All sittings← 2011-02-042011-02-08 →
Monday, February 7, 2011 · sitting No. 125
Panama free trade bill takes up most of Commons day
The House spent the largest share of its time on government orders debating Bill C-46, the Canada-Panama free trade agreement. New Democrat MP Alex Atamanenko warned that Panama remains one of the world's worst tax havens and questioned whether any small agricultural gains could justify the deal. Conservative MP Brad Trost countered that the agreement would benefit Canadian agricultural producers because the two countries grow different crops.
Question period featured sharp exchanges on several fronts. Liberal MP Ralph Goodale pressed the government on what Canada might concede in perimeter security talks with the United States. Bloc Québécois MP Gilles Duceppe demanded that Quebec receive the same $2.2 billion in sales-tax harmonization compensation already paid to other provinces.
Decided that day
- Bill C-46 passed
- Four amendments to delete clauses in Bill C-46 defeated
- Bill C-42 concurred in at report stage
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2011-02-07
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Canadian Human Rights Act
New Democrat MP Bill Siksay opened third-reading debate on Bill C-389, which would add gender identity and gender expression to the Canadian Human Rights Act.
Read the exchangeGovernment Appointments
New Democrat MP Charlie Angus accused the government of bypassing the vetting process to install a friend of the Prime Minister's director of communications as CRTC vice-chair.
Read the exchangeHuman Resources
Liberal MP Bonnie Crombie said Human Resources Minister Diane Finley had insulted working mothers by calling the use of daycare an abdication of parenting.
Read the exchangeAfghanistan
New Democrat MP Paul Dewar revealed that Canada had spent more than $41 million on private security firms in Afghanistan, some linked to warlords.
Read the exchangeForeign Affairs
Liberal MP Bryon Wilfert charged that the government had fired arms-control expert Earl Turcotte after the United States objected to his stance on cluster munitions.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- misdirectedCanada-U.S. RelationsRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to attacking the Liberal opposition instead of addressing the bargaining questions.
Quite honestly, I know it hurts the Liberal opposition when there is agreement between—
- deflectedCanada-U.S. RelationsRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates general goals without addressing sovereignty, privacy or parliamentary approval.
We are looking forward, in the weeks and months ahead, to be able to turn the corner and go forward and to ensure that we protect the jobs we have, that we continue to increase our trade, our growth and, indeed, as I mentioned before, protect our borders.
- misdirectedCanada-U.S. RelationsRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the previous Liberal government's record rather than answering the list of specific guarantees.
we are all reminded of the very poor record the previous government had in terms of its relations with the American government.
- partly answeredQuebec Language PolicyMr. Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.The answer refutes the premise that the government is attacking language laws but does not engage the accusation of division.
Language issues are a provincial jurisdiction.
- deflectedQuebec Language PolicyMr. Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.The answer mocks the questioner and pivots to constitutional peace instead of addressing the Prime Minister's past statements.
speaking of keeping a straight face, it the hon. member's statements that are laughable.
- deflectedHarmonization of Sales TaxesMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the position that Quebec must match other provinces but avoids explaining why compensation is withheld.
we have been clear from the start: Quebec will be treated the same as the other provinces.
- deflectedHarmonization of Sales TaxesMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats that the ball is in Quebec's court without addressing the timeline or the minister's letter.
If the same agreement is reached with Quebec as was reached with the other provinces, the issue will be resolved right away.
- deflectedHarmonization of Sales TaxesMr. Daniel Paillé (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer blames Quebec for not providing a document instead of addressing the compensation disparity.
Over two months ago, the Government of Quebec promised to provide us with a technical document on sales tax harmonization, but it has not yet done so.
- deflectedHarmonization of Sales TaxesMr. Daniel Paillé (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer restates ongoing talks and shifts to Quebec's missing document instead of addressing PM intervention or owed funds.
However, the Quebec government must provide the technical document.
- misdirectedGovernment AppointmentsMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer ignores listed qualifications and instead attacks the asker personally for raising the issue.
NDP members go out to the public and say that we need to raise the calibre and quality of debate in the House of Commons and what do they do?
- misdirectedGovernment AppointmentsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer pivots to smearing the opposition and defending the appointee's lack of conflicts rather than addressing broken vetting rules.
the NDP members smear Gwyn Morgan, attack Nigel Wright and attack Tom Pentefountas.
- misdirectedGovernment AppointmentsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer counters by accusing the asker of hypocrisy on CRTC independence and past votes instead of explaining the appointment process.
He turned his back on his constituents and he dares get up in the House and actually attack other people's credibility?
- answeredHuman ResourcesMrs. Bonnie Crombie (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly rebuts the claim by listing multiple parental choices supported by policy.
We are the party that has offered choice to parents in terms of child care.
- partly answeredHuman ResourcesMrs. Bonnie Crombie (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats the universal benefit and choice framing but does not address the 2011 vs 1911 timeline or early learning plan.
we brought in the universal child care benefit of $100 a month for each child under the age of six so that parents could choose what best met their needs
- answeredCaregiversMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Answer lists specific expansions to compassionate care leave and EI access for the self-employed.
