All sittings← 2015-05-252015-05-27 →
Tuesday, May 26, 2015 · sitting No. 217
Liberals move motion to end muzzling of federal scientists in supply debate
Liberal MP Ted Hsu moved a supply motion calling on the government to rescind rules that muzzle federal scientists and to create a chief science officer position. The motion states that research paid for by taxpayers must serve the public interest in protecting the environment and the health and safety of Canadians. Debate on the motion occupied 49 per cent of the sitting.
In Question Period, NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair pressed the government on the destruction of government archives and the alteration of an audit report on Senator Mike Duffy. Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney said the RCMP respects the will of Parliament and defended the budget implementation act. Conservative MP Paul Calandra said the NDP owes more than $2 million to taxpayers and should repay it.
Decided that day
- Opposition motion on government constraints failed
- Bill C-591 sent to second chamber
- Bill C-681 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2015-05-26
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Taxation
Liberal MP Scott Brison said the Parliamentary Budget Officer confirmed that TFSAs will cost future generations tens of billions of dollars each year, with a third of that borne by provinces. Finance Minister Joe Oliver said 11 million Canadians have TFSAs and most are middle- and lower-income earners.
Read the exchangeChamplain Bridge
NDP MP Hoang Mai said two-thirds of the Champlain Bridge beams are in extremely poor condition according to a Federal Bridge Corporation Limited report. Infrastructure Minister Denis Lebel said the government has given the bridge corporation all money needed for work and accused the NDP of voting against funding.
Read the exchangeCanada Post
NDP MP Irene Mathyssen said Canadians are angry over service cuts and a 94-year-old constituent needed a doctor's note to keep home delivery. Minister of State Jeff Watson said Canada Post delivered 1.4 billion fewer letters than in 2006 and must balance its books without burdening taxpayers.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
Liberal MP Joyce Murray said the Deschamps report found a hostile sexualized climate in the military and Major General Whitecross admitted little consensus on its seriousness. Defence Minister Jason Kenney said the Chief of the Defence Staff appointed Ms. Deschamps and put Major-General Whitecross in charge of a zero-tolerance strategy.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedPublic SafetyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer ignores the order question and pivots to registry praise plus an attack on NDP.
When will the NDP support our measures?
- deflectedPublic SafetyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). loaded question.Answer avoids who gave the order and instead accuses NDP of harassing citizens.
what is behind this question is that the member and his party want to harass the law-abiding citizens of our country.
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer sidesteps the audit release demand by demanding a free vote on firearms legislation.
he should let members have a free vote on the common sense firearms licensing act
- misdirectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer refuses to release the document and instead attacks the NDP over its own expenses.
the sad spectacle of having the Leader of the Opposition in court this summer trying to defend the over $2 million that they owe the taxpayers.
- misdirectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores the obstruction claim and pivots to accusing NDP members of owing taxpayers money.
it is the opposition, the NDP, that has 68 members who owe over $2 million
- deflectedSeniorsDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.Answer defends TFSA benefits but never addresses the OAS/GIS age raise or its impact on vulnerable seniors.
60% of the people who max out their tax-free savings accounts earn less than $60,000 a year.
- deflectedTaxationScott Brison (Liberal) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats TFSA praise and statistics without addressing the PBO cost projection or future-generation burden.
The TFSA is a wonderful way for Canadians to save for their first home, for their education and for their retirement.
- deflectedTaxationScott Brison (Liberal) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). loaded question.Answer defends TFSA and attacks Liberals instead of addressing the alleged GIS loophole for wealthy seniors.
I wonder what the member opposite will tell them.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Ève Péclet (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the question about PMO intervention and instead attacks the NDP on unrelated expenses.
That is why it is important that the NDP pay back the millions of dollars it owes taxpayers; do it now and avoid the sad spectacle of court.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids naming PMO staff and pivots to attacking the NDP on expenses.
However, it is no different for members of Parliament.
- partly answeredAccess to InformationMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the volume of requests but ignores the use of summer students and systemic issues.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyMr. Randall Garrison (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to funding and attacks the NDP instead of addressing the oversight mandate.
When will the NDP get serious about terrorism, put its money where its mouth is, and support our budget?
- deflectedPublic SafetyMs. Rosane Doré Lefebvre (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates the existing mandate without addressing the call to expand it for information sharing.
Bill C-51 has the committee report to Parliament.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMs. Rosane Doré Lefebvre (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites poll support and other agencies but does not address the oversight limitation raised.
