All sittings← 2013-03-182013-03-20 →
Tuesday, March 19, 2013 · sitting No. 224
Commons advances bill to fix urgent wiretap powers after supreme court ruling
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on debate of Bill C-55, the response to the Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. Tse. Parliamentary secretary Robert Goguen told members the bill preserves police ability to intercept communications without prior judicial authorization when urgency requires it. New Democrat Françoise Boivin and Green Party MP Elizabeth May pressed for stronger notification and record-keeping requirements.
In question period Conservative and New Democrat members clashed over the resignation of Labrador MP Peter Penashue. NDP leader Thomas Mulcair asked why the prime minister allowed Penashue to seek re-election before Elections Canada completes its investigation. Prime Minister Stephen Harper replied that Penashue will answer to Labrador voters.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2013-03-19
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Canada Revenue Agency
NDP leader Thomas Mulcair said the Canada Revenue Agency identified more than 8,000 offshore tax cheats yet faces a nearly $100-million budget cut. Prime Minister Stephen Harper answered that the government has already shut down several tax-haven arrangements.
Read the exchangeThe Economy
Finance minister Jim Flaherty told the House he will present budget 2013 on Thursday, March 21 at 4 p.m.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
Natural Resources parliamentary secretary David Anderson said the government has introduced a framework for a world-class oil-spill response plan.
Read the exchangeOfficial Languages
Treasury Board president Tony Clement said surveys show 90 to 92 per cent of public servants can work in the official language of their choice.
Read the exchangeNational Charities Week Act
Kitchener-Waterloo MP Peter Braid moved second reading of Bill C-458 to create a national charities week and extend the tax deadline for charitable donations.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- misdirectedCanada Revenue AgencyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the questioner's trip to Washington instead of addressing CRA resources for tax havens.
I am rather surprised to be getting a question like this on the economy from the leader of the opposition after he travelled to Washington to fight against Canadian jobs.
- misdirectedCanada Revenue AgencyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to criticizing the NDP's position on jobs and leaks rather than explaining CRA budget cuts.
If the leader of the NDP were so proud of the position he had taken, I wonder why we had to find out what he really said from leaks out of private meetings.
- deflectedThe BudgetThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids costing indecision by urging to wait for the budget and shifting to trade promotion.
rather than speculate, the leader of the NDP should wait for the budget to be tabled.
- misdirectedThe EconomyThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks NDP tax policies and resource views instead of addressing unemployment numbers or Penashue.
the manufacturers and exporters of our country say that the tax policies of the NDP alone would kill 200,000 jobs in that sector.
- deflectedEthicsThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer praises Penashue's record without addressing the timing of resignation or the ongoing investigation.
minister Penashue has done the right thing under difficult circumstances and he is prepared to take his record and be accountable to the people of Labrador
- deflectedEthicsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states voters will decide without addressing when standards apply or the timing of the campaign.
it is the people of Labrador who will make the decision on this matter.
- misdirectedEthicsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer blames the opposition for raising the issue and pivots to Penashue's work instead of addressing standards.
of course, it is the Liberal Party and the opposition which raised this particular issue today on the floor of the House of Commons.
- deflectedEthicsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer reiterates that voters decide without committing to any rule ensuring Elections Canada completes its work first.
In our democratic system, voters are the ones who make the decision in such a situation.
- deflectedInfrastructureMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates general investments and jurisdiction respect while deferring without addressing new long-term funding.
She will have to wait for the budget for the rest.
- deflectedIntergovernmental RelationsMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to criticizing the NDP alternative budget instead of addressing provincial transfer cuts or solutions.
Talk about irresponsibility with taxpayers' money—to bring forward something called an "alternative" budget with no numbers.
- deflectedIntergovernmental RelationsMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer emphasizes caucus consultations and patience for the budget while ignoring jurisdiction and leaks.
They have worked very hard, all of them, in consulting with people across the country and in their constituencies
- misdirectedRegional Economic DevelopmentMr. Jean Rousseau (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the question as untrue and defends past forestry spending rather than addressing Quebec regional office cuts.
the question is full of untruths.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to NDP ties with Québec solidaire and Paul Rose instead of addressing SNC-Lavalin donations to Conservatives.
That member donated to Québec solidaire as late as last year.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer again redirects to NDP leader's past and Québec solidaire instead of investigating Conservative fraudulent donations.
the NDP leader is in a better position to explain what went on with the fraudulent donations because he was a member of the organization that received them.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer contrasts Penashue with the NDP member and attacks the asker rather than addressing the website or ethics issue.
