Parliament AIIndependent · non-official

All sittings← 2016-10-252016-10-27 →

Wednesday, October 26, 2016 · sitting No. 98

Commons opens debate on corporate board diversity reforms

The House spent the largest share of the sitting on second reading of Bill C-25, an act to amend the Canada Business Corporations Act, the Canada Cooperatives Act, the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act and the Competition Act. Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains told members the bill would require federally incorporated firms to disclose the diversity of their boards and senior management on a comply-or-explain basis. Conservative MP Luc Berthold and NDP MP Brian Masse pressed the minister on whether the approach would produce faster results for women and other underrepresented groups.

In Question Period, Conservative Leader Rona Ambrose challenged Prime Minister Justin Trudeau over the government's description of the mission against the Islamic State and over cash-for-access fundraising by ministers. NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair pressed the Prime Minister on compliance with Canadian Human Rights Tribunal orders on services to First Nations children.

Decided that day

  • C-243 and C-240 advanced to second reading
  • C-316 and C-317 introduced
  • Bill referred to Justice committee
  • Bill referred to Finance committee
  • Bill referred to Human Resources committee
  • Motion on provincial collaboration passed
  • Motion on tax practices defeated

From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard

No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.

Who held the floor · 2016-10-26

Government (Liberal)OppositionOver the day: government 43%, opposition 57% of the words spokenQuestion PeriodGovernment businessPrivate members▲ Government side held the floor▼ Opposition held the floorOpened 14:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:00Last speech 19:50Time of day, Ottawa · the House sat 5 h 50 min · each dot is a stretch of debate, placed at the minute it began
64Bills Advance While Answers EvadeThe House spent most of its time on substantive business and moved four bills forward while passing four of five recorded votes. Question period produced almost no direct answers and two calls to order.AI-rated Score out of 100; the verdict and the answer ratings behind it are a model’s reading. How the AI rates this

AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this

Other moments

National Defence

Conservative Leader Rona Ambrose said social media posts showed Canadian troops engaged in combat near Mosul and asked why the government had not provided technical briefings. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau replied that the mission remained focused on training local forces and that safety would not be compromised for communications purposes.

Read the exchange

Ethics

Conservative Leader Rona Ambrose asked whether the Prime Minister still believed in his own ministerial fundraising rules after reports of $1,500-a-plate events tied to government files. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said federal rules were among the strictest in the country and that access did not require payment.

Read the exchange

Indigenous Affairs

NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair asked whether the government would support a motion to end discrimination against First Nations children after two further compliance orders from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau pointed to a five-year, $8.4-billion investment and said turning around past failures would take time.

Read the exchange

International Trade

Conservative MP Denis Lebel asked why the government had failed to close the Canada-European Union trade agreement. International Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland said Canada had completed its work and that the remaining steps now rested with the European Union.

Read the exchange

Infrastructure

NDP MP Matthew Dubé asked whether an infrastructure bank would divert funds promised for transit and housing into private projects. Infrastructure Minister Amarjeet Sohi said the government was engaging municipalities, provinces and the private sector to deliver a historic $120-billion commitment.

