All sittings← 2010-05-132010-05-25 →
Friday, May 14, 2010 · sitting No. 47
Commons approves committee reports and travel after lengthy debate
The House devoted the largest share of its time to committee business, with the procedure and house affairs committee tabling its tenth report on private members' business and the finance committee reporting Bill C-9 without amendment. Members also authorized travel by the status of women committee to five communities for its study of violence against Aboriginal women.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the economy, in which Liberal MP Wayne Easter accused the government of borrowing to finance corporate tax cuts while Conservative MP John Baird defended the measures as job creators. Further clashes occurred over national defence cuts and securities regulation.
Decided that day
- Bill C-27 was introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2010-05-14
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Privilege
Liberal MP Paul Szabo raised a question of privilege alleging a personal attack by Conservative MP James Bezan the previous day and asked the Speaker to review committee proceedings.
Read the exchangeNuclear Liability and Compensation Act
Bloc Québécois MP Guy André said Bill C-15 raises liability limits from $75 million to $650 million but urged further improvements and greater investment in renewables.
Read the exchangeSecurities
Bloc Québécois MP Pierre Paquette charged that the proposed national regulator is designed to strip Quebec of financial autonomy for Toronto's benefit; Conservative MP Lawrence Cannon replied that participation remains voluntary.
Read the exchangePoints of Order
Justice Minister Rob Nicholson told the House that all parties had reached an agreement on the release of unredacted documents concerning Afghan detainees that respects both parliamentary rights and national security.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedThe EconomyWayne Easter (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to job creation and the economic plan without addressing the debt or tax cut premise.
our number one goal, our number one objective as a government here in Canada is to create jobs, to create more hope, to create more opportunity.
- misdirectedThe EconomyWayne Easter (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Liberal conference and quotes a Liberal MP instead of addressing the borrowing or deficit claim.
The Liberal Party had a conference in Montreal, a policy conference, a thinkers' conference, but it did not allow Liberal MPs to speak.
- misdirectedThe EconomyWayne Easter (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer again quotes a Liberal MP on tax cuts rather than responding to the fiscal choices or grandchildren's debt.
Our leader has stressed...the importance of deeper corporate tax cuts as a primary means of achieving the investment, the rising living standards and the jobs, jobs, jobs that we all want for ourselves and our children.
- misdirectedThe EconomyMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer quotes a Liberal MP instead of addressing the deficit, tax cuts, or family priorities raised.
Corporate tax cuts are one of the best strategies to attract investment and help manufacturers battered by the high Canadian dollar
- misdirectedThe EconomyMr. Marc Garneau (Liberal) asked Mr. Laurie Hawn (Conservative). loaded question.The answer offers condolences then attacks the Liberals' record on military funding instead of addressing navy cuts or promises.
It is a bit rich for the party of the decade of darkness over there to talk about funding for the Canadian Forces.
- partly answeredSecuritiesMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses the voluntary participation and lack of national regulator but ignores the Quebec autonomy and Earl Jones premise.
Canada is the only major industrialized nation that does not have a national securities regulator.
- partly answeredSecuritiesMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer notes benefits for investors but does not address the isolation of Quebec or forced participation claim.
countless articles have explained that this type of organization would essentially provide better protection for Quebec investors, reduce useless expenditures and attract new investors and investment from abroad.
- deflectedSecuritiesMr. Robert Carrier (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer cites a victim's quote and ignores the cost, job loss, and autonomy questions entirely.
I would like to share with him something we heard recently from Joey Davis, a victim of Earl Jones who speaks for the victims' group.
- deflectedSecuritiesMr. Robert Carrier (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the premise and questioner rather than addressing constitutional jurisdiction.
I understand that my Bloc Québécois colleague is trying to paint a miserable picture of Quebec, but let me quote a study by Columbia University that showed that the system—
- misdirectedNational DefenceMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Laurie Hawn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer accuses the asker of falsehoods and attacks the NDP record instead of addressing fleet cuts.
that is really rich coming from the party that does not hold any respect for the equipment of the Canadian Forces and votes against every measure we bring in to equip the Canadian Forces.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Laurie Hawn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer denies the premise and attacks the asker without confirming or refuting specific ship operational cuts.
What the member is saying about the navy is simply not true. It is simply false. We are not tying up any ships.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked Mr. Laurie Hawn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer insults the asker personally and repeats denials without engaging the vice-admiral quote or budget allocation.
the only thing we get from that member normally is the curl of his lip.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Mr. Dean Del Mastro (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists unrelated funding examples instead of addressing the pattern of attacks on institutions.
