All sittings← 2016-09-272016-09-29 →
Wednesday, September 28, 2016 · sitting No. 83
House debates national security oversight bill in longest sitting
The House devoted the largest share of its sitting to debate on the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians Act. Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux said the bill would fulfill a commitment to create parliamentary oversight of security agencies and strike a balance between rights and security. NDP MP Peter Julian criticized the prime minister's appointment powers and lack of an independent chair, while Bloc Québécois MP Pierre-Luc Dusseault questioned whether the body qualified as a true parliamentary committee given the prime minister's veto over reports.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the economy and Pacific NorthWest LNG project. Conservative leader Rona Ambrose pressed the prime minister on private-sector job growth and the number of conditions attached to the LNG approval. NDP leader Thomas Mulcair challenged the government over indigenous consultations and greenhouse-gas targets for new pipelines.
Decided that day
- Motion requiring government action before funding proposals passed
- Amendment deleting words after funding proposals passed
- Bill failed second reading and referral to human resources committee
- Bill passed second reading and referral to justice committee
- Bills C-306, S-229, C-25 and C-307 introduced
- Bill C-247 advanced to second reading
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2016-09-28
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Natural Resources
Conservative leader Rona Ambrose asked the prime minister to commit personal leadership to move the Pacific NorthWest LNG project from approval to construction, citing unemployed workers in her riding.
Read the exchangeIndigenous Affairs
NDP MP Charlie Angus questioned the government's decision to send ministers to Vancouver airport rather than directly to affected first nations when announcing the LNG project.
Read the exchangeGovernment Expenditures
Conservative MP Karen Vecchio asked who was telling the truth after Brookfield Global Relocation Services said two prime ministerial aides had been briefed on relocation benefits that the aides had denied knowing.
Read the exchangeForeign Affairs
NDP leader Thomas Mulcair called for a parliamentary committee to review foreign arms sales before approval, citing sales to countries with human-rights concerns.
Read the exchangeHealth
Conservative MP Denis Lebel said the health minister must respect provincial jurisdiction and stop attaching conditions to Canada health transfers.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedNatural ResourcesRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer avoids committing to personal leadership and instead restates general policy goals.
the kind of leadership Canadians expect is the kind of leadership they had not had for 10 years, a government that understands that we need to grow the economy for the middle class and protect and sustain the environment at the same time.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer sidesteps the call for shovels in the ground by repeating economic and environmental talking points.
after 10 years of failed policies on growth that consisted mostly of tax breaks for the wealthiest Canadians, we are actually working to draw in global investment
- misdirectedEmploymentRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the previous government's record instead of addressing whether current spending created jobs.
in the last election, Canadians had a choice between a government that for 10 years was unable to create the kind of growth for Canadians that middle-class Canadians needed
- misdirectedEmploymentRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pivots to criticizing Conservatives rather than responding to the request to stop spending and focus on jobs.
the members opposite continue to not understand the lessons Canadians shared with them in the last election.
- misdirectedEmploymentRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer ignores the question on job creation and instead contrasts past and present policies.
after 10 years under the reign of a government with the worst record in economic growth since R. B. Bennett and the Great Depression
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends the consultation process without addressing the distance of the announcement or opposition from first nations.
we have always understood that in order to create the kind of government that people want, we need to both grow the economy and protect the environment.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the lack of a plan to reduce GHGs but does not directly tackle the pipeline approval question.
The problem is that, for a long time, previous governments, including Liberal governments, had plenty of targets, but no solid plan to reach them.
- answeredForeign AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states the commitment to sign the arms trade treaty and work with members on transparency.
we have been very clear. We believe that we need to demonstrate more transparency and rigour when it comes to the sale of arms on the international market.
- deflectedForeign AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer promotes signing the arms trade treaty but never addresses the request for a parliamentary committee on arms sales.
That is why we have committed to demonstrating a higher level of transparency and openness, and why we have agreed to sign on to the arms trade treaty.
- partly answeredHealthDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes upcoming meetings and funding increases but sidesteps the core issue of conditions on transfers and provincial jurisdiction.
I will be meeting with all my provincial and territorial counterparts over the next few weeks.
- partly answeredHealthDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms respect for provincial jurisdiction over health care but does not commit to removing conditions or altering the approach.
I respect that they deliver excellent care and have jurisdiction over that.
- misdirectedGovernment ExpendituresMrs. Karen Vecchio (Conservative) asked Scott Brison (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the previous government's record instead of clarifying who was briefed on the relocation expenses.
We are also aware that under the previous Conservative government, there were ministerial staffers reimbursed, in some cases, for $90,000 worth of moving expenses.
- misdirectedGovernment ExpendituresMrs. Karen Vecchio (Conservative) asked Scott Brison (Liberal). substantive question.The answer again pivots to criticizing the prior Conservative policy rather than addressing leadership on current entitlements.
I would remind the hon. member, who was, I believe, a caucus member previously, that under the Conservatives, there were staff members who were reimbursed for moving expenses in excess of $90,000.
