All sittings← 2007-06-192007-06-22 →
Wednesday, June 20, 2007 · sitting No. 175
Commons debates aeronautics act changes at report stage
The House spent the largest share of its sitting debating amendments to Bill C-6, the Aeronautics Act, at report stage. NDP MP Brian Masse said the government had decided to remove several amendments that would have strengthened safety accountability for airlines. NDP MP Peter Julian said the changes would reduce public oversight of carriers such as Air Canada and WestJet.
In Question Period, Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion offered condolences for three soldiers killed in Afghanistan and asked Prime Minister Stephen Harper to do the same. Harper said the government remained committed to the mission until February 2009 and would seek parliamentary approval for any extension. Dion later pressed Harper on whether the new equalization formula respected the Atlantic accord, and Harper replied that Newfoundland would receive the same transfers this year as before the budget.
Decided that day
- Bill C-6 passed
- Bills C-61, C-14 and C-47 advanced to the Senate
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2007-06-20
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Health
NDP Leader Jack Layton said families must choose between groceries and medication and called for a national pharmacare plan. Health Minister Tony Clement said the government had added more than $2 billion in health transfers and was discussing the issue with the provinces.
Read the exchangeStatus of Women
Liberal MP Maria Minna asked why equality language had been removed from the Status of Women Canada mandate. Minister Lynne Yelich said the government continued to operate on a principle of equality.
Read the exchangeAgriculture and Agri-Food
Bloc Québécois MP André Bellavance asked Agriculture Minister Christian Paradis whether negotiators had instructions to defend supply management. Paradis said the government would not touch tariffs or quotas.
Read the exchangeIncome Trusts
Liberal MP Garth Turner asked Finance Minister Jim Flaherty to justify the tax on income trusts. Conservative House Leader Peter Van Loan said the member had campaigned for income splitting and then voted against it.
Read the exchangeDemocratic Reform
Conservative MP Laurie Hawn said the Liberal-dominated Senate was refusing to vote on democratic reform legislation. Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the Senate had defied its own leader and public opinion.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- answeredAfghanistanStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly pays respects as requested.
We obviously will remember these three fallen members of the armed forces in our thoughts and prayers.
- deflectedEqualization FormulaStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). rhetorical question.Avoids the sarcastic question by listing positive aspects of the budget.
I have to point out that the budget was well received by most provincial and territorial governments.
- deflectedEqualization FormulaStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Responds with facts rather than addressing the accusation directly.
I disagree, Mr. Speaker. Here are the facts.
- answeredAfghanistanMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Clearly states the position on the mission end date.
Three of the four parties of this House have agreed with this military mission to February 2009.
- answeredAfghanistanMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.States the mission will end in February 2009 as asked.
the government has made it clear that the mission will end in February 2009.
- deflectedEqualization FormulaMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Promotes the adopted formula rather than agreeing to the proposed one.
the fairest formula is the one that this Parliament and this government adopted
- deflectedEqualization FormulaMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Focuses on restoration of balance without addressing tax field transfer.
fiscal balance was restored by a Conservative government.
- partly answeredEqualization FormulaMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.Addresses negotiations but not commitment to present proposals.
To this date we have not received a proposal from any provincial government.
- deflectedEqualization FormulaMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses budget wording on cost sharing but avoids the specific request for unconditional withdrawal and full compensation.
It is the intention of our government, as we have with the settlement of the fiscal imbalance, to limit our spending in areas of provincial jurisdiction where it touches on obviously provincial programs.
- deflectedHealthJack Layton (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights federal health spending but does not address leadership on a national approach to prescription drug costs.
It is this government that has ensured that there has been extra spending on health care in this budget and in last year's budget to the tune of $1.1 billion last year and $1.2 billion this year.
- misdirectedHealthJack Layton (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to attacking the asker for not supporting a cancer strategy instead of addressing a national pharmaceuticals approach.
Why is the hon. member not supporting our government when it comes to a national cancer strategy?
- deflectedStatus of WomenMaria Minna (Liberal) asked Mrs. Lynne Yelich (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates a general principle of equality without addressing the removal of equality from the mandate of Status of Women Canada.
I do not have to tell that member that she belongs to the Status of Women.
- deflectedOfficial LanguagesMs. Raymonde Folco (Liberal) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights new funding for minority communities but does not address reinstating the court challenges program.
The latest budget earmarks $30 million over two years to help minority communities in our country.
- partly answeredChild CareMs. Yasmin Ratansi (Liberal) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the child care promise by pointing to provincial actions and the universal child care benefit but does not confirm delivery of 125,000 spaces.
I point to the commitments in provincial budgets this spring where provinces say they are going to use that money that we are providing them to create spaces.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the asker and Liberal Party for blocking Bill C-44 instead of addressing funding for first nations drinking water safety.
