All sittings← 2016-01-252016-01-27 →
Tuesday, January 26, 2016 · sitting No. 9
Commons resumes throne speech debate as opposition presses on pipelines and Isis
The House spent most of the day on the resumed debate on the address in reply to the Speech from the Throne. Conservative MP Dan Albas told the House the largest single void in the speech was the absence of any mention of the need to prioritize a new Canada-United States softwood lumber agreement. Liberal MP Kim Rudd replied that the Minister of Natural Resources is consulting stakeholders coast to coast on modernization of the National Energy Board.
Question period opened with Conservative Leader Rona Ambrose pressing the government on the Toronto Island airport runway expansion to support Bombardier sales. Minister of Transport Marc Garneau said the government would not reopen the tripartite agreement. Later exchanges focused on National Defence Minister Harjit S. Sajjan's assessment of the mission against Islamic State and on the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ruling on first nations child welfare.
Decided that day
- Bill S-201 advanced through second reading
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2016-01-26
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
National Defence
Conservative MP James Bezan asked why the government alone wants to stop bombing Islamic State when allies want Canadian CF-18s to remain. Minister Sajjan said a thorough assessment is required to ensure the right capability is in place.
Read the exchangeNatural Resources
Conservative MP Gérard Deltell asked whether the government would stand up for Quebec's economy by supporting the Energy East pipeline that would supply the province's refineries. Minister Jim Carr said major projects must carry the confidence of Canadians.
Read the exchangeIndigenous Affairs
NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair asked the Prime Minister to instruct government lawyers not to appeal the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal decision on systemic discrimination against first nations children. Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould said the government would review the 180-page ruling but saw no reason for judicial review.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair pressed the government to redo environmental assessments for Kinder Morgan and Energy East as promised in the campaign. Minister Catherine McKenna said the government would rebuild trust in the process through consultations and science.
Read the exchangeForeign Affairs
Conservative MP Tony Clement asked why the Prime Minister is easing sanctions on Russia when Russia's foreign minister wants Canada to reduce support for Ukraine. Minister Stéphane Dion said Canada does not accept Russian interference in Ukraine and will find the most effective way to convey that message.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- answeredAir TransportationRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly explains the election commitment preventing reopening the tripartite agreement.
we took an undertaking during the last election to the people of Toronto, who care about the development of their waterfront, that we would not reopen the tripartite agreement.
- deflectedNational DefenceRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). loaded question.The answer affirms the threat is real but shifts focus to security services without addressing agreement with the minister.
the threat of ISIL is real. However, as leaders of the nation, we need to give confidence to our Canadians that our institution, our security services, will protect them.
- answeredNational DefenceRona Ambrose (Conservative) asked Stéphane Dion (Liberal). loaded question.The answer directly addresses the action on fighting IS by outlining the coalition support plan.
with the plan we are preparing, Canada will be stronger to support our coalition to fight this terrorist group, the so-called Islamic State.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses defending economic interests across regions but does not commit specifically to the Quebec pipeline project.
we will defend the economic interests of all Canadians, whether they live in Alberta, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, Quebec, or Newfoundland.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Gérard Deltell (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses general importance of resources and projects but avoids committing to the specific Quebec project.
we are aware of how important the natural resource sector is in Canada to creating jobs.
- answeredIndigenous AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the tribunal decision by committing to review and renovate the child welfare system.
we will take careful reading of it, but understand and recognize, there will likely not be any reason why we would seek judicial review of this decision.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses rebuilding trust in assessments but does not confirm redoing all existing pipeline assessments.
We are committed to rebuilding the trust of Canadians in the environmental assessment process, trust that was lost under the previous Conservative government.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). substantive question.The answer restates the commitment to rebuild trust without confirming whether assessments will be redone from scratch.
one of the commitments we made as a government is to rebuild the trust of Canadians in the environmental assessment process.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked MaryAnn Mihychuk (Liberal). substantive question.Mentions review of EI but avoids specific pledge on eligibility threshold.
we are in an active review of employment insurance standards, and will maintain and honour our commitments during the elections.
- answeredForeign AffairsMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked Stéphane Dion (Liberal). substantive question.Directly outlines plan to fight ISIS more effectively with coalition.
We will fight very strongly against the so-called Islamic State with determination for the reasons he just mentioned.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMr. James Bezan (Conservative) asked Harjit S. Sajjan (Liberal). loaded question.Attacks prior Conservative assessment instead of addressing why stop bombing ISIS.
As a result of the Conservatives' not having a good assessment of the situation, we can see why we are actually in this mess.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsTony Clement (Conservative) asked Stéphane Dion (Liberal). loaded question.Affirms support for Ukraine but sidesteps the Putin meeting and normalization query.
Canada will always be there for Ukraine.
- answeredForeign AffairsTony Clement (Conservative) asked Stéphane Dion (Liberal). substantive question.Explicitly states Canada will lift UN sanctions while retaining other measures.
Canada will therefore lift these sanctions, but will continue to mistrust a regime that must not obtain nuclear weapons
- deflectedForeign AffairsPeter Kent (Conservative) asked Stéphane Dion (Liberal). substantive question.Criticizes prior policy without confirming whether normalization plans will be abandoned.
It is good for nobody. We will change this policy.
- deflectedForeign AffairsPeter Kent (Conservative) asked Stéphane Dion (Liberal). loaded question.Avoids condemning incitement and pivots to accusing opposition of partisanship.
