NDP motion to enforce relevance in answers dominates supply day

Other moments

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

1. answered
   National DefenceMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states no decisions have been taken on the specific question about air strikes.I can report to the member opposite clearly no decisions have been taken.
2. answered
   National DefenceMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the call for a vote by outlining the condition under which Parliament would be consulted.if there were to be a combat mission, we would seek to bring it before Parliament as a matter of confidence.
3. partly answered
   National DefenceMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer offers to provide numbers later but does not address the current count of personnel on the ground.I do not have an hour-by-hour number to give my colleague opposite, but I would be very happy to get the specific numbers and relay them to her directly.
4. answered
   National DefenceMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer responds to the demand for a debate and vote by confirming the process for any combat mission.When there is a combat mission, if there is a combat mission, there will be a debate and a vote.
5. deflected
   Business of the HouseMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids supporting the motion by criticizing it as one-sided rather than addressing accountability directly.
6. partly answered
   National DefenceDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the request but provides no details on the timing or content of cabinet plans.We have not made any decision with respect to additional involvement, but we will reflect on the request that has been made.
7. deflected
   National DefenceDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states cabinet has not considered the matter and pivots to general threats without specifying parameters.cabinet has not considered this matter.
8. misdirected
   National DefenceMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer evades the time period query and ends by attacking the previous Liberal government instead.I wish the previous Liberal government under Paul Martin had brought these issues before Parliament.
9. partly answered
   National DefenceMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer lists aid efforts and restates vote pledge but sidesteps troop numbers and mandate queries.Canada and Canadian taxpayers are providing relief supplies and emergency shelters.
10. answered
    National DefenceMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly states that President Obama asked Canada to help.the ambassador from the United States was very clear that the President of the United States, President Obama, asked.
11. answered
    National DefenceMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states diplomatic status and advice role but adds partisan jab at NDP.It would be nice if the NDP got on side with the important work that are our armed forces are doing over there.
12. deflected
    National DefenceMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer lists actions taken but avoids committing to a vote while attacking opposition parties.What we saw, though, in the United Kingdom was the opposition parties, including the social democratic Labour Party, stand up and fight terrorism.
13. answered
    EmploymentMs. Jinny Jogindera Sims (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer confirms investigations and new penalties for the fraud case raised.What happened was absolutely outrageous, which is why there is a Canada Border Services Agency investigation, as well as one led by my ministry.
14. deflected
    EmploymentMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims data accuracy but does not address the specific discrepancy between statistics and employer reality.Our research shows that most of the discrepancies recently reported in the media come from information provided by employers.
15. answered
    EmploymentMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer confirms an investigation into the wage violation and notes penalties.Naturally, my department is now conducting an investigation.
16. misdirected
    EmploymentMs. Linda Duncan (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer defends the wage rule but pivots to attacking an NDP colleague's position instead of addressing Alberta enforcement.so could the member tell me what the position of the NDP really is?
17. deflected
    EmploymentMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Kevin Sorenson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists past job numbers and international praise but never addresses the temporary foreign worker program or a new jobs plan.Over 1.1 million net new jobs have been created in this country.
18. misdirected
    EmploymentMr. Arnold Chan (Liberal) asked Ed Fast (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to praising a trade deal and attacks the Liberals instead of addressing the minister's spending or unemployment in southwestern Ontario.it should surprise no one that the Liberals would continue to undermine Canada's trade agenda.
19. deflected
    Employment InsuranceScott Brison (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer disputes the premise of criticism and shifts to attacking the Liberals' past EI proposals rather than examining the tax credit's effect on layoffs.However, what the member is not telling us is the real Liberal EI agenda, which is to increase all sorts of benefits and programs to the tune of $6 billion
20. deflected
    Employment InsuranceScott Brison (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer cites endorsements and then demands the Liberals admit their own costly EI plans instead of addressing whether the credit rewards hiring.However, I want the member to come clean, because he is skating around the fundamental issue.
21. answered
    International TradeMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Ed Fast (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states that the new commissioner confirmed the agreement addresses EU concerns on transparency and regulation.This agreement is going to add over 80,000 new jobs to the Canadian economy.
22. deflected
    International TradeMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Ed Fast (Conservative). substantive question.The answer accuses the NDP of anti-trade rhetoric and avoids any mention of compensation for cheese producers or drug costs.A few months ago, they said they were waiting for the final text to be released to the public.
23. misdirected
    International TradeMs. Ève Péclet (NDP) asked Ed Fast (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP's trade record and ignores the $300,000 cost question entirely.It should surprise no one that the New Democrats would want us to cancel the event.
24. misdirected
    International TradeMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Ed Fast (Conservative). loaded question.The answer accuses the NDP of opposing all trade deals and never addresses the specific cost of the photo-op flights and security.Not once has it stood in the House and supported any one of the free trade agreements that Canada has ever signed.
25. deflected
    Aboriginal AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked K. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.Answer promotes government action plan and attacks NDP instead of addressing the inquiry request.
26. deflected
    Aboriginal AffairsMrs. Carol Hughes (NDP) asked K. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims action and criticizes NDP voting record without addressing the inquiry.
27. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Randall Garrison (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer defends committee membership instead of addressing the specific conflict of interest raised.We have full confidence that they will impartially review actions taken by our security services to protect Canadians against threats from any activists or radicals.
28. misdirected
    EthicsMs. Rosane Doré Lefebvre (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats defense of committee independence without addressing the named appointee's conflict.the Security Intelligence Review Committee is an independent committee made up of people with impeccable reputations.
29. partly answered
    Intergovernmental AffairsStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.Answer explains federal role and process but does not address the refusal to share scientific evidence or intergovernmental cooperation.Quebec conducts its own reviews, under its own laws.
30. misdirected
    EmploymentMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks Liberal position history instead of addressing the call for committee study of the program.The Liberal position on this is completely incoherent.
31. deflected
    Champlain BridgeMr. Hoang Mai (NDP) asked Mr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative). substantive question.Answer highlights job creation and project progress without addressing toll impact on other bridges.A new bridge will be built and the project will create 30,000 jobs in Montreal, Quebec and Canada.
32. deflected
    Champlain BridgeMr. Hoang Mai (NDP) asked Mr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims coordination with Quebec but does not address developing a coordinated transportation plan before tolls.the minister is working closely with the Government of Quebec and all the stakeholders from the south shore and Montreal.
33. deflected
    Forestry IndustryMs. Lise St-Denis (Liberal) asked Mr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative). substantive question.The answer offers only a general assurance without any concrete proposals.I can assure members that any suggestions that come in will be assessed on merit.
34. deflected
    The EnvironmentMr. François Lapointe (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the science basis but avoids the claim that scientists are being silenced.this decision was made by scientists and was based on science.
35. deflected
    Northern Economic DevelopmentMr. Dennis Bevington (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The response notes information availability but does not address extending the deadline.The information is available online.
36. deflected
    Marine TransportationMr. Jean-François Fortin (Independent) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). loaded question.The answer explains the safety focus without addressing the alleged double standard.That is their primary focus, and in this case, that is exactly what happened.
37. partly answered
    TaxationMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked Kevin Sorenson (Conservative). substantive question.The minister offers to consider the proposal and discuss it further.I will take it under advisement, and perhaps we can get together and talk a little bit about what he is suggesting here.
38. deflected
    EmploymentMr. Brent Rathgeber (Independent) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the policy priorities without addressing reversal of changes.we are listening to Albertans who want to ensure that Albertans come first for Alberta jobs