All sittings← 2013-02-052013-02-07 →
Wednesday, February 6, 2013 · sitting No. 205
Commons advances bill to speed removal of foreign criminals
Government Orders on Bill C-43, An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, consumed the largest share of the sitting as the House considered it at third reading. Conservative MP Jason Kenney moved third reading and said the bill would speed removal of foreign criminals while increasing resources for the Canada Border Services Agency. Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux said the Liberal Party supported deporting those convicted of serious crimes but wanted consequences for all crimes.
Question Period opened with clashes over electoral boundaries in Saskatchewan. NDP MP Thomas Mulcair asked whether the Prime Minister knew his party was behind fraudulent calls and accused Conservatives of lying to avoid responsibility. Conservative MP Stephen Harper said the party had explained the matter and that input from parliamentarians is expected by boundary commissions.
Decided that day
- Faster Removal of Foreign Criminals Act passed third reading
- Motion on employment insurance changes defeated
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2013-02-06
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Child Care
Liberal MP Judy Sgro said seven years ago the Prime Minister tore up signed child care agreements and that $15 billion had been squandered with no new spaces created.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
NDP MP Megan Leslie asked when the government would establish useful environmental protection policies after the Commissioner of the Environment report on offshore oil spills and hydraulic fracturing.
Read the exchangeInternational Trade
Liberal MP Bob Rae asked for assurance that dairy would remain off the table in Canada-European Union trade negotiations.
Read the exchangeVeterans
NDP MP Sylvain Chicoine said the government’s response to the ombudsman’s report on disability benefits fell short of ensuring procedural fairness for veterans.
Read the exchangeHealth
Liberal MP Hedy Fry said the minister ignored advice from her own advisory committee on limiting sales of high-caffeine energy drinks.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedElectoral BoundariesThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the timing question and shifts to defending the party's boundary input process.
The party has already explained what happened with these calls.
- deflectedElectoral BoundariesThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer rejects accusations without addressing knowledge or accountability and pivots to the boundary commission process.
As I think the Speaker knows very well, there are electoral commissions in effect to redraw boundaries.
- deflectedThe BudgetThomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the robocalls premise and budget mistakes query, restating general economic goals instead.
the objective for our upcoming budget is the same as previous budgets: to ensure economic growth, job creation and long-term prosperity.
- misdirectedThe BudgetMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Mrs. Shelly Glover (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP's voting record rather than addressing the infrastructure program request.
I want to be clear when I say that we were very disappointed in the NDP when it voted against many measures such as the small business hiring tax credit
- misdirectedThe BudgetMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Mrs. Shelly Glover (Conservative). substantive question.The answer criticizes the NDP's past votes instead of clarifying budget priorities on infrastructure and jobs.
as I said before, it was the NDP that Canadians were disappointed with, because they voted against so many good measures to maintain the job creation we have.
- answeredElectoral BoundariesBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the request by stating the government will not introduce partisan legislation to alter commission recommendations.
- partly answeredElectoral BoundariesBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms no process changes but adds an attack on the questioner's history rather than a full commitment.
The government will not make any changes to the process.
- answeredInternational TradeBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly confirms continued defense of supply management in trade talks.
the government has defended our supply management system successfully in various trade negotiations, and we continue to do so.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Ms. Michelle Rempel (Conservative). substantive question.Answer avoids timeline for new policies by quoting commissioner praise and listing past achievements instead.
It is our government that has seen actual reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Ms. Michelle Rempel (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states the jurisdictional position on fracking but does not address federal toxic-substance duties raised in the question.
our government knows that the primary responsibility for hydraulic fracturing is with the provinces.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Ms. Michelle Rempel (Conservative). substantive question.Answer restates polluter-pay principle and existing measures without committing to the commissioner's liability recommendations.
we understand that the fundamental principle of our environmental review system and our environment regime is the polluter pay principle.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the NDP for filibustering instead of addressing current nuclear-liability inaction.
the NDP members were the ones who filibustered it and did everything they could to prevent it from passing.
- deflectedElectoral BoundariesMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). loaded question.Answer discusses public submissions and a dissenting report but ignores the robocall interference allegation.
In an unprecedented move, one of the three commissioners tabled a dissenting report.
