All sittings← 2010-12-162011-02-01 →
Monday, January 31, 2011 · sitting No. 120
House devotes most of day to order paper questions
Routine proceedings on questions on the order paper and questions passed as orders for return occupied 65 per cent of sitting No. 120. Government House leader Tom Lukiwski tabled answers to dozens of written questions and moved that 175 others become orders for return, a step approved by the House.
Question period featured repeated opposition demands over the government's response to unrest in Egypt. Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff pressed Prime Minister Stephen Harper on whether Ottawa was defending democratic values and on delays in evacuating Canadians; Harper said the embassy was assisting hundreds of thousands of citizens and that a plane was ready to depart.
Decided that day
- C-613 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2011-01-31
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
National Defence
Liberal MP Marc Garneau said the government had failed to budget for mid-air refuelling modifications on the F-35 and asked when it would hold an open competition. Defence Minister Peter MacKay replied that any changes would stay within the existing budget and that cancelling the program would cost more than a billion dollars.
Read the exchangeSales Tax Harmonization
Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe asked why Quebec had not received $2.2 billion in sales-tax harmonization payments already given to other provinces. Harper said negotiations continue and that Quebec had chosen not to harmonize its tax.
Read the exchangeHealth
NDP Leader Jack Layton urged the government to train more family doctors and nurses. Harper said health care is a provincial responsibility but noted federal transfers have risen 30 per cent despite the recession.
Read the exchangeSerious Time for the Most Serious Crime Act
Justice Minister Rob Nicholson moved third reading of Bill S-6 to end the faint-hope clause for multiple murderers. NDP MP Joe Comartin accused the government of re-victimizing families by forcing repeated parole hearings.
Read the exchangePatent Act
NDP MP Megan Leslie moved to restore clauses in Bill C-393 that would simplify Canada's access to medicines regime for developing countries. Conservative MP Mike Wallace said Canada remains committed to maternal and child health in the developing world.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- answeredForeign AffairsMichael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the policy values conveyed to all governments including Egypt.
I said, I think, in North Africa last week that the fundamental basis of this government's foreign policy was the encouragement of freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law.
- answeredForeign AffairsMichael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly rebuts the claims of slow reaction and inadequate embassy service.
There are hundreds of thousands of Canadians in Egypt and the government, the embassy, is meeting their needs.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMichael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to general economic priorities without addressing cuts or corporate tax effects on services.
our government believes that the economy, job creation and economic growth are priorities for Canadians.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMichael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats tax and business talking points instead of addressing family priorities or listening to them.
We are not going to raise taxes on employers in the middle of a recovery.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMichael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer stays on tax policy and business opposition without engaging the question on middle-class families.
The proposal on the table right now from the Leader of the Opposition would be to raise taxes, not just on a handful of corporations but on 100,000 Canadian businesses.
- partly answeredSales Tax HarmonizationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges negotiations but does not explain what is holding up the file or the $2.2 billion.
we are currently negotiating this matter in good faith and making progress.
- partly answeredSales Tax HarmonizationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes the provincial choice and ongoing talks but avoids committing to compensation timing or amount.
we are currently negotiating this matter.
- misdirectedFinanceMr. Daniel Paillé (Bloc) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the question as redundant and pivots to unrelated transfer increases rather than addressing the listed debts.
It has been answered many times before.
- misdirectedFinanceMr. Daniel Paillé (Bloc) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.The answer insults the asker personally and pivots to equalization instead of the stabilization dispute.
I also understand there were no math lessons on the beach in Mexico, where the hon. member was getting his wonderful tan.
- partly answeredThe EconomyJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The response addresses job recovery but ignores the request to commit to NDP proposals.
This does not mean mission accomplished. There is still much to do to get the employment situation to the point where we want it.
- deflectedThe EconomyJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer promotes existing policies and discourages election talk without addressing the GIS increase.
Our government sees only one choice: helping families.
- answeredHealthJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The response explains federal-provincial roles and notes the 30% funding increase for health care.
we have increased the health care funding for our provinces by 30% and intend to ensure that funding increase continues into the future.
- misdirectedHealthScott Brison (Liberal) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner's past position on private health care rather than addressing tax cuts versus health funding.
that is an interesting question coming from the hon. member who I believe has actually run on promoting private health care.
- misdirectedHealthScott Brison (Liberal) asked Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.The response counters with a past quote from the asker instead of addressing current policy concerns.
The member for Kings—Hants said, "Liberals believe that government, through government spending, can create better opportunities in Canada to keep Canadians here. I believe that if the government reduces taxes we can create better opportunities here".
