Parliament AIIndependent · non-official

All sittings← 2016-04-152016-04-19 →

Monday, April 18, 2016 · sitting No. 41

House debates Air Canada maintenance rules as Liberals advance privatization changes

The House spent the largest portion of the sitting on second reading of a government bill to amend the Air Canada Public Participation Act. Liberal MP David de Burgh Graham told the House the changes would allow the airline to maintain aircraft outside the Montreal urban community and Winnipeg while remaining competitive. Conservative MP Kelly Block asked what savings the legislation would produce and how many Canadian jobs would be lost.

In Question Period, Conservative MP Andrew Scheer pressed Finance Minister Bill Morneau on the elimination of the children's fitness and arts tax credits. NDP MP Peter Julian asked National Revenue Minister Diane Lebouthillier to investigate dinners attended by senior Canada Revenue Agency officials at the Rideau Club that were paid for by accounting firms including KPMG.

From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard

No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.

Who held the floor · 2016-04-18

Government (Liberal)OppositionOver the day: government 33%, opposition 67% of the words spokenPrivate membersGovernment businessQuestion PeriodGovernment business▲ Government side held the floor▼ Opposition held the floorOpened 11:0512:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:00Last speech 18:25Time of day, Ottawa · the House sat 7 h 20 min · each dot is a stretch of debate, placed at the minute it began
35Another sitting that went nowhereThe sitting focused on extended debate over the Air Canada Public Participation Act and scattered other topics, yet no bills advanced and no votes occurred. Question period produced mostly deflected answers amid a few points of order.AI-rated Score out of 100; the verdict and the answer ratings behind it are a model’s reading. How the AI rates this

AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this

Other moments

Indigenous Affairs

NDP MP Georgina Jolibois said a legal misstep had allowed the Catholic Church to avoid paying millions of dollars to victims of residential school abuse, and asked the government to demand full payment.

Read the exchange

National Defence

NDP MP Randall Garrison asked Defence Minister Harjit S. Sajjan whether the government was reconsidering participation in the U.S. ballistic missile defence system.

Read the exchange

Foreign Affairs

NDP MP Hélène Laverdière said the government's ambassador to Saudi Arabia had listed priorities that omitted human rights and asked why the government was friendly with an authoritarian regime.

Read the exchange

Small Business

Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre asked Small Business Minister Bardish Chagger whether the government was raising the small business tax rate or abandoning the plan.

Read the exchange

The Environment

Conservative MP Todd Doherty asked Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson how many more jobs the Liberals would kill before approving projects such as Pacific Northwest LNG.

