All sittings← 2016-05-102016-05-12 →
Wednesday, May 11, 2016 · sitting No. 53
Liberals move time allocation on RCMP labour bill amid opposition protests
Government House leader Dominic LeBlanc moved a time allocation motion on Bill C-7, which amends the Public Service Labour Relations Act to give RCMP members collective bargaining rights. The motion limits report stage to one further sitting day and third reading to one sitting day, with the deadline set by a Supreme Court ruling for May 16. Conservative MP Cathy McLeod and NDP MP Daniel Blaikie objected that the government was rushing debate on a bill with flaws remaining from committee stage.
In Question Period, Conservative Leader Rona Ambrose pressed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on the composition of a special committee on electoral reform, saying Liberals had stacked it to retain control. Trudeau replied that the previous Conservative government had passed the Fair Elections Act without consultation and that Canadians had given his party a mandate to change the first-past-the-post system.
NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair asked whether videos of Saudi security forces using Canadian-made armoured vehicles against civilians constituted human rights violations that should halt further export permits. Trudeau said the government would not cancel a contract signed by the previous administration.
Decided that day
- Bill C-7 amendments passed
- House proceeded to Orders of the Day
- S-225 advanced to second reading
- S-1001 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2016-05-11
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Indigenous Affairs
NDP MP Romeo Saganash asked why the Department of Justice was opposing a new hearing for a St. Anne's residential school survivor after allegedly suppressing documents. Parliamentary Secretary Yvonne Jones said the government had complied with all court orders on document disclosure.
Read the exchangeHealth
NDP MP Don Davies urged Health Minister Jane Philpott to require tamper-resistant forms for all opioids. Philpott said a comprehensive approach including prescriber guidelines and treatment was required.
Read the exchangeEthics
Conservative MP Blaine Calkins questioned why the natural resources minister was left off the state dinner guest list in Washington while Liberal Party officials attended. Minister Dominic LeBlanc said the visit produced progress on border security and climate change.
Read the exchangeVeterans
Conservative MP Alupa Clarke asked why a monument to Afghanistan veterans had not been advanced while one for trade unions moved forward. Veterans Affairs Minister Kent Hehr said commemoration projects from Vimy Ridge onward would proceed in a dignified manner.
Read the exchangeDairy Industry
NDP MP Ruth Ellen Brosseau said the government had failed to act on diafiltered milk imports that cost farmers millions. Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAulay said the Liberals would defend supply management and seek a long-term solution.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- partly answeredFort McMurrayRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the committee but does not commit to fast-tracking infrastructure funding as asked.
we are going to be putting together an ad hoc cabinet committee to bring to bear the efforts of the entire government.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer criticizes past Conservative actions instead of addressing the referendum request.
forgive me if I find it a bit rich coming from the party that brought in the unfair elections act without any consultations to try to stack the deck in its favour.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates the campaign commitment without addressing the referendum or faith in Canadians.
we were very clear during the election campaign when we said that this would be the last election under first past the post.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Scott Reid (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question as silly and restates the commitment without addressing the referendum.
Again, Mr. Speaker, that the Conservatives suddenly discovered how important it is to engage with and listen to Canadians is a bit silly at this point.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Scott Reid (Conservative) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the referendum issue and pivots to criticizing the previous government.
It was not our compelling argument that convinced Canadians; it was what the last government did with its majority that convinced Canadians this must be the last election under first past the post.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer begins to restate the campaign promise without addressing the committee composition.
the essence of democracy is that we put forward a very clear plan to ensure that this was the last election—
- deflectedDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats the majority mandate without addressing unilateral action or committee voting rights.
Canadians gave us a majority. We will use this majority to make it harder to elect a government that does not represent the views and perspectives of all Canadians.
- answeredForeign AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the contract and human rights concerns by stating it will not be cancelled.
I have said from the very beginning that the Canadian government, led by me, will not cancel a contract signed by a previous government.
- deflectedForeign AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer avoids the arms sale and human rights evidence by attacking the asker instead.
He pretended to understand that in the election campaign.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Blake Richards (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer praises the committee but sidesteps the Liberal majority and referendum demand.
We have taken a unique approach and we have shown leadership by including all parties, the Bloc, the Green Party, the NDP, and the Conservatives, around this table.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Blake Richards (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats the town-hall plan without addressing the referendum request.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer emphasizes respect and modernization but ignores the committee majority and mandate question.
it is out of a great deal of respect for the people who put us here and for these democratic institutions that we have committed to reforming the existing system
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). loaded question.The answer claims consultation but evades committing to a referendum and ignores the China remark.
Canadians will have the first say and the final say.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer celebrates the day and attacks division without addressing the referendum commitment.
it is a great day for Canadian democracy.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Alain Rayes (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The answer defends new tools but does not answer whether 10 MPs should decide over the public.
