All sittings← 2013-01-302013-02-01 →
Thursday, January 31, 2013 · sitting No. 201
NDP motion on aboriginal economic outcomes dominates supply day
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on a New Democratic motion calling on the government to make improving economic outcomes for First Nations, Inuit and Métis a central focus of Budget 2013 and to commit to treaty implementation and meaningful consultation. NDP MP Jean Crowder moved the motion and Conservative minister John Duncan responded that the government is adding first nations to the land management regime and advancing projects such as the Haisla natural gas facility. Liberal MP Kevin Lamoureux recalled the Kelowna accord while Crowder replied that it omitted treaties and the duty to consult.
In Question Period, NDP MP Megan Leslie pressed the Prime Minister on the absence of aboriginal issues from his caucus speech and on insults from Conservative members. Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the government's priorities remain the economy, jobs and safety for all Canadians including aboriginal people. NDP MP Françoise Boivin and Conservative minister Rob Nicholson clashed over backbench attempts to reopen the abortion debate, with Nicholson stating the government will not reintroduce legislation on the issue.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2013-01-31
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Ethics
NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice asked whether the government would give the Ethics Commissioner power to impose fines after three investigations into the Minister of Industry, and Conservative minister Tony Clement said the government will review the commissioner's recommendations.
Read the exchangeHuman Resources and Skills Development Canada
Liberal MP Judy Sgro asked the Prime Minister how long the hard drive containing personal data on 600,000 Canadians has been missing from Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, and Conservative parliamentary secretary Kellie Leitch replied that the loss is unacceptable and the privacy commissioner is investigating.
Read the exchangeEmployment Insurance
Liberal MP Bob Rae urged the Prime Minister to drop the proposed rise in employment insurance premiums given slow economic growth, and Harper said the government will not artificially inflate the size of the program.
Read the exchangeHealth
NDP MP Libby Davies said the Minister of Health ignored warnings that a voluntary system would fail and 94 per cent of pharmacists still face shortages, and Conservative minister Leona Aglukkaq said the government is working with provinces and companies on a public website while monitoring compliance.
Read the exchangeNatural Resources
Bloc MP André Bellavance asked the government to respect Quebec's unanimous motions and withhold funding for the lower Churchill project, and Conservative minister David Anderson said the project will create 3,100 jobs and cut greenhouse gas emissions by 4.5 megatonnes.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer restates general priorities without addressing specific commitments or timelines on aboriginal issues.
These are the priorities we have for all Canadians.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer focuses on broad economic plan and avoids specifics on aboriginal consultations or budget inclusion.
Those are our priorities, not just for aboriginals, but for all Canadians.
- partly answeredAbortionMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer confirms legality and no intent to change law but does not address the 'not murder' framing or backbench actions.
This government, myself included, have made it very clear that the government does not intend to change the law in this regard.
- answeredEmploymentMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly cites existing programs and job creation numbers in response to request for practical measures.
With the youth employment strategy we have created over 50,000 new jobs for young Canadians.
- answeredEmploymentMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.Answer points to specific programs and job numbers created for youth unemployment.
The government is focused on making sure that young Canadians have opportunities, whether through the Canada student jobs program that created 36,000 new jobs for young Canadians or the 50,000 new permanent jobs for these young Canadians.
- partly answeredAboriginal AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer acknowledges education challenges and mentions investments and consultations but does not address whether the graduation target is high enough.
The government has undertaken a consultation with first nation communities across the country to improve aboriginal education and to make sure we get the results for the dollars we are spending
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks Liberal policy instead of addressing the proposed EI premium increase.
I know the Liberal Party wants to create a 45-day work year under EI across the country.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts focus to job creation numbers and restates general EI purpose without addressing cuts or provincial costs.
Clearly, the objective of this government is not to offer employment insurance to everyone, but rather to create jobs for everyone.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked John Duncan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids committing to immediate access by stating only that the decision is under review.
We are reviewing the court's decision.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Jonathan Genest-Jourdain (NDP) asked John Duncan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates general budget priorities instead of addressing support for the specific NDP motion.
like economic action plan 2012, budget 2013 will focus on jobs and economic opportunity for all Canadians, including first nations.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Romeo Saganash (NDP) asked John Duncan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer gives a broad statement on partnership without specifying any tangible steps.
our government is focused on working in partnership with our aboriginal partners to create jobs and growth for all Canadians, including first nations.
- partly answeredEthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the request by stating a plan to review the recommendations once the study is complete.
I can tell the House that we plan to review the Ethics Commissioner's recommendations once she has completed her study.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). substantive question.The answer describes guidelines and processes but does not identify recipients of the funds.
These are arm's-length community futures development corporations that have been around for 25 years and have proven to be successful in creating jobs and economic growth.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the corporations and denies wrongdoing without providing transparency on the specific fund.
