All sittings← 2013-06-102013-06-12 →
Tuesday, June 11, 2013 · sitting No. 267
House advances cluster munitions bill under 45th time allocation motion
The House devoted the largest share of its sitting to second reading of Bill S-10, the prohibiting cluster munitions act. Conservative House leader Peter Van Loan moved a motion to allot no more than five further hours to the stage, after which all necessary questions would be put. New Democratic MP Paul Dewar noted the motion marked the 45th time allocation this session.
In Question Period, New Democratic Party leader Thomas Mulcair asked whether Nigel Wright had spoken with Conservative Party officials about the Senate expense scandal before resigning. Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre replied that the Conservative Party maintains a single audited fund for partisan expenses and that Wright had acted alone.
Decided that day
- Bill S-10 passed third reading
- Amendment deleting words from a motion failed
- Motion on Bill S-6 passed
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2013-06-11
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
First Nations Elections Act
Conservative House leader Peter Van Loan moved time allocation on Bill S-6 after 44 previous instances, prompting New Democratic MP Peter Julian to call the step a record of disrespect for Parliament.
Read the exchangeAboriginal Affairs
New Democratic MP Jean Crowder said five years after the apology, First Nations children still lack safe homes and equitable education, while Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt replied that his party supports every practical step toward reconciliation.
Read the exchangeRail Transportation
New Democratic MP Olivia Chow noted the Transportation Safety Board again called for mandatory automatic braking systems and voice recorders after the Burlington derailment, and asked how many more deaths would prompt action.
Read the exchangeVeterans Affairs
Veterans Affairs Minister Steven Blaney announced that retired Lieutenant-Commander Owen Parkhouse, a veteran with 25 years of service, would become the first veteran to serve as vice-chair of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- answeredEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the specific question about contact with party officials.
we do not have any information to suggest that he did.
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts focus to the party's fund rather than addressing PMO staff use for partisan work.
the Conservative Party has a single fund for partisan expenses, including the party leader's partisan expenses.
- partly answeredEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes annual audits but does not address whether the Prime Minister ordered a specific review of Wright's actions.
the Conservative Fund of Canada is audited every year.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the question about Wright's reason and instead attacks the Liberal leader over a senator.
While the Liberal leader is here in the House of Commons, it would be great if he could explain to Canadian taxpayers why he thinks it would be a great idea for the Liberal senator from Ottawa Centre
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids the question on Wright's credibility and pivots to attacking Liberal senators.
I wonder what his position is now of Senator Pana Merchant.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer references ongoing reviews then shifts to questioning the Liberal leader's expenses instead of providing the cheque.
If the Liberal leader does want to again show transparency and the importance of transparency, perhaps the Liberal leader could tell Canadians if he indeed claimed MP expenses
- answeredEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states they lack access to the personal cheque while noting reviews are underway.
we do not have access to a personal cheque by Nigel Wright.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims the question was answered then pivots to an unrelated point about the asker.
but a question that has not been answered, while the member for Timmins—James Bay raises—
- deflectedEthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The response avoids the question by stating they lack access to the cheque rather than explaining refusal.
we do not have access to Mr. Wright's personal cheque.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates known facts about resignation without addressing the specific questions asked.
Mr. Wright resigned, clearly stating that he acted in a way that was not in keeping with the Prime Minister 's guidelines
- partly answeredEthicsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.It claims to have answered but provides limited information on the fund without fully addressing discussions.
A single fund is used to pay for all Conservative Party spending and that fund is controlled by the Conservative Party.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.Responds by correcting the member but avoids the specific question about access.
The Conservative Party fund is controlled by the Conservative Party.
- deflectedElections CanadaMs. Alexandrine Latendresse (NDP) asked Tim Uppal (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats the commitment without providing a timeline or details.
We committed to introducing legislation, and we will introduce legislation.
