All sittings← 2011-03-092011-03-11 →
Thursday, March 10, 2011 · sitting No. 143
Bloc motion denouncing government conduct dominates house debate
The house devoted most of its sitting to an opposition day motion moved by Bloc Québécois MP Pierre Paquette that denounced the government's disregard for democracy and its use of public funds for partisan purposes including the economic action plan and the 2006 election campaign. Paquette and other members argued that only Conservative expenses were rejected by Elections Canada and that ministers should resign over rulings on document disclosure.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on compliance with speaker rulings requiring production of documents on F-35 costs and on the conduct of International Cooperation Minister Bev Oda. Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff and NDP leader Jack Layton pressed the government to table all documents and remove the minister while Conservative house leader John Baird said the government would comply and remain focused on the economy.
Decided that day
- Motion denouncing government conduct passed
- C-61 advanced in first chamber
- C-635, C-636 and C-637 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2011-03-10
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Freezing Assets of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act
Parliamentary secretary Deepak Obhrai thanked colleagues for fast-tracking Bill C-61 while Liberal MP Bob Rae and NDP MP Paul Dewar supported the measure but called for a five-year parliamentary review of the act and the Special Economic Measures Act.
Read the exchangePetitions
Liberal MP Francis Valeriote presented a petition from more than 1,000 Guelph residents supporting the CBC while NDP MP Robert Vincent tabled one signed by 4,203 people urging an inquiry into gasoline price fluctuations.
Read the exchangeCanada Post-Secondary Education Act
NDP MP Niki Ashton introduced Bill C-635 to set criteria for federal funding of post-secondary education while Conservative MP Brent Rathgeber introduced Bill C-637 to make assaults on public transit operators an aggravating factor in sentencing.
Read the exchangeRequest for Emergency Debate
Liberal MP Jim Karygiannis requested an emergency debate on events in Libya and Egypt citing civil war, religious strife and rising Canadian energy prices but the request was not granted during the sitting.
Read the exchangeCanadian Jewish Congress
Bloc MP Claude Bachand, Liberal MP Irwin Cotler, NDP MP Thomas Mulcair and Conservative MP Scott Reid each marked the 1919 founding of the Canadian Jewish Congress and its role in human rights advocacy.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- partly answeredGovernment AccountabilityMichael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Commits to complying with the ruling but does not address firing the minister.
we will make every effort to comply with your ruling.
- deflectedGovernment AccountabilityMichael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Ignores the request and pivots to attacking Liberals on the economy.
What is absolutely shocking is that the leader of the Liberal Party is trying to distract Canadians from their priorities.
- deflectedNational DefenceMichael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Avoids the cost question and instead praises the military and sovereignty.
The men and women in the Canadian armed forces are prepared to pay the ultimate price.
- partly answeredNational DefenceDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Laurie Hawn (Conservative). loaded question.Rejects the false equivalence but restates the government's cost figures without new data.
our experts stand by their estimates and stand by the projections.
- partly answeredNational DefenceDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Laurie Hawn (Conservative). loaded question.Rejects the premise and repeats the $16 billion figure while attacking the questioner.
my loud colleague is simply wrong.
- partly answeredInternational Co-operationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.Accepts the ruling and promises cooperation but does not address the Prime Minister's role.
I look forward to attending the procedures and House affairs committee and I will fully co-operate to provide the needed clarity.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). rhetorical question.Ignores the transparency question and accuses the Bloc of seeking an election.
the Bloc is trying to do everything it can to create a distraction and trigger an opportunistic and needless election
- answeredPolitical FinancingMs. Christiane Gagnon (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.Directly explains the routine allocation and that unspent funds return to revenue.
whatever remains will be returned to the consolidated general revenue fund.
- misdirectedPolitical FinancingMs. Christiane Gagnon (Bloc) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the question about Conservative ads and instead attacks the Bloc Québécois with unrelated allegations.
the hon. member for Québec must answer to this: on July 15, 2004, the Bloc Québécois transferred $17,071.20 to the local election campaign of the member for Québec.
- partly answeredGovernment AccountabilityJack Layton (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the Speaker's ruling and states intent to comply but avoids committing to immediate tabling of documents.
We appreciate the ruling and we will be working very hard to comply with it in the days ahead.
- deflectedGovernment AccountabilityJack Layton (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer references a Liberal motion and pivots to jobs and the economy instead of confirming tabling of costs.
We will not be pushed away from the fundamental priority of Canadians, which is jobs and the economy.
- deflectedGovernment AccountabilityJack Layton (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats compliance language but shifts focus entirely to budget priorities and away from document transparency or cabinet issues.
The single priority in that budget is the creation of jobs, the creation of hope, the creation of opportunity.
- answeredGovernment SpendingMs. Siobhan Coady (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains the routine allocation for budget advertising and notes that much of the funds may go unspent.
The Department of Finance routinely has allocated to it some money to inform Canadians about benefits in the budget and other steps taken by the Department of Finance with respect to benefits for Canadians.
- misdirectedGovernment SpendingMr. Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the current spending question and instead attacks past Liberal actions on hospitals and schools.
unlike the Liberal government in the mid-1990s, we will not balance the budget in our country by taking money away from hospitals and schools.
