All sittings← 2010-06-112010-06-15 →
Monday, June 14, 2010 · sitting No. 62
Commons advances bill to restrict pardons for serious crimes
The House spent the largest share of its time on second reading of Bill C-23, the Eliminating Pardons for Serious Crimes Act. Bloc Québécois MP Marc Lemay said the Criminal Records Act already protects victims adequately and that justice must remain individualized. The bill was later deemed read a second time and referred to committee of the whole by unanimous consent.
Question Period focused on delays in reaching an agreement on Afghan detainee documents. Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff pressed the government to conclude an accord that day, while Justice Minister Rob Nicholson said the government remained prepared to sign and would not compromise national security.
Members also clashed over the cost and planning of the G8 and G20 summits. NDP MP Paul Dewar questioned the choice of outreach countries while Liberal MP Mark Holland criticized sole-sourced contracts and the overall expense.
Decided that day
- Bill passed third reading and do pass
- Motion denouncing government efforts on Quebec failed
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2010-06-14
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Competition Act
Conservative MP Dean Allison warned that Bill C-452 would give the Commissioner of Competition broad powers to investigate entire industry sectors without evidence of wrongdoing.
Read the exchangeCreating Canada's New National Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 Act
Heritage Minister James Moore introduced Bill C-34 to create a national museum at Pier 21 in Halifax, fulfilling a government commitment from the throne speech.
Read the exchangeAfghanistan
Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff said the government was dragging its feet on an accord seven weeks after the Speaker's ruling, while Justice Minister Rob Nicholson replied that progress had been made over ten meetings.
Read the exchangeG8 and G20 Summits
Liberal MP Mark Holland said the government had spent more than one billion dollars on 72 hours of meetings with 85 per cent of contracts sole-sourced, while Treasury Board President Stockwell Day defended the process as managed by public servants.
Read the exchangeInternational Co-operation
Bloc Québécois MP Johanne Deschamps asked why the government refused to include abortion services in its G8 maternal-health plan, and International Co-operation Minister Bev Oda replied that the focus remained on saving mothers and children.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedAfghanistanMichael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims progress and optimism but avoids stating when or if the government will comply with the Speaker's ruling.
However, I continue to be optimistic at this point that an agreement will be reached.
- deflectedAfghanistanMichael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer asserts readiness to sign without addressing the claim of deliberate delay or committing to conclude today.
I am not quite sure how much research the hon. member has done on this but, again, what he will find out, if he has a look into this, is that we have been prepared to sign an agreement at every single meeting.
- deflectedAfghanistanMichael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats claims of readiness and invites the asker to a meeting rather than explaining the ongoing delay.
However, if he wants to really get fully informed, I invite him to the meeting later on this afternoon.
- deflectedG8 and G20 SummitsMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer rejects the premise but provides no explanation of the venue change or cost management.
We have indicated here that costs of holding both summits, a large part of the costs, are attributed to security, which is extremely important.
- deflectedG8 and G20 SummitsMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to general assurances about the public service without addressing sole-sourcing or the billion-dollar cost.
Our goal is to ensure that taxpayers get value for money.
- partly answeredG8 and G20 SummitsMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the economy is the main priority but acknowledges climate change will be addressed among other issues.
Of course, a number of issues will be dealt with, including climate change.
- partly answeredG8 and G20 SummitsMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer confirms climate change will be among issues addressed while prioritizing the economy.
Other issues will also be addressed and, as I said, climate change will be among them.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationMs. Johanne Deschamps (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.The answer focuses on maternal health support without addressing the exclusion of abortion or reopening the debate.
What did Melinda Gates say? She said that the number of dying is "atrocious" and she added: The truth is, we can prevent most of these deaths -- and at a stunningly low cost -- if we take action now.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationMs. Johanne Deschamps (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists unrelated aid achievements instead of addressing maternal health commitments or the alleged freeze.
We have retained our commitment to doubling our international assistance.
- partly answeredAfghanistanJack Layton (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer gives a conditional response tied to the asker signing a document rather than an unconditional commitment.
if the hon. member is prepared to commit to signing the document that we will present today, this in fact will be the last meeting.
- deflectedAfghanistanJack Layton (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the yes/no question about minority-government authority and pivots to security obligations.
Any documentation has to be consistent with our international obligations.
- misdirectedAfghanistanJack Layton (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the question and instead attacks the asker by referencing a supposed coalition partner.
If he wants to hook up with his coalition partner the Leader of the Opposition , why do not both of them come to the meeting this afternoon
- deflectedG8 and G20 SummitsMrs. Lise Zarac (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer rejects the premise but discusses economic promotion instead of the fake-lake cost or reputation impact.
When we look at Canada's economic performance over the past few months, there is no doubt that the eyes of the world are on Canada.
