House advances Air Canada bill to overhaul centres amid Quebec concerns

Other moments

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

1. deflected
   Government AdvertisingDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Scott Brison (Liberal). loaded question.Answer explains policy but avoids addressing the specific video or rule-breaking claim.That is not the case in this example.
2. misdirected
   Government AdvertisingDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Scott Brison (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to attacking Conservatives' past spending instead of addressing the ad rules.That is a little rich for the Conservatives, who spent hundreds of millions of dollars in some cases advertising programs that did not exist
3. misdirected
   Government AdvertisingDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Scott Brison (Liberal). loaded question.Answer defends policy but pivots to criticizing Conservatives' record rather than responding to the hypocrisy claim.We brought in these new policies, which for the first time define clearly what is acceptable in terms of government advertising and what is not, in response to 10 years of taxpayer and power abuse of this under the Conservatives.
4. partly answered
   Government AdvertisingMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Scott Brison (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states it was not paid advertising and defines the policy scope.It is very clear as well that this was not paid government advertising, so the Conservatives should change their questions now having learned the truth on this.
5. misdirected
   Government AdvertisingMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Scott Brison (Liberal). loaded question.Answer attacks Conservatives' past actions instead of confirming or addressing the self-promotion claim.The Conservatives, who spent hundreds of millions of dollars promoting themselves in partisan advertising, abusing the taxpayer, abusing our democratic system, should be ashamed to attack a government that is actually cleaning up the mess that they left.
6. deflected
   Canada Revenue AgencyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.Answer notes seriousness of allegations but refuses to address the call for an inquiry due to ongoing investigation.My colleague across the aisle knows very well that I cannot comment on any matter that is currently under police investigation.
7. partly answered
   Canada Revenue AgencyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses tax evasion efforts and Panama papers but does not confirm who is in charge or commit to an inquiry.We now have it. This is a problem of global proportions. We are taking a close look at all the data we have today and will do the same with the data still to come.
8. deflected
   InfrastructureThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts to positive remarks on Quebec relations instead of addressing infrastructure delays or CRA issues.I am proud to say that we are building a very strong relationship with the Province of Quebec.
9. deflected
   InfrastructureThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Amarjeet Sohi (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to past funding shortfalls instead of addressing the timeline for starting the project.when we look at the funding that was allocated to the province of Quebec in 2014, up until last October, zero dollars were delivered.
10. deflected
    Democratic ReformMr. Scott Reid (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer questions the value of referendums rather than explaining why one will not be held.When Ontarians voted on electoral reform in 2007, nearly half did not vote.
11. deflected
    Democratic ReformMr. Scott Reid (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer attacks the Conservatives' approach instead of addressing the call for a referendum.I am not surprised that talking to only half of Canadians is an acceptable approach for the Conservatives.
12. deflected
    Democratic ReformMr. Blake Richards (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer lists consultation methods but avoids confirming or denying a referendum.We intend to use a multitude of methods, including the special committee, town halls by all MPs in their ridings, social media platforms, and additional processes
13. deflected
    Democratic ReformMr. Blake Richards (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer emphasizes committee process without answering whether a referendum will occur.This government is committed to bringing all parties to the table to be part of this important dialogue at an all-party committee
14. deflected
    Democratic ReformMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer again contrasts turnout in past referendums rather than justifying the refusal of one.In the last two electoral reform referenda, almost half of the population did not vote.
15. deflected
    Democratic ReformMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer challenges the opposition to suggest alternatives instead of defending the no-referendum stance.I encourage them to bring forward ideas other than a referendum.
16. partly answered
    Democratic ReformMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly addresses inclusion of other parties on the committee but sidesteps the core question of using a majority to force reform.our proposed motion includes both the Bloc Québécois and the Green Party members on the committee.
17. deflected
    Democratic ReformMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). loaded question.The answer promotes collaboration without directly answering the yes-or-no commitment request.If we are going to modernize our electoral system, if we are going to further connect constituents to this place, then we need to work together, set aside partisan interests, and deliver on the commitments that two-thirds of us made to Canadians this past election.
18. partly answered
    International TradeMr. Todd Doherty (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses the negotiation timeline and priority but avoids specifics on protecting small producers.We are within the negotiation period in which we will come out with a framework for this agreement.
19. deflected
    International TradeMr. Todd Doherty (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the question's premise as misleading rather than addressing job protection directly.It is completely misleading to say that we are not aware of what is happening in the industry.
