All sittings← 2010-04-302010-05-04 →
Monday, May 3, 2010 · sitting No. 38
House debates bill to end house arrest for serious crimes
Members spent the largest share of the sitting on second reading of Bill C-16, which would restrict conditional sentences for property and violent offences. Conservative MP Brent Rathgeber opened debate by arguing that serious offenders must serve time in custody rather than at home. Liberal MP Brian Murphy and Bloc Québécois MP Serge Ménard pressed for data on added provincial prison costs and noted that conditional sentences remain suitable in some cases.
Question period focused on two main clashes. Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc accused ministers of granting privileged access to Rahim Jaffer in breach of the Conflict of Interest Act. NDP Leader Jack Layton questioned whether the government would tighten Arctic drilling rules after the Gulf of Mexico spill, and Prime Minister Stephen Harper replied that existing Canadian standards are already stricter.
Decided that day
- S-3 advanced in first chamber
- S-9 introduced
- C-4 given second reading
- C-21 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2010-05-03
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Canadian Forces Superannuation Act
NDP MP Charlie Angus said the covenant with veterans requires that pensions not be clawed back after service members reach 65.
Read the exchangeWorld Press Freedom Day
Liberal MP Todd Russell said the Conservative government received another failing grade from Canadian Journalists for Free Expression for delays in access-to-information requests.
Read the exchangeSébastien's Law (protecting the public from violent young offenders)
NDP MP Bill Siksay warned that ending publication bans on young offenders would hinder rehabilitation and increase recidivism.
Read the exchangeAfghanistan
Bloc Québécois MP Claude Bachand said the government is hiding behind national-security claims to withhold records from the Military Police Complaints Commission.
Read the exchangeFirearms Registry
Conservative MP Randy Hoback said the Liberal leader is forcing caucus members to ignore constituents and back the long-gun registry.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- misdirectedEthicsDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Liberal Party instead of addressing whether the Conflict of Interest Act was contravened.
The Liberal Party gets more and more ridiculous in the reaches it makes on this question.
- deflectedEthicsDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates government actions on lobbying rules without addressing the specific claim of illegal preferential treatment.
The Lobbyist Registration Act is a lot stronger and tougher because of the actions of this government and this Prime Minister
- misdirectedEthicsDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to attacking the prior Liberal government and the sponsorship scandal rather than addressing consequences for the ministers.
Let us compare that to the Liberals when literally millions of dollars went missing in the sponsorship scandal.
- deflectedEthicsMs. Siobhan Coady (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer points to the independent commissioner without addressing consequences for cabinet members under the guide for ministers.
If the member opposite has any allegations or any evidence, she should follow the example of the Prime Minister and forward it on to the relevant authority.
- misdirectedEthicsMs. Siobhan Coady (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the prior Liberal government and questions the member's evidence instead of addressing PCO consultations or accountability.
We did so because of the sorry and poor ethics that lobbyists exercised under the previous Liberal government.
- partly answeredAccess to InformationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges delays in access to information and states willingness to improve, but does not address the claim of blocking requests.
In a recent report, we noted that responses to access to information requests sometimes took too long, and we are prepared to improve that situation.
- deflectedAccess to InformationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the matter is not government business and information was passed to authorities without explaining the decision to fire the minister.
All the information has been passed on to the authorities.
- deflectedAccess to InformationMrs. Carole Freeman (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer emphasizes handing information to the commissioner without providing the names of ministers and parliamentary secretaries requested.
the reason we are having this debate in the House of Commons is that this government has handed over all information to the lobbying commissioner and the parliamentary committee.
- deflectedAccess to InformationMrs. Carole Freeman (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer provides statistics on response times but ignores the specific accusations about broken promises.
according to the report on access to information, it is clear that we respond to most requests within 30 days.
- answeredThe EnvironmentJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The response directly assures stricter rules in Canada.
Fortunately, we have much stricter rules in Canada to prevent such a disaster.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids addressing the request to call specific conferences.
There are rules for relief wells.
- answeredThe EnvironmentJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Explicitly states no weakening of standards.
We will do no such thing in terms of weakening environmental standards.
- deflectedEthicsMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps confirming the identity and focuses on accountability.
my parliamentary secretary is the member for Fort McMurray—Athabasca
- deflectedEthicsMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Shifts to discussing the Lobbyists Act instead of answering about the consultant.
This government, as a matter of its first course of business, strengthened that act.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The response attacks the previous government rather than addressing the request for appearance.
Canadians can see the difference between this Conservative government and the unethical conduct of the previous Liberal government.
- partly answeredEthicsMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Provides some information on actions taken but does not confirm if ministers will appear.
We also referred this matter to an independent authority.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Claude Bachand (Bloc) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer cites public information and a witness but avoids addressing the alleged use of security as pretext.
on the contrary, it is clear that there is plenty of information on the public record.
- partly answeredAfghanistanMr. Claude Bachand (Bloc) asked Mr. Daniel Petit (Conservative). substantive question.The answer commits to providing documents but ignores the responsibility claim and the specific shortfall in pages released.
the government's lawyers are continuing to work with the Military Police Complaints Commission in order to provide all the necessary documents that are relevant to its mandate.
