All sittings← 2014-06-022014-06-04 →
Tuesday, June 3, 2014 · sitting No. 95
Commons curbs debate on Honduras trade deal
Government House leader Peter Van Loan moved a time allocation motion limiting debate on Bill C-20, the Canada-Honduras Economic Growth and Prosperity Act, to five hours at report stage and five hours at third reading. New Democratic MP Peter Julian said the motion marked the 68th use of closure or time allocation by the government. Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux noted the motion restricted members' ability to contribute to debate on the bill.
In Question Period, NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair pressed the government on the appointment of Daniel Therrien as Privacy Commissioner, citing his prior legal work for CSIS, CSEC and the RCMP. Treasury Board president Tony Clement defended the choice as the result of a rigorous selection process and said Therrien possessed the necessary experience. NDP environment critic Megan Leslie asked the government to reject the Northern Gateway pipeline after 300 scientists questioned the review panel's findings.
Decided that day
- Canada-Honduras trade agreement passed
- Veterans bill sent to committee
- Adjournment motion defeated
- S-221 and C-27 advanced to second reading
- C-608 and C-609 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2014-06-03
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Committees of the House
Conservative MP Greg Kerr presented the unanimous third report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs on the Enhanced New Veterans Charter Act and thanked analysts and members for their work.
Read the exchangeJustice for Animals in Service Act (Quanto's Law)
Justice minister Peter MacKay introduced Bill C-35, known as Quanto's law, to increase penalties for harming law enforcement, military and service animals.
Read the exchangeVictims Bill of Rights
NDP MP Wayne Marston said his party would support sending the victims bill of rights to committee and urged all parties to work together to strengthen it.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
NDP MP Jack Harris asked whether the government would announce fighter jet options before the House rises and hold a fair competition; Associate Defence minister Diane Finley said ministers were reviewing reports from an independent panel.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedPrivacyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer praises qualifications and process but ignores the conflict of interest raised.
This appointment was made pursuant to a very rigorous process where a number of highly qualified individuals were identified, and we have found the person who is the most qualified to actually have this position.
- deflectedPrivacyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats praise for candidate without addressing how many programs were approved.
The appointment was made pursuant to a rigorous process, which identified Mr. Therrien as a highly qualified candidate—the best candidate for this position.
- misdirectedPrivacyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the questioner's logic instead of addressing the conflict or recusal issue.
according to the Leader of the Opposition , actually having experience on legal matters and on privacy matters disqualifies someone for a post.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims prior action on coal but does not confirm new rules for oil and gas.
we took action on this two years ago, which means that our regulations will come into effect sooner than the United States'.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). loaded question.Answer shifts focus to Canada's small share of emissions rather than confirming oil and gas rules.
Coal-fired energy generation in the United States produces twice the greenhouse gas emissions that all the emissions produced in Canada do.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.Answer references past action but provides no timeline for oil and gas regulations.
We are acting on this and we welcome the United States moving on the greenhouse gas regulations related to this sector.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.Answer invokes past Liberal leader and lists unrelated programs instead of addressing timing.
it was Michael Ignatieff who said that the Liberals did not get it done.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.Answer discusses coal regulations but avoids any commitment on oil and gas timing.
in the first 21 years, Canada's coal regulations are expected to result in a cumulative reduction in emissions equivalent to removing 2.6 million personal vehicles from the roads a year.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMr. François Choquette (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims the target was announced two years ago and provides details on regulations.
We took action in this sector two years ago, which means that our regulations will come into effect sooner than those of the United States.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The minister avoids specifying a timeline and instead highlights Canada's emissions share.
Canada represents less than 2% of the global greenhouse gas emissions, while the United States produces almost 20%.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Greg Rickford (Conservative). substantive question.The answer refuses to comment on the decision.
- partly answeredPrivacyMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Addresses the process but disputes the premise of the question.
The candidate appeared before committee today, as we all wanted him to do.
- misdirectedPrivacyMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Ends by questioning the member's respect for taxpayer money instead of addressing the request.
When is he going to respect taxpayer money when it comes to the use of illegal offices and illegal mailouts?
- misdirectedPrivacyMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Responds by accusing the NDP of attacking individuals rather than addressing the appointment.