We are confident that the individuals around the committee table will put their narrow partisan interests aside and serve the Canadians who have put us here.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses cooperation and documents but only partly responds to opposing the new hearing.
We are prepared to co-operate and ensure that all the necessary information is provided in legal proceedings.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). loaded question.The answer highlights general reconciliation efforts and document compliance without addressing the specific claims of suppressed evidence or defending predators.
we have complied with all of Justice Perell's orders regarding documents related to St. Anne's.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses the historic nature of the visit and policy progress instead of explaining the guest list choices or absence of the natural resources minister.
The other side of the House is struggling with how a guest list at a state dinner is drawn up.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends expense disclosure and trip outcomes while avoiding a clear total cost figure or addressing the changing numbers cited.
Our government has led with open and transparent disclosure of expenses, and every single one of those expenses was justified
- deflectedEthicsMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer focuses on the historic visit and accomplishments rather than justifying the Liberal Party president's inclusion on the delegation.
Our visit was a historic one, and a great deal of progress was made on files and issues that affect the lives of Canadians
- deflectedEthicsMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer accuses the questioner of exaggeration and praises transparency without providing a reconciled total cost for the trip.
the fact that my colleague keeps repeating exaggerated claims does not make them true.
- partly answeredHealthMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the opioid issue and outlines a broad approach but does not directly address implementing tamper-proof requirements for the full class of opioids.
It will require a comprehensive approach, one that includes prescriber guidelines, one that includes patient information, one that includes treatment, and one that includes prevention.
- partly answeredHealthMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Jane Philpott (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms commitment to the Canada Health Act principles but offers no timeline or specific enforcement action against ancillary fees in Quebec.
I am committed to working with all my Canadian partners to strengthen our universal public health care system while upholding the principles of the Canada Health Act.
- answeredEthicsMr. Chris Warkentin (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly confirms that the chief of staff has met all Conflict of Interest Commissioner requirements and will follow the established screen.
I can assure my honourable colleague, this House, and Canadians that my chief of staff has completed all the requirements of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner and will be abiding by all guidelines set forward.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Chris Warkentin (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer follows guidelines but pivots to rhetorical attack on colleague instead of addressing the zero-involvement guarantee.
Does my honourable colleague indicate that all we want to work in agriculture are people who know nothing about agriculture?
- deflectedEthicsMr. Bev Shipley (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer claims guidelines will be followed but deflects by expressing disappointment and repeating the same rhetorical jab.
- partly answeredEthicsMr. Bev Shipley (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer directly states that guidelines will be followed and cautions on involvement without changing subject.
the Conflict of Interest Commissioner has set guidelines.
- answeredIndigenous AffairsMs. Sheila Malcolmson (NDP) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). substantive question.Answer affirms commitment to inquiry, participation, and immediate action without evasion.
We are determined to work with all of those who have been impacted to ensure that this inquiry has the outcomes that are necessary for healing, and for reconciliation for so many women, children, and families across our country.
- partly answeredDairy IndustryMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer acknowledges the issue and states intent to defend supply management but offers no timeline or specific action.
we are working to reach a long-term solution that will work for all of the dairy sector across this nation.
- answeredVeteransMr. Alupa Clarke (Conservative) asked Kent Hehr (Liberal). loaded question.Answer directly confirms commemoration priority and ongoing work with heritage ministry.
We are working closely with the ministry of heritage to see this project through, and rest assured it will be done.
- answeredNational DefenceMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked John McKay (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses safety measures and confirms pre-approval by leadership.
The members who were recently profiled were preselected and approved by Canadian Armed Forces leadership.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked John McKay (Liberal). loaded question.Answer shifts blame to previous government and avoids admitting any error or new action.
as I recollect, the hon. member standing in the House in a previous Parliament was because his government wanted some photo ops.
- answeredIndigenous AffairsMrs. Cathy McLeod (Conservative) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the veto question by stating it is not part of FPIC.
Mr. Perry Bellegarde, the national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, has already said that veto is not utilized in free, prior, and informed consent in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMr. Fin Donnelly (NDP) asked Hunter Tootoo (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids the question by noting the issue is new and future meetings are planned.
I would like to inform the member that I plan to meet with her to discuss this further in the near future.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked John McKay (Liberal). substantive question.The response redirects focus to the defence review process without confirming plans.
Clearly, the issue of the reopening of the Saint-Jean college is of utmost importance to the minister and to my colleague from Saint-Jean, who has tirelessly promoted this reopening.
- answeredDemocratic ReformMs. Elizabeth May (Green) asked Justin Trudeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly assures that the PM will not control Liberal members' votes on the committee.
On the issue of committee members, I can assure the Leader of the Green Party that I will no more control the Liberal members on that committee than she will control the Green member on that committee.