All sittings← 2014-06-202014-09-16 →
Monday, September 15, 2014 · sitting No. 109
House debates red tape reduction bill as question period focuses on Iraq deployment
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on government orders for the Red Tape Reduction Act. Maxime Bernier told the House the one-for-one rule would be enshrined in law and that the rule had already produced more than $20 million in net savings for business. Marc-André Morin and Hélène LeBlanc questioned whether the measures addressed the concerns of small and medium-sized firms.
Question period opened with repeated exchanges on the deployment of Canadian Forces personnel to Iraq. Thomas Mulcair asked how many members were being sent and why no parliamentary vote had been held. Stephen Harper replied that the mission was not combat and that only non-combat deployments had been reviewed by committee.
Further clashes centred on employment insurance premiums and the conduct of the Prime Minister's former chief of staff. Mulcair pressed the government on its refusal to raise the minimum wage while cutting taxes for large companies. Alexandre Boulerice asked why charges had been laid against Mike Duffy but not against Nigel Wright.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2014-09-15
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Foreign Affairs
Marc Garneau asked whether Parliament should debate the Iraq deployment and whether the Prime Minister would take part. Rob Nicholson said the mission was not combat and that ministers had already appeared before the defence and foreign affairs committees.
Read the exchangeAboriginal Affairs
Niki Ashton called for a national inquiry into missing and murdered indigenous women after the death of Tina Fontaine. K. Kellie Leitch said police investigations already address the cases and that another study was not required.
Read the exchangeCitizenship and Immigration
Andrew Cash said the government was removing social assistance from refugees and called the move an attack on basic Canadian values. Chris Alexander replied that the changes protect the immigration system from abuse.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
Guy Caron asked why the government had not released Fisheries and Oceans Canada studies on drilling near Cacouna. Gail Shea said the work was exploratory and had been reviewed by department experts under strict conditions.
Read the exchangeAccess to Information
Charlie Angus said military spending on Viagra had become a state secret and accused the government of dysfunction in handling access requests. Dan Albas said the government had processed a record number of requests and released more than six million pages.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- answeredForeign AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the number of personnel deployed and their roles.
there are several dozen Canadian army personnel also deployed to Iraq in an advise-and-assist capacity.
- answeredForeign AffairsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the promise by explaining the government's consistent position on votes for combat missions.
wherever there has been a deployment of a combat nature, the government has put this to Parliament for a further confidence vote, and that is not the case with the present mission to Iraq.
- misdirectedEmploymentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The question shifts from military deployments to an unrelated poverty topic, and the answer responds only to the military part while deflecting the new query.
I think if you review the record, you will see the government's position on parliamentary votes on military deployment has been very consistent.
- deflectedEmploymentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the minimum wage and tax cut question to restate unrelated government benefits.
This government lowered the GST for all Canadian families.
- deflectedEmploymentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids the interference question by listing past benefits and attacking the NDP's voting record.
Why does the NDP vote against every idea unless it is about more taxes and more borrowing?
- misdirectedEmploymentMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the EI plan critique and instead attacks the Liberal tax plan while promoting its own record.
What we understand on this side is that his plan for higher taxes and higher deficits is not a plan that will help the economy.
- deflectedEmploymentMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer sidesteps the proposed exemption by praising its own announcement and criticizing the Liberal alternative.
- deflectedEmploymentMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats praise for its announcement and attacks the Liberal position instead of addressing the exemption proposal.
I congratulate the Minister of Finance for this fine announcement.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses consultation with provinces but evades the direct yes/no on provincial jurisdiction over resources.
the government consults with the provinces and territories on a regular basis.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the NDP instead of addressing the FIPA or provincial control question.
it would take an amazing leap of logic for anybody in Alberta to think the NDP is going to trust their resources to them.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer pivots to an unrelated NDP investigation rather than addressing the Wright cheque question.
the NDP is facing a similar investigation, with over $1.5 million of potentially illegal funds
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the questioner on unrelated cheques and separatism instead of addressing the scandal.
he and a number of the members of his caucus cut cheques to support illegal offices in provinces where they actually have no members of Parliament
- answeredEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Paul Calandra (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly states that the government does not direct the DPP and that the matter is before the courts.
this government does not direct the Director of Public Prosecutions.
- deflectedAccess to InformationMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Dan Albas (Conservative). substantive question.Answer lists access-to-information statistics instead of addressing alleged obstruction of the Act.
Our government processed nearly 54,000 access to information requests, which is a 27% increase over the previous year
- deflectedTaxationMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay (Conservative). loaded question.Answer defends CRA independence and accuses the asker of shameful motives rather than addressing the audit suspension request.