The member, together with the Liberal Party, is supporting that sad state of affairs by blocking Bill C-44
- deflectedSecurities IndustryMr. Thierry St-Cyr (Bloc) asked Ms. Diane Ablonczy (Conservative). loaded question.The answer discusses federal jurisdiction and a future paper but avoids explaining action in a provincial area of securities regulation.
We are within the federal jurisdiction and we will be preparing a paper on this issue, and I hope the hon. member will read it.
- misdirectedSecurities IndustryMr. Thierry St-Cyr (Bloc) asked Ms. Diane Ablonczy (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the asker as fanning flames and dismisses the claim without addressing the civil code or Quebec's will.
the member knows that is nonsense. I know he likes to fan these flames, but that is completely and utterly untrue.
- answeredAgriculture and Agri-FoodMr. André Bellavance (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the government's position on defending supply management and following the House motion.
the Government of Canada will continue to support and defend supply management.
- deflectedAgriculture and Agri-FoodMr. André Bellavance (Bloc) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats prior instructions without addressing the claim of inaction or positioning at WTO.
the coalition's instructions were to defend supply management and not to touch tariffs and quotas.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentGeoff Regan (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to attacking the Liberals' past record instead of addressing the current plan's emissions impact.
I think it is very interesting to note that the Liberals are doing everything they possibly can rather than talk about their record.
- misdirectedMinisterial ExpensesMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The answer compares to Liberal spending and adds an unrelated NASCAR jab instead of disclosing expenses.
we are proud of our track record of cabinet ministers' expense spending, because it is a fraction of what the Liberal ministers spent.
- answeredHealthHedy Fry (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states that wait times guarantees have been established in every province and territory.
we have in each and every province and territory a patient wait times guarantee, at least one in many of the provinces and moving ahead with more.
- partly answeredConsumer AffairsMs. Penny Priddy (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses monitoring and inspectors but does not explain why importers are not made responsible.
we do have inspectors and investigators who are on the scene and who are busy analyzing the products to see whether there is any kind of health hazard.
- deflectedConsumer AffairsMs. Penny Priddy (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes importer action but pivots to buyer beware without committing to regulatory change.
The fact of the matter is we get what we pay for.
- answeredSoftwood LumberMr. Blair Wilson (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly rebuts the premise by detailing the agreement's protections against worse outcomes.
without the softwood lumber agreement, we would be facing new chapter 19 lawsuits, new actions.
- deflectedAutomobile IndustryNavdeep Bains (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the specific auto industry concern by attacking the opposition's source of advice instead.
I guess when the Liberals lose some critical members from the other side, they start to take their economic lessons from the NDP.
- misdirectedGovernment PoliciesKen Dryden (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the question about answers and divisions to deliver an unrelated personal anecdote about the speaker's grandmother.
our Canada is the Canada that my grandmother, a refugee from communism, told me about when she said it was a country of freedom, hope and opportunity.
- misdirectedGovernment PoliciesKen Dryden (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer turns to attacking the Liberal Party's motives rather than addressing the claimed lack of purpose or answers.
Who is in the way every step of the way? One group of people, the Liberal Party.
- answeredExpenses of the Former Lieutenant Governor of QuebecMr. Jean-Yves Laforest (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the government's actions and position on committee independence regarding the request to testify.
This government recognizes and respects the authority and the independence of parliamentary committees to invite whomever they wish to appear.
- deflectedExpenses of the Former Lieutenant Governor of QuebecMrs. Vivian Barbot (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to general accountability talking points instead of addressing the specific proposal on future lieutenant governors appearing before committees.
This government, when it took power, tabled a bill on accountability, which is now law.
- answeredSupply ManagementMr. Bernard Patry (Liberal) asked Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly affirms the commitment to defend supply management with no changes to quotas or tariffs.
Our government will defend supply management. No, we will not touch quotas. No, we will not touch tariffs.
- partly answeredVeterans AffairsMr. Peter Stoffer (NDP) asked Greg Thompson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer addresses the extension commitment and recent additions but does not explain the timing or broken-promise accusation.
we brought 12,000 people, veterans and spouses, into that program in the last year alone.
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMs. Catherine Bell (NDP) asked Loyola Hearn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights existing spending and enforcement without addressing the call for increased conservation funding or policy changes.
If the member wants to see what we will really do for the west coast, I suggest to her that she stay tuned.
- misdirectedCanada Summer JobsMr. Michael Savage (Liberal) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). loaded question.The answer responds with a personal insult about the asker's age instead of addressing the program's implementation or transparency issues.
For my friend, though, I do not care how many times he asks me, he is not young enough to qualify for a Canada summer job.