All sittings← 2013-05-212013-05-23 →
Wednesday, May 22, 2013 · sitting No. 253
Commons backs extended sittings as ethics questions dominate question period
The House devoted the largest share of its time to a government motion to extend sitting hours until midnight each day. Conservative House leader Peter Van Loan moved the motion, which would allow additional debate on pending legislation before the summer recess.
In question period the main exchanges centred on the $90,000 cheque given to Senator Mike Duffy. NDP leader Thomas Mulcair pressed Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird on which independent body would examine the transaction, while Baird maintained that the matter had been referred to the Senate ethics officer and a Senate committee.
Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux said his party was prepared to sit longer hours but objected to repeated use of time allocation. The motion remained before the House at adjournment.
Decided that day
- Sitting hours extended
- Anaphylaxis motion adopted
- Closure on government business adopted
- House proceeded to orders of the day
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2013-05-22
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Canadian Museum of History Act
Heritage Minister James Moore introduced second reading of Bill C-49 to create the Canadian Museum of History, saying the new mandate would allow broader national storytelling.
Read the exchangeRoyal Canadian Mounted Police
NDP MP Niki Ashton asked the government to strengthen measures against sexual harassment in the RCMP after new allegations surfaced; Public Safety Minister Vic Toews defended the enhancing RCMP accountability act.
Read the exchangeGovernment Appointments
NDP MP Chris Charlton accused the government of patronage after ten failed Conservative candidates were named to the new Social Security Tribunal; Government House leader Peter Van Loan said appointments followed a merit-based process.
Read the exchangeYouth Unemployment
NDP MP Chris Charlton said youth unemployment had risen two points in seven years and stood at double the national average in Hamilton; no minister responded directly.
Read the exchangeQalipu Mi'kmaq First Nation Band
Liberal MP Carolyn Bennett supported a motion to clarify registration rules for the Qalipu Mi'kmaq First Nation, arguing that recent changes undermined an earlier agreement.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates a prior quote without addressing the credibility of the Senate committee or naming the bodies.
What I did say yesterday was, and I quote: "Furthermore, this matter has been referred to two independent bodies for review"
- partly answeredEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer addresses the independence claim by noting opposition members on the committee but avoids confirming control.
There will be members of the opposition, of political parties, on that committee.
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats denial of a legal document without addressing release of the trust document or cheque.
I said that our understanding was that there was no such legal document.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to ethics legislation and cooperation instead of confirming absence of all PMO documents.
This matter has been referred to her, and the government is prepared to fully co-operate as she looks into this issue.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer repeats a narrow denial without naming anyone who has knowledge of the scandal.
No one in the government is aware of any agreement or any legal document with respect to this payment.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses the final report outcome instead of identifying who ordered changes to the Duffy report.
As I understand it, the report did, in the end, reflect the fact that a repayment had been made.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to general principles about public service rather than naming who ordered leniency on Duffy.
People should be working to advance the public interest and not to advance their own interests.
- answeredEthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the Prime Minister learned of the payment from media and was not consulted.
At a press conference just a few moments ago, responding to questions from the media, the Prime Minister indicated that he was not consulted, nor was he asked to sign off on it, nor would he have signed off on it.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer refers the matter to the ethics officer without addressing the call for police involvement or committee membership.
this matter has been referred to the ethics officer, Mary Dawson, for review, as it properly should be.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates the Prime Minister's lack of prior knowledge but ignores questions about others in the PMO or Senate involvement.
It was very clear that he was not consulted about this payment.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats the Prime Minister's unawareness without addressing who in the PMO knew or authorized the deal.
the Prime Minister was unaware of this payment.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer focuses on Nigel Wright's sole responsibility but avoids confirming awareness of other cheques or transfers.
Nigel Wright accepted sole responsibility for his action.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer highlights the ethics watchdog but does not confirm submission of any documents to the commissioner.
it was this government that brought in an independent and strengthened ethics watchdog.