The only politics in this story are the very shameful political motivations of the member and his party.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay (Conservative). loaded question.Answer accuses the member of scoring cheap points and reiterates no interference instead of addressing the witch-hunt claim.
the member really should be ashamed of himself for attempting to score cheap political points on the backs of professional public servants at the CRA.
- deflectedEmploymentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists unrelated government achievements without addressing the minimum wage request.
Canadians of all income levels have seen their incomes rise since our government came to office.
- answeredForeign AffairsMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer confirms Parliament will discuss the issue and invites participation.
My understanding is that Parliament in fact will be discussing this, and I invite everyone to participate.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the Liberal Party's past record instead of addressing the EI plan criticism.
the Liberal Party claims to support small businesses, but it is opposed to the idea of them saving over $550,000.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the government's scheme without addressing the full EI refund proposal.
Over 90% of small businesses, of all businesses, would benefit: 780,000 businesses and $550 million over the next two years.
- partly answeredHealthMr. Dany Morin (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses safety actions but pivots to new legislation without tackling the specific companies.
whenever there is a dangerous product identified, Health Canada inspectors act immediately.
- answeredHealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses transparency concerns by citing the new framework.
we just recently launched a world-leading regulatory transparency framework and action plan at Health Canada.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends equipment deliveries then attacks the NDP's voting record.
How did the NDP vote? The NDP voted against all of these.
- answeredNational DefenceMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the current status of the fighter jet replacement process.
no decision has been made about replacing the CF-18 fleet.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked K. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids explaining the refusal of an inquiry by instead arguing no study is needed and action means policing.
We do not need yet another study on this topic.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked K. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats prior deflection on studies and pivots to an unrelated action plan instead of addressing the inquiry refusal.
As I just mentioned, the RCMP has said in its own study the vast majority of these cases have been addressed and are solved through police investigations.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Andrew Cash (NDP) asked Chris Alexander (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the bill withdrawal request and instead defends the system against abuse without engaging the specific policy criticism.
By making changes to the system, our government is ensuring immigration is protected from those who seek to abuse taxpayer-funded health care, welfare and other social benefits.
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Chris Alexander (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP rather than addressing the bill's impact on refugees or human dignity.
We will not take any lessons about that from the NDP.
- partly answeredInfrastructureMr. Arnold Chan (Liberal) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses federal infrastructure spending levels but does not engage the specific request on Toronto transit or Scarborough subway timing.
we have the longest and largest infrastructure program in Canadian history, totalling $70 billion over the next 10 years.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Adam Vaughan (Liberal) asked K. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). loaded question.The answer turns to attacking the opposition's past budget votes instead of addressing the inquiry or search support question.
How dare the opposition raise this when it opposed budgets for shelters, when it opposed the $25 million that we have invested—
- answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains the exploratory nature of work, lack of NEB submission, and DFO review conditions.
At this stage, the only work being conducted in the area is exploratory in nature, and it has been carefully reviewed by DFO experts and authorized contingent on very strict conditions.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. François Lapointe (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the transparency concern by redirecting to a Google search instead of addressing the in-camera meeting or scientific advice.
I find it hard to comprehend why the NDP is running around requesting an emergency committee meeting to request information that it could find with a simple Google search.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked K. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). loaded question.The answer promotes government actions without addressing the call for apology or inquiry.
Today I was pleased to stand in the House and table our action plan to address family violence and violent crimes against aboriginal women and girls.
- answeredInternational DevelopmentMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Ms. Lois Brown (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the shift to project-based funding and extensions provided to the institute.
Our government announced over three years ago that we would be moving to project-based funding and we would be winding down core funding.
- deflectedAir TransportationMs. Mylène Freeman (NDP) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). loaded question.The answer states the decision is the lessee's responsibility without addressing intervention.
The decision that it has taken to bring down the terminal at Mirabel Airport is one that it is allowed to do under its lease agreements and it does respect the terms of the lease with Transport Canada.
- partly answeredFisheries and OceansMr. Jean-François Fortin (Independent) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes consideration of the report and digital services but does not commit to a decision on keeping the library open.
We have received the Commissioner of Official Languages' final report and are considering it.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMrs. Maria Mourani (Independent) asked Ms. Roxanne James (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists past legislation rather than outlining new intended actions for returning fighters.
I would like to also remind the House that it was this government, the Conservative government, that introduced the first counter-terrorism strategy, passed the Combating Terrorism Act, and most recently, the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act
- answeredForeign AffairsMr. Dean Del Mastro (Independent) asked Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.The answer provides an update on seeking an international investigation into the downing.
we would like an international investigation to find out who actually was responsible for bringing down this aircraft.