All sittings← 2009-03-312009-04-02 →
Wednesday, April 1, 2009 · sitting No. 38
Commons debates energy efficiency bill as recession dominates question period
The House devoted the largest share of its time to debate on Bill S-3, which amends the Energy Efficiency Act to broaden regulation of energy-using consumer products. Liberal MP Geoff Regan said the changes would allow standards, labelling and promotion of efficient appliances such as washing machines and refrigerators. Bloc Québécois MP Christian Ouellet pressed for faster action and comparison with Nordic standards.
In question period the main clashes centred on employment insurance, compensation for Quebec's harmonized sales tax, the situation of Air Canada workers and women's rights in Afghanistan. Liberal MP John McCallum asked for a national standard for EI eligibility after the OECD forecast further job losses. Bloc Québécois MP Gilles Duceppe demanded $2.6 billion in compensation for Quebec, while NDP MP Jack Layton questioned the government's response to a new Afghan law on women.
Conservative ministers replied that five extra weeks of benefits had already been added, that negotiations on compensation would proceed in good faith and that Canada was pressing Afghanistan to meet its human rights obligations.
Decided that day
- C-17 read a second time and sent to environment committee
- S-220 passed second reading
- C-311 passed second reading
- C-356, C-354 and C-355 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2009-04-01
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Air Canada
Liberal MP Marlene Jennings asked what the government was doing to protect jobs and pensions at Air Canada, which faces possible restructuring. Conservative MP John Baird said the government was engaged and following the file closely.
Read the exchangeAutomotive Industry
Liberal MP Francis Valeriote pressed for faster action on a credit facility to support vehicle sales. Conservative MP Tony Clement said the secured credit facility in the budget would help financing and fleet purchases.
Read the exchangeTaxation
Bloc Québécois MP Robert Carrier asked why the government was re-implementing a tax loophole after promising to close it. Conservative MP Jean-Pierre Blackburn said Canada was working with international partners to protect the tax base.
Read the exchangeCanadian Security Intelligence Service
NDP MP Jack Harris asked when the government would stop CSIS from using information obtained through torture. Conservative MP Peter Van Loan said the agency does not practise or condone torture.
Read the exchangeCitizenship and Immigration
Liberal MP Maurizio Bevilacqua said the government had ignored IRB recommendations and failed to reappoint qualified members. Conservative MP Jason Kenney said a new screening process had slowed appointments temporarily but occupancy was now near 95 per cent.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses existing EI measures without addressing the call for a national standard.
We have extended the benefits in a series of ways by adding five weeks to the program, ensuring that there is work sharing, ensuring that a number of people will maintain their jobs, and for those who are not able to qualify for EI, we ensure they can take training.
- misdirectedG20John McCallum (Liberal) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.The answer refuses to admit error and shifts to praising Conservative leadership instead of addressing the historical point.
I do not think you would ever hear a Conservative admit that.
- deflectedInternational Monetary FundJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.Responds by mentioning other aid efforts without addressing IMF funding specifically.
We continue on our track to double aid to Africa.
- partly answeredAir CanadaMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer expresses concern and mentions meetings but does not detail specific protections for jobs.
Yesterday I met with one of the biggest unions of the employees there and indicated my active engagement with the file.
- deflectedAir CanadaMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The response discusses various issues but ends by attacking the opposition's carbon tax instead of reassuring on pensions.
The one thing this government would never do to Air Canada and to the travelling public is bring in a monster-sized carbon tax, which would have decimated the industry.
- deflectedGoods and Services TaxMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer insists on differences and accuses of creating fake debates rather than committing to compensation.
But they need to stop create fake debates like this one.
- misdirectedGoods and Services TaxMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to insulting the questioner and his party instead of addressing the compensation request.
He has never governed, nor will he ever.
- partly answeredGoods and Services TaxMr. Jean-Yves Laforest (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer criticizes the asker for reading a sheet while claiming to monitor and negotiate in good faith.
with all due respect, I will tell my colleague that he should listen instead of reading his sheet while I answer questions.
- deflectedGoods and Services TaxMr. Jean-Yves Laforest (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer insists the tax is not harmonized and refuses to address compensation in the House.
They wanted to engage in a false debate, but now they see that the tax was not harmonized.
- partly answeredAfghanistanJack Layton (NDP) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states concerns and calls for compliance but gives no specifics on consequences or reconsideration.
We are calling unequivocally upon the government in Afghanistan to ensure it lives up to its international treaty obligations for human rights, especially human rights for women.
- deflectedAfghanistanJack Layton (NDP) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats concerns without answering whether the approach will be reconsidered.
We are calling on the government of Afghanistan to live up to its obligations, to clarify its position on where it stands and to ensure that the human rights of all people, including and especially the human rights of women, are protected to the full extent of its obligations.
- misdirectedAfghanistanMs. Dawn Black (NDP) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the premise of the question rather than addressing action on the law.
I really do not appreciate a question being raised about what our soldiers have been standing for.
- answeredAutomotive IndustryMr. Francis Valeriote (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly describes the credit facility and related measures already underway.
we are moving ahead with the Canadian secured credit facility.
- deflectedAutomotive IndustryMr. Francis Valeriote (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to praising the budget and attacking the Liberal leader instead of explaining timing.