That is exactly why we expanded and made it easier for people to take compassionate care leave, to help their families and help friends cope with these difficult challenges.
- deflectedCaregiversMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer restates prior actions and ends by attacking the asker's voting record instead of addressing corporate tax cuts versus caregiver support.
When it comes to the cost, it is a shame that the member opposite cannot remember that she actually voted for those funds she is talking about.
- deflectedCanada-U.S. RelationsMr. Jean-Yves Laforest (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the call for transparency, mandate disclosure, debate and vote, instead promoting government actions and attacking the Bloc.
First and foremost, I want to assure the Bloc that this side of the House defends the interests of Canada and Canadians, even though the Bloc has no interest in that.
- deflectedCanada-U.S. RelationsMrs. Maria Mourani (Bloc) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses border efficiency concerns but sidesteps the secret perimeter negotiations and service cuts.
We are obviously concerned about border crossings.
- deflectedNuclear SafetyMs. Christiane Gagnon (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the commission's independence without addressing the request to cancel the permit using government discretion.
the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission is an independent body that is responsible for ensuring safety in the nuclear sector.
- misdirectedNuclear SafetyMs. Christiane Gagnon (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the asker with scare tactics claim and reframes the issue instead of addressing provincial waste management.
it is no surprise that the Bloc Québécois would resort to scare tactics.
- partly answeredInternational Co-operationJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Ms. Lois Brown (Conservative). loaded question.The answer explains concerns with CTF funding but does not address why Barrick Gold receives CIDA support.
we understand that agency officials expressed concern with CTF regarding a lack of focus, lack of sustainability and lack of budgetary information.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Ms. Lois Brown (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends accountability measures but avoids the core question of redirecting funds from corporations back to teachers and churches.
Our government is bringing real accountability to development funding in order to ensure that taxpayer dollars bring real results.
- misdirectedForeign AffairsBryon Wilfert (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer calls the premise ludicrous and shifts to general policy without addressing the firing of Turcotte.
- deflectedForeign AffairsBryon Wilfert (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates the ambassador's role but does not address the firing or leadership comparison.
I want to reassure the member that it is our ambassador in Geneva who will indeed be leading these discussions.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer cites international standards but avoids addressing the specific allegations about warlords on payroll.
Canada adheres to the Montreux Document, and the document clearly establishes the standards through which private security is used.
- partly answeredAfghanistanMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses the legal compliance of contractors but does not engage the broader claims about guidelines or racketeers.
I will remind my hon. colleague that all firms contracted by the government are subject to Afghan law.
- misdirectedCanadian Radio-television and Telecommunications CommissionMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the accusation without addressing the appointee's qualifications or the deregulation claim.
Mr. Pentefountas is qualified.
- deflectedCanadian Radio-television and Telecommunications CommissionMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer flatly rejects the premise without engaging the substance of the CRTC control allegation.
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Robert Oliphant (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the prior Liberal record instead of addressing the current funding cuts to settlement agencies.
Shame on the Liberals for their longstanding neglect of newcomers to Canada.
- misdirectedCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Robert Oliphant (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.The answer continues attacking Liberal history rather than responding to the specific accusation of cutting settlement funding.
The previous Liberal government froze settlement funding for 13 years.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer corrects the premise on the trade deal status but does not address the projected drug price increases.
In terms of the issue in question, the pharmaceutical issue, this is actually one of many issues still to be negotiated.
- deflectedInternational TradeMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the member's facts and pivots to general economic benefits without addressing the pharmacare or price concerns.
this member could not be much more out of touch, because the fact is that what she is laying on the table is not agreed to.
- deflectedKnowledge EconomyMrs. Alexandra Mendes (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The question embeds an unsupported accusation that Conservatives do not care about Quebec, while the answer offers general hiring statistics instead of addressing the Pfizer closure.
My colleague, the House leader, informs me that 46% of Quebec companies are intending to hire in the next three months.
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Robert Bouchard (Bloc) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The question asks for an explanation of two specific investment decisions and an unkept promise; the answer directly states there is no impact on Bagotville and notes 400 new personnel.
the Joint Meteorological Centre at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown will have no impact, none, on CFB Bagotville.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Ms. Lois Brown (Conservative). substantive question.The question seeks the reason for rejecting a specific CIDA application; the answer avoids it by accusing the opposition of partisanship and restating general aid principles.
I know the opposition is attempting to turn this into a purely partisan attack but I certainly give Canadians much more credit than that.
- deflectedPharmaceutical IndustryMrs. Alexandra Mendes (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The question repeats the loaded claim that Conservatives are indifferent to Quebec R&D losses; the answer counters with spending figures but does not address the Pfizer closure or subsidy cuts.
It is this government, under the economic action plan, that added an extra $10 billion to the R and D budget of the Government of Canada
- partly answeredForeign AffairsMr. Jean Dorion (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The question asks whether the government will freeze Ben Ali family assets; the answer states ongoing work with Tunisian authorities but gives no commitment or timeline.
as I mentioned last week, we are working closely with Tunisian authorities to determine the most appropriate way to achieve the intended objective.