Parliament AIIndependent · non-official

All sittings← 2013-06-102013-06-12 →

Tuesday, June 11, 2013 · sitting No. 267

House advances cluster munitions bill under 45th time allocation motion

The House devoted the largest share of its sitting to second reading of Bill S-10, the prohibiting cluster munitions act. Conservative House leader Peter Van Loan moved a motion to allot no more than five further hours to the stage, after which all necessary questions would be put. New Democratic MP Paul Dewar noted the motion marked the 45th time allocation this session.

In Question Period, New Democratic Party leader Thomas Mulcair asked whether Nigel Wright had spoken with Conservative Party officials about the Senate expense scandal before resigning. Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre replied that the Conservative Party maintains a single audited fund for partisan expenses and that Wright had acted alone.

Decided that day

  • Bill S-10 passed third reading
  • Amendment deleting words from a motion failed
  • Motion on Bill S-6 passed

From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard

No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.

Who held the floor · 2013-06-11

Government (Conservative)OppositionOver the day: government 45%, opposition 55% of the words spokenGovernment businessQuestion PeriodGovernment businessGovernment business▲ Government side held the floor▼ Opposition held the floor
70Bills Advance Past Routine SparringThe House spent nearly all its time on substantive debate over cluster munitions, First Nations elections and related bills, moving several measures forward. Recorded votes approved key stages while Question Period produced mostly partial or deflected answers.AI-rated Score out of 100; the verdict and the answer ratings behind it are a model’s reading. How the AI rates this

AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this

Other moments

First Nations Elections Act

Conservative House leader Peter Van Loan moved time allocation on Bill S-6 after 44 previous instances, prompting New Democratic MP Peter Julian to call the step a record of disrespect for Parliament.

Read the exchange

Aboriginal Affairs

New Democratic MP Jean Crowder said five years after the apology, First Nations children still lack safe homes and equitable education, while Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt replied that his party supports every practical step toward reconciliation.

Read the exchange

Rail Transportation

New Democratic MP Olivia Chow noted the Transportation Safety Board again called for mandatory automatic braking systems and voice recorders after the Burlington derailment, and asked how many more deaths would prompt action.

Read the exchange

Veterans Affairs

Veterans Affairs Minister Steven Blaney announced that retired Lieutenant-Commander Owen Parkhouse, a veteran with 25 years of service, would become the first veteran to serve as vice-chair of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board.

