Commons advances prostitution bill to third reading amid heated debate

Other moments

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

1. deflected
   HealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids the consent question by reiterating the donation to WHO without addressing the company or delay.It is up to the World Health Organization to deploy these vaccines as efficiently, ethically, and quickly as possible.
2. deflected
   HealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). substantive question.The answer sidesteps the NewLink deal and delay by again blaming WHO logistics.It is up to it to manage the logistics and to dispense them as quickly and as efficiently as possible.
3. answered
   HealthMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly lists Canada's aid actions in response to the call for more help.Canada has been at the forefront of responding to the Ebola crisis.
4. misdirected
   National DefenceMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP instead of providing the requested 30-day account.What is the problem with the NDP?
5. deflected
   National DefenceMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats general statements about ISIL without giving a specific mission account.We have been forthright. We have told New Democrats this and we have indicated that we are putting people on the ground to provide advice to the Iraqis.
6. deflected
   National DefenceMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer refers debate limits to House leaders without addressing whether five hours suffices.I understand that these issues are being discussed among House leaders
7. deflected
   National DefenceMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer contrasts past Liberal practice but does not address the five-hour limit.I appreciate the changes this government has brought in so that any type of military mission will be subject to a discussion and a vote in Parliament.
8. misdirected
   National DefenceMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks Liberal positions instead of engaging the proposed alternatives or debate quality.I think most people are just trying to figure out where the Liberal Party stands on all these issues.
9. deflected
   Foreign AffairsMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer pivots to past 30-day operation and PM advice instead of addressing ongoing humanitarian aid needs.Again, it is coming to a conclusion, and we were very helpful in providing that advice because we want to assist the people of that area.
10. answered
    Foreign AffairsMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly lists Canada's donor status and specific aid items being delivered now.Our contribution will allow for those most desperately in need to receive food, hygiene kits, cooking materials, blankets, tents, medical supplies, and other essential supplies
11. deflected
    Foreign AffairsMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.Answer denies the premise and lists general partners without confirming action on the four specific asks.this is not true. The member is not correct in saying that.
12. partly answered
    Veterans AffairsMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Mr. Parm Gill (Conservative). substantive question.Answer acknowledges the report and notes funding increases but offers no timeline or new commitments for the charter review.Our government agrees with the vast majority of the recommendations, both in spirit and intent.
13. deflected
    Veterans AffairsMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Mr. Parm Gill (Conservative). substantive question.Answer cites a supportive quote instead of addressing the timeline for action on the veterans charter.It is a step in the right direction.... Veterans...need the changes [the minister] is bringing in
14. misdirected
    Veterans AffairsMr. Sylvain Chicoine (NDP) asked Mr. Parm Gill (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks the member for playing political games rather than addressing funding or timelines for recommendations.I would encourage the member opposite to stop playing political games when it comes to Canada's veterans
15. answered
    HealthMs. Alexandrine Latendresse (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). loaded question.Answer explains Canada's doses and WHO role, directly countering the claim of dragging feet.It is up to the World Health Organization to decide how it thinks it can best use these doses.
16. partly answered
    HealthMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). substantive question.Answer lists existing contributions but does not address the specific new requests for health workers and testing centres.We have contributed $35 million in equipment, direct food and expertise.
17. deflected
    HealthMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the job is posted but provides no information on the delay or posting level.The job has been posted and as soon as I have an update for the House, members will be hearing about it.
18. misdirected
    National DefenceRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to criticizing Liberals on the human cost instead of addressing budget exposure or appropriations.I would like the Liberals to concentrate on the human cost of what is taking place in that part of the world.
19. deflected
    National DefenceRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates ally support and urges Liberals to join without addressing the Turkey-Kurds conundrum or side clarity.It would be nice if the Liberals could unequivocally come on side with that.
20. partly answered
    National DefenceRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer rejects the analysis and describes the current mission but does not weigh alternatives or explain the choice of air strikes.The mission that we are a part of right now is to provide strategic and tactical advice to the Iraqis at this particular time.
