All sittings← 2016-02-242016-02-26 →
Thursday, February 25, 2016 · sitting No. 25
NDP motion seeks universal 360-hour employment insurance threshold
The House spent the largest share of its time on a New Democratic motion that calls on the government to create a single 360-hour qualifying threshold for employment insurance benefits across the country. Ms. Karine Trudel moved the motion and argued that successive Liberal and Conservative cuts have left too many workers without access to benefits they paid into. Liberal MP MaryAnn Mihychuk and NDP MP Peter Julian questioned the member on regional impacts and training support.
In Question Period, Conservative Leader Rona Ambrose pressed the government on broken promises over deficit limits and a national carbon tax. Finance Minister Bill Morneau's parliamentary secretary Navdeep Bains defended the government's infrastructure and middle-class tax plans while Minister of Environment and Climate Change Catherine McKenna cited support from industry and former Conservative advisers for carbon pricing.
Decided that day
- C-6, C-232, C-233, C-234, C-235, C-236, C-237, C-238, C-239 and C-240 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2016-02-25
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Committees of the House
Liberal MP Robert Oliphant presented the first report of the Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying and noted that a majority of members from both chambers had agreed on most recommendations despite the absence of full consensus.
Read the exchangeIndigenous Affairs
NDP MP Charlie Angus described a state of emergency declared by Mushkegowuk Nishnawbe Aski Nation after another youth suicide in Moose Factory and asked the government to meet First Nations leaders on health funding gaps.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
NDP MP Hélène Laverdière and Conservative MP Pierre Paul-Hus questioned why the government is spending more than $45 million to remain in the F-35 joint strike fighter program when it has said it will not buy the aircraft.
Read the exchangeEthics
Conservative MP Jacques Gourde asked whether Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould would recuse herself from aboriginal program discussions given her husband's lobbying role with the First Nations Finance Authority.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedThe EconomyRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer ignores incoherence claims and pivots to past surplus and Liberal plan.
What did it do with that surplus? It turned it into a $150-billion debt.
- deflectedThe EconomyRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.Answer avoids broken-promise and borrowing questions by restating infrastructure and benefit plans.
We have a plan and we will remain committed to that plan.
- deflectedTaxationRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.Answer sidesteps the imposed carbon tax question by citing external supporters instead of addressing provincial choice.
we were very clear when we were elected that we would take real action to tackle climate change, unlike the previous government.
- misdirectedFinanceMaxime Bernier (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer attacks the alternative scenario rather than addressing the broken deficit promise or apology request.
Imagine the alternative: the opposition parties would be making budget cuts at the worst possible time.
- deflectedFinanceMaxime Bernier (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer reframes debt concerns as justification for stimulus without explaining how added debt creates wealth.
We will stimulate the economy, create jobs, and put Canada back on the right path.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges the crisis and mentions partners but does not commit to meeting leaders or a specific plan.
Federal, provincial, and first nation partners are working strongly together to address these complex issues of mental illness and suicide
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.Answer notes nation-to-nation commitment but avoids specific funding gap closure or immediate meeting pledge.
Our government is working with our partners everywhere in Canada, including provincial and territorial governments, to provide effective, sustainable, and inclusive services to our indigenous communities.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Jean-Yves Duclos (Liberal). substantive question.Answer recognizes challenges but gives no budget commitment to equalize health services.
Our government is working closely with the provinces, territories, municipalities, and first nations to significantly and seriously improve living conditions in our indigenous communities.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). substantive question.The response discusses consensus and conversations but does not address the proposed committee.
We look forward to engaging in a meaningful conversation with Canadians that will ensure that all voices are heard.
- deflectedTaxationLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Mr. François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer promotes the government's plan without addressing the specific question on federal costs for Ontario taxes.
This government has a plan for the middle class.
- misdirectedTaxationLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Mr. François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The response attacks the previous government instead of addressing the carbon tax question.
the one thing we will never take is lessons from the previous government about deficits.
- deflectedRegional Economic DevelopmentMr. Luc Berthold (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). substantive question.The answer claims openness but avoids confirming any meeting or specific regional plan.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentEd Fast (Conservative) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The response defends the election mandate and cites a quote without addressing the carbon tax abandonment request.
in the last election, we were elected to tackle climate change.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer indicates the credit is under consideration but does not confirm continuation or expansion.
Industry groups have stressed the importance of renewing the mineral exploration tax credit, and we are considering it as the upcoming budget approaches.
- deflectedTaxationPierre Poilievre (Conservative) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.The response shifts to the innovation agenda without addressing the revenue impact of the stock option tax change.
When I talk to those businesses, they are very supportive of our innovation agenda.
- answeredJusticeMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Mr. Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly clarifies the ruling's scope regarding medical marijuana.
This ruling in no way affects the existing criminal prohibition on the possession, production, and trafficking of marijuana for non-medical purposes.
- answeredJusticeMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Mr. Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.The answer explains the government's plan to legalize and regulate rather than pursuing immediate decriminalization.
We have a very clear plan to legalize, regulate, and restrict the access to marijuana.
- deflectedJusticeK. Kellie Leitch (Conservative) asked Ms. Kamal Khera (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses medical access instead of the requested appeal or protection from recreational use.
it is vitally important that those who need marijuana for medical use as prescribed by a medical professional have access to it.
- answeredJusticeRob Nicholson (Conservative) asked Mr. Bill Blair (Liberal). substantive question.The answer outlines the regulatory plan to protect children as requested.
- deflectedPhysician-Assisted DyingMr. Colin Carrie (Conservative) asked Ms. Kamal Khera (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses the committee report without addressing protection for seniors with dementia.
We will be examining this report closely as the government crafts an appropriate legislative response to the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling
- partly answeredPhysician-Assisted DyingMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Mr. Sean Casey (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges next steps but does not confirm or deny opening access for minors.
There are still many steps to take, including the debates in this place, in committee and in the Senate.
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Erin Weir (NDP) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly explains the industrial benefits and lack of purchase commitment.
part of the program, as the member knows from the previous government, is the industrial benefits that it also brings.
- answeredNational DefenceMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains the industrial benefits and lack of purchase commitment.
Being part of this program brings industrial benefits for Canadian companies, and being part of the program does not commit Canada to buy the F-35.
- answeredEthicsMr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly confirms adherence to Ethics Commissioner advice on recusal.
the Minister of Justice will meticulously follow all of the advice she is given by the Ethics Commissioner.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Mark Strahl (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer attacks the question as smears rather than addressing the alleged conflict of interest.
what would be helpful would be if the members opposite put an end to the drive-by smears.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). loaded question.The answer defends the minister and insults the asker instead of addressing the lobbying conflict.
The member is clearly struggling with a very basic concept.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Blaine Calkins (Conservative) asked Hunter Tootoo (Liberal). loaded question.The answer changes the subject to unrelated meetings and a book reference instead of addressing the ethical screen issue.
the member opposite seems to be a fan of Phoebe Gilman's book, Something from Nothing
- partly answeredGasoline PricesMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the concern and offers to work together but does not address the specific proposal for an ombudsman.
I look forward to working with the member opposite in finding a solution to make sure consumers are not being gouged
- deflectedCanadian Coast GuardMs. Rachel Blaney (NDP) asked Hunter Tootoo (Liberal). substantive question.The answer states the plan is moving forward without waiting for the committee as requested.
We are moving forward with that plan, the equipment is working, and the committee members will do their work
- misdirectedEthicsMrs. Karen Vecchio (Conservative) asked Hunter Tootoo (Liberal). loaded question.The answer again references a book and lists meetings instead of addressing the ethical screen and ties to Irving.
there is another fan of Phoebe Gilman's book, Something from Nothing
- partly answeredNational DefenceMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses the comprehensive plan and consultation but does not specify countries or justify lack of parliamentary consent.
We were taking a reasoned approach, and that was why it was a comprehensive plan.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Pierre Paul-Hus (Conservative) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer discusses general threat monitoring without addressing the specific Libya deployment or Boko Haram concern.
our government and our security forces will always look at threats around the world, not just Libya and other places.
- partly answeredTransportMrs. Kelly Block (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Describes tabling and future consultations but does not specify how the report will be used to create jobs.
We will also be consulting stakeholders throughout the rest of this year.
- deflectedCanadian HeritageMr. Pierre Nantel (NDP) asked Mélanie Joly (Liberal). substantive question.Acknowledges issues and mentions consultations but provides no concrete actions to protect jobs.
we will also continue to consult in order to ensure—
- misdirectedTransportMr. Chris Warkentin (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Begins by calling the asker confused and shifts focus to defending the process rather than timelines for rail access.
my hon. colleague is a bit confused, so let me clarify it for him.
- partly answeredAerospace IndustryMr. Xavier Barsalou-Duval (Bloc) asked Navdeep Bains (Liberal). loaded question.Recognizes importance and notes ongoing talks but offers no justification for perceived indifference or specific plans.
We are in talks with Bombardier.
- deflectedAir CanadaMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Praises the deal and future benefits without addressing enforcement of the existing law on fleet maintenance.
- misdirectedPoints of OrderMr. Luc Thériault (Bloc) asked Wayne Easter (Liberal). rhetorical question.The response ignores the motion entirely and raises an unrelated fiscal point.
the "Fiscal Monitor" is a snapshot in time, and does not give the fiscal situation—
- answeredBusiness of the HouseMr. Andrew Scheer (Conservative) asked Dominic LeBlanc (Liberal). substantive question.Directly lists the planned business for the coming days and week.
this afternoon we will continue with debate on the opposition motion that we began this morning.