- partly answeredEthicsMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses the committee report outcome but sidesteps PMO awareness of in-camera meetings.
the committee has now publicly reported.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Craig Scott (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes referral to the ethics officer and non-direction of police but does not commit to calling the RCMP.
This matter has been referred to her.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Craig Scott (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer cites confidence in the ethics process without conceding possible criminality or calling the RCMP.
We have confidence in the process in place.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer shifts to past joint work and blames Liberal senators instead of addressing the timing of any ethical lapse.
One of the things that we fought for was to have an independent Senate ethics officer that was combined with an independent House ethics officer.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes Wright's resignation and an independent review but does not address producing the cheque or confirming its existence.
An independent officer of Parliament will have the opportunity to review this matter, and we look forward to her reporting back to Parliament in short order.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promises cooperation with the ethics officer but avoids any commitment to release the specific email or documents.
obviously the government, as it always does, will co-operate fully with the independent parliamentary ethics officer.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Justin Trudeau (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats the prior response and pivots to the government's past bill while denying knowledge of a legal agreement.
In fact, it was this government that introduced a bill providing for an independent ethics watchdog for the House of Commons.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMrs. Anne-Marie Day (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the consolidation for efficiency and states third parties can still advocate, but does not address the no-direct-communication order.
Third-party groups will continue to be able to advocate on behalf of their clients.
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer describes the new tribunal's selection process but ignores the donations violation and demand to return funds.
the members of the Social Security Tribunal are, of course, appointed through a rigorous process, a rigorous selection process that ensures that they have to meet specific experience and competence--
- answeredGovernment AppointmentsMr. Ryan Cleary (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly cites the independent report finding no political influence and notes actions taken on recommendations.
The Public Service Commission report clearly states, "No evidence was found to support allegations of political influence in the ACOA investigations."
- deflectedEthicsMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer pivots to promoting the Canada job grant instead of addressing the claim that rule-breaking has become the norm.
this year, the government is implementing new measures to help Canadians, including the new Canada job grant, in order to help Canadians get training so they can find a job or find a better job.
- answeredScience and TechnologyMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). substantive question.The minister directly affirms understanding and cites specific investments made.
Mr. Speaker, of course, we do.
- deflectedScience and TechnologyMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). loaded question.Response pivots to criticizing NDP voting record rather than addressing the reported decline.
the problem actually is that every time we provide new funding and investment, the NDP votes against it.
- deflectedRoyal Canadian Mounted PoliceMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.Answer highlights NDP opposition to the bill instead of committing to further action on harassment.
Unfortunately, the NDP voted against it and put nothing in its place.
- misdirectedRoyal Canadian Mounted PoliceMs. Rosane Doré Lefebvre (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). loaded question.Response congratulates the member on her child then redirects responsibility to the commissioner.
I would like to welcome the member back to the House and congratulate her on the birth of her child.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer refers to the Prime Minister's earlier press conference without addressing the specific questions raised.
the Prime Minister spoke to this issue at a press conference earlier today.
- answeredEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Minister directly states that no one in government is aware of any such legal document.
I have been very clear. No one in this government is aware of any legal document with respect to this payment.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Mr. Rick Dykstra (Conservative). loaded question.Response emphasizes the government's plan and statistics instead of addressing new barriers or costs.
In fact, thanks to our plan for faster family reunification, we are on track to cut the backlog and wait times in half so families will be reunited with their parents and grandparents.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Sean Casey (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer again refers only to the Prime Minister's press conference without engaging the question.
I think the Prime Minister spoke to that issue at a press conference with journalists earlier today.
- answeredHousingMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly states the jurisdictional reason for no federal assistance and points to the provincial program.
the pyrrhotite problem falls under provincial jurisdiction.
- deflectedHousingMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses budget renewals but ignores the requests to table the report and consider its specific recommendations.
Economic action plan 2013 renewed the homelessness partnership strategy and it renewed the affordable housing agreements.
- answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Jean-François Fortin (Bloc) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). loaded question.The answer explains the processing change as an efficiency measure and confirms third-party advocacy remains possible.
we are consolidating EI processing to ensure the system is more effective and efficient for all Canadians.