21. deflected
    Citizenship and ImmigrationMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Chris Alexander (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the premise that refugees lack health care and defends the appeal without addressing withdrawal.the hon. member should be ashamed of suggesting that a single refugee in Canada is not benefiting from generous health care programs, because that is the truth.
22. deflected
    Citizenship and ImmigrationMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Chris Alexander (Conservative). loaded question.The answer accuses the member of misleading and restates the appeal without addressing the specific impacts on pregnant women or children.once again, the hon. member is misleading the House.
23. misdirected
    Citizenship and ImmigrationMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Chris Alexander (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to attacking NDP on ISIL and passports instead of addressing the court ruling or appeal withdrawal.Why does the NDP refuse to consider the revocation of passports and the revocation of citizenship for those who take up arms against refugees
24. misdirected
    Citizenship and ImmigrationMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Chris Alexander (Conservative). loaded question.The answer refuses further comment on the court matter and shifts to ISIL and NDP refusal instead of addressing child hospitalizations or withdrawing the appeal.Why does the NDP refuse to do anything to help millions of people in Iraq
25. partly answered
    Rail TransportationMrs. Anne-Marie Day (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer rejects the president's view and lists past actions but does not address whether further improvements are planned.Mr. Harrison's comments that the government somehow overreacted are disappointing.
26. answered
    Rail TransportationMr. Claude Gravelle (NDP) asked Mr. Jeff Watson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the TSB conclusion and commits to implementing every recommendation.it will implement every recommendation made by the Transportation Safety Board.
27. deflected
    SeniorsMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Mr. Scott Armstrong (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists past Conservative measures but ignores the call to support the NDP seniors strategy.no government in the history of this country has done more for seniors in Canada than the Conservative Party of Canada.
28. deflected
    HousingMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Mr. Scott Armstrong (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes Housing First but does not address the withdrawal from social housing or rising rents.in terms of housing, we have initiated a new program: housing first.
29. partly answered
    InfrastructureMs. Chrystia Freeland (Liberal) asked Mr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites existing infrastructure spending but does not address the IMF advice on new investments given low interest rates.The new building Canada plan, with an envelope of $53 billion over 10 years, is operational.
30. partly answered
    HealthMs. Kirsty Duncan (Liberal) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). substantive question.The answer mentions examining options for protective gear but focuses on past funding rather than fulfilling the September pledge.we are examining our options to get the protective gear there as efficiently as possible.
31. misdirected
    Fisheries and OceansMr. Philip Toone (NDP) asked Mr. Randy Kamp (Conservative). substantive question.The answer assumes local groups are taking over but does not address government responsibility for repairs to the historic lighthouse.I assume that is what is happening in this situation.
32. misdirected
    Fisheries and OceansMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Mr. Randy Kamp (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists prior actions and criticizes the member's vote instead of committing to pass the bill.I do wish the member had voted for both of those initiatives.
33. deflected
    Aboriginal AffairsCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked K. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids any mention of a national inquiry and instead promotes the government's plan while attacking the Liberals.Unlike the Liberals who vote against matrimonial property rights and those unique things that aid these women, we are focused on making sure that these victims of crimes are supported.
34. deflected
    The EnvironmentMr. Dennis Bevington (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer discusses emissions reductions and rejects a carbon tax but never addresses helping with Northwest Territories fire costs or admitting climate change links.We are accomplishing this without a job-killing carbon tax, which would raise the price of everything.
35. partly answered
    Foreign AffairsMr. André Bellavance (Independent) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms ongoing humanitarian aid but sidesteps concrete plans for root causes like poverty and democracy.In that part of the world, we are one of the leaders in providing humanitarian assistance.
36. deflected
    National DefenceMs. Elizabeth May (Green) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer notes growing allies and a threat to Canada without engaging the trap or selective motivation points raised.The number of allies that are engaged in this process is growing on a daily basis.
37. deflected
    National DefenceMr. Bruce Hyer (Green) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims the matter was put before Parliament but never commits to unlimited debate or a full discussion.We put this matter before Parliament.