The people of Timmins voted NDP, and they got a big talker for the big city.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer challenges the member to repeat allegations outside and attacks his record instead of addressing Penashue's potential charges.
I encourage him to finally have the courage to repeat those kinds of allegations outside.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores the ethics investigation query entirely and pivots to unrelated resource sector praise.
Those of us on this side of the House of Commons are thrilled and proud to look at Newfoundland and Labrador succeeding and enjoying prosperity, precisely because of our natural resources sectors.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Scott Andrews (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.Answer evades the compliance agreement and hypocrisy question by attacking the prior Liberal MP instead.
the people of Labrador had a big-talking Liberal who delivered nothing for far too long.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.Answer sidesteps the cheating and investigation concerns by repeating resource achievements and a Franklin quote.
As Benjamin Franklin said, well said is good, but well done is better.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Sean Casey (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the question's premise by claiming the opposition criticizes Penashue for being online rather than addressing ethics.
normally they attack Peter Penashue for spending too much time in Labrador with his constituents.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer ignores oil spill prevention rules and instead attacks the NDP leader's national leadership.
Once again, he demonstrated he is not prime ministerial material.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer references a new oil spill response framework but mostly attacks the NDP's opposition to energy projects.
yesterday we introduced the framework for our world-class oil spill response plan.
- answeredOfficial LanguagesMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly addresses Official Languages Act obligations by citing the Roadmap and consultations.
we take our obligations under the Official Languages Act very seriously.
- answeredOfficial LanguagesMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.Answer affirms bilingual services and cites a survey showing 92% of public servants can work in their language of choice.
92% of them were able to express themselves in the language of their choice to constituents, to people of Canada.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.Answer avoids the specific request to reject demands by pivoting to unrelated attacks on NDP policy.
The New Democrats have promised to bring back the long gun registry if they are given the chance.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer addresses treaty standards but deflects the binary choice by attacking registry policy instead.
What we do not what to do is target duck hunters and sportsmen.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyMr. Randall Garrison (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.Answer partially addresses the show content and privacy but ignores cost and ending the practice.
The show he is talking about is about the situations faced daily by our front-line border officers.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyMs. Rosane Doré Lefebvre (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.Answer ignores the cost question entirely and attacks the NDP on unrelated immigration policy.
In fact, the NDP even voted against the faster removal of foreign criminals act.
- partly answeredOfficial LanguagesStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.Answer provides historical rates but does not address the claimed drop or low priority under Conservatives.
In 2002, 2005, 2008 and 2011, the rate was always between 90% and 92%.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentLawrence MacAulay (Liberal) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states the decision to end federal operation but does not commit to stopping destruction or extending funding.
Our government is continuing important freshwater research in other facilities across Canada
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Kennedy Stewart (NDP) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats the end of federal facility status without addressing extension of funding or preventing clear-cutting.
The department has a number of science facilities that are focused on our freshwater program.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Laurin Liu (NDP) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims ongoing science work but avoids the question of halting dismantling until new operator arrives.
There are also freshwater components to the science program that are conducted at most of our other nine major research institutes
- deflectedParliamentary Budget OfficerCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked Mr. Royal Galipeau (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids naming any meeting date or process review.
the co-chairs of the committee will call a meeting of the committee at the appropriate time.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Ms. Lois Brown (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the question on lost funds and pivots to general praise.
Canadians can be proud of the results that their hard-earned tax dollars are achieving abroad.
- partly answeredTourism IndustryMr. François Lapointe (NDP) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites a national policy and visitor growth but does not address Quebec-specific support.
I would like to point out to the hon. member that we announced a national tourism policy a few months ago.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bruce Hyer (Independent) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). loaded question.The answer justifies the closure and other sites but evades the timing and firing questions.
we have in fact made the decision to close the Experimental Lakes and will be ending the federal facility.
- misdirectedPoints of OrderMauril Bélanger (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the asker instead of addressing the interpretation suggestion.
I welcome the intervention of the opposition House leader because it made my point about doing as I say, not as I do.
- misdirectedPoints of OrderDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Mr. Royal Galipeau (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer shifts to accusing another member rather than engaging the decorum point.
today, in the statements before question period, a member with 688 days of experience in the House, the hon. member for Manicouagan , deliberately and viciously named a member of Parliament.