All sittings← 2009-05-112009-05-13 →
Tuesday, May 12, 2009 · sitting No. 56
Commons advances RCMP pension bill at third reading
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on third reading of Bill C-18, An Act to amend the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Superannuation Act. Conservative MP Dave MacKenzie said the measure would modernize pension portability for RCMP members. Liberal MP Dan McTeague and NDP MP Paul Dewar raised questions about wage restraint and seniority recognition during the debate.
Question Period opened with exchanges on infrastructure spending delays. Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff said municipalities were still waiting for funds promised in the budget. Prime Minister Stephen Harper replied that projects would begin this fiscal year after identification with provincial and municipal partners.
Decided that day
- C-9 advanced in second chamber
- C-18 advanced in first chamber
- C-383 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2009-05-12
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Environmental Enforcement Act
Conservative MP Dean Del Mastro said Bill C-16 would deliver deterrence, denunciation and environmental restoration. Bloc Québécois MP Bernard Bigras questioned whether fines would deter large polluters such as Syncrude.
Read the exchangeSri Lanka
Liberal MP Kirsty Duncan asked what action the government would take to evacuate civilians after a hospital was shelled. Minister of International Cooperation Bev Oda called for a ceasefire to allow humanitarian access.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
Liberal MP Denis Coderre said the Auditor General found the department could not track surplus funds accurately. Minister of National Defence Peter MacKay replied that new accounting issues would be examined while equipment purchases proceed under the Canada First defence strategy.
Read the exchangeStatus of Women
NDP MP Irene Mathyssen said the Auditor General found the government had failed to apply gender-based analysis across programs. Minister of Public Safety Vic Toews said the government had included the requirement in memoranda to cabinet.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer disputes the premise on growth but ignores the specific question on infrastructure funding delays.
the latest OECD figures predict that Canada will have the strongest economic growth of the G7 countries.
- partly answeredThe EconomyMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims projects will proceed but does not address past underspending or current approval delays.
We will be carrying out many projects across the country in the coming year.
- deflectedThe EconomyMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer pivots to attacking Liberal tax policies instead of addressing missed construction season or municipal waits.
All those projects will do a lot more for the economy than the carbon tax, the increased GST, the increased EI payroll taxes and all the taxes that the Liberal Party wants.
- answeredSri LankaMs. Kirsty Duncan (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly states the government's call for ceasefire and aid access in response to the evacuation and aid query.
That is why we are calling for a ceasefire so humanitarian aid can have access and can be delivered to those who are facing such a devastating situation.
- answeredSri LankaMrs. Michelle Simson (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.Answer confirms expedited family class processing alongside ceasefire and aid efforts.
our immigration officials at our Colombo mission are expediting the processing of family class reunification applications for Sri Lankan nationals.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer notes intent to set targets with the US but does not confirm absolute reduction targets requested.
we are working along with the U.S. government in setting targets and creating a regulatory system for greenhouse gas emissions for the economy of the entire continent.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the Bloc for pitting regions against each other rather than addressing intensity versus absolute targets or appointments.
it is always interesting to see the Bloc Québécois leader again attacking Alberta and Ontario in asking a question about the environment.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.Answer asserts clear strategy but dismisses the commissioner's critique as partisan without engaging the overestimation claim.
Contrary to the Bloc Québécois and the Liberals, we have clear objectives and a clear strategy for fighting climate change.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the specific accusations by insulting the asker and pivoting to unrelated international meetings.
Instead, he just stays in his living room.
- deflectedInfrastructureJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates general plans and attacks the NDP's budget vote instead of explaining the delay.
It is somewhat ironic to see the NDP supporting these projects now, when it voted against them in the budget.
- deflectedInfrastructureJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats the same general claim and again attacks the NDP vote rather than providing spending or job figures.
but I have to say, it is no thanks to the NDP, which voted against all of these projects when it decided to vote against the budget before even reading it.
- misdirectedInfrastructureJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the call to use the gas-tax model and instead attacks the NDP's past coalition proposal.
if we followed the NDP, we would still be having this ridiculous coalition with no policies.
- partly answeredNational DefenceDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the Auditor General meeting and accounting issues but does not explain why the $300 million was lost.
There are issues that we have to deal with in terms of accounting, and I thank her.
- partly answeredNational DefenceDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses the Auditor General recommendations and states no decisions have been made on helicopters but does not address the bilingualism complaint.
There have been no decisions made concerning relocation of equipment.
- deflectedInfrastructureMr. Gerard Kennedy (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites an old report on potential jobs but does not explain why the one-page form omits job-creation data.