20. partly answered
    Natural ResourcesCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). loaded question.The answer notes support for the sector and the NEB process but does not address driving investment out.The government has put in a transparent process with the National Energy Board that needs to run its course, so we ensure we have environmental protection for our country and the confidence of Canadians moving forward.
21. deflected
    Natural ResourcesCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). loaded question.The answer praises the sector and balances economy with environment without addressing reputation or policy impacts.We recognize that in order for our economy to grow and the oil and gas sector to be part of that, we need to ensure that the economy and the environment go hand and hand.
22. partly answered
    Employment InsuranceMr. Erin Weir (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.The answer explains the criteria and recent extensions but does not address why Regina was excluded.Recent results have shown that three additional regions have met the existing definition of a sharp and sustained economic downturn.
23. partly answered
    Employment InsuranceMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). loaded question.The answer references mandate and recent announcements but does not address broken promises or specific regions.Just a few days ago, we announced that three further regions would be eligible for important enhancements in the EI system.
24. answered
    JusticeMr. Michael Cooper (Conservative) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly addresses judicial vacancies and outlines short-term and comprehensive appointment plans.We are moving forward to ensure that we have short-term procedures in place to fill some of the most needed vacancies, while ensuring we have a comprehensive process that will diversify the judiciary across the country.
25. partly answered
    JusticeMr. Michael Cooper (Conservative) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). loaded question.Addresses vacancies but pivots to diversity without a timeline for appointments.we will be moving forward with short-term vacancies in the very near future
26. answered
    HealthMr. Colin Carrie (Conservative) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). loaded question.Directly corrects the false premise on Tylenol and explains the evidence-based heroin policy.there is no attempt to ban the sales of acetaminophen or Tylenol from pharmacy shelves
27. deflected
    HealthMr. Colin Carrie (Conservative) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). loaded question.Ignores the specific Tylenol and heroin claims to restate general drug policy principles.Our approach to drug policy in the country is firmly founded on the best scientific evidence
28. partly answered
    CBC/Radio-CanadaMr. Pierre Nantel (NDP) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.Acknowledges the secrecy concern but only promises future transparency without addressing current practices.the process must be independent, open, and transparent
29. partly answered
    Disaster AssistanceMs. Georgina Jolibois (NDP) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). substantive question.States general engagement and support but provides no specific plan for northern Saskatchewan communities.We are there to help and support wherever possible
30. deflected
    Indigenous AffairsMrs. Cathy McLeod (Conservative) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). loaded question.Avoids the veto question by restating that consultation and development are complementary.we do not see any agreements or working relationships with indigenous people as an impediment to resource development in Canada
31. deflected
    Indigenous AffairsMrs. Cathy McLeod (Conservative) asked Ms. Kim Rudd (Liberal). loaded question.Restates consultation priority without answering yes or no on veto for UNDRIP implementation.resource development cannot go through unless there is consultation and negotiation with all communities involved
32. misdirected
    Agriculture and Agri-FoodMr. Chris Warkentin (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). substantive question.Answers about food safety inspection instead of addressing intervention on the hog virus spread.the Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food and the CFIA will inspect food and ensure it is safe for consumers in the country
33. deflected
    Parks CanadaMr. Jim Eglinski (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer offers discussion but provides no plan or action on the beetle issue.As I have offered to him in the past, I am more than happy to have a conversation about issues relating to Jasper National Park.
34. deflected
    The EnvironmentMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Hunter Tootoo (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses process and reports but does not address when funds or pollutant info will be provided.A discussion paper will be done this month and the mid-term report will follow next month.
35. partly answered
    Consular AffairsMr. Garnett Genuis (Conservative) asked Mr. Omar Alghabra (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms engagement and consular work but does not confirm high-level PM involvement with North Korea.We are highly engaged on this file and we will not stop until Mr. Lim is back home.
36. answered
    Aerospace IndustryMr. Simon Marcil (Bloc) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly rejects the premise of dismantling Bombardier and states the government's supportive intent.
37. deflected
    Physician-Assisted DyingMr. Luc Thériault (Bloc) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends the bill's balance but does not address the accusation of lacking courage.We are committed to ensuring that we move forward with Bill C-14 , to hear robust dialogue and debate, and to ensure that we strike the right balance between ensuring personal autonomy and doing as much as we can to protect the vulnerable.
38. deflected
    Democratic ReformMr. Rhéal Fortin (Bloc) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends the motion as respectful but does not address when or how the PM will respect the parliamentary system.The proposed motion includes both the Bloc and the Green Party at the table, which goes beyond the normal practice for unrecognized parties.