All sittings← 2011-06-142011-06-16 →
Wednesday, June 15, 2011 · sitting No. 9
Harper defends job record amid NDP attacks on labour disputes
Oral questions on employment occupied the largest share of House time. NDP Leader Jack Layton pressed Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper on manufacturing job losses and the lack of a growth strategy. Harper replied that Canada leads the industrialized world in job creation and that the budget supports a private-sector recovery.
Layton also raised the Air Canada and Canada Post disputes, accusing the government of undermining bargaining rights. Harper said both sides failed to reach settlements that threatened broader economic damage, prompting the government to prepare back-to-work legislation.
Further exchanges saw Liberal MP Bob Rae challenge Harper over the finance minister's New York remarks and Treasury Board spending, while NDP members pressed on G8 legacy fund expenditures and search-and-rescue closures.
Decided that day
- The Supporting Vulnerable Seniors and Strengthening Canada's Economy Act passed second reading and was referred to the finance committee
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2011-06-15
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Canada Post Corporation
NDP MP Yvon Godin asked Labour Minister Lisa Raitt why Canada Post locked out workers after the union offered to suspend strikes, and whether the government would impose back-to-work legislation.
Read the exchangeG8 Summit
NDP MP Charlie Angus accused President of the Treasury Board Tony Clement of wasting $50 million on Muskoka projects and demanded an apology for abuse of public funds.
Read the exchangeBorder Infrastructure Fund
NDP MP John Rafferty said the government diverted $50 million from the border infrastructure fund to the minister's riding and asked Clement to apologize.
Read the exchangeSearch and Rescue
Liberal MP Judy Foote cited Winston Pitcher of the Canadian Coast Guard Auxiliary warning that closures in St. John's and Quebec City would delay rescues.
Read the exchangeForeign Investment
NDP MP Peter Julian pressed Industry Minister Christian Paradis for new rules on foreign takeovers after layoffs at Vale Inco, Stelco and Custom House.
Read the exchangeSyria
Conservative MP Kevin Sorenson asked Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird for the government's latest steps to support the Syrian people amid the crackdown.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedEmploymentJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights existing records and the budget without outlining a new strategy.
Canada has the best job creation record in the industrialized world.
- deflectedEmploymentJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer counters with positive job stats and references the NDP position rather than addressing manufacturing losses.
the Canadian economy has created over 550,000 jobs since the recession.
- partly answeredEmploymentJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses the disputes and economic impact but not the fairness of bargaining or overall job plan.
Due to their inability to reach a settlement, they are threatening greater damage on other parties in the Canadian economy.
- deflectedCanada Post CorporationMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). substantive question.The answer focuses on the decision to legislate rather than addressing good faith bargaining.
in this case, Canada Post and the union have been unable to reach a negotiated settlement
- deflectedAir CanadaMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). substantive question.The answer justifies intervention on economic grounds without addressing the role of workers as consumers.
on behalf of Canadians in general and because we have a strong mandate on this economy to make sure it recovers, we have acted.
- deflectedForeign AffairsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the premise and pivots to G20 cooperation instead of addressing interference.
I do not know what the leader of the Liberal Party is talking about, but I can tell him this.
- partly answeredAuditor General's ReportBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer acknowledges the report and recommendations but avoids directly confirming if the Auditor General is telling the truth.
It does make some interesting recommendations and observations.
- deflectedLabour RelationsBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer treats both disputes identically without addressing the alleged double standard.
This could cause serious damage to the Canadian economy and to a large part of the population.
- deflectedPovertyMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer promotes the economic action plan without addressing the gazebos claim or timeline for realizing poverty seriousness.
our economic action plan was there to fight poverty.
- misdirectedPovertyMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks NDP timing and voting record instead of addressing tax breaks or poverty rise under Conservatives.
the NDP's concern for poverty is a little late in coming.
- partly answeredGovernment SpendingMrs. Nycole Turmel (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.Answer references the PBO report and explains rationalization of services but does not detail logic for specific departmental cuts.
Our plans are on stream. We are looking at rationalizing some services, but also delivering those services to taxpayers in a better way.
- answeredG8 SummitMr. Alexandre Boulerice (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer lists the 32 projects funded and notes acceptance of Auditor General recommendations.
There were 32 infrastructure projects that went forward, including resurfacing a runway at the airport in North Bay, repaving a provincial highway, and building a community centre.
- deflectedG8 SummitMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer criticizes the opposition's debate level and restates project outcomes without addressing the apology request.
I listened with great interest when the new Leader of the Opposition said that he was going to come to the House of Commons and raise the level of debate.
- misdirectedG8 SummitMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer labels the question as slanderous character assassination rather than addressing accountability for fund use.
that, I deeply regret to say, was slanderous and character assassination.
