Parliament AIIndependent · non-official

All sittings← 2015-06-052015-06-09 →

Monday, June 8, 2015 · sitting No. 226

Commons debates NDP motion to ringfence employment insurance premiums

The House spent the largest share of its sitting on a supply-day motion moved by New Democratic Party MP Robert Aubin that would require employment insurance premiums to finance only benefits for unemployed workers. The motion calls on the government to shield premiums from political interference, improve accessibility and abandon its plan to set rates unilaterally. Debate on the motion remained ongoing at adjournment.

Question period featured repeated exchanges on Senate expenses. New Democratic Party Leader Thomas Mulcair asked whether Prime Minister Stephen Harper knew of Senator Leo Housakos's spending before naming him Speaker and whether the Prime Minister's Office had contacted the senator about the Auditor General's report. Conservative MP Paul Calandra replied that the Senate itself had invited the review and awaited its findings.

Decided that day

  • Bill C-67 passed third reading
  • Bill C-66 passed third reading
  • Supplementary Estimates (A) concurred in
  • Main Estimates 2015-16 approved except one vote
  • Senate Vote 1 approved

From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard

No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.

Who held the floor · 2015-06-08

Government (Conservative)OppositionOver the day: government 37%, opposition 63% of the words spokenPrivate membersGovernment businessGovernment business▲ Government side held the floor▼ Opposition held the floorOpened 11:0513:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:00Last speech 23:00Time of day, Ottawa · the House sat 11 h 55 min · each dot is a stretch of debate, placed at the minute it began
66Estimates pass, opposition bids sinkThe House devoted most of its time to supply and estimates, approving several appropriation bills and advancing government legislation through multiple stages. A handful of opposition motions failed while Question Period produced mostly deflected answers.AI-rated Score out of 100; the verdict and the answer ratings behind it are a model’s reading. How the AI rates this

AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this

Other moments

The Environment

New Democratic Party Leader Thomas Mulcair said Canada had watered down the G7 communiqué on climate change and asked when the government would produce a credible plan. Conservative MP Colin Carrie said the G7 statement was strong and accused the opposition of seeking a job-killing carbon tax.

Read the exchange

Infrastructure

Liberal MP David McGuinty noted the finance minister's call at home to cut infrastructure spending while the Prime Minister signed a G7 statement urging more investment. Conservative MP Denis Lebel said the new building Canada plan is the largest in history and rejected the premise of the question.

Read the exchange

National Defence

New Democratic Party MP Élaine Michaud said the government planned to lower recruitment targets for women after the Deschamps report on sexual harassment. Conservative MP Erin O'Toole said Canada remains a leader in placing women in leadership roles in the forces.

Read the exchange

Aboriginal Affairs

New Democratic Party MP Jonathan Genest-Jourdain said Aboriginal Affairs had retaliated against Cindy Blackstock for her human-rights complaint. Conservative MP Mark Strahl said the government had increased child and family services funding by 40 per cent since 2006 and was reviewing the tribunal decision.