Read the exchange

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

  1. deflected
    National DefenceRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer praises the forces and restates the mission without addressing transparency concerns.We are engaged, as we predicted we would be engaged, in a mission that is dangerous, but very important to make sure that Canada does its part in the fight against Daesh.
  2. deflected
    National DefenceRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Answers by explaining the policy change but avoids committing to briefings.We will not put our men and women of the Canadian Forces in harm's way for communications purposes.
  3. partly answered
    National DefenceRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Acknowledges the issue and states they are investigating without specifics on response.With regard to the troubling report about the Canadian Armed Forces, we are looking into it.
  4. deflected
    EthicsRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The response defends the system without addressing the specific fundraising events mentioned.The fact is there are still jurisdictions in Canada that have no limits on personal donations, that allow corporate developers and allow unions to donate.
  5. deflected
    EthicsRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.Shifts to praising openness instead of addressing rule violations.We follow all the rules and laws around fundraising.
  6. deflected
    EthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Reiterates existing rules without addressing legislating them.Canadians can be reassured that at the federal level we have some of the strictest limits on donations of anywhere in the country.
  7. deflected
    EthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Emphasizes current rules and accessibility without agreeing to empower the commissioner.It is impossible for anyone to give more than $1,500 a year to a political party.
  8. deflected
    Indigenous AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.Highlights investments but avoids directly answering the motion support question.That is why we have made a historic five-year investment of $8.4 billion.
  9. deflected
    Indigenous AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The response highlights investments without addressing the motion or court actions.It is why we are investing a historic $8.4 billion over the next five years to begin to fix these terrible wrongs.
  10. deflected
    International TradeDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The answer shifts blame to Conservatives instead of addressing the preference for fundraising.When we took office, that very important agreement had stalled because the Conservatives could not reach a deal with the European Union.
  11. deflected
    International TradeDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.The response attacks the prior government rather than addressing the softwood lumber or CETA status.CETA had stalled under the previous government.
  12. deflected
    EthicsMr. Pat Kelly (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer opens with holiday wishes then asserts rule compliance without addressing secrecy.I would like to take a quick moment, because there are many communities that will be celebrating this weekend, to wish all members in the House and all Canadians a happy Diwali and happy Bandi Chhor Divas.
  13. deflected
    EthicsMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The response restates platform commitments instead of addressing the fundraising or carbon tax impact.We ran on a platform, and we are committed to advancing that platform.
  14. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer accuses the member of confusion rather than addressing the events or consultations.the member is intentionally confusing an open and transparent budget consultation process with lawful and ethical fundraising.
  15. deflected
    EthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The response asserts rule compliance without addressing the specific donations or access claims.When the rules are followed, no conflict of interest can exist.
  16. deflected
    International TradeMs. Karine Trudel (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). substantive question.The answer expresses surprise at NDP stance and quotes Europeans instead of committing to CETA fixes or addressing TPP jobs.frankly, I am surprised that the NDP cannot get behind an agreement that has the full support of socialists across Europe.
  17. deflected
    International TradeMs. Tracey Ramsey (NDP) asked Chrystia Freeland (Liberal). loaded question.Answer evades consultations and TPP by praising CETA and attacking NDP instead.Are there any trade deals the NDP will ever support?
  18. deflected
    National DefenceMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked John McKay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer restates coalition mandate without addressing training shift, hospital, or secrecy claims.At this time, the coalition is pursuing its mandate to advise, to assist, and to train and it has not gone beyond that mandate.
  19. misdirected
    National DefenceMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked John McKay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer denies change then attacks opposition's transparency record instead of clarifying mission details.To think of the hon. member's party as an open and transparent party is, in some respects, a contradiction in terms.
  20. deflected
    National DefenceMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked John McKay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer repeats unchanged mandate without addressing Syria expansion or Prime Minister contradiction.We remain committed to an advise, assist, and train mission.
  21. deflected
    National DefenceMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked John McKay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer limits response to current Iraq focus and refuses to address Syria vote or extension.We are not taking military operations in any place else, and we are not about to engage in speculation as to where anything might go in this conflict.
  22. partly answered
    InfrastructureMr. Matthew Dubé (NDP) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). loaded question.Answer addresses infrastructure investment but not privatization or foreign sale concerns.we are engaging with the municipalities. We are engaging with the provinces and territories and we will also engage with the private sector
  23. deflected
    InfrastructureMr. Matthew Dubé (NDP) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). loaded question.Answer highlights meetings with municipalities without addressing privatization or fundraiser influence.last week the Minister of Finance , the Minister of Environment , and I all met with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities
  24. deflected
    YouthPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked MaryAnn Mihychuk (Liberal). loaded question.Answer promotes youth programs without addressing taxes or job impacts from small businesses.I am proud to indicate that we are all in on helping young Canadians find a meaningful career
  25. deflected
    Persons with DisabilitiesPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked MaryAnn Mihychuk (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general labour supports but ignores the specific clawback and tax issue raised.We are continuing to support small business with reductions in EI payments, work share opportunities by doubling the length of opportunity, and providing more opportunities for small business to create new jobs for Canadians.
  26. deflected
    FinanceMs. Dianne L. Watts (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.The minister discusses studying recommendations but does not address the funding source or tax question.We are studying them, and we are considering how we can use its insights, as well as our policies, to make sure we can grow our economy for the long term.
  27. deflected
    FinanceMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates receipt of the report without addressing where the money for the bank would come from.This report contained important recommendations on how we can amplify the economic impact of our policies.
  28. partly answered
    Public Services and ProcurementMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Ms. Leona Alleslev (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges delays and priority status but gives no count of unpaid students or payment timeline.Resolving these cases is our priority.
  29. deflected
    Public Services and ProcurementMs. Sheri Benson (NDP) asked Ms. Leona Alleslev (Liberal). substantive question.The answer expresses understanding but avoids stating any new deadline.However, resolving these cases remains our top priority.
  30. partly answered
    National DefenceMr. Joël Godin (Conservative) asked John McKay (Liberal). substantive question.The answer recognizes the wrong and notes engagement but does not explain the lack of reply to the specific letter.In fact, the government is fully engaged on a wide departmental basis to address the very issue he raises.
  31. partly answered
    National DefenceMr. John Brassard (Conservative) asked John McKay (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes the historical wrong and need for a whole-of-government response but does not address the lack of reply.In order to be able to have a proper response to the person, we need to address this with a whole-of-government approach.
  32. deflected
    Veterans AffairsMrs. Cathay Wagantall (Conservative) asked Kent Hehr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer focuses on general veteran support services while ignoring the Apotex fundraiser and trust question.I encourage all the members who have issues regarding military service to come forward to our department.
  33. partly answered
    EmploymentMr. Matt Jeneroux (Conservative) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses jobs via project approvals but ignores the specific mocking query on the minister's comment and carbon tax.we have approved 72 projects, working in consultation with the municipalities and the province, with a total combined value of $3 billion to create jobs and prosperity for Albertans.
  34. deflected
    Canadian HeritageMr. Pierre Nantel (NDP) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses consultations and leadership but avoids the request to have the finance minister ensure fair payments from tech firms.We will consult all stakeholders in order to come up with a new method and a new program to meet the great challenge facing Canadian content in the digital age.
  35. deflected
    Public Services and ProcurementMr. Alupa Clarke (Conservative) asked Ms. Leona Alleslev (Liberal). loaded question.The answer acknowledges the problem as a priority but provides no details on fixing it or addressing the unreported departments.Employees of the department are working non-stop; resolving this matter is our top priority.
  36. answered
    International TradeMs. Elizabeth May (Green) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains the modification of the investor-state provisions to address European concerns.That is why we sat down with the Europeans and created a new ISDS approach that actually makes it the gold standard, makes it an extraordinarily progressive deal that Europe has happily signed on to.