NDP moves no-confidence motion over climate change failure

Other moments

Question Period, exchange by exchange

AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this

1. deflected
   EthicsRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates the party's position without addressing the specific taped words quoted in the question.As I have said, the only considerations ever presented to Chuck Cadman were the considerations that we wanted to have him rejoin the Conservative caucus and present himself as a Conservative candidate.
2. deflected
   EthicsRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioners for ignoring facts instead of addressing the new conversation mentioned.The Liberals are going to be continually spinning in the mud as they continue to ignore that fact.
3. answered
   EthicsRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly responds to the question about post-vote efforts by stating multiple personal invitations were made.As a matter of fact, after that vote there were a number of times when I saw Chuck Cadman around and I would tell him he was welcome back to our party any time.
4. deflected
   EthicsMr. Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats a prior claim without explaining what the taped phrase financial considerations referred to.We wanted Chuck to run for the Conservative Party.
5. deflected
   EthicsMr. Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the legal allegations by quoting Cadman instead of addressing the rules or Criminal Code claims.
6. partly answered
   Canada-U.S. RelationsMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer acknowledges the seriousness and states an investigation is underway but does not address the Bush/Republican motive premise.The government is working to get to the bottom of this matter.
7. deflected
   Canada-U.S. RelationsMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes an investigation but pivots to praising NAFTA benefits instead of addressing the suspension request.Canada has certainly enjoyed the benefits from a significant increase in jobs, an increase in the standard of living, and an increase in average incomes.
8. deflected
   EthicsMs. Meili Faille (Bloc) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer boasts about transparency legislation but does not address the specific incidents of non-transparency raised.we are quite proud of our record on transparency and the introduction of an unprecedented accountability act that provides for transparency.
9. deflected
   EthicsMs. Meili Faille (Bloc) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). rhetorical question.The question launches a broad attack on ethics without seeking specific information, and the answer pivots entirely to economic achievements.This morning, we learned that 43,000 new jobs were created throughout Canada in February.
10. deflected
    Canada-U.S. RelationsJack Layton (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The question assumes a cover-up via double standard, and the answer responds with sarcasm about the asker's media appearances before shifting to NAFTA praise.I welcome back the leader of the NDP from his visit on the U.S. television circuit, which I gather was very successful in reaching the audience he was really trying to reach.
11. deflected
    Canada-U.S. RelationsJack Layton (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The question builds on a premise of damaged credibility and demands an apology, while the answer denies the premise and pivots to affirming NAFTA support.that question from the leader of the NDP is totally off base.
12. misdirected
    Canada-U.S. RelationsGarth Turner (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The question equates the chief of staff to Scooter Libby and demands firing, but the answer ignores the demand and mocks the asker about a book launch.I want to draw to everybody's attention that the member for Halton has been letting everybody on the Hill know that he has released his new book.
13. partly answered
    Canada-U.S. RelationsGarth Turner (Liberal) asked Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.The question demands the Prime Minister fire his chief of staff, and the answer states an investigation is underway with action to follow based on results.as the Prime Minister and the government House leader have said, we take this matter very seriously and, for that reason, we have asked for an investigation by the Privy Council and we will continue.
14. partly answered
    Canada-U.S. RelationsMr. Jean-Claude D'Amours (Liberal) asked Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). loaded question.The question assumes tarnished reputation and demands firing, while the answer affirms the investigation but redirects to criticizing the Liberals' motion.what Canadians would like to know is what kind of action the Liberal Party is taking by putting forward a non-confidence motion for the opposition parties themselves.
15. deflected
    Canada-U.S. RelationsMr. Jean-Claude D'Amours (Liberal) asked Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). loaded question.The question challenges the independence of the Privy Council investigation and demands firing, but the answer defends the investigation and pivots to urging focus on the economy.What we would like to know is why the Liberals are not raising issues like the budget and the economy.
16. misdirected
    Status of WomenMs. Nicole Demers (Bloc) asked Mr. Rob Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The question accuses the minister of failing to defend abortion rights, but the answer claims the question misleads about a vote and shifts to violent crime legislation.the hon. member has almost crossed the line to deliberately misleading Canadians about the vote that took place on a private member's bill.
17. deflected
    Status of WomenMs. Nicole Demers (Bloc) asked Mr. Rob Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer pivots to Tackling Violent Crime Act and free vote instead of addressing Bill C-484 dangers.Our government is committed to fighting crimes against women and that is why we introduced the Tackling Violent Crime Act.
18. deflected
