All sittings← 2014-02-252014-02-27 →
Wednesday, February 26, 2014 · sitting No. 52
Commons holds lengthy Ukraine debate amid election reform clashes
The House devoted the largest share of its time to a take-note debate on the situation in Ukraine. Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird and Parliamentary Secretary Chris Alexander outlined Canada's support for the new authorities in Kyiv and announced a forthcoming ministerial visit. Opposition members pressed for asset freezes against former president Viktor Yanukovych and questioned why opposition MPs were excluded from the delegation.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the fair elections act and Senate expenses. NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair asked why an earlier caucus draft had been rejected and whether Senator David Tkachuk had informed the Prime Minister's Office of Mike Duffy's withdrawal from the Deloitte audit. Prime Minister Stephen Harper replied that the bill represented comprehensive reform and that confidentiality rules had not been broken.
Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau raised the 90-per-cent cut to the building Canada fund and asked why infrastructure spending was being reduced while growth slowed. Harper said the new plan totals $70 billion over ten years and has municipal support.
Decided that day
- The House approved the government's budgetary policy.
- The House agreed to honour Afghan veterans.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2014-02-26
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
The Budget
NDP MP Mike Sullivan asked Conservative MP Cheryl Gallant how the budget would address storage of spent nuclear fuel for 500,000 years at Chalk River.
Read the exchangeCanada Post
NDP MP Matthew Kellway said Toronto council opposed ending home delivery and asked why the government was ignoring big-city mayors meeting in Ottawa.
Read the exchangeCitizenship and Immigration
Liberal MP Stéphane Dion said Canada had committed to only 1,300 Syrian refugees while Sweden had already accepted 15,000.
Read the exchangePrime Minister's Office
NDP MP Charlie Angus said the Prime Minister's Office had spent $130,000 on meals, including a $7,000 pizza party, and asked why rules were being broken.
Read the exchangeTaxation
NDP MP Peggy Nash said the Conservative plan would cost $3 billion a year and would not benefit 86 per cent of families.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores the fundraiser question entirely and shifts to praising the minister and correcting an unrelated statistic.
I think the minister of democratic reform is doing an excellent job, including on the fair elections act.
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses confidentiality but evades the specific question about what Senator Tkachuk told the PMO.
The auditors themselves have confirmed that the audit was handled with the utmost confidentiality and no rules were broken.
- misdirectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer redirects the question to the Senate instead of addressing what Tkachuk reported to the PMO.
This is a question for the Senate.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer avoids explaining why the caucus rejected the draft and instead attacks the questioner's accuracy and reading habits.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer again urges reading the bill without explaining what changed between drafts.
I encourage the NDP leader to look at the facts and read this bill, which his party has so far refused to read.
- partly answeredInfrastructureMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer defends the infrastructure fund as a record investment but does not address the 90% cut or timing with slowing growth.
last year the government presented to Parliament a new building Canada fund, which actually has a record investment over the past decade
- misdirectedInfrastructureMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the Liberal leader's economic understanding instead of addressing infrastructure cuts.
what is out of touch is the Liberal leader, who thinks that a budget will balance itself.
- deflectedInfrastructureMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats praise for the plan and notes Liberal opposition without explaining the cuts or addressing the promise-follow-through criticism.
last year, the government presented an infrastructure plan for the coming decades that totalled $70 billion over ten years.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses collective cabinet responsibility rather than identifying any specific PMO role.
under our system of government, cabinet, of course, is collectively responsible for the legislation it presents before the House of Commons.
- misdirectedDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The response attacks the question as a conspiracy theory and invokes Osama bin Laden instead of answering.
Maybe, Mr. Speaker, they even spoke to Osama bin Laden.
- partly answeredDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the rationale for contribution limits but does not state how the $300 figure was derived.
as you well know, the government has put a limit on private donations.
- answeredDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states that donor records were not used and explains the basis for the amount.
I really do not know how one would do that.
- answeredDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the reasons for banning voter cards and vouching with reference to inaccuracy rates and fraud risk.
a large percentage of voter ID cards contain inaccuracies, one in six.
- partly answeredDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims evidence exists but provides no specific cases and shifts to potential irregularity.
The answer, Mr. Speaker, is yes, but in any case, the more disturbing issue is that we actually would not know if that were the case.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The question assumes intent to suppress senior votes; the answer lists alternative IDs and procedures without addressing the premise.
