All sittings← 2010-06-032010-06-07 →
Friday, June 4, 2010 · sitting No. 56
Commons debates omnibus budget bill as opposition attacks closure
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on government orders for the Jobs and Economic Growth Act. NDP MP Jim Maloway said the 880-page bill buried unpopular measures and that closure prevented proper debate on the privatization of AECL. Conservative MP Ted Menzies said the bill contained necessary economic measures and accused opposition members of fearmongering.
Question period opened with exchanges on G8 and G20 costs. Liberal MP Siobhan Coady questioned spending on infrastructure far from the summit site. Industry Minister Tony Clement said legacy projects delivered regional benefits and noted similar Liberal spending at past summits.
Further exchanges addressed greenhouse gas reductions. Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc said an Environment Canada report showed the government had overstated reductions by a factor of ten. Conservative MP Mark Warawa said emissions had fallen 2.1 per cent under the current government after rising under the previous one.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2010-06-04
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Afghanistan
NDP MP Paul Dewar asked what plan existed for Afghanistan after the 2011 military withdrawal. Minister of State Peter Kent said the government would respect the 2008 parliamentary resolution and shift to a civilian mission.
Read the exchangePensions
NDP MP Wayne Marston urged the government to increase GIS and expand the CPP after municipal support at the Federation of Canadian Municipalities conference. Conservative MP Ted Menzies said consultations with provinces would produce results and urged passage of the budget bill.
Read the exchangeShipbuilding Industry
Liberal MP Scott Simms asked for specifics on joint support ships and Arctic patrol vessels. Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor said the national shipbuilding procurement strategy would create long-term work and that the joint support ship project remained a priority.
Read the exchangeCommittees of the House
Bloc MP Mario Laframboise asked why the Prime Minister's director of communications would not appear before a committee. Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre said the committee had ignored rules of fairness and that ministerial responsibility required ministers rather than staff to answer.
Read the exchangeCopyright
Bloc MP Carole Lavallée asked why the government would not extend the private copying levy to MP3 players. Industry Minister Tony Clement said the bill protected artists without imposing new taxes on consumers.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedG8 and G20 SummitsMs. Siobhan Coady (Liberal) asked Mr. Dave MacKenzie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the cost and mismanagement question by quoting the opposition leader's past statement.
We want to make it very clear...when we are the government of Canada, the next G8 Summit will be held at Deerhurst Resort in Huntsville.... You heard it from me: the G8 Summit will be in this community when we form the next government.
- misdirectedG8 and G20 SummitsMs. Siobhan Coady (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Liberals' past spending instead of addressing the listed G8 expenditures.
In 1995, for the G7 Halifax summit, then finance minister Paul Martin spent $300,000 on the Bluenose
- deflectedG8 and G20 SummitsMs. Siobhan Coady (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer again pivots to Liberal spending in Halifax rather than explaining the G8 project locations.
One of the other things the Liberals did in Halifax, after the 1995 G7 summit was over, was spend another $3 million on projects in Halifax just to thank the people of that city.
- partly answeredG8 and G20 SummitsDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the agenda and costs but does not address why climate change was omitted.
It is a full agenda. It is an agenda that has been approved by the other participating countries, and we look forward to hosting a historic summit.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the previous Liberal government and Bill C-311 instead of addressing the Environment Canada report.
Now the opposition is pushing the NDP's Bill C-311 publicity stunt, which would throw Canada back into recession.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists unrelated actions and ignores the specific overestimation of emission reductions.
In the last three years, this government has negotiated the Copenhagen accord, harmonized our environmental targets with the Obama administration, introduced tailpipe emission standards for cars and light trucks, announced emission regulations for 15 categories of heavy trucks, and I could go on and on.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats emission claims and insults the questioner without addressing the 2012 forecast.
I do not know what the member is smoking.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Bloc's voting record instead of responding to the Kyoto target exceedance claim.
Maybe a party that voted against $6.7 billion in green infrastructure since 2005.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists domestic initiatives instead of addressing the G8/G20 priority.
We have allocated $100 million for the next generation renewable power initiative and an additional $80 million for the eco-energy retrofit homes program.
- answeredAfghanistanMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.Directly states the plan to end military mission in 2011.
We have made it eminently clear that this government will respect the parliamentary resolution of 2008 and cease our military mission to Afghanistan in 2011.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.Responds about committee motions rather than a full House debate.
We urge opposition members of the committee to participate and to forward their suggestions to Parliament.
- misdirectedAfghanistanMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.Ignores the funding question and accuses of wrong facts while pivoting.
once again, my colleague has his facts wrong.
- deflectedG8 and G20 SummitsJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Mr. Dave MacKenzie (Conservative). substantive question.Focuses on security measures without addressing compensation.
this government is taking its responsibilities seriously. That is why we do have the security that is in place in the city of Toronto to host this summit.
- answeredG8 and G20 SummitsJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.States they will consider costs of loss of business.
the Government of Canada will in fact consider any costs associated with loss of business during the G20 summit.
- misdirectedG8 and G20 SummitsMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Denies the premise and insults the opposition's knowledge.
