All sittings← 2012-09-272012-10-01 →
Friday, September 28, 2012 · sitting No. 155
House advances bill tightening rules on political loans
The House spent the largest share of its time on second reading of Bill C-21, the Political Loans Accountability Act. Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski said the measure would end the practice of unpaid debts at the riding level by making associations and parties responsible for candidate loans. NDP MP Libby Davies asked whether loopholes remained, while Conservative minister Tim Uppal welcomed cross-party support to send the bill to committee.
Question period opened with NDP MP Libby Davies pressing the government over unilateral reductions in health transfers. Minister Christian Paradis replied that transfers continue to rise and that the NDP lacks any health-care plan. Subsequent exchanges focused on delays in closing the XL Foods plant after an E. coli finding and on the adequacy of consultation with first nations before pipeline approvals.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2012-09-28
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Food Safety
NDP MP Nycole Turmel said the month-long delay before the XL Foods licence was suspended showed that self-regulation had failed, and Minister Gerry Ritz answered that 46 inspectors had worked daily at the plant and that the system had contained the problem.
Read the exchangeNatural Resources
Liberal MP Ralph Goodale cited former minister Jim Prentice on the absence of meaningful first-nations consultation for the northern gateway project, and Conservative MP David Anderson replied that 41 first nations are receiving funding to participate in the review.
Read the exchangeInternational Trade
NDP MP Guy Caron asked why the Canada-China investment agreement allows secret arbitration, and Conservative minister Peter Van Loan said the treaty had been tabled for 21 days and that any member could move a vote on it Monday.
Read the exchangeEmployment Insurance
NDP MP Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet asked the minister to withdraw changes that hurt seasonal workers, and Minister Kellie Leitch said the government is creating jobs through the youth employment strategy and apprenticeship grants.
Read the exchangeStatus of Women
Bloc MP André Bellavance said women's groups in Quebec had called for the resignation of the minister for status of women after her vote on abortion, and Conservative MP Susan Truppe replied that the House had voted and that the government had funded more than 550 projects for women and girls.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- misdirectedHealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer denies the claim and attacks the NDP's competence instead of addressing the PBO report or transfer amounts.
They have no idea of what they are doing on this.
- deflectedFood SafetyMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.The answer emphasizes general priorities and resources but avoids explaining the specific one-month delay in closing the plant.
Of course, the NDP members constantly vote against those initiatives.
- deflectedFood SafetyMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights added inspectors but does not address reversing the self-policing policy or the company's corrective actions.
we have added inspectors to the line and given the CFIA the capacity, from a monetary perspective, to do its job in a more fulsome way.
- deflectedFood SafetyMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims the system works and attacks NDP voting rather than explaining the delay or ending self-regulation.
I wish the NDP members would help us do that by voting for our initiatives.
- deflectedFood SafetyMs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.The answer denies cuts and notes funding but ignores the US notification and lack of a prevention plan.
Of course, the NDP voted against that initiative.
- misdirectedFood SafetyRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the member as ill-informed and shifts blame to the prior Liberal government instead of addressing the delay or biologist firings.
that question comes from another ill-informed opposition member.
- partly answeredFood SafetyRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly denies the biologist claim and references new legislation for faster response but does not explain the 12-day notification delay.
We are introducing important legislation to help the CFIA respond to food safety situations more swiftly.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer disputes the premise and cites general business activity but does not address the specific failure to consult First Nations as raised by Prentice.
as usual, the member opposite has it wrong.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores the question about listening to lobbyists and former ministers, instead pivots to first nations funding and attacks opposition.
The only ones who seem to want to interfere with that science-based process is the opposition and its House leader.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer avoids consultation question entirely by attacking opposition ideology and listing unrelated grievances.
Everything they talk about, including their $21 billion carbon tax, works against Canadians.
- partly answeredPublic SafetyMr. Kennedy Stewart (NDP) asked Ms. Candice Bergen (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses cyber security investments but ignores the specific Nexen takeover and foreign involvement questions.
Our government recently made significant investments of $90 million in a cyber security strategy designed to defend against electronic threats, hacking and cyber espionage.
- answeredInternational TradeMr. Kennedy Stewart (NDP) asked Mr. Gerald Keddy (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly explains the arbitration process and public access provisions in the China FIPA.
As we do with other investor-state disputes, this FIPA provides for Canada to make all documents submitted to an arbitration tribunal available to the public.
- answeredInternational TradeMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.Answer confirms the tabling process and explicitly offers debate and vote opportunities in the House.
If opposition members wish to see a vote on that treaty in the House, they can have it.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). loaded question.Answer dismisses the premise as ridiculous and shifts to general statements on standards without addressing specific consensuses.
the suggestion that Canada is not interested in arms trade treaties, cluster munitions treaties, is ridiculous.
- misdirectedForeign AffairsMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks the premise about isolation by criticizing past UN voting and listing unrelated achievements instead of addressing the Prime Minister's schedule.
Canada's policy is no longer to please every dictator with a vote at the United Nations.
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Mr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly explains the role of the secretariat and that no funds will be spent until review is complete.