- partly answeredG20 SummitMr. Andrew Cash (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer offers to expedite specific claims but pivots to electoral success in Toronto instead of full responsibility for G20 fallout.
if there is any business, and the member provided the name of one, that is awaiting compensation, give it to me, I will be very happy to ensure that it is rectified as quickly as possible.
- deflectedG20 SummitMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats offer to help specific businesses and praises Toronto MPs without addressing unequal treatment or paperwork issues.
Boy, oh, boy, in the last 30 years, the people in Toronto elected the best crop of MPs that we have seen in that city in a long time.
- answeredBorder Infrastructure FundMr. John Rafferty (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly refutes the premise that funds were diverted from border infrastructure.
- deflectedSearch and RescueMs. Judy Foote (Liberal) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). loaded question.The response states a general priority without addressing the specific closures or expert concerns raised.
Our top priority will continue to be the safety and security of all Canadians.
- misdirectedSearch and RescueMr. Scott Simms (Liberal) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the former Liberal government instead of addressing the current closures or quotes presented.
that is from a fine source, the former Liberal government that decimated the Canadian Coast Guard through its neglect.
- deflectedVeteransMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Steven Blaney (Conservative). loaded question.The response offers a general statement on veterans' care without addressing the specific case or advertising spending mentioned.
We on this side of the House, and I hope on all sides of the House, care for the well-being of all of our veterans.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses general policy on foreign investment without addressing the specific call for new regulations or listed companies.
The hon. member is trying to mix different issues and muddy the waters.
- partly answeredForeign InvestmentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the general review process but does not commit to a transparent public review or acting before the deadline.
significant investments will continue to be reviewable under the Investment Canada Act, and always as a net benefit for Canada.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Dany Morin (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The response gives a general commitment to rights without addressing measures to combat the reported increase in hate crimes.
We believe strongly in protecting the rights of all Canadians regardless of their background, regardless of their roots.
- deflectedJusticeMr. Randall Garrison (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats a general equality commitment without addressing action on transgender protections or the prior legislation.
the commitment of this government to the equality of all Canadians remains as firm as it has always been.
- partly answeredTransportationMr. Jamie Nicholls (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.Provides info on past investments but does not outline a specific plan or timeline for repair.
Since our government took office in 2006, we have invested $135 million in repairing the federal government's share of the Mercier Bridge and in continuing the work.
- deflectedTransportationMs. Hélène LeBlanc (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.Responds by claiming work is happening but avoids addressing long-term plan or specific actions for Montreal.
If there are traffic jams, it is because there is work being done.
- answeredEmploymentMr. Kennedy Stewart (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Directly presents the summer jobs program as the plan to help youth employment.
That is why I was very pleased to announce last week the launch of Canada's summer jobs program for this summer with an additional $10 million in permanent funding.
- answeredEmploymentMr. Guy Caron (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Directly presents additional funding for student jobs as the plan to address youth unemployment.
That is why we have just announced a very large amount of money that will result in the creation of 3,600 additional student jobs this summer
- deflectedCanadian Wheat BoardMr. Frank Valeriote (Liberal) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.Mentions moving forward openly but provides no details on the new model or implementation.
we on this side of the House want to ensure that the Wheat Board has the ability to move forward, not in a single desk way but in a way that is open and accountable to the farmers it serves
- misdirectedCanadian Wheat BoardMr. Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.Turns to criticizing opposition members instead of addressing the plebiscite or impacts.
western Canadian farmers have been inundated with advice from Ontario members and members from downtown Winnipeg, but what they do is listen to their own.
- partly answeredHealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). substantive question.Highlights existing safety measures without addressing the call for new regulations on pediatric disclosure.
I want to assure the member and all Canadians that we have one of the safest drug approval systems in the world.
- partly answeredHealthMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). substantive question.Describes voluntary and incentive-based approaches without committing to mandatory regulations.
I can assure the member and Canadians that we are up to speed.
- deflectedForeign AffairsDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Diane Ablonczy (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses consular services and legal complexities but avoids the request for personal ministerial intervention.
there is no simple way to transfer a Canadian citizen, who is in the legal process in another country, back to Canada.
- answeredSeniorsMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Alice Wong (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the end of the initiative by citing ongoing campaigns and new budget funding.
We have also committed additional funds in budget 2011 to further support elder abuse awareness.
- answeredPulp and Paper IndustryMr. Robert Aubin (NDP) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.The answer specifies government action through R&D funding to address industry challenges.
Our recent budget provided $60 million to support research and development for new products, to the satisfaction of the Forest Products Association of Canada.
- partly answeredLabour RelationsMr. André Bellavance (Bloc) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). loaded question.The answer explains the rationale for back-to-work legislation but does not address the accusation of wanting to muzzle workers.
It is not with great pleasure that we do that, because it is a fact that the best deal that can be had is the one that the parties themselves actually reach through their collective bargaining.