All sittings← 2010-12-092010-12-13 →
Friday, December 10, 2010 · sitting No. 115
Commons advances bill to end faint hope for future murderers
Government orders on Bill S-6, the Serious Time for the Most Serious Crime Act, occupied the largest share of sitting time. Conservative MP Bev Oda moved amendments to restore the short title and delete a provision allowing extensions of the 90-day application window for faint hope reviews. The bill, reported back from the justice committee, would repeal the faint hope clause for offenders convicted after royal assent while tightening procedures for earlier cases.
In question period the main exchanges concerned climate talks in Cancun and the Kyoto protocol. Bloc Québécois MP Mario Laframboise pressed the government to show leadership and extend Kyoto, while Conservative MP Mark Warawa said the government seeks a treaty covering all major emitters. Pension changes and the KAIROS funding decision also produced repeated opposition questions.
Decided that day
- C-30 advanced through first chamber and second reading
- C-603 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2010-12-10
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Criminal Code
NDP MP Joe Comartin said the government had taken nearly five years to respond to the 2006 Shoker Supreme Court ruling on bodily-substance samples and warned that costs would fall on the provinces.
Read the exchangeSerious Time for the Most Serious Crime Act
NDP MP Joe Comartin questioned why the government replaced the victims ombudsman after the previous office holder supported the gun registry.
Read the exchangeTobacco Products
Liberal MP Yasmin Ratansi asked why the health minister had told provincial counterparts that new cigarette warning labels were off the table while telling Parliament they remained under review.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
Bloc Québécois MP Pierre Paquette cited a 2007 legal opinion warning that transfers to Afghan authorities could expose Canadian Forces to criminal charges if torture was likely.
Read the exchangeCanada-U.S. Border
Liberal MP Bob Rae asked why the government was considering an agreement affecting immigration, refugees and security without first consulting the House.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedCanada-U.S. BorderBob Rae (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer dismisses the query as hearsay without addressing consultation with the House.
we obviously do not comment on hearsay and speculation.
- deflectedCanada-U.S. BorderBob Rae (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer again labels the concern as rumours and avoids any discussion of House consultation.
the hon. member is getting carried away again.
- partly answeredHaitiDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses actions taken with Haitian officials and offers of help but does not specify embassy reopening timing.
I also offered Canada's help in this operation.
- deflectedTobacco ProductsMs. Yasmin Ratansi (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). loaded question.The answer rejects the premise and pivots to the government's record instead of addressing lobbyist influence.
The news stories are simply wrong.
- answeredTobacco ProductsMs. Yasmin Ratansi (Liberal) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly clarifies the minister's statements to provinces and outlines ongoing actions.
I have never said to the provincial and territorial governments that it was off the table.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Laurie Hawn (Conservative). loaded question.The answer reframes the memo as routine advice and does not address knowledge of violations.
The simple fact is all the Judge Advocate General was doing was giving prudent legal advice
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Laurie Hawn (Conservative). loaded question.The answer flatly denies the claim and accuses the opposition of manufacturing a story without engaging the responsibility question.
The opposition members are trying to make a news story of something that is merely routine.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Mario Laframboise (Bloc) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). substantive question.The answer praises provinces and shifts to general environmental pride instead of addressing Kyoto extension.
our provinces and territories have demonstrated real leadership and will contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Mario Laframboise (Bloc) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates the Copenhagen accord support instead of addressing whether the government will set targets or reconsider its position.
The Copenhagen accord has the support of 139 signatory countries, and covers not just 27% of greenhouse gas emissions, as reported by the Bloc, but 85% of total greenhouse gas emissions.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks publicity stunts and claims constructive participation without addressing the question about the minister's comments or fossil awards.
Canadians do not like the publicity stunts of individuals or groups who are trying to embarrass Canada.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the monitoring question by referencing the federal panel but does not address regulating the tar sands or protecting communities.
She will be reporting very soon on whether the monitoring systems are adequate.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Joe Comartin (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats the 85% emissions claim and lists accord pillars without addressing the adaptation fund or community impacts.
Canada will continue to work with the nations on the five pillars of the accord: financing, mitigation, adaptation, technology, as well as measuring and verification.
- partly answeredInternational Co-operationJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges ministerial responsibility for decisions but does not correct the parliamentary secretary's statement or address the CIDA president's testimony.
departments are responsible for making recommendations all the time but ultimately it is the responsibility of the minister to make the decision.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.The answer reiterates that the minister decides without identifying who altered the recommendation or addressing the contradiction.