They should be ashamed of themselves.
- answeredHealthMr. Dany Morin (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.Details the funding and progress made with provinces on wait times.
We have seen, through our investment in wait times guarantee of over $1 billion, that the provinces are making very good progress in certain areas.
- answeredHealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.Emphasizes ongoing work with provinces and cites data on improvements.
I am happy to work every day with the provinces and territories on the delivery of health care.
- answeredHealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains government actions and results on wait times.
we are an active partner in reducing wait times.
- misdirectedInternational TradeMs. Chrystia Freeland (Liberal) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). substantive question.The response attacks the questioner's record and attendance instead of addressing the CETA timeline.
Now you want to ask questions on a trade file? You should learn it first.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Ted Hsu (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists concrete regulatory actions taken to reduce emissions.
In the first 21 years Canada's coal regulations are expected to result in a cumulative reduction in emissions equivalent to removing 2.6 million personal vehicles from the roads each year.
- misdirectedInfrastructureMr. Ted Hsu (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer dismisses the premise without any substantive response or explanation.
- misdirectedGovernment AppointmentsMr. Ryan Cleary (NDP) asked Rob Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The response notes the termination but pivots to attacking the NDP instead of addressing who directed the appointments or committee appearance.
when is the NDP going to pay back the taxpayers' dollars it has been wrongfully using throughout our country?
- misdirectedGovernment AppointmentsMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked Rob Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats the termination fact but redirects criticism back at the NDP.
saying it louder does not change the answer.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). substantive question.The response expresses surprise without addressing what remains to be negotiated.
I am a little surprised by the hon. member's question.
- answeredInternational TradeMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). substantive question.The answer details the remaining technical and translation steps for the deal.
Since reaching the agreement in principle last October, officials from both sides continue to work diligently to finalize the technical aspects of the agreement that includes conversion of the agreement in principle into a legal text of over 1,000 pages, then translated into several languages.
- deflectedNational DefenceMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer describes the review process without addressing whether a competition will occur.
We have been going through that. An independent panel has reviewed the work and research done by the RCAF.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates the review process and goal without confirming timing or competition.
Once we have made a decision we will announce it, and the reports will be released.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Mr. James Bezan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms zero tolerance but ignores the call for a civilian inquiry.
The Chief of the Defence Staff is investigating.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMs. Élaine Michaud (NDP) asked Mr. James Bezan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the opposition instead of addressing the credibility of the military-led process.
It is a little rich for New Democrats to be coming out now commenting on sexual assault within the Canadian Armed Forces and not supporting legislation in this House to actually toughen penalties.
- partly answeredVeterans AffairsMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer notes a committee report and non-partisan work but does not address the specific incident or disrespect claim.
This is a good sign that we are working in a non-partisan way to address the issues and concerns of all veterans and their families.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Frank Valeriote (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer expresses pride in the event but avoids any commitment on covering costs for veterans.
We owe an eternal gratitude to all of the men and women in uniform who took part in that historic liberation.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the five-year limit but does not address dropping the appeal.
For two decades, Canada's policy limited to five years the length of time one can be abroad and still vote.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformMs. Alexandrine Latendresse (NDP) asked Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer justifies the policy and attacks the NDP but does not address the appeal or one million Canadians abroad.
The five-year limit has been in place for two decades.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Francis Scarpaleggia (Liberal) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates general claims about strengthening protections and penalties without naming any pollutants or addressing the regulatory change.
Our changes also make penalties tougher in order to punish those people who actually break the law by causing serious harm to fisheries.
- misdirectedSeniorsMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Alice Wong (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP's tax policies and voting record instead of addressing the request for a national aging strategy.
We will take no lessons from the NDP, which would raise taxes for all Canadians, including seniors.
- deflectedParks CanadaMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). loaded question.The answer discusses unrelated water quality investments and avoids any mention of Parks Canada budget cuts or the Gatineau River.
That is why we have invested significantly to clean up and improve water quality and to protect fish in targeted areas such as the Great Lakes and Lake Winnipeg.
- deflectedIntergovernmental RelationsMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). loaded question.The answer praises federal and Quebec spending restraint without addressing the specific claims about health transfers or EI fund use.
We reduced our spending and we are working to spend the money we have.