    Official LanguagesMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked Mrs. Sylvie Boucher (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks Bloc for whining rather than addressing French language protections in labour code.As usual, all the Bloc can do is whine and complain.
19. deflected
    Official LanguagesMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked Mrs. Sylvie Boucher (Conservative). substantive question.Answer restates general commitment without engaging Bill C-482 or labour code changes.as I said, we on this side of the House are working hard to promote both languages in Canada.
20. answered
    EthicsGeoff Regan (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly denies the alleged statement to the journalist.No, Mr. Speaker, because it is simply not true.
21. answered
    EthicsGeoff Regan (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly calls the cited column false.Mr. Speaker, the column that my colleague is citing from yesterday's Globe and Mail is false.
22. misdirected
    EthicsJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberals' facts and motives instead of addressing the article's content on Cadman.The Liberals are persistently trying to change their lines of attack because they are operating without the basic facts of the case that Chuck Cadman himself presented to Canadians.
23. answered
    EthicsJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly denies bribe offer and threatens legal action.there was no offer of a $1 million life insurance bribe.
24. partly answered
    Status of WomenMs. Penny Priddy (NDP) asked Mrs. Sylvie Boucher (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses funding increase but ignores wage gap and cuts mentioned in question.I would remind my hon. colleague that our government has increased the women's program budget by 76%, to the highest level it has ever reached.
25. partly answered
    Status of WomenJack Layton (NDP) asked Mrs. Sylvie Boucher (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists specific funding for projects but does not address wage gaps, poverty rates or other groups mentioned.this week, the Minister of Canadian Heritage, Status of Women and Official Languages announced the following amounts: $528,800 to Women in Cities International for a project entitled "creating safer communities for marginalized women and everyone"
26. misdirected
    Science and TechnologyScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the prior Liberal government instead of addressing the claim about misleading the House.It sounds like the Liberals are still disconnected from ordinary Canadians.
27. deflected
    Science and TechnologyScott Brison (Liberal) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates the replacement of the position and thanks the asker rather than explaining why the position was ended.I want to thank that Liberal member for allowing our budget to pass and our science and technology strategy to go through.
28. misdirected
    Government AppointmentsMr. Todd Russell (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner and the Liberal Party as making baseless accusations instead of addressing the OPP or PMO actions.That is the extreme point those members have gotten to.
29. partly answered
    SeniorsMr. Raymond Gravel (Bloc) asked Mrs. Lynne Yelich (Conservative). substantive question.The answer lists GIS increases and other measures but does not address retroactive payments or the specific debt to seniors.In the 2008 budget, we increased the exemption for GIS from $500 to $3,500.
30. answered
    National DefenceMr. Robert Bouchard (Bloc) asked Mr. Laurie Hawn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly assures that the runway will receive needed infrastructure despite an opening sarcastic remark.I can assure the hon. member and the House that it will receive all the infrastructure it needs to do the great job that it has been doing up until now and which I know will continue.
31. answered
    Public Works and Government ServicesMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly denies the premise with a single word.
32. deflected
    Science and TechnologyMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). substantive question.The answer blames prior Liberal actions and states a process exists rather than confirming whether the minister will meet the deadline.In 1998 the Liberals sold Canada out by signing over RADARSAT-2 to MDA because the Liberals could not negotiate a deal.
33. deflected
    Science and TechnologyMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Mr. Colin Carrie (Conservative). substantive question.Answer redirects responsibility to another minister instead of addressing the request to refuse the sale.Actually, Mr. Speaker, it is the Minister of Industry who is responsible for Investment Canada.
34. deflected
    Public Works and Government ServicesMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.Answer promises information later rather than addressing the specific payment and tender issues raised.I can get the answers after question period.
35. misdirected
    Aboriginal AffairsMr. Lloyd St. Amand (Liberal) asked Mr. Rod Bruinooge (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts to attacking the opposition on an unrelated policy instead of addressing the funding commitment.Would members of his party extend matrimonial real property rights to first nations women on reserve?
36. misdirected
    The EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks the Bloc and previous government instead of explaining the poor results in the commissioner's report.There is nothing the Bloc Québécois can do.
37. misdirected
    The EnvironmentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer dismisses the concern with sarcasm about Liberal support rather than addressing the stalled report.They like me. They really like me.
38. answered
    Fisheries and OceansLawrence MacAulay (Liberal) asked Loyola Hearn (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly affirms support for inshore fishermen and lists related actions taken.Does he think, for one minute, that we would stand by and let anything like that happen to our inshore fishermen?
39. partly answered
    Points of OrderRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses the procedural distinction but focuses on disputing the characterization of the vice-chair's response.