- partly answeredFormer Public Sector Integrity CommissionerMr. Jean-Claude D'Amours (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states that legal advice was followed and notes the upcoming committee appearance but does not address the payment amount or rationale.
In this case, the government sought legal advice. We followed that advice.
- deflectedFormer Public Sector Integrity CommissionerMr. Jean-Claude D'Amours (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer again cites legal advice and committee appearance while pivoting to an unrelated Information Commissioner report.
I am really pleased to see the Information Commissioner's report today, talking about improvements in access to information, if that is what the member is talking about.
- deflectedFormer Public Sector Integrity CommissionerMs. Meili Faille (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids tabling the contract by redirecting to the commissioner's upcoming committee appearance.
The former commissioner will appear before the committee in 40 or 45 minutes.
- deflectedFormer Public Sector Integrity CommissionerMs. Meili Faille (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the $500,000 payment justification by restating general priorities and again pointing to the committee appearance.
The former commissioner will appear before the committee in 45 minutes.
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Robert Carrier (Bloc) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the delay by noting the RCMP investigation but does not explain the lack of charges or government inaction since 2006.
The RCMP is currently investigating the case.
- deflectedCanada Revenue AgencyMr. Robert Carrier (Bloc) asked Keith Ashfield (Conservative). substantive question.The answer refuses to provide timing details and simply defers entirely to the ongoing RCMP investigation.
we will wait for the RCMP investigation to be completed.
- answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Robert Oliphant (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the data source and clarifies it was not from government resources.
I understand that demographic data is commercially available from Statistics Canada and other sources.
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Robert Oliphant (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to attacking the Liberal Party's record instead of addressing the requested independent review.
why is the Liberal Party trying to divert attention from its 13 years of failure to deliver on the priorities and aspirations of new Canadians?
- misdirectedPolitical FinancingMs. Martha Hall Findlay (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the Conservative repayment demand and instead attacks the Liberal Party with unrelated past transactions.
I will give her the occasion to explain why, on July 26, 2004, the Liberal Party of Canada transferred exactly $5,000 to the local campaign of Aileen Carroll
- misdirectedPolitical FinancingMs. Martha Hall Findlay (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer again evades the repayment question by listing additional Liberal in-and-out examples.
In the riding of Don Valley West , the Liberal Party transferred $5,000 on January 9, 2004, which then transferred $5,000 back to the Liberal Party on July 15 of the same year.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Laurie Hawn (Conservative). loaded question.Answer disputes the premise and PBO methods without addressing the trust question or confirming actual costs used.
Mr. Speaker, once again my colleague is simply wrong.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Laurie Hawn (Conservative). loaded question.Answer addresses cost overruns but pivots to unrelated quotes and election talk instead of spinoffs or job guarantees.
Our government's top priority is growing the economy and creating jobs.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Yves Lessard (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer lists past EI measures but ignores the request for future budget reforms on access and benefits.
I am doubtful of the Bloc's sincerity, since it voted against all of these measures that would help vulnerable people.
- misdirectedForestry IndustryMr. Robert Bouchard (Bloc) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks the member's past statements instead of addressing the silvicultural program extension request.
After harping on for years about loan guarantees, he realized that the ruling in London sided with the government.
- answeredInternational Co-operationBob Rae (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly names who was consulted and confirms no conversation with the immigration minister on KAIROS.
I have not specifically had any conversation with the minister of immigration, because it was not directly related to development or his responsibilities.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationBob Rae (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats denial of conversation but shifts to unrelated funding announcement instead of addressing the immigration minister's role.
Today I am pleased to announce that Canada is supporting the Afghan-Canadian Community Centre where 1,800 people have received literacy training
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.Answer defends controlled use policy but ignores the transition plan and hypocrisy questions.
It is a question of managing the risk.
- deflectedNatural ResourcesMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats safe-use stance but does not engage with the call to stop funding or side against the industry.
I repeat: it is a question of managing the risk.
- deflectedGovernment CommunicationsMs. Raymonde Folco (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer justifies the practice by historical precedent without addressing the abuse of power claim.
this is a practice that was used for a long time by different governments.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyMr. Marc Lemay (Bloc) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to attacking another member instead of addressing the funding cuts.
The member for Wascana just keeps rattling on and on. Perhaps he could actually get up and ask an intelligent question.
- partly answeredOfficial LanguagesMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer affirms commitment to bilingual services but does not specifically commit to designating the Atlantic region structure as bilingual.
Our government is committed, in accordance with the Roadmap for Canada's Linguistic Duality, to ensuring that every Canadian has that right to government services in the official language of their choice.
- deflectedAccess to InformationHelena Guergis (Independent) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promises to follow laws but diverts to criticizing the CBC instead of confirming release.
I can only tell the member for Simcoe—Grey that at least she does not have to make an access request to the CBC because then she would never get anything.
- answeredBusiness of the HouseMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly outlines the government's plans for House business and addresses compliance with the ruling.
We will continue debate today on the Bloc opposition motion that began this morning.