They do not know what they are talking about. That is why they are in the opposition.
- deflectedG8 and G20 SummitsMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Defends the spending by comparing to previous government instead of answering about the facilities.
It is not any different in this case, as was the case in 1995 in Halifax.
- deflectedCommittees of the HouseMr. Mario Laframboise (Bloc) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.Answer criticizes committee process instead of addressing whether the director should appear.
the committee has ignored all rules of fairness by announcing the summons to the news media before it was even delivered.
- partly answeredCommittees of the HouseMr. Mario Laframboise (Bloc) asked Jay Hill (Conservative). substantive question.Answer restates ministerial responsibility stance but sidesteps the public servants inconsistency raised.
We are talking about political staff and they will no longer be appearing.
- answeredForest FiresMr. Jean-Yves Laforest (Bloc) asked Mr. John Duncan (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly describes government actions taken with first nations and province during the crisis.
Our officials have been working with the first nations and with the province of Quebec, which is primarily responsible for the required evacuations and related work.
- deflectedForest FiresMr. Jean-Yves Laforest (Bloc) asked Mr. John Duncan (Conservative). substantive question.Answer references existing agreements without confirming coverage of the specific unexpected costs mentioned.
the member knows that there are agreements in place which take care of all of these situations.
- partly answeredTerrorismIrwin Cotler (Liberal) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.Answer acknowledges concern but only states ongoing consideration without committing to listing the IRGC.
We continue to consider the possibility of such sanction.
- deflectedHuman RightsIrwin Cotler (Liberal) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts to general UN actions rather than addressing referral to the UN Security Council.
We have censured the behaviour of Iran in these areas on any number of violations of human rights.
- partly answeredShipbuilding IndustryMr. Scott Simms (Liberal) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). loaded question.Answer covers some ship projects but omits specifics on numbers, costs, and timelines requested.
the joint support ship project remains a key priority.
- misdirectedShipbuilding IndustryMr. Scott Simms (Liberal) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the Liberals' record instead of addressing prioritization of joint supply ships.
I find it quite rich that this is coming from the Liberals, who are known for the decade of darkness.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Joe Comartin (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims the question was already asked and highlights emission reductions without addressing the request for a plan.
For the first time in Canada, under this government, greenhouse gas emissions have stabilized and they are going down.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Joe Comartin (NDP) asked Mr. Mark Warawa (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the NDP bill and restates government actions instead of addressing targets or spending concerns.
What do those members not understand about that?
- deflectedCopyrightMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the bill's goals without justifying the difference in levies for CDs versus MP3 players.
The goal of this bill is to offer protection to artists in order to increase their creativity in Canada.
- deflectedCopyrightMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer rejects a new tax and claims protections for artists without addressing fair remuneration or the levy request.
However, we will not impose on consumers a new tax on their iPods, their BlackBerrys, their computers, their television sets to finance the Bloc's plans.
- answeredOil and Gas IndustryMr. Sukh Dhaliwal (Liberal) asked Mr. Brian Jean (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states there are no plans to reopen the exclusion zone and clarifies the existing agreement.
This government has no plans to reopen the exclusion zone on tankers travelling between Alaska and Washington state.
- answeredOil and Gas IndustryMr. Sukh Dhaliwal (Liberal) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer denies the claim of regulatory change and quotes the unchanged guidelines on relief wells.
Operators are expected to identify an alternate drilling installation for relief well purposes and provide a description of its operating capability, its location, contractual commitments, state of readiness...
- deflectedPensionsMr. Wayne Marston (NDP) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses consultations and contrasts parties without committing to the requested pension measures.
To the member's credit, he has contributed to that consultation, unlike the Bloc and Liberals who have contributed zero to the pension consultations.
- deflectedPensionsMr. Wayne Marston (NDP) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to passing the budget bill instead of addressing the call to implement specific pension reforms.
There is legislation in the budget bill that needs to be passed and needs to be passed soon.
- deflectedCommittees of the HouseScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer criticizes committee procedures instead of addressing the subpoena service or law compliance.
the committee has ignored all of the rules of fairness by announcing the summons to the news media before it was actually delivered.
- deflectedShipbuilding IndustryMr. Gérard Asselin (Bloc) asked Mr. Jacques Gourde (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the national strategy but ignores the specific Quebec transportation cost disadvantage and fair share request.
Our strategy will create over 75 million person-hours of employment and inject $35 billion into Canada's shipbuilding industry.
- answeredHealthMr. Jim Maloway (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly explains the health assessment and decision not to reverse the caffeine rule.
Our health risk assessments conclude that there are no risks to consumers.
- misdirectedCommittees of the HouseScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to job growth and attacks the Liberal leader instead of addressing the committee appearance issue.
I notice that the member forgot to mention the enormous job growth this country experienced in the last month.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationMr. Jean Dorion (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends aid policy in general and attacks the prior government without addressing the CCIC funding cut.
This government has been acknowledged for fulfilling its commitment, unlike the previous government that made a commitment to the starving children of the world and did not fulfill that commitment after signing the food aid convention four years out of seven.