All sittings← 2008-02-152008-02-26 →
Monday, February 25, 2008 · sitting No. 53
Commons debates motion to extend Afghanistan mission past 2009
Government orders on Afghanistan occupied half the sitting as members considered a motion moved by Defence Minister Peter MacKay to continue Canadian Forces and civilian participation in the UN-mandated NATO-led mission beyond February 2009. MacKay told the House that the government sought a united position reflecting the best interests of the country and its soldiers. Liberal MP Denis Coderre said the party supported the Afghanistan Compact yet wanted clarification on several elements of the motion.
In question period Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion pressed Prime Minister Stephen Harper to revive Bill C-30 and hold a debate on climate change. Harper replied that the government had already presented its targets of a 20 per cent reduction by 2020 and 60 to 70 per cent by 2050 in the throne speech adopted with Liberal support. Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe urged the government to use part of the $10.6-billion surplus to aid manufacturing and forestry rather than devote it entirely to debt reduction.
Decided that day
- C-44 given second reading
- C-219 given second reading
- S-229, S-230, C-513, C-511 and C-512 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2008-02-25
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Income Tax Act
Liberal MP Scott Simms said Bill C-219 would provide a $1,000 tax credit for more than 100 hours of service and a larger credit for 200 hours, helping recruitment in rural areas.
Read the exchangeAtomic Energy of Canada Limited
Liberal MP Michael Ignatieff asked Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn whether the government had fired regulator Linda Keen to make Atomic Energy of Canada more attractive to private investors.
Read the exchangeManufacturing Industry
Liberal MP Sue Barnes said Finance Minister Jim Flaherty had insulted Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty and urged a partnership to help the manufacturing sector instead of attacks.
Read the exchangeOlder Workers
Bloc Québécois MP Yves Lessard said only $60 million from the surplus was needed for an income-support program for workers over 55 who cannot retrain.
Read the exchangeKosovo
Liberal MP Bryon Wilfert pressed the government for a clear position on Kosovo independence after several countries had recognized the declaration.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedThe EnvironmentStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer restates throne speech targets instead of addressing request to resurrect Bill C-30 or hold debate.
The House adopted these targets.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer discusses plan details and throne speech without addressing debate on Bill C-30.
we are working out the details of our plan.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer repeats targets and throne speech support without engaging criticism or Nature journal reference.
The government has been very clear and is now developing the details of its plan in that regard.
- misdirectedAtomic Energy of Canada LimitedMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks opposition inconsistency and avoids addressing privatization motive for firing regulator.
They change their minds from one week to the next.
- misdirectedAtomic Energy of Canada LimitedMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks opposition flip-flopping instead of addressing bending safety rules for privatization.
They do not know where they stand.
- partly answeredFinanceMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer notes existing spending and tax cuts but does not address using surplus for economic stimulus.
It is important to maintain a balanced approach and that is what the government intends to do.
- deflectedFinanceMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer claims broad tax cuts without addressing targeted use of surplus for manufacturing and forestry.
In reality, this government has cut taxes for everyone, not just for certain companies, but for every company in the country
- deflectedFinanceMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.Answer emphasizes balanced budget and debt reduction without responding to Quebec consensus on surplus allocation.
I am not one who wants to pass on to my children and grandchildren the kind of debt that the Liberals passed on to us.
- partly answeredFinanceMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites general job gains but does not address targeted action for the manufacturing and forestry crisis.
I might remind the hon. member that in January alone there were 7,200 new jobs created in Quebec.
- deflectedThe EconomyJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the overall approach and balanced policy instead of explaining action for displaced workers.
We believe they are saying to maintain the balanced approach.
- partly answeredThe EconomyJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses health investments and job numbers but ignores the specific Halifax and Sault Ste. Marie examples raised.
this government has made important investments in health care, including launching important projects on wait times
- partly answeredManufacturing IndustrySue Barnes (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer claims cooperation with Ontario on a trust agreement but does not address the alleged insults or bickering.
it is very clear that we are working together with the province of Ontario to finalize the community trust agreement
- misdirectedManufacturing IndustrySue Barnes (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to praising a company in the asker's riding and accuses the Liberals of wanting deficits rather than addressing the dollar and U.S. economy issues.
I am surprised that the hon. member is in such a poor mood.
- deflectedManufacturing IndustryJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer accuses the questioner of pitting regions against each other instead of justifying the differing treatment of aerospace and auto sectors.
is it not classic that the Liberal Party and the hon. member would try to pit Canadian against Canadian and region against region.
- deflectedManufacturing IndustryJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks Liberal spending promises and deficits rather than explaining consistency in industry support.
what they call consistency is that they would subsidize everyone.
- misdirectedOlder WorkersMr. Yves Lessard (Bloc) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). substantive question.The answer expresses sympathy and cites training investments but then attacks the Bloc and questions faith in Quebecers instead of addressing the older-worker program request.
he should have a little bit more faith in the people of Quebec.
- deflectedOlder WorkersMr. Yves Lessard (Bloc) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes general policies instead of addressing the specific cost of the proposed program.