Read the exchange

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

  1. deflected
    EthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids addressing the Prime Minister's prior knowledge by redirecting to the Senate's Auditor General review.Senator Housakos has already answered that question.
  2. deflected
    EthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer sidesteps any contact between the PMO and Housakos by repeating the Senate's invitation to the Auditor General.as you know, it was the Senate that invited the Auditor General in to examine all of their expenses.
  3. deflected
    EthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores questions on the PMO's current role and instead repeats the Senate Auditor General reference.it was the Senate that invited the Auditor General in to examine all of their expenses.
  4. partly answered
    The EnvironmentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses the G7 statement but then shifts to attacking opposition tax policies rather than fully engaging the climate plan critique.the G7 released a strong, unanimous statement on climate change.
  5. partly answered
    The EnvironmentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the government's record on emissions but pivots to criticizing opposition tax plans instead of outlining a full climate strategy.our government's record is clear.
  6. deflected
    InfrastructureMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids reconciling domestic budget cuts with the G7 communiqué by touting the overall infrastructure plan and attacking NDP taxes.the new infrastructure plan, which is currently in progress and began on April 1, is the largest infrastructure plan in the history of Canada.
  7. misdirected
    InfrastructureMr. Adam Vaughan (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the premise and the asker's past record instead of addressing the timing or amount of transit funding.I totally disagree with the premise of my colleague's question, and he knows it.
  8. deflected
    InfrastructureMr. Adam Vaughan (Liberal) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). substantive question.The answer disputes the facts about funding restrictions and pivots to praising the overall program size without clarifying timelines or eligibility.the member opposite is twisting Dickens and twisting the facts.
  9. deflected
    InfrastructureMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.Answer promotes Conservative plan and attacks NDP carbon tax instead of addressing adoption of NDP proposal.We are delivering the largest infrastructure plan in Canada's history while we continue to cut people's taxes.
  10. partly answered
    InfrastructureMr. Hoang Mai (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims they work with municipalities more than NDP but pivots to criticizing NDP centralization without addressing the bill to future generations.we work with the municipalities more than the NDP does.
  11. partly answered
    InfrastructureMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). loaded question.Answer begins addressing round tables and work with FCM but is cut off and does not fully engage the question about working with mayors or NDP.while we were building the new building Canada plan, we held 13 round tables across the country.
  12. deflected
    InfrastructureMr. Matthew Kellway (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.Answer rejects NDP centralization claim and restates transfer of funds to provinces without addressing the practical transit plan.The NDP wants to manage on behalf of the municipalities and provinces.
  13. misdirected
    EthicsMs. Ève Péclet (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer ignores PMO advice question and attacks NDP on unrelated $2.7 million expense issue.Of course the NDP's mistake was not deliberate.
  14. misdirected
    EthicsMs. Ève Péclet (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer ignores Senate appeal process question and attacks the member on NDP owing $2.7 million.the member who talks about ethics in the Senate owes the Canadian taxpayers $27,111
  15. misdirected
    EthicsMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.Answer dismisses the appointment question and pivots to attacking NDP on $2.7 million scheme.the question that has not been answered is why 68 members of the NDP caucus participated in a scheme
  16. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer ignores Senate reform question and attacks NDP respect for Constitution and taxpayers over $2.7 million.the NDP has absolutely no respect for the Canadian Constitution and it actually has no respect for the Canadian taxpayer.
  17. deflected
    EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP's record instead of addressing Senate oversight or Board of Internal Economy reforms.that is a New Democratic Party that owes three times as much as the Auditor General has apparently identified in the Senate, $2.7 million.
  18. deflected
    International TradeMs. Chrystia Freeland (Liberal) asked Ed Fast (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights past trade deals and adjusted export stats but avoids stating when CETA will be completed.Our government has concluded free trade agreements with 38 different countries, with many more to come.
  19. deflected
    The EnvironmentMr. Francis Scarpaleggia (Liberal) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to criticizing Liberal and NDP tax policies rather than explaining Canada's G7 climate stance or past commitments.What do the Liberals and New Democrats want to do? They want to want to increase taxes for middle-class families, put Canada back into the red and implement a job-killing carbon tax.
  20. partly answered
    The EnvironmentJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists specific regulatory actions on methane and fertilizers but opens with an attack on the Liberals.We are reducing emissions, while growing the economy and creating well-paying jobs.
  21. deflected
    National DefenceMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Erin O'Toole (Conservative). loaded question.The answer praises existing female leadership but does not address any change in recruitment targets for women.Canada, in fact, is one of the leaders in ensuring that we have women in leadership positions throughout the Canadian Armed Forces.
  22. deflected
    National DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Erin O'Toole (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms commitment to the Deschamps report but sidesteps the claim that recruitment targets for women are being lowered.the Canadian Armed Forces has committed to implementing all of Madame Deschamps' recommendations.
  23. deflected
    National DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Erin O'Toole (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses service pins and historical recognitions instead of addressing budget cuts to ID or record services.No government in the history of this country has recognized the service and sacrifice of men and women in uniform and our veterans more than this government
  24. answered
    National DefenceMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Erin O'Toole (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly confirms the project is budgeted and underway with the community.the Canadian Armed Forces and the Department of National Defence have committed to this decontamination project adjacent to Valcartier and are working with the community of Shannon and the surrounding municipality to ensure that this project is done properly.
  25. deflected
    Aboriginal AffairsMr. Jonathan Genest-Jourdain (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Strahl (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores retaliation accusation and pivots to funding and review without addressing reconciliation.We are reviewing the tribunal decision to determine the next steps.
  26. deflected
    Aboriginal AffairsMrs. Carol Hughes (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Strahl (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats general commitments and funding without addressing the promotion or discrimination claim.We are reviewing the tribunal decision to determine the next steps.
  27. deflected
    Aboriginal AffairsMrs. Carol Hughes (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.Answer discusses general reconciliation efforts but avoids yes/no on seeking papal apology.The Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development has written to the provinces, the territories, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Vatican to bring to their attention the report and its recommendations.
  28. deflected
    Aboriginal AffairsMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.Answer thanks commission and notes letters sent but does not address whether PM will push Pope for apology.The Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development has written to the provinces, the territories, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Vatican to bring to their attention the report and its recommendations.
  29. partly answered
    Foreign AffairsMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer confirms raising issue with Saudi government but does not confirm direct PM intervention with the king.Canadian representatives have raised this issue with the Saudi government.
  30. deflected
    National DefenceMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Erin O'Toole (Conservative). loaded question.Answer affirms commitment to recommendations but ignores the claim of lowered recruitment targets.the Canadian Armed Forces has committed to implementing all of Madame Deschamps' recommendations and learnings from her study of this serious issue.
  31. partly answered
    Foreign AffairsMr. Pierre-Luc Dusseault (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states concern and that matter was raised but does not confirm sending a clear new message or showing leadership for release.Canadian officials have raised this matter with the Saudi government.
  32. partly answered
    Foreign AffairsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer notes ongoing calls for clemency but does not address increasing high-level diplomatic pressure.We continue to call for clemency in this case, and that will continue until clemency is granted.
  33. deflected
    Aboriginal AffairsCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked Mr. Mark Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses funding increases and general commitments instead of addressing the requested apology or sanctions.our government remains committed to the health, safety, and well-being of first nations children.
  34. deflected
    Public Works and Government ServicesMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes benefits of the system but avoids addressing the delay or accepting responsibility.we are committed to being more efficient with the email system, consolidating 63 separate systems into one.
  35. answered
    Natural ResourcesMr. André Bellavance (Independent) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains the government's policy of not intervening before an independent review.Our government relies on the independent National Energy Board for decisions related to proposals for energy infrastructure, including TransCanada's energy east proposal.
  36. misdirected
    The EnvironmentMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks opposition parties on taxes instead of addressing the G7 climate stance or ecoAUTO request.The Liberals and the NDP want to increase taxes for middle-class families, put Canada back into the red and implement a job-killing carbon tax.
  37. deflected
    InfrastructureMr. Jean-François Fortin (Forces et Démocratie) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites proposal numbers and program history but does not address whether the deadlines are unrealistic.over 300 proposals have been submitted to Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions since we launched the program.
  38. misdirected
    The EnvironmentMr. Jean-François Fortin (Forces et Démocratie) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats the G7 statement and pivots to attacks on opposition tax policies rather than climate action.