It said that if we were to invest $12 billion of federal money to support infrastructure and then ask the provinces and the municipalities to join us, we could create between 300,000 and 400,000 jobs.
- misdirectedInfrastructureMr. Gerard Kennedy (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the tracking question and launches a personal attack on the asker regarding Ontario politics.
If he will not work with the provinces and with Premier Dalton McGuinty to help the people of Ontario, he should step aside, because those of us on this side will.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Lisa Raitt (Conservative). substantive question.Mentions renewable programs but pivots to defending carbon capture rather than committing to a renewables plan.
We have a whole suite of eco-energy programs, from renewable heat to power from hydro, to all kinds of measures that are available to the public and to companies in order to ensure that we have green technology and that we are indeed protecting the environment.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.Addresses offsets and negotiations but does not commit to a carbon exchange or 1990 baselines.
as I have indicated, we are dealing with the matter of offsets, which the hon. member raises in her question, the entire question of the integrity of the offset system
- answeredNational DefenceMr. Robert Bouchard (Bloc) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Directly denies any plan to move helicopters, addressing the core claim.
There is no decision and no plan to move the helicopters from the Bagotville base.
- deflectedNational DefenceMr. Claude Bachand (Bloc) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Ignores the question about the minister's statement and instead attacks the Bloc.
This is an attempt by the Bloc, constantly, to create a crisis that causes fear for the men and women who are on the bases.
- deflectedEmploymentJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.Repeats denial but does not address or correct the prior public comments on upcoming numbers.
I can assure the member opposite and the House that I do not comment on the employment numbers that are going to be released the next day.
- misdirectedEmploymentJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.Ignores the request for a promise and instead attacks the member's car choice.
I encourage the member opposite, who thinks he drives a North American car and then decides that he does not drive a North American car, to join me and come down to Oshawa, buy an Impala and support the Canadian economy.
- deflectedCanadian Broadcasting CorporationMr. Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.Avoids addressing the broken promise by attacking Liberals' past record instead.
The only party in this House to have made cuts to the CBC is the Liberal Party of Canada.
- deflectedCanadian Broadcasting CorporationHedy Fry (Liberal) asked James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.Ignores the mandate question and pivots to past Liberal cuts and election promises.
It was the Liberals who cut the CBC. It is the Conservative government that keeps its word to taxpayers.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the Kyoto act as mischief and pivots to general plans without addressing law compliance or targets.
That is clear. This government will carry on.
- partly answeredStatus of WomenMs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.The answer rebuts the report interpretation and states actions taken but does not specify a timeline for full implementation.
Our government is completing that in every department.
- answeredFisheries and OceansMr. Raynald Blais (Bloc) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly confirms an emergency meeting will occur and references prior industry engagement.
As I told the hon. member this morning in committee, we certainly will meet with the industry.
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMr. Raynald Blais (Bloc) asked Gail Shea (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists existing programs and investments but does not address new EI eligibility or subsidies requested.
We have received many requests from the lobster industry and every one of them will be taken into consideration.
- partly answeredStatus of WomenAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.The answer disputes the report's criticism and affirms ongoing work but offers no commitment to consistent future analyses.
I have had the discussion with the Auditor General and we are committed to working with the Auditor General.
- misdirectedAccess to InformationDan McTeague (Liberal) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner's prior Liberal government record instead of addressing current document-keeping failures.
that is rich coming from a member who was part of the government that consistently opposed the release of information to the public.
- deflectedForeign InvestmentMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites the court process and trade benefits but does not address intervening to protect jobs or national interest.
That process is ongoing and should not be interfered with by the Government of Canada.
- partly answeredForeign InvestmentMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes the court process and hopes for Canadian buyers but does not commit to intervention or sector support.
There have been no bids entertained so far.
- misdirectedAfghanistanBryon Wilfert (Liberal) asked Peter Kent (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the prior Liberal government instead of addressing the request for a special envoy.
This is pretty rich, Mr. Speaker, coming from the former Liberal government's soft power fantasies on non-engagement.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMr. Serge Cardin (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The response defends the trade deal and mentions human rights provisions but does not address the specific scandal or wiretapping allegations.
There are certain provisions which allow us to continue to support the human rights included in the agreement, and this is a better agreement than those Colombia has signed with other countries.
- answeredHealthMs. Judy Wasylycia-Leis (NDP) asked Leona Aglukkaq (Conservative). substantive question.The minister directly confirms reviewing the CNA recommendations and taking concrete steps on recruitment and retention.
I have instructed my department to carefully review the recommendations from the Canadian Nurses Association, including an update on the baseline study.