On the other side, we have a Liberal leader who says one thing in British Columbia and another in the House of Commons.
- deflectedAutomotive IndustryMs. Ruby Dhalla (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer dismisses the question with a joke about Liberals and offers no commitment on warranties.
There is no leadership on the other side.
- deflectedAutomotive IndustryMs. Ruby Dhalla (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights collaboration with others and attacks the opposition without detailing new help for workers.
On the other side, we have a multitude of voices: no actual policy, sound and fury, signifying nothing.
- answeredEmployment InsuranceMrs. Josée Beaudin (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains why the five-week extension is preferable to eliminating the waiting period.
If we eliminate the waiting period, the only thing that happens is that benefits start two weeks earlier and stop two weeks earlier.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMrs. Josée Beaudin (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats prior talking points about consultations and the five-week benefit without addressing the waiting period critique.
We decided to provide five additional weeks to workers who lose their jobs at a time when our country is in a difficult economic situation because we believe that it is clearly more beneficial for them.
- partly answeredTaxationMr. Robert Carrier (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). loaded question.The answer acknowledges the tax haven problem and international efforts but does not explain why loopholes for billionaires are allowed.
we are working with an international committee to try to move forward on this issue.
- answeredTaxationMr. Robert Carrier (Bloc) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states actions being taken against tax havens including G20 discussions and increased resources.
We are cracking down on tax havens.
- deflectedAfghanistanBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer opens with sympathy for a bombing and condemns violence instead of specifying consequences for the Afghan law.
Only a few hours ago their provincial council building was destroyed by a suicide bomb and their provincial director of education and deputy director of public health were both killed.
- deflectedAfghanistanBob Rae (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer reiterates a clear message to Afghanistan but avoids naming any specific Canadian-led consequences or actions.
None of the other countries, which are involved in helping Afghanistan, have suggested that they are taking unilateral preemptive action.
- answeredAirport SecurityJoseph Volpe (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer specifies the five-point plan and the 10-day deadline for an RCMP agreement.
We have given 10 days for an agreement to be signed or the RCMP will be called in for discussions with both my colleague and the Minister of Public Safety
- answeredAirport SecurityJoseph Volpe (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists concrete actions including information sharing, legislative review, and revoking clearances.
We are revoking the security clearance when RCMP have provided evidence that a person may pose a security risk.
- deflectedCanadian Security Intelligence ServiceMr. Jack Harris (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses only CSIS not practicing torture, not the policy on using torture-derived information.
CSIS has made it quite clear that it does not practise the use of torture in information gathering and intelligence gathering.
- misdirectedAfghanistanMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Answer states the opposite of the expected position and fails to engage the question on Afghanistan torture.
We absolutely condone the use of torture.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts focus to a domestic announcement instead of addressing US engagement and Canadian action on climate change.
This afternoon I presented the automobile industry with regulatory standards limiting exhaust emissions.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks the Bloc's consistency rather than addressing credits for Quebec manufacturers or reference years.
It is hard to take the Bloc members seriously.
- partly answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Jean-Claude D'Amours (Liberal) asked Mr. Ed Komarnicki (Conservative). substantive question.Answer mentions funding for EI processing but does not explain delays in hiring from 2008 postings.
Our minister has announced $60 million that will be applied specifically to ensure the resources are there to have the benefits flow as quickly as possible.
- answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Jean-Claude D'Amours (Liberal) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly lists measures taken to speed up EI processing and hiring.
we have instituted special measures to accelerate the processing of applications: we have invested $60 million, hired more resources, among other things, and made changes so that people who have to fill out a form can do so electronically to speed up the process.
- deflectedAir CanadaMr. Wayne Marston (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer notes review of pensions but does not address Air Canada or ACE's specific pension funding refusal.
The Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance is currently looking at the pension liabilities of federally regulated pensions.
- deflectedAir CanadaMr. Wayne Marston (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer affirms general support for workers but avoids taking a position on ACE versus Air Canada pensions.
unequivocally this government stands on the side of hard-working Canadians, Canadians who work hard, who play by the rules, who want to be able to count on their pension plans for a stable retirement.
- partly answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMaurizio Bevilacqua (Liberal) asked Jason Kenney (Conservative). substantive question.The answer explains the new non-patronage appointment process and 95% occupancy but does not address ignoring recommendations or the specific 50% non-reappointment claim.
We gave to the IRB the responsibility for pre-screening candidates through an exhaustive process of exams and interviews before recommending them to the government.
- deflectedMontreal Airport AuthorityMr. Mario Laframboise (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The minister notes airports are at arm's length and offers a private meeting rather than addressing the moratorium or convening parties.
Canada's airports operate independently and at arm's length from the government.
- misdirectedFinanceMr. Glenn Thibeault (NDP) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.The response counters by questioning the asker's side and criticizing their budget vote instead of addressing credit-card regulation.
that brings to mind the question whose side is that hon. member on, because we actually put in a number of suggestions in the budget that we are willing to do to protect consumers.
- partly answeredInfrastructureMr. Bill Casey (Independent) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The minister acknowledges the project and states priorities are being identified but provides no timeline or commitment on the civic-centre application.
Step by step we are identifying priorities and moving forward.