Departments always make recommendations to ministers and the minister ultimately decides what course to take.
- answeredPensionsGerry Byrne (Liberal) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the policy change is cancelled and that cases will be reviewed under the old policy.
The policy change has been cancelled.
- misdirectedPensionsGerry Byrne (Liberal) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the member for misleading seniors instead of tabling the instructions or confirming the call centre information.
The member is purposely misleading Canadian seniors.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationMr. Jean Dorion (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.The answer claims responsibility but sidesteps the accusation of misleading the House.
I will take full responsibility.
- answeredInternational Co-operationMr. Jean Dorion (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly rejects both the premise and the request to restore funding.
The answer to the question, Mr. Speaker, is no.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMs. Meili Faille (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to trade and jobs instead of addressing transparency or balance.
We know that this government has defended Canadians' interests and, by means of its economic action plan, increased Canada's economic activity, which has created jobs.
- misdirectedPublic SafetyMs. Meili Faille (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the Bloc and changes the subject rather than answering about the Privacy Commissioner.
the Bloc Québécois is getting worked up about hearsay and speculation.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMauril Bélanger (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights aid increases and dismisses the question as a rumour without addressing embassy spending imbalance.
This is just another rumour started by the Liberals.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMauril Bélanger (Liberal) asked Steven Fletcher (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to unrelated Senate reform proposals instead of addressing the bill's status.
What would be very helpful for the Liberal Party to do would be to support our legislation that would limit the terms of senators to eight years and, also, to support our initiative to have senators elected.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks Liberal attendance rather than addressing the climate policy accusation.
A couple of months ago, taxpayers paid for those members to go to the Nagoya biodiversity conference.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly describes ongoing federal work on erosion and adaptation strategy.
Environment Canada, through partnership and funding, has worked with the Ouranos consortium to assess the bank erosion problem on the lower St. Lawrence River.
- answeredPotash IndustryMr. Claude Gravelle (NDP) asked Mr. Mike Lake (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly explains why no reasons can be given due to withdrawal.
Once an application is withdrawn, there is no opportunity for the Minister of Industry to make a final decision and thus provide reasons.
- deflectedPotash IndustryMr. Claude Gravelle (NDP) asked Mr. Mike Lake (Conservative). loaded question.Answer restates the decision without addressing the change of mind.
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMs. Diane Bourgeois (Bloc) asked Mr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses ethics and investigations but not the specific numbers requested.
Any allegation of wrongdoing is taken very seriously and thoroughly investigated.
- deflectedCanada Revenue AgencyMs. Diane Bourgeois (Bloc) asked Mr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative). substantive question.Answer gives a general commitment without addressing the specific question on pursuing businesses.
our government is committed to protecting our tax base from anyone who tries to avoid paying their taxes.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). loaded question.Answer notes acceptance of recommendations but does not address the specific plans or training questions.
The government has accepted the commissioner's recommendations and actions are already under way.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer attacks the previous Liberal government instead of addressing the current issue.
The Liberals owe the House an apology for what they did.
- deflectedGovernment PrioritiesMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.Answer criticizes the NDP voting record rather than addressing job creation plans.
Members of the NDP have a lot of audacity to stand and say that we are not helping Canadians.
- answeredPensionsMr. Wayne Marston (NDP) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly confirms the policy has been cancelled and reverted.
the policy has been cancelled.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists other EI extensions and programs but does not address extending the specific long-term workers program.
we have extended the EI pilot projects that related to working while on claim, the best 14 weeks, the extra 5 week pilot project program.
- deflectedHigh Tides in Eastern QuebecMr. Gérard Asselin (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Mentions collaboration but avoids committing to specific help for victims or referencing the precedent.
I would like to remind the hon. member that the Government of Quebec and the federal government have been working very well together on this issue.
- misdirectedAirline IndustryMr. Jim Maloway (NDP) asked Mr. Brian Jean (Conservative). substantive question.The response attacks the NDP instead of addressing the tax and competition issue.
However, that NDP member represents a caucus that wants to close down Canada and wants to stop creating jobs in Canada.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends extensions but attacks the opposition on taxes without justifying spending priorities.
If the member and his party had their way, they would increase taxes and kill, according to experts, approximately 400,000 jobs.
- partly answeredHydroelectricityMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.Acknowledges support for environment but states the funding request is under review without commitment.
There is a request that has come in to them to help fund this.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Defers the family reunification question and focuses on other aspects of the situation in Haiti.
I will let my colleague, the Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism , answer the question about reuniting families.