In the case of seniors who live in residences, they can use identification such as an attestation of residence letter of stay, admission form, statement of benefits, or hospital bracelets in the case of hospital care facilities.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). rhetorical question.The rhetorical question mocks the policy; the answer reiterates available IDs without engaging the fraud-prevention logic.
as I just said, there are 39 pieces of ID that voters can use.
- deflectedDemocratic ReformThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses an independent commissioner but does not address the specific restriction on the Chief Electoral Officer.
Obviously we expect Elections Canada to focus its efforts on the good conduct of elections.
- misdirectedPrime Minister's OfficeGerry Byrne (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer pivots to criticizing the previous Liberal government instead of addressing the PMO expense claim.
I am pleased to report that since the Liberals, who kind of mainlined their hospitality expenses, were in power, we have actually been able to cut hospitality expenses by the Government of Canada by 48%.
- deflectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists past procurements but does not address the cost of failures, delays or cancellations.
The military lived under a decade of darkness under the Liberals prior to us forming government.
- partly answeredFinanceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer affirms the Prime Minister's view on income splitting but ignores the question about who speaks for the government.
we think income splitting would be an excellent policy for Canadian families, just as it has been an excellent policy for Canadian seniors.
- deflectedCanada PostMr. Matthew Kellway (NDP) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains Canada Post's plan but does not address the specific concerns about Toronto or safety impacts.
That has been in place for two-thirds of Canadian addresses since the 1980s.
- partly answeredCanada PostMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). substantive question.The answer begins to clarify the scope of changes but cuts off without addressing municipal needs.
What is happening is that we are converting, or rather, Canada Post is converting one-third—
- deflectedHousingMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Candice Bergen (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites total spending figures but does not address the planned cuts or municipal coordination.
It has resulted in more than 880,000 individuals and families being supported through things like our renewal investment in affordable housing, as well as our homelessness partnering strategy.
- deflectedHousingMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims transit is eligible under the plan but does not address red tape or renewal of housing agreements.
Never in Canadian history has a government invested more than our government in public transit.
- deflectedPrime Minister's OfficeMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores the specific PMO expense question and pivots to attacking opposition disclosure and carbon taxes.
That kind of hypocrisy is not tolerated by taxpayers.
- deflectedPrime Minister's OfficeMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores the PMO spending and pig award question, instead attacking NDP expense disclosure.
the members of the NDP caucus do not want to disclose their expenses to the people and taxpayers.
- deflectedGovernment AdvertisingMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer consists of a single non-responsive sentence that does not address the advertising spend or award.
Those are fighting words, Mr. Speaker.
- misdirectedGovernment AccountabilityMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer mocks the questioner as comedy hour and attacks NDP union ties instead of addressing pork award or Senate spending.
it is Yuk Yuk's comedy hour in question period.
- misdirectedForeign AffairsMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks NDP and Liberals for past positions rather than addressing exclusion of opposition MPs from the Ukraine delegation.
The Liberals actually thought this whole thing was a joke.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Chris Alexander (Conservative). substantive question.Answer defends the 1300 figure with comparisons but provides no exact arrival number requested.
Canada is once again at the top of the list with its commitment to welcome 1,300 refugees this year.
- deflectedConsumer ProtectionMs. Annick Papillon (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer cites existing legislation but pivots to attacking NDP carbon tax stance instead of new collusion measures.
The New Democrats have always advocated for carbon taxes, always advocated for higher prices against consumers
- deflectedConsumer ProtectionMr. John Rafferty (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer highlights Competition Bureau actions but attacks NDP taxes rather than addressing a gas price watchdog.
It is New Democrats who want to go after consumers and hurt them with carbon taxes and higher taxes across the board.
- answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Sean Casey (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly explains the rationale for the regional changes to address prior unfairness in EI qualification.
Finally, we have ended that aberration, that fundamental unfairness in the system.
- answeredHealthMrs. Djaouida Sellah (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer details the existing pan-Canadian strategy that requires advance notices of shortages as requested.
Companies have to provide advance notices of shortages online, and they also have to include information for physicians on alternative treatments.
- answeredIntergovernmental RelationsMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer provides a direct affirmative response to the request for a guarantee on reducing youth unemployment.
- deflectedCanada PostMrs. Maria Mourani (Independent) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). loaded question.The answer explains Canada Post's financial challenges and plan but avoids the question about giving ammunition to sovereignists.
Its five-point plan, once implemented, would see it self-sufficient again in 2019.