The fact is this government is helping workers today.
- partly answeredKosovoMrs. Vivian Barbot (Bloc) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). substantive question.The response indicates ongoing assessment without committing to a position.
We are assessing the situation.
- deflectedTV5Mrs. Maria Mourani (Bloc) asked Jim Abbott (Conservative). substantive question.The answer focuses on a meeting rather than addressing government silence.
the meeting that was held this weekend between representatives of the partnering governments on TV5 was a perfect occasion to highlight that TV5 is an important tool
- deflectedFederal-Provincial RelationsMr. Scott Simms (Liberal) asked Mr. Ted Menzies (Conservative). loaded question.The answer highlights government successes without addressing the specific accusations.
it was this Conservative government that finally brought a peaceful settlement to the fiscal imbalance
- misdirectedFederal-Provincial RelationsMr. Scott Simms (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The response denies the premise and emphasizes positive contributions instead of addressing the question directly.
I said absolutely no such thing in that meeting or at any time.
- deflectedKosovoBryon Wilfert (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats the previous response and insults the questioner.
obviously the hon. member is not quick enough on his feet to come up with a different question
- deflectedKosovoBryon Wilfert (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids giving a timeline and instead references advice from a former prime minister.
maybe the hon. member might consider listening to his former colleague, former prime minister Chrétien, because he did advise that we should remain cautious.
- misdirectedPublic AppointmentsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The response defends the appointees and criticizes the NDP rather than addressing the accountability pledge.
I know that the problem in the House of Commons is that we have people like the NDP members who just will not stop attacking people in the media.
- deflectedPublic AppointmentsMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.Cites a positive media quote praising appointments without addressing the broken promise or cronyism allegations.
"...many, perhaps more, are going to eminently qualified Canadians. Better than ever, you are getting appointments of top-notch people that are going to serve Canada well. No more of the pork-barrel patronage that we saw in the past"
- deflectedStatus of WomenMaria Minna (Liberal) asked Mrs. Sylvie Boucher (Conservative). loaded question.Lists general spending on women without addressing the comparison to defence advocacy funding.
our government spends $20 million every year on projects that a have a direct impact on women and young girls, a record for Status of Women Canada.
- deflectedStatus of WomenMaria Minna (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.Defers to an ongoing court case instead of addressing the double standard allegation.
that very particular issue is now before the courts. I think all members of the House of Commons would agree it would be inappropriate to make any comments on it at this time.
- answeredCigarette SmugglingMs. Raymonde Folco (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.Directly states that additional resources have been provided to the RCMP and authorities.
That is why we have provided the RCMP and other authorities with additional resources to reduce the problem she mentioned.
- partly answeredCigarette SmugglingMs. Raymonde Folco (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.Provides seizure statistics but does not detail measures for public health or aboriginal communities.
For example, between December 2 and 4 of last year, the RCMP seized nearly one million illegal cigarettes, and it is continuing to do its job.
- deflectedCigarette SmugglingMr. Serge Ménard (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.Focuses on past Liberal government actions rather than outlining specific current measures.
In the past, when the Liberal government was in power, resources were cut and crime rates increased. We want to increase resources and cut crime.
- deflectedCigarette SmugglingMr. Serge Ménard (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.Attacks the Bloc Québécois instead of detailing leadership or planned measures.
That is something the Bloc members cannot do. They cannot do anything to help the people of Quebec with this problem, but we can.
- partly answeredCitizenship and ImmigrationMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.States that cases are evaluated individually without providing specifics or a timeline for this family.
as the hon. member knows, each case is evaluated on its own unique merits and circumstances and based on all of the facts. We are happy to look at the situation on that basis.
- partly answeredAfghanistanMs. Dawn Black (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer acknowledges the combat point via a Liberal quote but pivots to training spin and opens with a name pun.
a new dawn is breaking out of the black.
- misdirectedCanadian ForcesMs. Dawn Black (NDP) asked Greg Thompson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the resource question and instead attacks the NDP voting record and calls them hypocritical.
this is the NDP members at their hypocritical best, because as they well know, we doubled the amount of OSI clinics in this country in our last budget, and they stood in the House and voted against that budget.
- deflectedInfrastructureAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Vic Toews (Conservative). substantive question.The answer blames the prior government and ends by shaming the asker instead of addressing the funding switch.
That member should be ashamed.
- answeredGuaranteed Income SupplementMs. Louise Thibault (Independent) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly lists measures taken to help seniors including GIS increases above inflation.
we have introduced a number of different measures to lift the burden, including raising the guaranteed income supplement two years in a row over and above the inflation rate
- deflectedAtomic Energy of Canada LimitedMs. Catherine Bell (NDP) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). loaded question.The answer refuses to address the firing motive and instead states the review process and court limitation.
of course with respect to Ms. Keen I cannot comment on that matter as it is before the courts.
- partly answeredPoints of OrderAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Mr. Rod Bruinooge (Conservative). substantive question.The answer briefly restates the narrow-scope objection and warns of precedent without engaging the Beauchesne citation.
The bill is very narrow in its scope.