The member opposite is making a very obvious reputation denials of these community futures development corporations.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer turns to attacking the questioner over donations instead of addressing support for the Ethics Commissioner.
It might be interesting to note that the president and executive vice-president of AVR actually made donations to the NDP in 2011.
- answeredEthicsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly denies the premise and explains the code of ethics while welcoming whistleblowers.
On this side of the House, if there is a whistleblower who has found any wrongdoing, we would welcome and indeed expect that whistleblower to bring this to the attention of the public and of relevant authorities.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Hélène Laverdière (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies the specific claim about the oath without addressing it and pivots to general ethics standards.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMs. Lise St-Denis (Liberal) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the reforms and local reactions but does not address assurances for seasonal employers or any specific plan.
our government is making common sense changes to better connect Canadians with available jobs in their local areas that match their skills.
- deflectedHuman Resources and Skills Development CanadaJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer emphasizes seriousness and investigations but avoids any timeline or details on when the hard drive went missing.
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner has been notified and an investigation is ongoing to safeguard against future incidents.
- deflectedHuman Resources and Skills Development CanadaMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states no fraudulent use and ongoing investigation but does not address whether parents' or spouses' information was exposed.
There has been no fraudulent use of this information.
- deflectedAbortionMs. Françoise Boivin (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates the Prime Minister's position on not reopening the debate and shifts to unrelated priorities.
The government will not reintroduce legislation and will not reopen this debate.
- partly answeredHealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). loaded question.The answer explains the collaborative approach and monitoring but does not directly address ignoring experts or the 94% survey.
our approach has been to work with the provinces and the drug companies so they can share information about drug shortages publicly on a website.
- deflectedSearch and RescueMr. Fin Donnelly (NDP) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists assets and claims no negative impact but does not address lack of consultation or warnings from British Columbia officials.
Changes in Vancouver will have no negative impact on our ability to respond quickly and effectively to distress incidents on the water.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the review process and calls for listening but does not address ignoring concerns or gutting environmental laws.
nothing could be further from the truth and the member opposite knows that.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMrs. Anne-Marie Day (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies the premise outright and pivots to unrelated job-creation statistics rather than addressing the impact on seasonal workers.
what the member opposite has said is completely false.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats the same job-creation talking point and does not address whether the EI changes contradict the system's purpose.
This government has created 920,000 net new jobs for Canadians.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Philip Toone (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the request for a meeting and instead recites general economic talking points.
I will reiterate that this government is focused on job creation and economic growth.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids the question about changing policy or the spring gap and instead lists unrelated programs and job numbers.
- partly answeredHuman Resources and Skills Development CanadaScott Brison (Liberal) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer begins to address privacy seriousness but is cut off and does not answer when the data was last held.
as I mentioned before, the government takes the privacy of Canadians extremely seriously—
- misdirectedTaxationScott Brison (Liberal) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the Liberals' tax record instead of committing to or addressing tax-code simplification.
actually making taxes fair is a surprising comment coming from a Liberal.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMrs. Sadia Groguhé (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the opposition's understanding and shifts to backlog statistics without addressing the consulate-closure plan.
unfortunately the question shows that the official opposition has absolutely no grasp of immigration-related issues.
- deflectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMs. Jinny Jogindera Sims (NDP) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer criticizes the NDP's grasp of the system and pivots to backlog reduction instead of explaining the plan for the new files.
frankly, the more the New Democrats ask about these issues the more it reflects that they have no understanding of our immigration system.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights past actions and contrasts with opposition without addressing the specific request for increase.
Unlike the Liberals who cut this very program, we have brought benefits and programs to veterans at an unprecedented level over the last seven years under the leadership of our Prime Minister .
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Murray Rankin (NDP) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the policy change and alternatives but ignores the security investigation and commitment request.
Taxpayers can still file on paper.
- deflectedEmploymentMs. Isabelle Morin (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer turns the question back on the NDP instead of outlining new plans for youth unemployment.
why does the NDP not make this a priority and support what this government is doing with the youth employment strategy
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. André Bellavance (Bloc) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer focuses on project benefits without addressing the request to respect Quebec and withhold funding.
The lower Churchill project will provide significant economic benefits to the Atlantic region.
- partly answeredBusiness of the HouseMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the specific bill mentioned but pivots to general productivity claims.
On the question of Bill C-32 , I will again offer to my friend that we could pass that bill right now, at all stages, if the NDP is agreeable.
- answeredPrivilegeMauril Bélanger (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer directly assesses whether parliamentary duties were impaired, which is the core of the privilege claim.
I did not hear any aspect of the duties or responsibilities of a member of Parliament that were in any way blocked so that his abilities to perform them were impaired in any particular way