- misdirectedElectoral BoundariesMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.Answer pivots to accusing the NDP of similar conduct rather than addressing Conservative robocalls.
the NDP is condemning a practice in which it itself engaged.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.Answer notes an ongoing Senate review but does not address recovering the claimed expenses from Senator Duffy.
The Senate is, as we know, doing a review of its current rules and ensuring that they are properly applied to all senators.
- deflectedElectoral BoundariesMr. Craig Scott (NDP) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.Answer emphasizes public input and final commission authority while avoiding any pledge to cease government pressure.
The process allows and encourages the public to make submissions.
- deflectedElectoral BoundariesMr. Craig Scott (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer avoids the question by dismissing the premise and pivoting to attack the NDP.
I will bet dollars to doughnuts that we will be able to find a lot of NDP submissions to these parliamentary hearings.
- deflectedInternational TradeWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). loaded question.Answer rejects the premise outright and shifts to general talking points without addressing drug costs.
I reject the premise of the hon. member's question.
- partly answeredInternational TradeDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer restates the government's position on supply management but pivots to attack a Liberal candidate.
our position on supply management is very clear, and it is the same position that we have maintained in various international negotiations.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsCarolyn Bennett (Liberal) asked John Duncan (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores the statistics on education outcomes and pivots to describing ongoing consultations.
we are taking serious action to ensure that first nations students have access to a quality education, just like every other student in Canada.
- deflectedChild CareMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer changes subject to the universal child care benefit instead of addressing shortage of regulated spaces.
That is why we brought in the universal child care benefit six and a half years ago now, and that has provided help to over three million Canadian children.
- deflectedChild CareMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer defends the existing benefit and notes provincial funding but does not engage with the economic argument for a national program.
we do have a national program that is accessible by all parents.
- misdirectedVeteransMr. Sylvain Chicoine (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer provides statistics and claims action but ends by attacking the NDP for not supporting initiatives.
The real question is why, every time we introduce measures to improve veterans' living conditions, the NDP fails to support them or, even worse, votes against them.
- misdirectedVeteransMr. Peter Stoffer (NDP) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims commitment to fairness but redirects to criticizing the NDP's voting record.
When will the NDP support our initiatives and vote with the government to fund our veterans initiatives?
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Philip Toone (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer promotes government job-matching efforts without addressing claims of punishing workers or lack of jobs.
We are trying to help people find jobs. The NDP should help us do it.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Robert Chisholm (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts to general talking points on worker shortages instead of explaining call centre issues.
Far from it, Mr. Speaker, we are helping Canadians get back to work.
- answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly counters the premise by stating interest and detailing recovery actions taken.
we are very interested in how much of this money goes missing, and that is why we aggressively pursue all information we receive.
- deflectedCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.Answer emphasizes international leadership and a quote but avoids committing to a domestic revenue-loss estimate.
Under this government, we have taken a leadership role with our international partners.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer asserts personal rural support without addressing the question on rural Conservative members' positions.
My constituents have been telling me that they support the changes we are making.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer cites supportive associations rather than responding to concerns about job losses or listening to CFIB.
there are a lot of employers' associations who are with us on this.
- misdirectedCanadian Wheat BoardMs. Niki Ashton (NDP) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). loaded question.Answer rejects the premise outright and pivots to farmer success and rail legislation instead of addressing the ad.
I reject the premise of the question.
- deflectedCanadian Wheat BoardMr. Malcolm Allen (NDP) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). loaded question.Answer denies the charge and discusses consultations without addressing why farmers feel taken for granted.
- partly answeredHealthHedy Fry (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). loaded question.The answer describes new regulatory measures but does not address the advisory committee recommendation or whether the limit change is sufficient.
Our government announced a new approach to regulating energy drinks and would include limits on the level of caffeine in these products.
- partly answeredInternational Co-operationMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Julian Fantino (Conservative). loaded question.The answer points to online project data but does not provide the specific number of approved projects requested.
All of our projects are online, available for the member to access.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Pierre Dionne Labelle (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP rather than addressing the specific claim about EI impacts on parliamentary restaurant workers.
the NDP is talking nonsense yet again.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMr. André Bellavance (Bloc) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). loaded question.The answer asserts consultation and defense of supply management but does not confirm or deny the specific cheese import concession mentioned.
We regularly consult with provinces and industry.