Read the exchange

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

  1. answered
    EthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the specific question about contact with party officials.we do not have any information to suggest that he did.
  2. deflected
    EthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts focus to the party's fund rather than addressing PMO staff use for partisan work.the Conservative Party has a single fund for partisan expenses, including the party leader's partisan expenses.
  3. partly answered
    EthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes annual audits but does not address whether the Prime Minister ordered a specific review of Wright's actions.the Conservative Fund of Canada is audited every year.
  4. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the question about Wright's reason and instead attacks the Liberal leader over a senator.While the Liberal leader is here in the House of Commons, it would be great if he could explain to Canadian taxpayers why he thinks it would be a great idea for the Liberal senator from Ottawa Centre
  5. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids the question on Wright's credibility and pivots to attacking Liberal senators.I wonder what his position is now of Senator Pana Merchant.
  6. deflected
    EthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer references ongoing reviews then shifts to questioning the Liberal leader's expenses instead of providing the cheque.If the Liberal leader does want to again show transparency and the importance of transparency, perhaps the Liberal leader could tell Canadians if he indeed claimed MP expenses
  7. answered
    EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states they lack access to the personal cheque while noting reviews are underway.we do not have access to a personal cheque by Nigel Wright.
  8. deflected
    EthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims the question was answered then pivots to an unrelated point about the asker.but a question that has not been answered, while the member for Timmins—James Bay raises—
  9. deflected
    EthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The response avoids the question by stating they lack access to the cheque rather than explaining refusal.we do not have access to Mr. Wright's personal cheque.
  10. deflected
    EthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates known facts about resignation without addressing the specific questions asked.Mr. Wright resigned, clearly stating that he acted in a way that was not in keeping with the Prime Minister 's guidelines
  11. partly answered
    EthicsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.It claims to have answered but provides limited information on the fund without fully addressing discussions.A single fund is used to pay for all Conservative Party spending and that fund is controlled by the Conservative Party.
  12. deflected
    EthicsMs. Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.Responds by correcting the member but avoids the specific question about access.The Conservative Party fund is controlled by the Conservative Party.
  13. deflected
    Elections CanadaMs. Alexandrine Latendresse (NDP) asked Tim Uppal (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats the commitment without providing a timeline or details.We committed to introducing legislation, and we will introduce legislation.
  14. deflected
    Elections CanadaMr. Craig Scott (NDP) asked Tim Uppal (Conservative). substantive question.Avoids a yes/no answer by restating the commitment without specifying timing.we committed to introducing legislation, and we will introduce that legislation.
  15. misdirected
    EthicsMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). rhetorical question.The response attacks the questioner personally instead of addressing the rhetorical point.one thing I do know is that there will not be any Conservative members of Parliament who, unlike the member for Winnipeg Centre , will be defending lawsuits for libel this summer.
  16. partly answered
    Elections CanadaCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked Ms. Eve Adams (Conservative). substantive question.Provides details on expenses but does not explicitly confirm compliance with rules.Elections Canada has very clear-cut rules and definitions of what can and cannot constitute a personal campaign expense.
  17. partly answered
    National DefenceJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Addresses the specific case and claims it applies to all injured members but does not confirm the pension or policy commitment requested.That is his option. That is the case with all Canadian Forces members injured in combat.
  18. deflected
    National DefenceJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Ignores the request for assurances and responds only with sarcasm instead of substance.I am pleased that he is pleased, Mr. Speaker.
  19. partly answered
    Search and RescueMs. Christine Moore (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Describes actions taken but does not explain the prior delay highlighted in the question.This was in addition to a number of measures we announced at that time to improve the ability of the Canadian Forces to respond to the largest search and rescue territory on the planet.
  20. deflected
    Search and RescueMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Highlights positive statistics instead of addressing the failure to act on prior warnings.In fact, in 2011, 103 Squadron, based in Gander, in the member's home province, averaged a 21.3-minute reaction time in the 30-minute posture, and 58.7 minutes during the two-hour evening posture.
  21. misdirected
    PrivacyMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Insults the asker as paranoid and shifts to general privacy assurances rather than answering about PRISM concerns or steps taken.I can advise my hon., albeit paranoid, friend that, in fact, CSE does not target Canadians, and of course, nor do we ask our allies to do so.
  22. answered
    National DefenceMr. Peter Stoffer (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Gives a clear yes and restates the policy that injured members control their release timing.Yes, Mr. Speaker, I have already answered that question.
  23. partly answered
    Rail TransportationMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Steven Fletcher (Conservative). loaded question.Notes listening to recommendations but does not commit to mandating the requested systems.I will point out that safety has actually improved over the decade.
  24. partly answered
    Rail TransportationMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.Lists prior actions taken but does not address introducing new legislation for mandatory systems.We have already taken action to improve our railway safety system.
  25. deflected
    Library and Archives CanadaMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states the premise is inaccurate and defers to a future appointee without addressing the paywall policy.The hon. member's information is not quite accurate.
  26. deflected
    Library and Archives CanadaMr. Andrew Cash (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer defends funding and modernization but avoids confirming or denying the paywall or double-payment claim.When the new permanent president is installed, probably this fall, he or she will look at the digitization aspect and will look at these questions
  27. partly answered
    PrivacyMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Answer addresses CSEC legal limits and foreign focus but ignores the census question entirely.CSEC is prohibited by law from directing its activities toward Canadians, or directing its activities at any person in Canada.
  28. deflected
    Foreign AffairsMs. Ève Péclet (NDP) asked Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.Answer offers general praise for Canada's role but does not explain the specific UN position on education and gender equality.Canada is pleased to take a leadership role in the resolution of this important topic about gender violence.
  29. deflected
    Foreign AffairsMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats leadership claim and adds legal compliance without committing to the requested full range of services.However, most important, we have to comply with our laws in our country and that is what we will do.
  30. misdirected
    Employment InsuranceMark Eyking (Liberal) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). loaded question.Answer pivots to job creation statistics and ignores the specific EI case and seasonal industry impacts raised.In fact, this government has created over a million net new jobs since the downturn of our recession, creating opportunities for Canadians.
  31. partly answered
    Employment InsuranceMs. Ruth Ellen Brosseau (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.Answer acknowledges slow appeals and describes the new tribunal but gives no timeline for the constituent's case.The new Social Security Tribunal will continue to provide all Canadians with a fair, quick and accessible mechanism, while eliminating unnecessary duplication of administrative procedures.
  32. misdirected
    InfrastructureMr. Jasbir Sandhu (NDP) asked Steven Fletcher (Conservative). substantive question.Answer incorrectly refers to ferries and provincial jurisdiction instead of addressing the bridge toll request.we often get requests such as this, but in most cases ferries fall within provincial jurisdiction.