- partly answeredNational DefenceMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer corrects the refuelling claim but pivots to criticizing cancellation without addressing an open competition.
In fact, the F-35 will have refuelling capability and capacity.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The response emphasizes the costs of cancellation and past failures rather than clarifying additional expenses.
What would cost our country a billion dollars, if not more, would be to cancel the procurement process that the member's party began.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Jean Dorion (Bloc) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses changes and future hopes but ignores the question about analysts' conclusion.
Our hope is that as the situation normalizes there in the future, once again that kind of relationship could be established for the benefit of the citizens of both countries.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsMr. Jean Dorion (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Addresses intent to freeze assets but does not confirm awareness of the specific risk of assets moving to tax havens.
We will look at every possible option to ensure that their assets are frozen.
- misdirectedJusticeMrs. Maria Mourani (Bloc) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). loaded question.Shifts focus to blaming the opposition instead of addressing responsibility for the release.
We would ask the Bloc, instead of opposing our legislation at every turn, to support us so that we can work together
- deflectedJusticeMrs. Maria Mourani (Bloc) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.Redirects to passing the government's own bills rather than addressing support for the Bloc's bill.
I would ask the opposition to agree unanimously to pass our bills in respect of public safety
- partly answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMaria Minna (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.Defends funding levels and criticizes prior government but does not address reversing the specific cuts.
When we came to office, that government was only investing $200 million in settlement services. We are investing $600 million.
- answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMaria Minna (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). loaded question.Directly corrects the factual premise about an agreement owing Ontario funds.
There are no federal transfers to Ontario for settlement funds and there never have been.
- partly answeredHealthMr. Todd Russell (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Highlights expansions to benefits but does not address the choice between tax cuts and further family support.
That is why one of the first things we did was expand who would be eligible for compassionate care benefits
- answeredForeign AffairsMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly rebuts the claim of tepid response by detailing Canada's actions on evacuation and reforms.
Canada has been extremely forceful, not only in terms of its response to be able to evacuate Canadians on a voluntary basis from that country, which is under way but, as well, speaking out so that the regime that is in place in Egypt responds and listens to what the population is saying
- answeredForeign AffairsMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Answer explicitly confirms the call for democratic transition and communication to Mubarak's government.
as I have mentioned before, we are calling for a transition toward democratic reform.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Christiane Gagnon (Bloc) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.Answer addresses the plan and targets but ignores the premise of inaction and oil company accommodation.
We do have a plan and I wish my colleague would recognize that we are well on course to achieve our 2020 targets, our initial targets.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Christiane Gagnon (Bloc) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts focus to unlikely cap-and-trade and selective praise instead of committing to a comprehensive plan.
a continental cap and trade program is highly unlikely in the near future, and my colleague was very selective in forgetting to mention that the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy in fact complimented our government on our accomplishments to date.
- misdirectedUnited Arab EmiratesMs. Martha Hall Findlay (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the opposition's focus rather than addressing penalties to Canadians and jobs from UAE relations.
- deflectedUnited Arab EmiratesMs. Martha Hall Findlay (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Answer restates refusal to sign bad deals and criticizes opposition instead of outlining steps to restore relations.
On this side of the House, we refuse to sign agreements that are not good for Canada and that are not in our country's best interests.
- partly answeredSportsMr. Glenn Thibeault (NDP) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). substantive question.Answer notes high funding and helmet use but does not address the 40% cut or restoring prevention research funding.
Right now, amateur sport in Canada is receiving its highest level of funding in history.
- deflectedSportsMr. Glenn Thibeault (NDP) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). substantive question.Answer emphasizes funding levels and defers to organizations without addressing US leadership or developing a strategy.
We will continue to support those organizations to continue to do their work, as we have done, but we are not going to start regulating the wearing of helmets in sports.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner's voting record and accuses double-talk instead of addressing the funding cuts or safety impacts.
I wish the member would stop her double-talk and actually support measures that keep dangerous criminals behind bars and give young people a chance to get out of gangs.
- deflectedQuebec City ArenaMr. Michel Guimond (Bloc) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). substantive question.The answer opens by dismissing the Bloc and restates the private-sector condition without committing or rejecting the request outright.
someone needs to settle this matter, and it is obviously not going to be the Bloc members.
- partly answeredIndustryMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Mr. Mike Lake (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the U.S. Steel breach via court action and committee study but does not speak to a broader industrial strategy or pension priority.
as U.S. Steel is in breach of its production and employment undertakings, this government continues to pursue a court action against the company.