Read the exchange

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

  1. answered
    EcuadorDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Marie-Claude Bibeau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly provides an update on consular help and announces concrete support funding.I can say that we will be providing $1 million to local authorities for relief efforts in the very near future.
  2. deflected
    FinanceDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids naming any taxes and instead restates general economic investment talking points.Now is the time to grow the economy through investment.
  3. deflected
    FinanceDenis Lebel (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the transparency accusation by repeating claims of openness without addressing the specific criticism.we have been open and transparent with Canadians and will continue to do so.
  4. deflected
    TaxationMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer ignores the request to reverse credits and pivots to defending the child benefit instead.The Canada child benefit will help nine out of 10 families.
  5. deflected
    TaxationMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.The answer again evades restoring the credits and repeats the same child-benefit talking point.Our measures will help nine out of 10 families with children to have more money in their pockets.
  6. partly answered
    Canada Revenue AgencyMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the event details but does not confront the conflict-of-interest concern raised.The event was organized by the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada, a professional association.
  7. deflected
    Canada Revenue AgencyMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.The answer denies attendance by key staff but does not address reopening deals or launching an investigation.The public servants who were in charge of the KPMG file and made recommendations on it did not attend the receptions hosted by CPA Canada in 2014 and 2015.
  8. partly answered
    Foreign AffairsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Ms. Pam Goldsmith-Jones (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms human-rights dialogue but does not explain the omission of rights from the listed priorities.We do not miss an opportunity to raise this with our Saudi counterparts, nor do we miss opportunities for positive engagement.
  9. deflected
    Foreign AffairsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Ms. Pam Goldsmith-Jones (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates contract history and transparency steps instead of addressing the ambassador's priorities or regime friendliness.The release of the report on Friday was the first of many steps we will be taking to provide greater transparency on human rights assessments.
  10. deflected
    Small BusinessPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). substantive question.The response lists economic supports without clarifying whether the tax rate change was deferred, proceeding, or cancelled.small business owners want and need a robust economy to succeed.
  11. deflected
    Small BusinessPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer asserts no tax increases but avoids confirming or denying the specific rate changes described in the question.
  12. deflected
    Small BusinessAlice Wong (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The response emphasizes meetings and listening without addressing the dismissal of recommendations or broken promises.I have been working closely with small business owners and stakeholders across this nation.
  13. deflected
    Small BusinessAlice Wong (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses collaboration but sidesteps why the tax rate reduction was ignored or altered.Part of working together is listening to each other and engaging in difficult conversations.
  14. partly answered
    Small BusinessMr. Joël Godin (Conservative) asked Bardish Chagger (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states the rate reduction that occurred but ignores the carbon tax and payroll tax criticisms.In January, the tax rate went down from 11% to 10.5% for small business owners.
  15. deflected
    TaxationMr. Joël Godin (Conservative) asked Bill Morneau (Liberal). loaded question.The response highlights tax cuts and benefits without addressing the claimed $4 billion burden or cancelled credits.Nine million Canadians now have more money in their pockets as a result of this tax cut.
  16. partly answered
    Indigenous AffairsMs. Georgina Jolibois (NDP) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the issue and pledges reconciliation but attributes fault to the prior government without committing to demand payment.It seems that the previous government did create an unfortunate misjustice that has allowed it to not own up to the implications.
  17. partly answered
    Indigenous AffairsMs. Brigitte Sansoucy (NDP) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). substantive question.Answer expresses concern but shifts blame to prior government without explaining current handling.Unfortunately, we have no control over the correspondence that has allowed it to be off the hook, which was originally sent by the former administration.
  18. deflected
    Ministerial ExpensesMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.Answer praises minister and cites guidelines without addressing the specific LA trip expense.All expenses, on all of her trips, are transparent and done according to all the various ethical guidelines that are imposed on her.
  19. deflected
    Ministerial ExpensesMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.Answer repeats that rules were followed but ignores the first-class and per-diem details raised.
  20. deflected
    Ministerial ExpensesMrs. Karen Vecchio (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.Answer invokes ethical guidelines without addressing the double-billing allegation or repayment.all of the minister's travels are done according to the ethical guidelines and the guidelines with which we have to comply as members of the government.
  21. deflected
    Ministerial ExpensesMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). substantive question.Answer states expenses are public and rules followed but does not explain the side trip.the minister's expenses are public, published, and transparent.
  22. answered
    National DefenceMr. Randall Garrison (NDP) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly states no participation and no decision to change policy.Canada currently does not participate in the ballistic missile defence.
  23. answered
    National DefenceMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). substantive question.Answer explains the review process includes open discussion on the topic.By not opening up the discussion on ballistic missile defence and allowing Canadians to have a say in this, it would not be an open defence review.
  24. partly answered
    The EnvironmentMr. Todd Doherty (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.Answer notes existing port processes and upcoming review but does not address job impacts.Projects that reach a certain threshold are reviewed by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.
  25. partly answered
    The EnvironmentMr. Todd Doherty (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses the project review process and timeline but avoids the premise of using buzzwords to kill jobs.There will be a decision within the next few months, and it will be based on science and on data, not on politics.
  26. partly answered
    The EnvironmentMr. Bob Zimmer (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer confirms one project approval and states the same process applies to others but does not give a decision date.The same process will be used with Pacific Northwest and all other LNG projects to ensure that environmental impacts will be managed if in fact the projects are to proceed.
  27. deflected
    The EnvironmentMr. Bob Zimmer (Conservative) asked Mr. Jonathan Wilkinson (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to criticizing the previous government instead of addressing the delay or approval timeline.One of the reasons that this group is sitting on this side of the House and that group is sitting there is because Canadians lost faith in the ability of the previous government to manage the environment.
  28. answered
    International TradeMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Mr. David Lametti (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly explains the consultation and parliamentary review process for the TPP.We plan to study it, put it before Parliament, and therefore put it before the Canadian people.
  29. partly answered
    International TradeMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). substantive question.The answer affirms support for supply management and consultation but does not address compensation or specific promises.We have fully consulted with the stakeholders across the country.
  30. answered
    Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMr. Bob Saroya (Conservative) asked John McCallum (Liberal). substantive question.The answer provides the current cost status, housing figures, and defends the program spending.not only can I say that we are under budget, I can also say that I am extremely proud of our refugee program, which has brought 26,000 people to Canada.
  31. deflected
    Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked John McCallum (Liberal). substantive question.The answer repeats prior points and criticizes the questioner instead of explaining support shortfalls or spending details.it sounds like the hon. member did not hear my answer to the previous question.
  32. deflected
    Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipMichelle Rempel (Conservative) asked John McCallum (Liberal). loaded question.The answer restates housing statistics and pivots to a boast about demand rather than addressing hotel matching or support gaps.I am probably the only immigration minister in the world whose major problem is an inability to get refugees to Canada fast enough to satisfy the overwhelming generosity of Canadians, but I am working on it.
  33. deflected
    Indigenous AffairsMrs. Cathy McLeod (Conservative) asked Ms. Yvonne Jones (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses partnerships and recognition but provides no information on projected costs.We have every intention to continue our partnership with Métis and non-status people in the country to advance them and move them forward.
  34. partly answered
    Employment InsuranceMs. Karine Trudel (NDP) asked MaryAnn Mihychuk (Liberal). substantive question.The response highlights past actions and improvements but does not address the specific concerns about seasonal workers or the planned withdrawals from the fund.I am very pleased to say that we have provided $2.5 billion to Canadians from coast to coast to coast, including reducing the deductible, improving service, reversing the negative 2012 changes,
  35. deflected
    Foreign AffairsMr. Garnett Genuis (Conservative) asked Ms. Pam Goldsmith-Jones (Liberal). substantive question.The answer emphasizes ongoing work and a specific investment but avoids providing any timeline for a replacement office.We are continuing our important work as we move toward a comprehensive vision of human rights.
  36. partly answered
    Canada Revenue AgencyMr. Rhéal Fortin (Bloc) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). substantive question.The answer clarifies the organizer of the event but does not address whether the relationship is appropriate.Most of the CRA employees who work in accounting and auditing belong to that association.
  37. deflected
    Canada Revenue AgencyMr. Rhéal Fortin (Bloc) asked Diane Lebouthillier (Liberal). loaded question.The response accuses the asker of not understanding and reiterates the budget without addressing the cronyism allegation.if I am always repeating myself, it is because my colleague opposite does not seem to be able to understand the correct answers.
  38. deflected
    Physician-Assisted DyingMr. Luc Thériault (Bloc) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer expresses confidence in the bill's compliance but does not address eligibility under the specific criterion mentioned.I am confident we are responding in a substantive way to the Carter decision, as well as ensuring that it is in compliance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.