All sittings← 2014-06-122014-06-16 →
Friday, June 13, 2014 · sitting No. 103
Commons advances victims bill of rights after lengthy debate
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on the victims bill of rights act, with members from the NDP, Liberals and Conservatives debating its provisions at second reading. NDP MP Linda Duncan said the bill required stronger amendments to match recommendations from the victims ombudsman, while noting provincial consultation would be essential before passage.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on privacy after the Supreme Court struck down warrantless access to subscriber data. NDP MP Peter Julian pressed the government to amend Bill C-13 to comply with the ruling, and Parliamentary Secretary Bob Dechert replied that the decision would be reviewed while work continued on cyberbullying measures.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2014-06-13
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Agricultural Growth Act
NDP MP Réjean Genest said the omnibus bill bundled too many changes and warned that seed companies would limit variety choices to raise prices.
Read the exchangePublic Works and Government Services
Liberal MP Marc Garneau said the fighter-jet evaluation remained biased toward a single bidder and called for a fresh competitive process.
Read the exchangeSocial Development
NDP MP Sadia Groguhé said thousands of disability claimants faced multi-year waits because the tribunal had too few umpires after the government eliminated part-time positions.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
NDP MP Kirsty Duncan cited the joint review panel's findings of significant adverse environmental effects and asked whether the government would reject the project.
Read the exchangeCitizenship and Immigration
NDP MP Paul Dewar asked how many government-sponsored Syrian refugees had actually arrived in Canada after conflicting ministerial statements.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the pipeline question and instead attacks the asker about unrelated spending.
What I wonder is if that member and his party will say "yes" to paying back the $1.7 million they owe taxpayers.
- deflectedPrivacyMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the ruling but pivots to unrelated crime-fighting without addressing Bill C-13 or the requested balanced approach.
In addition, we will continue to crack down on cyberbullies and online criminals who work against and make our children and all Canadians unsafe.
- deflectedPrivacyMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats that the decision will be reviewed but avoids any commitment to amend the surveillance bills.
We will continue to crack down on cyberbullies and online criminals to keep children and vulnerable communities safe in Canada.
- partly answeredSocial DevelopmentMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Mr. Scott Armstrong (Conservative). loaded question.The answer explains the tribunal's caseload handling but does not address whether deaths before benefits are acceptable.
The SST is giving top priority to these legacy cases.
- misdirectedSocial DevelopmentMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Mr. Scott Armstrong (Conservative). substantive question.The answer briefly references legacy cases then shifts to attacking the NDP over unrelated spending instead of proposing emergency measures.
However, when it comes to bungling and incompetence, why do the New Democrats not pay back the money they took from Canadian taxpayers to fund their campaign offices across the country and also for flyers sent to many ridings, illegally using taxpayer money for partisan purposes.
- partly answeredPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Mr. Bernard Trottier (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states that reports are under review and an announcement will follow but does not commit to a new procurement process.
When that analysis is completed, an announcement will be made to the Canadian public.
- partly answeredPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Mr. Bernard Trottier (Conservative). substantive question.The answer again notes reports are being assessed and an announcement will come but sidesteps the call for an impartial process.
When the government has assessed the options, an announcement will be made.
- deflectedEmploymentScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Peter Braid (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights the Building Canada plan but does not address reversing infrastructure cuts or responding to David Dodge.
The new Building Canada plan is open for business, with over $53 billion of funding over the next decade, stable and predictable funding.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.The answer expresses concern and condemns terrorism but provides no information on steps taken for the refugee crisis.
We call for restraint on the use of force in populated areas.
- partly answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Mr. Costas Menegakis (Conservative). substantive question.The response gives a total number of Syrians protected but does not specify government-sponsored refugees currently in Canada.
Since the start of the Syrian conflict, Canada has provided protection to more than 1,100 Syrians.
- partly answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMs. Christine Moore (NDP) asked Mr. Costas Menegakis (Conservative). substantive question.Provides total protection numbers and resettlement commitment but not the specific count of government-sponsored refugees in Canada.
Since the start of the Syrian conflict, Canada has provided protection to more than 1,100 Syrians.
- deflectedPrivacyMs. Ève Péclet (NDP) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states respect for the court and intent to review but does not explain why they proceeded without waiting.
We have just received the decision and we will take the time to review it properly.
- deflectedPrivacyMs. Ève Péclet (NDP) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.The response highlights study time and respect for court but does not address splitting the bill.
We respect the work of the court, but we will continue to crack down on cyberbullies and online criminals to protect children and all Canadians.
- deflectedPrivacyMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.The answer focuses on protecting children and reviewing but avoids committing to revisiting the legislation.
We will review the decision of the Supreme Court and determine the best course of action.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Bernard Valcourt (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites the ongoing court process to decline further comment without addressing the allegations.
The hon. member refers to a matter that is presently before the court. Out of respect for our court system, I will not make further comment.
- partly answeredSocial DevelopmentMr. Mike Sullivan (NDP) asked Mr. Scott Armstrong (Conservative). loaded question.The response explains the intent behind the tribunal and current actions on backlogs but rejects the loaded premise.