The public understands, since a recent poll indicates that more than 71% of Canadians support our anti-terrorism measures.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Mr. Parm Gill (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms support for supply management in general but does not confirm a meeting or renewed commitment.
our government will continue to promote Canadian trade interests across all sectors of our economy, including supply management.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Mr. Parm Gill (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes ongoing engagement but does not provide a specific plan to resume bilateral talks with Japan.
Canada continues to engage with our Japanese partners to advance our trade interests both through bilateral talks and at the TPP.
- misdirectedInternational TradeMr. Don Davies (NDP) asked Mr. Parm Gill (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP's trade record instead of addressing stalled Japan negotiations.
The fact is that the NDP is ideologically opposed to any and all trade.
- misdirectedScience and TechnologyMr. Ted Hsu (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer mocks the questioner for supporting the union rather than addressing the scientific integrity request.
I appreciate that the hon. member is shilling for the union bargaining unit with its latest demands from the taxpayers.
- partly answeredNational DefenceMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the minister's committee attendance and military actions taken but not the specific delay in apology or lack of consensus.
I appeared before committee for two hours just a couple of weeks ago.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates general policy on zero tolerance without addressing implementation of all Deschamps recommendations.
He put Major-General Whitecross in charge of implementing the 10 recommendations set out in the report.
- deflectedNational DefenceMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats government actions taken but avoids committing to leadership on changing the culture or addressing lack of consensus.
It was under this government that the Chief of Defence Staff appointed a general to manage the response of the Canadian Armed Forces
- partly answeredNational DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the minister's absence and prior appearances but does not address showing leadership on the systemic problem.
I appeared at the committee for two hours the last time that it met.
- answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Mike Sullivan (NDP) asked Mr. Costas Menegakis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains the process and timeline for the family to respond to concerns raised.
Mrs. Talosig has 60 days to respond and address the concerns raised by these officials.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Costas Menegakis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights past generosity but does not address the request for a three-month deferral of deportations.
We extended this generosity to the Haitian community for over a decade, allowing them to stay in Canada because of the unsafe conditions in their country.
- deflectedChamplain BridgeMr. Hoang Mai (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP voting record instead of addressing transparency on reports.
We had a vote in 2009; the NDP voted against.
- deflectedChamplain BridgeThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer accuses the asker of scaring the public and pivots to praise for the agency rather than addressing mismanagement.
scaring the public with inaccurate information is this party's modus operandi.
- deflectedCanada PostMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to defending Canada Post's finances and attacking the NDP plan instead of addressing service cuts and consultation.
The NDP's plan for Canada Post would cost taxpayers a half a billion dollars a year
- deflectedCanada PostMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer dismisses the question by correcting profit figures and telling the member to let the agency proceed.
The member can tell that to the retirees.
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationHedy Fry (Liberal) asked Mr. Costas Menegakis (Conservative). loaded question.The question builds on a false premise of a discriminatory policy; the answer attacks the asker for playing politics on an undecided case.
it is shameful that the Liberal member opposite chooses to play politics with immigration cases.
- deflectedInfrastructureMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). loaded question.The question assumes a partisan stunt; the answer explains the timeline for 2017 projects without addressing the partisan claim.
If we want to have a project done before that date, we have to start the process and that is what we are doing now.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Raymond Côté (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the independent status of the port but does not clarify the assessment process difference.
the Port of Quebec, as the member will know, is an independent, arm's-length organization that is responsible for its operational decisions.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights increased officers and arrests instead of addressing tool shortages or closed crossings.
I would like to reassure her that we have increased the number of front-line Canada Border Services Agency officers by 26%.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer evades the direct query about who ordered document destruction by criticizing the asker and shifting to unrelated policy attacks.
from a member who had occupied an important cabinet position, I would expect more trust and respect for the excellent work of the RCMP and its professionalism.
- deflectedInfrastructureMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The response avoids addressing any agreement with Quebec by repeatedly insisting the program is purely federal.
We do not need to call the provinces.
- partly answeredOfficial LanguagesMr. Jean-François Fortin (Forces et Démocratie) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). substantive question.The answer clarifies existing NEB obligations but sidesteps the request to change the law regarding applicant documents.
Questions related to documents filed by an applicant should be directed to the project proponent.
- deflectedThe MinistryMr. Brent Rathgeber (Independent) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The response ignores the bill and cabinet size entirely, pivoting instead to unrelated fiscal achievements.
That is why we have delivered, thanks to the leadership of our Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance , a balanced budget this year.