward to the task force delivering its document later today.
  19. deflected
    EthicsMr. Alexander Nuttall (Conservative) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). loaded question.The answer repeats task force details without addressing insider trading or stock movement.We look forward to receiving the report, which will be delivered by the task force later today.
  20. partly answered
    EthicsMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). loaded question.The answer states the report will be released publicly after translation but does not detail preventive measures.It is my understanding that the chair will release a statement publicly.
  21. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the question as mixing issues and pivots to general praise of rules instead of addressing donor information.the member is intentionally mixing things that need not be mixed.
  22. misdirected
    Natural ResourcesMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). rhetorical question.The answer attacks the opposition and quotes an NDP premier rather than addressing the pipeline decision.The Alberta NDP seems to get it. When will the party opposite?
  23. answered
    Natural ResourcesMr. Randall Garrison (NDP) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly explains the draft plan, public comments, and upcoming January release to address orca concerns.Those are being incorporated into a new action plan, which will be released in January.
  24. partly answered
    Public Services and ProcurementMr. Alupa Clarke (Conservative) asked Judy Foote (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the decision rationale and negotiation process but refuses to confirm the unit price.I am not going to stand here and prejudge what the value of the contract will be.
  25. deflected
    Public Services and ProcurementMr. Alupa Clarke (Conservative) asked Judy Foote (Liberal). loaded question.Answer restates commitments and attacks prior government without addressing timeline or cost query.We are going to do that by living up to our commitment to have an open and transparent competition, where any plane that meets the requirements will be able to compete.
  26. deflected
    Public Services and ProcurementMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked Judy Foote (Liberal). substantive question.Answer avoids identifying who wrote requirements and pivots to general defense of policy.We are going to make sure that we have the equipment we need to do the job expected of us.
  27. misdirected
    Public Services and ProcurementMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked John McKay (Liberal). substantive question.Answer attacks Conservatives' past cost estimates instead of naming who initiated the changes.Their requirements went from $9 billion, to $16 billion, to $26 billion, to $42 billion, to $45 billion, and they are telling us how to manage a procurement.
  28. answered
    Public SafetyMr. Matthew Dubé (NDP) asked Ralph Goodale (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states timeline tied to completion of ongoing consultation.we have made it very clear that amendments with respect to Canada's security laws will be forthcoming when the national security consultation is complete.
  29. partly answered
    Canada Revenue AgencyMr. Pierre-Luc Dusseault (NDP) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.Answer accepts recommendations and notes an action plan but provides no specific timeline for two-year waits.an action plan to reduce processing times for objections is already being drawn up.
  30. partly answered
    HealthPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.Answer commits to reviewing report and consulting partners but does not address reversing the decision.We will make sure our approach acquires the support of the partners involved in building this important hospital
  31. misdirected
    HealthPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Conservatives' regional approach rather than addressing the minister's decision or stepping aside.Conservatives have shown that their way of approaching problems is to pit one region against the other.
  32. deflected
    CBC/Radio-CanadaPeter Van Loan (Conservative) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer defends past reinvestment and notes consultations without addressing additional funding request.we reinvested $675 million in CBC/Radio-Canada because there were important cuts in the past 10 years that really negatively affected our public broadcaster.
  33. partly answered
    Interprovincial TradeMr. John Barlow (Conservative) asked Mr. Greg Fergus (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms support for freer trade and notes a working group but does not commit to the constitutional right or address the appeal.this government does support freer trade within Canada.
  34. deflected
    Softwood LumberMs. Karine Trudel (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The response highlights government efforts and external praise but does not confirm whether plan B is ready.We are seeking a good deal for Canada, not just any deal.
  35. deflected
    Democratic ReformMr. Blake Richards (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses Bill C-33 changes but sidesteps the specific concerns about foreign interference.we repealed the unfair elements of the Fair Elections Act, and extended the right to vote to those Canadians living and working abroad.
  36. deflected
    Natural ResourcesMs. Elizabeth May (Green) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The response justifies the interim process and decision without addressing the request to suspend or reconsider.Getting resources to market in smart sustainable ways is a fundamental responsibility of the prime minister and of the Canadian government.