All sittings← 2014-06-062014-06-10 →
Monday, June 9, 2014 · sitting No. 99
House limits debate on citizenship bill after 71st time allocation
The House spent the largest share of the sitting on government orders for the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act. Conservative MP Peter Van Loan moved a motion to allot no more than five further hours at report stage and five hours at third reading of Bill C-24, with proceedings to be interrupted at expiry.
New Democrat MP Peter Julian called the motion the 71st use of time allocation by the government and said it exceeded the previous Liberal record. Conservative MP Chris Alexander said the bill responded to long-standing calls for overhaul and had been studied in advance of committee stage.
In question period, New Democrat MP Megan Leslie pressed the government on sole-sourcing F-35 purchases and on the constitutionality of new sex-work legislation, while Liberal MP Ralph Goodale raised concerns over stagnant growth and infrastructure delays.
Decided that day
- Bill C-31 passed
- Motion on Bill C-24 passed
- S-215 given second reading
- C-611 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2014-06-09
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Canada Pension Plan
Conservative MP Dave Van Kesteren presented Bill C-591 to close a loophole denying Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security benefits to those convicted of killing a spouse, and New Democrat MP Murray Rankin questioned the exclusion of manslaughter.
Read the exchangeLac-Mégantic
Green Party MP Elizabeth May marked nearly one year since the Lac-Mégantic disaster and noted a class-action suit seeking court permission that day in Sherbrooke.
Read the exchangeAgriculture and Agri-Food
New Democrat MP Ruth Ellen Brosseau said the grain-transportation crisis had cost farmers eight billion dollars and criticized the government for ignoring earlier warnings before introducing Bill C-30.
Read the exchangeCitizenship and Immigration
New Democrat MP Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe said settlement groups had urged the government to accept ten thousand Syrian refugees and cited the UN request to relocate one hundred thousand.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids the specific requests to table the report and explain refusal of tenders.
Once we have made a decision, then we will make an announcement.
- deflectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates the review process without addressing tabling the report or confirming competition or jobs.
Once a decision is made, we will be announcing that and releasing the reports.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.The answer reminds of roles and describes the bill instead of addressing submission to the Supreme Court.
I would remind the member that it is for the government to propose legislation, and it is for Parliament and all of its members to debate that legislation.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the bill meets tests and emphasizes debate instead of releasing legal opinions.
It is the role of the government to propose legislation, and it is the job of all parliamentarians to debate that legislation.
- deflectedJusticeMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms DOJ review and constitutionality without addressing the number or content of legal opinions.
Bill C-36 , like all legislation, is reviewed by Department of Justice officials in terms of its constitutionality.
- partly answeredThe EconomyRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses EI by stating a freeze but does not commit to rolling back premiums.
We will also be responsible, as we have promised, to freeze EI payments.
- deflectedInfrastructureRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights the gas tax fund permanence without addressing cuts, delays, or competition for funds.
The member does not speak about this part of the program.
- deflectedInfrastructureStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims no broken promise and notes ongoing work but does not state how many agreements were signed.
- deflectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the premise as nonsense and describes the process without addressing whether a sole-sourced purchase is planned.
- deflectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the source of information rather than addressing whether single-engine risks in the north will be considered.
the hon. member should not believe everything he reads in the newspapers, especially when the source of some of that information is rather dubious.
- partly answeredPublic Works and Government ServicesMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states no decision has been made and explains the expert review process, which partially addresses the request to table the report.
A group of experts has read the report and the analyses prepared by the Canadian Forces about all of the replacement options to ensure that the analyses are impartial and transparent.
- deflectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates the goal of providing equipment and the review process without addressing the cost or tendering questions.
our goal is to provide the Canadian Forces with the equipment they need to do their job.
- misdirectedEmploymentMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to overall job creation statistics instead of addressing the F-35 procurement's impact on employment or industrial spinoffs.
our government has achieved more in terms of job creation than other G7 countries.
- deflectedEmploymentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). loaded question.The answer corrects a statistic but does not offer any new concrete idea for reducing unemployment.
once again, the member opposite is misinformed.
- misdirectedEmploymentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Joe Oliver (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP's voting record instead of responding to the proposal on the small business hiring tax credit.
it is rich for the NDP to be criticizing our government's record on job creation.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains Canada's existing controls and notes consultation will occur, which partially addresses whether Canada will sign the treaty.
We will consult and we will act accordingly.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids any commitment on signing or ratifying by restating existing controls and deferring to future consultation.
we will consult, and when it is appropriate, we will make the decision.
- misdirectedEmploymentJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the prior Liberal government and its record instead of addressing current enforcement shortfalls.
It was the Liberals that did nothing.
- misdirectedEmploymentJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to attacking the Liberal record on the stripper program rather than responding to the reported abuses.
it would take a Liberal to understand abuse.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the review process and conditions but does not address the scientists' safety assessment or the request to reject the project.
We are carefully reviewing this report and a decision will be forthcoming.
- deflectedPrivacyMs. Charmaine Borg (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes Bill S-4 and notes the member's prior support instead of addressing the lost census forms or identity-theft protections.
I am disappointed to see her change of heart.
- deflectedPrivacyMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses Bill S-4 and the Privacy Commissioner without outlining steps to contact affected individuals about identity theft or fraud.
we have gone further in Bill S-4
- partly answeredAgriculture and Agri-FoodMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Lemieux (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights Bill C-30 and recent movement figures but does not address the $8 billion cost or corridor issues raised.
The latest figures show that our government's efforts to get grain moving are working.
- deflectedAgriculture and Agri-FoodMr. Malcolm Allen (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Lemieux (Conservative). substantive question.The answer describes the bill's provisions without acknowledging ignored warnings or admitting any ministerial failure.
It obligates the rail companies to move one million metric tonnes of grain a week.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. François Choquette (NDP) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). loaded question.Answer explains dispersant policy but avoids addressing overall preparedness or admitting lack thereof.
it is where it is a net benefit for the environment, and that is the means by which we will be allowing this to happen.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly rebuts the claim of no plan and outlines the three pillars of their approach.
that is categorically false. There are response plans in our country and many people take part in them
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). loaded question.Answer restates general policy and consultation commitment without addressing rejection of the project or lobbyist influence.
Projects will only proceed if they are safe for Canadians and safe for the environment.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Mrs. Kelly Block (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats regulatory framework language and avoids addressing scientists, municipalities or spill plan deficiencies.
We will continue to consult with aboriginal communities prior to making any decision on this project.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the Liberals instead of addressing the minister's meetings or climate plan.
unfortunately, the Liberals are really messed up on the environmental file.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.Answer praises the plan and avoids the funding or website donation data question.
Canadians across the country have applauded the announcement we made to launch the national conservation plan.
- partly answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Chris Alexander (Conservative). substantive question.Answer provides donor status and numbers protected but does not specify timing or response to the 10,000-refugee request.
Canada has already offered protection to more than 1,100 Syrians.
- partly answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Andrew Cash (NDP) asked Chris Alexander (Conservative). substantive question.Answer cites donor rank and 1,100 protected but does not commit to reassessing or increasing intake targets.
Canada continues to resettle one in ten refugees worldwide.
- answeredThe EnvironmentJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly commits to preserving the parkland by stating there is no plan to sell it.
As we have indicated many times, there is no plan and no intention to sell the parkland at Downsview Park.
- deflectedTourismMs. Annick Papillon (NDP) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.The response highlights positive tourism events instead of addressing budget cuts or new investments.
There is so much good news in Canada's tourism industry that the member has forgotten it.
- answeredPrivacyMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer refutes the premise and explains how the bill protects privacy while noting NDP support.
Bill S-4 goes a great way to protect Canadians online, and the NDP should know that.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Jean-François Fortin (Bloc) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The minister states unfamiliarity with the file and defers to a future review without action.
I am not familiar with this particular file, but I will look into it and provide the honourable member with the facts.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Jean-François Fortin (Bloc) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The response defends the process and public servants but offers only a promise to review the case.
However, I will look into this particular case and share my findings with the hon. member.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bruce Hyer (Green) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the government's existing policy and attacks a carbon tax without considering the proposed fee and dividend.
We are going to continue with our approach.