What will not happen any more is the attempt by the opposition, the Conservative Party, to make it a partisan issue in Canada.
- partly answeredIndigenous AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked Jody Wilson-Raybould (Liberal). substantive question.States review is underway but gives no yes/no on filing for judicial review.
We are undertaking to do our due diligence and review that decision, but I cannot anticipate anything within that decision that would cause me to file for judicial review.
- deflectedIndigenous AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Carolyn Bennett (Liberal). substantive question.The answer expresses general commitment without outlining any specific plan to address systemic negligence.
All members of this government will work tirelessly to make sure to right the wrongs of the past and make sure that every indigenous child in this country has an equal start in life.
- partly answeredFinanceLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Mr. François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer addresses household debt measures but ignores the core question on government spending and debt.
The government wants to ensure that household finances remain strong and that household debt is manageable.
- deflectedFinanceLisa Raitt (Conservative) asked Mr. François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer discusses consultations already held instead of confirming whether finance committee pre-budget consultations will occur.
I am very happy to report that, with the Minister of Finance , we went from coast to coast and met with thousands of Canadians.
- misdirectedFinanceMr. Phil McColeman (Conservative) asked Mr. François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer pivots to inherited debt and general principles rather than confirming plans to target small businesses.
I remind my hon. colleague opposite that we inherited a debt of more than 150 billion Canadian dollars from the Conservative government.
- misdirectedFinanceMr. Phil McColeman (Conservative) asked Mr. François-Philippe Champagne (Liberal). substantive question.The answer shifts to listing new benefits and past debt instead of identifying who is next targeted for spending cuts.
The hon. colleague said there was a surplus. Actually Canadians know about the $150 billion debt that he left us.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the report and promises monitoring but provides no timeline or concrete fixes for the flaws.
I am assured by the chair that there will be instant action.
- answeredNatural ResourcesMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states a new process and transition period will be announced in days for the projects mentioned.
I can now say that it will be in a number of days.
- answeredNatural ResourcesCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.The answer directly states the government will not support the NAFTA challenge as it is the proponent's business.
We have also said that the decision to appeal it through a NAFTA panel is the business of the proponent and not of the Government of Canada.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesCandice Bergen (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). loaded question.Answer pivots to criticizing prior government and promoting own process instead of addressing confidence in minister or pipeline challenge.
Rather than playing politics with pipelines, rather than trying to pit one region of the country against another, we will unite Canadians who will understand that the process as we are now in transition will be a much better process than was followed by that government.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). substantive question.Answer acknowledges job losses and commodity prices but shifts to defending regulatory process without directly addressing Energy East or confidence issues.
we have indicated that we understand the human consequence to job loss.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMrs. Shannon Stubbs (Conservative) asked Kent Hehr (Liberal). rhetorical question.Answer avoids any commitment on supporting Alberta energy workers and instead invites the asker to Calgary to hear positive views.
I suspect the member should come down to Calgary and talk to the people to whom I am talking.
- answeredCanada PostMs. Karine Trudel (NDP) asked Judy Foote (Liberal). substantive question.Answer directly confirms an independent review and coast-to-coast consultations on Canada Post.
We are going to ensure that Canadians are consulted, from coast to coast to coast.
- partly answeredRail TransportationMs. Linda Duncan (NDP) asked Marc Garneau (Liberal). substantive question.Answer addresses rail safety concerns and recent CP action but does not commit to public release of risk reports.
Recently we took action against CP with respect to the issue of railway personnel fatigue.
- deflectedThe SenateMr. Blake Richards (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). loaded question.Answer describes the new advisory board but ignores the secrecy critique and questions about accountability.
The advisory board is led by the distinguished Order of Canada recipient Huguette Labelle.
- deflectedThe SenateMr. Scott Reid (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). loaded question.Answer reiterates non-partisan goals without addressing poll data or secrecy layers in the appointment process.
Canadians mandated us to bring real change to the Senate, and we are doing that without opening up the Constitution.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Scott Reid (Conservative) asked Maryam Monsef (Liberal). loaded question.Answer sidesteps the referendum precedent and secrecy issue by emphasizing complexity of reform and engagement.
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsMr. Chris Warkentin (Conservative) asked Lawrence MacAulay (Liberal). loaded question.The answer avoids addressing the alleged conflict of interest and instead highlights qualifications and compliance.
my chief of staff is extremely qualified for the job.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Hunter Tootoo (Liberal). substantive question.The answer opens with an unrelated birthday tribute and offers only general reassurance without committing to action on moving the vessel.
I would like to take this opportunity to wish all of the dedicated women and men of the Canadian Coast Guard a happy birthday.
- deflectedAutomotive IndustryMr. Colin Carrie (Conservative) asked Mr. Greg Fergus (Liberal). loaded question.The answer acknowledges the sector's importance but sidesteps the specific policy criticisms and timeline request.
the government recognizes that the automotive sector is a very important sector in Canada, employing almost half a million people.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesMs. Monique Pauzé (Bloc) asked Catherine McKenna (Liberal). loaded question.The answer addresses the commissioner's report and NEB response but does not engage the demand to scrap the project.
The National Energy Board told us that it accepts the report's conclusions and is working on implementing solutions.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Luc Thériault (Bloc) asked Jim Carr (Liberal). loaded question.The answer pivots to a general statement on consultation and avoiding division rather than responding to the Quebec opposition claim.
it would be interesting to compare the positions of the three parties opposite to what we are advocating, which is to consult Canadians about a process