I think the Liberals are acquainted with FrancoFolies in Westmount—Ville-Marie. That was $175,000 for each of two years.
- misdirectedGovernment ProgramsMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Mr. Dean Del Mastro (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer praises the Quebec caucus and ignores the question about cuts and social policy reversals.
when it comes to this party's Conservative Quebec caucus, it stands four-square behind its province and behind its country.
- deflectedNational DefenceScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Laurie Hawn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats funding increases and long-term plans without addressing the Treasury Board report or capacity limits.
The fact is we will not be tying up any ships. Please understand that.
- deflectedNational DefenceScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Laurie Hawn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer denies cuts and insults the opposition without reconciling the reported reductions or vice-admiral statements.
What is being gutted across the floor is common sense.
- deflectedStatus of WomenMrs. Claude DeBellefeuille (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the abortion question entirely and shifts to unrelated child mortality abroad.
We have a responsibility to take action to protect and save these children's lives.
- deflectedStatus of WomenMrs. Claude DeBellefeuille (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer again avoids abortion and pivots to violence against women initiatives.
That is why we are focused on ending violence against women, and time after time we are introducing new laws to protect women and children from violent rapists and offenders.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsMr. Jean-Yves Laforest (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses consular services and prior discussion but does not confirm whether repatriation was demanded.
As we have done in many cases, we will offer all possible consular services to this woman who is presently in Saudi Arabia.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMr. Jean-Yves Laforest (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer emphasizes legal constraints and complexity without stating any action on repatriation.
In this context, we are providing all consular services possible in the circumstances.
- misdirectedEthicsJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the question's accuracy and declares it irrelevant rather than addressing the caucus decision.
there is not enough time in my answer to correct all of the factual inaccuracies in the member's question.
- misdirectedEthicsJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question as not serious and repeats that it is before the courts.
that member's question is neither serious nor credible.
- partly answeredOffshore DrillingMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer rebuts the no-plan claim with details on liability and zones but uses insulting language.
- deflectedOffshore DrillingMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.The answer evades the moratorium question and instead criticizes the asker while restating the regulatory regime.
the hon. member, instead of scrutinizing the way I speak English, should check the state of the law enforced here in Canada.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the hypocrisy claim by declaring the issue non-governmental and court-bound.
the matter has nothing to do with government business and it is before the courts.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the ethics allegations and instead compliments the questioner's quotability.
I am very pleased on behalf of all members of the government caucus to congratulate the member opposite.
- deflectedPharmaceutical IndustryMr. Luc Malo (Bloc) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses health transfers instead of intellectual property protections for innovative drug firms.
this government continues to remain committed to supporting the provinces and territories in the delivery of health care
- partly answeredPharmaceutical IndustryMr. Luc Malo (Bloc) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists some Quebec funding but pivots to attack the Bloc's voting record rather than outlining a biotech plan.
if the Bloc members had their way, none of this funding would go into their province of Quebec because they voted against it.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to G8 maternal health leadership instead of addressing domestic cuts to women's programs.
Our government has a responsibility to act.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer claims record women's funding and cites NGOs while ignoring the listed domestic cuts.
our government has increased the funding for women's groups to the highest level ever in the history of this country.
- partly answeredChild and Maternal HealthMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer emphasizes G8 leadership but supplies no dollar figure for Canada's contribution.
Obviously, when the G8 leaders get together we will see those plans.
- deflectedChild and Maternal HealthMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer praises the initiative and seeks opposition support without stating any funding commitment or response to doubling Global Fund money.
I am very pleased to hear that the NDP is now supporting this initiative.
- deflectedAutomotive IndustryMr. Francis Valeriote (Liberal) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). substantive question.Answer ignores the dealership closures and instead lists unrelated government spending while attacking the opposition.
Why would the opposition not support that?
- misdirectedFirearms RegistryMr. Thierry St-Cyr (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts to attacking the member's colleague instead of addressing police support for the registry.
The member should ask his colleague from Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord , who wants to criminalize his own constituents.
- answeredVictoria HarbourMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly clarifies the limited federal role and notes collaboration with an NDP member.
It is both the city and the province.
- misdirectedPoints of OrderMs. Libby Davies (NDP) asked Mrs. Shelly Glover (Conservative). rhetorical question.The statement is not a question and the reply addresses an unrelated language issue while attacking a Liberal member.
Today I would like to offer them some encouragement.