- deflectedG8 and G20 SummitsMrs. Lise Zarac (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies the partisan-agenda claim and lists agenda items without addressing the underlying accusation.
on the contrary, the Prime Minister has indicated that we will discuss climate change.
- partly answeredG8 and G20 SummitsMs. Siobhan Coady (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses overall security costs but does not answer the specific cost of inviting extra countries.
the majority of the costs are related to the security of the G8 and the G20.
- deflectedSecuritiesMr. Daniel Paillé (Bloc) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the voluntary system and external praise instead of addressing the AMF agreement.
this is a voluntary process that we are encouraging the provinces to take part in.
- deflectedSecuritiesMr. Daniel Paillé (Bloc) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.The answer promotes voluntary opt-in and investor protection instead of addressing autonomy or existing system improvements.
once again, a voluntary system would not deprive anyone of the opportunity of being part of a Canada-wide system
- deflectedCopyrightMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights job creation and balance instead of addressing enforcement burdens on creators.
, which we introduced in the House of Commons, is fair to both consumers and creators.
- misdirectedCopyrightMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Bloc's past proposal rather than addressing the digital lock's impact on creators or consumers.
The only suggestion we have heard from the Bloc Québécois so far was to impose a new $75 tax on iPods.
- misdirectedAerospace IndustryMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the opposition's past record instead of addressing the tendering process.
it was his party when in government which, in 2002, entered into this 10-year, $10 billion contract.
- deflectedAerospace IndustryMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question with sarcasm and states no decision yet instead of confirming procedures.
I only wish we could somehow bottle that feigned indignation and manufactured outrage for a positive purpose.
- deflectedOffshore DrillingGeoff Regan (Liberal) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer emphasizes existing rigorous standards instead of addressing liability limits or taxpayer protection.
We know that the Canadian offshore drilling system is one of the most solid, rigorous systems in the world.
- deflectedOffshore DrillingGeoff Regan (Liberal) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer reiterates regulatory standards and denies loopholes instead of committing to 100% liability legislation.
Therefore, he should stop speaking about loopholes.
- deflectedPensionsMr. Wayne Marston (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses general retirement security cooperation without addressing the GIS increase request.
we are seeking to work co-operatively with our provincial and territorial partners to further strengthen Canada's retirement income system.
- deflectedPensionsMr. Wayne Marston (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.Responds by listing past actions instead of addressing the full NDP plan.
The fact is we have already done much for seniors.
- partly answeredAgriculture and Agri-FoodMr. André Bellavance (Bloc) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.Mentions working on changes but does not confirm fixing production costs in AgriStability.
We continue to work toward changes within the parameters of those programs
- deflectedAgriculture and Agri-FoodMr. André Bellavance (Bloc) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.Shifts focus to provincial relations instead of program changes.
we do not work arbitrarily in this situation.
- misdirectedCommittees of the HouseMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.Defends ministerial responsibility tradition without addressing the specific Soudas claims.
as a government, we have already announced that we intend to continue respecting the tradition of ministerial responsibility.
- misdirectedCommittees of the HouseWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). rhetorical question.Diverts to a soccer game and then criticizes the questioner on an unrelated issue.
this gives me an opportunity to highlight the good work of Mr. Dimitri Soudas in building friendships between members of Parliament and members of the media with a soccer game
- deflectedG8 SummitMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). rhetorical question.Praises the summit without justifying the specific country invitations or priorities.
the Prime Minister has decided to invite a number of foreign dignitaries and representatives of different countries to discuss the outstanding issues they face.
- partly answeredG8 SummitMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.Provides endorsements but no specific commitment amount for maternal health.
Canada is proposing a bold but achievable plan that can save countless lives
- deflectedTourism IndustryMrs. Alexandra Mendes (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer promotes other supported festivals rather than addressing the claimed cuts to specific events or G8/G20 comparison.
We have supported marquee tourism festivals through this special stimulus fund.
- answeredGovernment ProgramsMr. Richard Nadeau (Bloc) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly explains the three reasons the festival did not qualify for funding.
The reason this festival did not qualify for taxpayer funding was that this particular festival had a $1 million surplus left over from last year.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.Answer discusses general health transfers and collaboration but avoids the specific funding commitment requested for aboriginal maternal health versus G20.
This year alone our government is transferring over $25.4 billion, which is an all-time high to the provinces and territories.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsMrs. Alexandra Mendes (Liberal) asked Jay Hill (Conservative). loaded question.Answer refuses to respond due to the question's tone instead of addressing the festival funding issue.
we have no minister by that designation and until members actually address their questions in a respectful manner there will not be a minister answering.
- misdirectedPrison FarmsMr. Alex Atamanenko (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer shifts entirely to job creation and the economy without addressing the prison farm program or asset sales.
Our single focus is on the economy and to return Canadians to work.