- deflectedGovernment ExpendituresMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Scott Brison (Liberal). substantive question.The answer claims Brookfield clarified its statement but avoids confirming whether the PMO was truthful about briefings.
Brookfield has clarified its comments and have confirmed that members of the Prime Minister's staff were consistent with the truth.
- misdirectedGovernment ExpendituresMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the questioner and quotes a former Conservative staffer instead of resolving the briefing contradiction.
My friend knows very well that Brookfield has apologized for that erroneous information.
- deflectedHealthMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.The answer stresses increased transfers and future meetings but does not address scrapping the cuts or negotiating in good faith.
There will be no cuts to health care.
- answeredHealthMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly refutes the comparison and confirms new negotiations are underway unlike the prior government.
I have been given direction from the Prime Minister to negotiate a new health accord with the provinces and territories.
- deflectedGovernment ExpendituresMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the expenses question by attacking the opposition and referencing a past chief of staff.
We know how faithfully our friends across the way followed the orders of Mr. Harper's chief of staff, Guy Giorno.
- deflectedGovernment ExpendituresMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the query on hidden expenses by quoting a former official on the program's purpose.
The federal relocation program—which applies to hundreds of moves annually, including moves by employees of government, military and RCMP—exists for a very good reason.
- answeredGovernment ExpendituresMr. Larry Miller (Conservative) asked John McCallum (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses the memory lapse claim by confirming proactive disclosure nine months prior and immediate correction.
Quite the opposite of what the member just said, it was nine long months ago that we recorded this expense through proactive disclosure.
- answeredGovernment ExpendituresMr. Larry Miller (Conservative) asked John McCallum (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly justifies the expense as standard policy and reiterates prior disclosure.
I would certainly say it is entirely appropriate that when one hires a staff person or a consultant and the person is in Thailand, yes the government pays for the transport of that individual to Ottawa and for the relevant hotel expenses.
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Pierre-Luc Dusseault (NDP) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the consultation launch but ignores the request to halt ongoing investigations.
I am proud to have announced the official launch of our consultations to clarify charitable organizations' involvement in political activities.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates general commitment to justice without addressing the specific court fight or ministers' conflicting statements.
We uphold the Indian residential school settlement process, and members know that.
- answeredJusticeRob Nicholson (Conservative) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). loaded question.The answer explains the new appointment process and affirms commitment to regional representation without guaranteeing it.
We are committed to respecting the custom of regional representation, functional bilingualism, diversity, and ensuring that we have the highest calibre of jurist to be the next Supreme Court of Canada justice.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Stéphane Dion (Liberal). loaded question.The answer clarifies terminology instead of addressing the claimed contradiction between officials.
There is a huge difference between discussions and negotiations.
- deflectedForeign AffairsPeter Kent (Conservative) asked Stéphane Dion (Liberal). loaded question.The answer congratulates the asker on word choice rather than resolving the contradiction raised.
I also want to congratulate him that he has seen the light, because now he speaks about discussions.
- answeredForeign AffairsPeter Kent (Conservative) asked Stéphane Dion (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly affirms agreement and reads the government's condemning declaration on the missile.
In a nutshell, the declaration clearly condemns it.
- partly answeredRail TransportationMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Ms. Kate Young (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses data sharing but does not engage the request to strengthen regulations or assessments.
That is why the minister issued protective direction no. 36, delivering on our commitment to share more data with communities and first responders.
- deflectedRail TransportationMs. Linda Duncan (NDP) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses interim principles and one project but ignores the call for mandatory assessments on rail.
These principles were actually used to engage indigenous peoples, who will now be part of environmental assessments of the Pacific NorthWest LNG project.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Bob Zimmer (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends the approval process but does not address why conditions were added or unemployment impacts.
Those 190 conditions are consistent with that, because we need to make sure that any resources developed are done in a sustainable way.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Bob Zimmer (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends conditions and job creation but avoids explaining why they might prevent construction.
I am very proud that this project will create over 5,000 good, middle-class jobs, including union jobs.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer notes projects are judged individually and cites job creation but does not address other pending projects.
each of these projects will be judged on its own merits.
- partly answeredOfficial LanguagesMr. Bernard Généreux (Conservative) asked John McCallum (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the report and promises consideration but offers no concrete immediate plan to equalize costs.
We received yesterday's report and will give it very serious consideration.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Wayne Stetski (NDP) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.The response describes the UNESCO mission without addressing collaborative protection measures or preventing endangered status.
Reactive monitoring missions are carried out around the world as an act of due diligence to assess potential threats to the outstanding universal value of world heritage sites.
- partly answeredLabourMr. Bev Shipley (Conservative) asked MaryAnn Mihychuk (Liberal). substantive question.The answer stresses compliance with the labour code and mentions working with the owner but does not address granting an exemption.
However, companies must respect the Canada Labour Code and it is our duty to ensure the health and safety of workers across Canada.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsHunter Tootoo (Independent) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). substantive question.The response details one housing investment for Nunavut but does not specify timelines or funding approach for all groups mentioned.
This year we announced a $178-million investment into Inuit housing, of which $78 million will go to Inuit in Nunavut.