No money has been spent to purchase new fighter jets and no money will be spent until the secretariat conducts an independent review of the cost of replacing the CF-18s.
- misdirectedPolitical Party FinancingMr. Mathieu Ravignat (NDP) asked Mr. Robert Goguen (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the question on Conservative ties and instead attacks the opposition.
Is there organized crime in the opposition? I have to wonder.
- misdirectedPolitical Party FinancingMr. Scott Andrews (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the donation question and pivots to attacking Liberals and NDP.
not like the illegal contributions that the NDP receives, not like the $40 million that the Liberals took out of taxpayer coffers to fund its own party.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMs. Lise St-Denis (Liberal) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses general job initiatives but does not address seasonal rehiring consistency.
we have been focused on ensuring this occurs, whether that be the targeted initiative for older workers or the new EI small business hiring tax credit.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Scott Simms (Liberal) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes job creation programs without addressing fishermen's EI benefit concerns.
Economic action plan 2012 put forward a number of initiatives, whether that be helmets to hardhats or the opportunity for the EI small business hiring tax credit.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMs. Marjolaine Boutin-Sweet (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats job initiatives and attacks opposition instead of addressing EI reform impacts.
What about the NDP carbon tax of $21 billion that will kill jobs across the country?
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. François Choquette (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights job numbers but sidesteps the question on negative effects of EI changes.
this government has created 770,000 net new jobs since the downturn of the recession in July 2009.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMrs. Sana Hassainia (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes employment programs and criticizes opposition without addressing the reform denial claim.
It is the Liberals' and the NDP's opposition to these great initiatives that really has stifled those opportunities
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMs. Alexandrine Latendresse (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims local support for changes but does not acknowledge real consequences raised.
the workers in my riding of Simcoe—Grey are delighted with these changes because they allow those people who are unemployed to find jobs.
- deflectedFinancial InstitutionsMs. Paulina Ayala (NDP) asked Mrs. Shelly Glover (Conservative). loaded question.Answer ignores bank fees entirely and pivots to attacking NDP carbon tax.
Furthermore, the NDP's carbon tax would increase not just the cost of groceries and electricity, but the cost of everything Canadian families buy.
- deflectedFinancial InstitutionsMs. Annick Papillon (NDP) asked Mrs. Shelly Glover (Conservative). substantive question.Answer cites a business quote on credit cards but never addresses bank fees or future action.
Merchants have been well served by the code.
- misdirectedGasoline PricesMs. Annick Papillon (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the asker about a carbon tax instead of addressing gasoline price increases.
What are the members opposite advocating? A carbon tax that would cost Canadian taxpayers $21 billion.
- misdirectedGasoline PricesMr. Alain Giguère (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.Answer again pivots to attacking the NDP carbon tax and questions the member's attendance rather than gas prices.
His party's election platform advocated a $21 billion carbon tax.
- partly answeredForeign InvestmentScott Brison (Liberal) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states each deal must show net benefit but does not address board composition or market access specifics.
each single deal that is proposed here will have to provide a net benefit for Canada.
- partly answeredAboriginal AffairsJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). loaded question.Answer lists funded First Nations consultations but ignores the Prentice criticism and constitutional duty question.
First nations are being consulted extensively during that.
- deflectedParks CanadaMs. Anne Minh-Thu Quach (NDP) asked Ms. Michelle Rempel (Conservative). loaded question.Answer highlights increased park space but never addresses the $30 million cuts or reduced services.
under our government's tenure we have increased protected park space by over 50%.
- answeredCanada Post CorporationMs. Charmaine Borg (NDP) asked Steven Fletcher (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly explains Canada Post's arm's-length status and market-driven decisions on closures.
Canada Post is an arm's length crown corporation that makes day-to-day operating decisions based on market demand.
- deflectedForeign AffairsJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Mr. Bob Dechert (Conservative). rhetorical question.The question mocks rather than inquires and the answer ignores it to list unrelated achievements.
perhaps the member was not paying attention when I mentioned earlier that the Prime Minister is meeting with two world leaders in New York today.
- answeredEmploymentMs. Isabelle Morin (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The question asks for a youth jobs plan and the answer cites the youth employment strategy and related measures.
we actually did put forward a plan in the budget in March, some $50 million for the youth employment strategy.
- misdirectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Marc-André Morin (NDP) asked Ms. Kellie Leitch (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists programs and then attacks the NDP instead of addressing EI cuts or the 300 km rule.
I ask the NDP members opposite, why do they just want to raise taxes and kill jobs?
- deflectedStatus of WomenMr. André Bellavance (Bloc) asked Mrs. Susan Truppe (Conservative). loaded question.The question assumes unfitness from a vote and the answer pivots to unrelated government spending on women.
I am very proud of what our government has done for women and girls.
- deflectedStatus of WomenMr. André Bellavance (Bloc) asked Mrs. Susan Truppe (Conservative). substantive question.The question seeks clarity from the Prime Minister and the answer repeats that the vote occurred and it is time to move on.
The House of Commons voted and it is time to move on.