- deflectedElections CanadaMr. Craig Scott (NDP) asked Tim Uppal (Conservative). substantive question.Avoids a yes/no answer by restating the commitment without specifying timing.
we committed to introducing legislation, and we will introduce that legislation.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). rhetorical question.The response attacks the questioner personally instead of addressing the rhetorical point.
one thing I do know is that there will not be any Conservative members of Parliament who, unlike the member for Winnipeg Centre , will be defending lawsuits for libel this summer.
- partly answeredElections CanadaCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). substantive question.Provides details on expenses but does not explicitly confirm compliance with rules.
Elections Canada has very clear-cut rules and definitions of what can and cannot constitute a personal campaign expense.
- partly answeredNational DefenceJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Addresses the specific case and claims it applies to all injured members but does not confirm the pension or policy commitment requested.
That is his option. That is the case with all Canadian Forces members injured in combat.
- deflectedNational DefenceJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Ignores the request for assurances and responds only with sarcasm instead of substance.
I am pleased that he is pleased, Mr. Speaker.
- partly answeredSearch and RescueMs. Christine Moore (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Describes actions taken but does not explain the prior delay highlighted in the question.
This was in addition to a number of measures we announced at that time to improve the ability of the Canadian Forces to respond to the largest search and rescue territory on the planet.
- deflectedSearch and RescueMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Highlights positive statistics instead of addressing the failure to act on prior warnings.
In fact, in 2011, 103 Squadron, based in Gander, in the member's home province, averaged a 21.3-minute reaction time in the 30-minute posture, and 58.7 minutes during the two-hour evening posture.
- misdirectedPrivacyMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Insults the asker as paranoid and shifts to general privacy assurances rather than answering about PRISM concerns or steps taken.
I can advise my hon., albeit paranoid, friend that, in fact, CSE does not target Canadians, and of course, nor do we ask our allies to do so.
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Peter Stoffer (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Gives a clear yes and restates the policy that injured members control their release timing.
Yes, Mr. Speaker, I have already answered that question.
- partly answeredRail TransportationMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Steven Fletcher (Conservative). loaded question.Notes listening to recommendations but does not commit to mandating the requested systems.
I will point out that safety has actually improved over the decade.
- partly answeredRail TransportationMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.Lists prior actions taken but does not address introducing new legislation for mandatory systems.
We have already taken action to improve our railway safety system.
- deflectedLibrary and Archives CanadaMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states the premise is inaccurate and defers to a future appointee without addressing the paywall policy.
The hon. member's information is not quite accurate.
- deflectedLibrary and Archives CanadaMr. Andrew Cash (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer defends funding and modernization but avoids confirming or denying the paywall or double-payment claim.
When the new permanent president is installed, probably this fall, he or she will look at the digitization aspect and will look at these questions
- partly answeredPrivacyMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Answer addresses CSEC legal limits and foreign focus but ignores the census question entirely.
CSEC is prohibited by law from directing its activities toward Canadians, or directing its activities at any person in Canada.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMs. Ève Péclet (NDP) asked Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.Answer offers general praise for Canada's role but does not explain the specific UN position on education and gender equality.
Canada is pleased to take a leadership role in the resolution of this important topic about gender violence.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats leadership claim and adds legal compliance without committing to the requested full range of services.
However, most important, we have to comply with our laws in our country and that is what we will do.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceMark Eyking (Liberal) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). loaded question.Answer pivots to job creation statistics and ignores the specific EI case and seasonal industry impacts raised.
In fact, this government has created over a million net new jobs since the downturn of our recession, creating opportunities for Canadians.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.Answer acknowledges slow appeals and describes the new tribunal but gives no timeline for the constituent's case.
The new Social Security Tribunal will continue to provide all Canadians with a fair, quick and accessible mechanism, while eliminating unnecessary duplication of administrative procedures.
- misdirectedInfrastructureMr. Jasbir Sandhu (NDP) asked Steven Fletcher (Conservative). substantive question.Answer incorrectly refers to ferries and provincial jurisdiction instead of addressing the bridge toll request.
we often get requests such as this, but in most cases ferries fall within provincial jurisdiction.