- deflectedOil IndustryMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms existing strict laws without addressing whether stricter regulations should be imposed on Arctic oil activities.
Our government, our country, has strict laws and regulations to protect the environment.
- partly answeredOil IndustryMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer stresses safety review but does not commit to reversing any potential NEB exemption decision.
drilling is not going to occur until and unless the National Energy Board is clear and satisfied that the drilling plans are safe and that they do protect the environment.
- deflectedOil IndustryMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer speaks generally about environmental protection but evades the direct yes-or-no question on respecting the tanker moratorium.
This government will make no effort that would compromise our environment.
- misdirectedOil IndustryMs. Joyce Murray (Liberal) asked Mr. David Anderson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Liberals on deceit and notes the member's prior silence instead of addressing the risk to ecosystems.
I do not think the Liberals should be talking about deceit.
- deflectedForestry IndustryMrs. Lise Zarac (Liberal) asked Denis Lebel (Conservative). loaded question.The answer justifies past actions and trade agreements but does not address reconsidering the decision to abandon forestry workers.
previous governments ignored the forestry industry for years, but we signed a trade agreement with our major softwood lumber industry partners.
- deflectedScience and technologyMrs. Lise Zarac (Liberal) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). loaded question.The answer counters with overall funding totals but sidesteps the specific claims of brain drain and ideological firings.
No government in the history of this country has supported science, scientists and technology more than this Conservative government.
- misdirectedEthicsMr. Thomas Mulcair (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the question as outrageous rather than addressing whether other ministers will be investigated.
that question from the deputy leader of the NDP is quite outrageous.
- deflectedEthicsMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the Prime Minister's actions but avoids explaining any secrecy around the member for Simcoe—Grey.
the member for Simcoe—Grey will be pleased to learn she has a friend over in the NDP.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationMs. Johanne Deschamps (Bloc) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists government priorities but does not address whether groups providing abortion services will lose funding.
Our initiative will include training and support for front-line health workers, better nutrition and provision of micronutrients, screening and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS, proper medication, family planning and immunization.
- deflectedInternational Co-operationMs. Johanne Deschamps (Bloc) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). loaded question.The answer repeats the government's position on not reopening the debate without addressing the accusation of following an anti-abortion agenda.
The government has been very clear: it will never reopen the abortion debate.
- partly answeredFisheriesMr. Brian Murphy (Liberal) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists general supports for fishers but does not address the specific claim of abandoning New Brunswick fishers.
We have extended capital gains exemptions to fishers that his government would not do.
- deflectedFisheriesMr. Brian Murphy (Liberal) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses the difficulty of quota cuts but avoids addressing the lack of support or meeting requests for New Brunswick fishers.
I hope that the hon. member is not saying that we should be allowing fishers to overfish.
- partly answeredProduct SafetyMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the status of Bill C-6 but does not commit to a timeline for reintroduction.
We will continue to work with stakeholders to improve the legislation and reintroduce it sometime in this House.
- partly answeredProduct SafetyMs. Megan Leslie (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The answer references prior introduction of Bill C-6 but provides no timeline or plan to address ongoing unsafe products.
Unfortunately, the Liberal senators amended the legislation.
- deflectedPublic SafetyMr. Rodger Cuzner (Liberal) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses general support and programs but ignores the specific tax credit request.
Our Conservative government remains committed to working with provincial and municipal governments, which are responsible for first responders.
- deflectedAgri-FoodMr. André Bellavance (Bloc) asked Gerry Ritz (Conservative). substantive question.The response vaguely mentions taking interests to heart without addressing the Codex or labelling plan.
at any of these meetings, Canada always takes the best interests of our producers and our processors to heart, and that will be our position.
- misdirectedOfficial LanguagesMr. Yvon Godin (NDP) asked Mr. Daniel Petit (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to general principles of judge selection instead of addressing the bill or Senate vote.
our government will continue to be guided by principles of merit and legal excellence in the selection and appointment of judges to Canada's highest courts.
- deflectedPensionsJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Gary Goodyear (Conservative). substantive question.The answer focuses on consultations without mentioning the specific bill or Senate action.
the government has been consulting all across Canada.
- misdirected400th Anniversary of Quebec CityMs. Christiane Gagnon (Bloc) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). substantive question.The response criticizes the Bloc Québécois and avoids addressing the funding shortfall.
Unfortunately, I have to say that the Bloc members did not contribute to that success.
- answeredAboriginal AffairsMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms action and details upcoming meetings to address the issue.
yes, this is a cause for concern. In fact, in a week and half's time I will be meeting with George Abbott, who is the minister responsible for this in the province of British Columbia, to come together with a plan with first nations communities, the province and the federal government about how we can best protect these aboriginal languages.
- partly answeredInternational Co-operationBob Rae (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.The answer provides factual reasons for the cut but does not engage with the accusatory premise.
A 2009 evaluation of this organization showed there were performance and management shortcomings, declining organizational capacity that had not been sufficiently addressed by the organization.