We fixed a problem because we wanted to make sure that there was consistency among decisions from coast to coast to coast.
- partly answeredSocial DevelopmentMs. Isabelle Morin (NDP) asked Mr. Scott Armstrong (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states tribunal is prioritizing legacy cases but does not detail specific fixes for delays in benefits.
The department and the SST are now putting these legacy cases at the top of the priority list.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Kirsty Duncan (Liberal) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). substantive question.Answer avoids agreeing or committing to reject by restating reliance on review process.
We are proud of the work that they do in ensuring that projects are safe for Canadians and safe for the environment.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Kirsty Duncan (Liberal) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). substantive question.Answer again sidesteps agreement with findings by noting only that report is under review.
We are carefully reviewing this report, and a decision will be forthcoming.
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Frank Valeriote (Liberal) asked Mr. Costas Menegakis (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks premise by redefining cheapening citizenship and references minister's family history instead of apologizing.
I would argue that is what cheapened it.
- partly answeredPublic Works and Government ServicesMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Mr. Bernard Trottier (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses review of options but does not explain why outdated strategy is used only for F-35s.
It is looking at the different options in terms of defence capabilities, benefits to Canadian industry, and finally life-cycle costs.
- partly answeredPublic Works and Government ServicesMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Mr. Bernard Trottier (Conservative). substantive question.Answer points to website for reports but does not address when full report will be public or industrial benefits guarantee.
Many of them are available on the National Fighter Procurement Secretariat's website.
- misdirectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Mr. Bernard Trottier (Conservative). substantive question.Answer dismisses question as wrong and lectures asker's party without addressing open bidding.
We do not need any lectures from the member's party.
- deflectedLabourMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Mrs. Cathy McLeod (Conservative). substantive question.Answer refers concerns to Industrial Relations Board and states no regulatory changes planned.
Of course, if anyone has any concerns in terms of practice, they do have the ability to make reference to the Industrial Relations Board.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Tarik Brahmi (NDP) asked Ms. Roxanne James (Conservative). substantive question.The answer dismisses the effectiveness of a no-fly zone instead of addressing the timeline for implementation.
I hardly think that a no-fly zone would stop a helicopter from landing because I do not think the operator was concerned about getting a ticket.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyMr. Tarik Brahmi (NDP) asked Ms. Roxanne James (Conservative). substantive question.The response acknowledges collaboration but provides no specific measures.
Of course our government is working with the Quebec government on this issue
- deflectedHousingMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Mr. Scott Armstrong (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts responsibility to the provincial government without addressing the federal role or commitment.
the regulations around pyrrhotite are controlled by the provincial level of government
- deflectedHousingMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Mr. Scott Armstrong (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts responsibility to the provincial government without addressing the federal role or commitment.
It is the same question, Mr. Speaker, and it will receive the same answer.
- misdirectedPrivacyWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to online crime protection instead of addressing the government operations centre directive.
what parents have told us, what victims have told us, what victims organizations have told us, and what all Canadians have told us, is that they want legislation that will protect Canadians from online criminals
- deflectedPrivacyWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Ms. Roxanne James (Conservative). substantive question.The response mocks the concern about privacy instead of answering about the directive.
Not only are the protesters, the people watching the protesters, Canadians and people all around the world aware of this protest, but suddenly someone in the government is aware of this and those members think it is a public safety concern and a privacy issue. Give me a break.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Linda Duncan (NDP) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights past achievements without committing to reinstating the specific program.
Our government will continue to invest in Canadian companies that develop innovative and sustainable technologies.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Linda Duncan (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). substantive question.The response emphasizes Canada's global share and past investments rather than outlining a clean energy strategy.
Canada supports the international agreement on climate change that includes real action by all emitters.
- deflectedRegional Economic DevelopmentMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the specific accusations about broken commitments and pivots to unrelated ACOA office staffing.
The hon. member went off on several issues there, but on ACOA, we maintain the office in Sydney.
- misdirectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMrs. Anne-Marie Day (NDP) asked Mr. Bernard Trottier (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses naval procurement and shipyards instead of the ice rink funding question asked.
our government is determined to provide the men and women of the Royal Canadian Navy and the Canadian Coast Guard with the equipment they need
- deflectedIntergovernmental RelationsMr. Jean-François Fortin (Bloc) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). loaded question.The answer references a past vote but avoids addressing the minister's alleged threats or Quebec's jurisdiction claims.
Parliament dealt with exactly that issue four years ago.
- partly answeredIntergovernmental RelationsMr. Brent Rathgeber (Independent) asked Mr. Scott Armstrong (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses tightening rules and prioritizing Canadians but does not address devolving the program to Alberta.
The minister has already made several indications that he is going to make new announcements to tighten up this situation
- answeredJusticeMr. Brent Rathgeber (Independent) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains the bill's intent to protect minors and show compassion rather than prosecute victims.
Bill C-36 shows compassion toward those trapped in this awful practice.