All sittings← 2007-04-302007-05-02 →
Tuesday, May 1, 2007 · sitting No. 144
House debates apology to residential school survivors
The House spent the largest part of the sitting on a supply day motion calling for an apology to survivors of Indian residential schools. Liberal MP Gary Merasty moved the motion, which asked Parliament to apologize for trauma caused by assimilation policies that led to loss of aboriginal culture and left a legacy of abuse. Conservative MP Ron Cannan said the government does not condone past dealings with first nations and hopes lessons have been learned.
Question period focused on calls for the Prime Minister to state whether he retains confidence in the Minister of National Defence. Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion asked repeatedly if confidence remained, citing disputes over Red Cross access and prisoner treatment in Afghanistan. Prime Minister Stephen Harper replied that he retains confidence in the minister and questioned the opposition leader's association with Green Party Leader Elizabeth May.
Decided that day
- 16th Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women passed
- Apology to Indian Residential Schools survivors passed
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2007-05-01
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
The Environment
Bloc Québécois MP Bernard Bigras asked the environment minister to adopt absolute reduction targets and an international carbon exchange as suggested by the UN's Kyoto representative. Environment Minister John Baird said the government has a plan to cut greenhouse gases 20 per cent in absolute terms within 13 years.
Read the exchangeBulk Export of Water
Bloc Québécois MP Serge Cardin asked whether the government would ensure trade agreements do not override provincial bans on bulk water exports. International Trade Minister David Emerson said federal law already prohibits bulk exports and water in its natural state is not covered by NAFTA.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
NDP MP Dawn Black asked what the defence minister is doing about a Norad computer retrofit that cost more than double its estimate and is years late. Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor said the overrun occurred under previous Liberal governments.
Read the exchangeTelecommunications Industry
Liberal MP Scott Brison said the CRTC confirmed deregulation will raise rural phone rates and asked why the industry minister's policy should cost small-town Canadians more. Industry Minister Maxime Bernier said deregulation applies only to urban centres while rural service remains under CRTC regulation.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- misdirectedAfghanistanStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer ignores the yes/no question and attacks the opposition leader instead.
I have said repeatedly that it is the Leader of the Opposition in whom I lack confidence.
- misdirectedAfghanistanStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer again evades the confidence question by pivoting to Elizabeth May remarks.
I think the Leader of the Opposition should be able to say that he believes that diminishing the Holocaust and using Nazi analogies are inappropriate.
- answeredAfghanistanStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly states confidence in the minister before shifting topics.
obviously I have confidence in the Minister of National Defence , someone who has served as a member of the Canadian Forces.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer disputes facts cited but does not address the call to fire the minister.
the problem once again is that the opposition continues to have its facts wrong.
- misdirectedAfghanistanMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.Answer twists the question into an accusation about supporting terrorists rather than addressing Geneva conventions.
Is the hon. member saying that he supports Taliban terrorists?
- partly answeredAfghanistanMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses the inquiry point but not the request to stop transfers.
- partly answeredAfghanistanMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer discusses the existing arrangement but does not commit to stopping transfers or an independent inquiry.
we have an arrangement with the Afghan government and with the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission concerning the transfer of detainees.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Claude Bachand (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.Answer notes allegations heard but ignores the Geneva convention compliance question.
last week I indicated that our corrections officers had heard allegations of torture in two cases, but there is no proof.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Claude Bachand (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids addressing compliance with the Geneva convention by pivoting to NATO preferences on Afghan handling of prisoners.
In addition, the head of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces said that it was preferable for the Afghans to continue developing their ability to receive and handle prisoners, and that is exactly what is happening.
- deflectedAfghanistanJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates prior admissions about allegations but does not explain why transfers continue despite them.
He said that officials from Correctional Service Canada had passed on these allegations, but that there was no proof.
- misdirectedAfghanistanJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The question attacks multiple ministers with loaded claims of misleading and inconsistency; the answer counters by attacking the opposition's facts instead of addressing the call for a shuffle.
The opposition members have their facts wrong. I would love to shuffle them around but it is not within my power.
- deflectedAfghanistanLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids stating the number of prisoners by criticizing the opposition's past lack of interest rather than providing information.
when I published the fact in February that we had corrections officers in the prisons in Afghanistan, the opposition members were not even interested and never asked a question.
- misdirectedAfghanistanLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The answer refuses to provide numbers by labeling them operational and instead challenges the previous Liberal government to disclose its own figures.
However, if the previous Liberal government wants to admit how many prisoners it transferred, we are quite open to hear it.
- deflectedAfghanistanDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). loaded question.The question frames the government as less serious than NATO by invoking Taliban rhetoric; the answer pivots to general praise for military compliance without engaging the comparison.
It is working incredibly hard and doing an incredibly good job, and that includes conforming with international law.
- partly answeredAfghanistanDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). loaded question.The question demands accountability on allegations and Geneva compliance; the answer addresses the lack of specific evidence and ongoing investigations but ignores the call to drop rhetoric and shuffle.
The NATO commander, as the member so often likes to refer to, has said that he sees no specific evidence to these allegations.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights the government's absolute reduction plan but does not address adopting a carbon exchange or responding to the UN representative's specific suggestion.
this government is very proud of having a real plan for reducing, in terms of absolute figures, greenhouse gases by 20% in the next 13 years.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer ignores the carbon exchange question entirely and attacks the Bloc instead.
The Bloc Québécois is a bunch of dreamers.
- answeredBulk Export of WaterMr. Serge Cardin (Bloc) asked David Emerson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly confirms federal law and NAFTA exclusion for bulk water exports.
I can confirm that under the International Boundary Waters Treaty Act, it is against federal law to export bulk water in Canada.
- answeredBulk Export of WaterMr. Serge Cardin (Bloc) asked David Emerson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly states water in natural state is already excluded under NAFTA.
as I said, it is already Canadian law and it is built into the NAFTA that water in its natural state is not covered by the NAFTA, full stop.
- misdirectedAfghanistanKaren Redman (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the opposition for repeating allegations rather than addressing the Geneva convention question.
does the hon. member not understand that Canadians continue to be offended by members of the opposition, continue to be offended by their insistent repeating of the Taliban allegations as though they are the gospel truth?
- partly answeredAfghanistanKaren Redman (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). substantive question.Answer mentions an arrangement with Afghanistan but does not address confidence in the minister or defending soldiers.
we have said several times in this House that the Government of Canada has an arrangement with the government of Afghanistan and with the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission.
- deflectedAfghanistanIrwin Cotler (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). loaded question.Answer challenges the member for evidence instead of addressing the listed reports or government action.
if the hon. member has specific evidence for these allegations we would be happy to receive it.
- misdirectedAfghanistanIrwin Cotler (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks the Liberal Party instead of responding to the question about contradictory answers and Geneva convention.
It is typical of the Liberal Party to try to run from their own words and from their own actions when they very clearly have stood in this House and many times in front of the media and have taken the Taliban's words as the truth.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMs. Dawn Black (NDP) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.Answer blames previous Liberal government rather than addressing current action on the Norad retrofit cost overrun.
if the member really wants to know where the money was wasted, she had better check the years. It was wasted under Liberal rule.
- misdirectedNational DefenceMs. Dawn Black (NDP) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). loaded question.Question assumes loss of confidence and demands replacement; answer attacks question phrasing then shifts to blaming prior government on Norad costs.
that was a pretty convoluted question.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Question challenges carbon tax claims and demands impact statement; answer ignores query to attack Green Party candidate remarks.
The evoking of the Nazi era by the Green Party leader in order to score political points is insensitive to those who lived through this dark time.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. David McGuinty (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Question attacks sudden carbon tax announcement and demands admission of improvisation; answer pivots to Liberal candidate's comments instead of addressing regulations.
There is also a consequence when the leader of the Liberal Party endorses a candidate for Parliament who makes offensive comments, not only about the darkest period in human history, but also about evangelical Christians.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Francis Scarpaleggia (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Question asks when government will revive Bill C-30 for real climate plan; answer briefly notes agreement areas then attacks Liberal candidate's remarks.
it is time for the Liberal members opposite to stand up against outrageous, hateful, meanspirited comments made by their candidate running in Central Nova.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Francis Scarpaleggia (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Question accuses minister of breaking Kyoto obligations and demands honesty; answer restates government plan without addressing Kyoto commitments.
greenhouse gas emissions. We will do so by more than any other country over the next 13 years.
- answeredPublic SafetyMrs. Maria Mourani (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.Question asks if housing sexual predator near school is appropriate; answer shares concern and states instructions to terminate such leases.
I have given instructions that leases should be terminated in such situations.
- partly answeredCrime PreventionMr. Serge Ménard (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.Question challenges delay in approving Quebec crime prevention proposals; answer notes review process and prior Quebec announcements but does not explain timeline.
A few months ago, I was pleased to announce a number of programs in Quebec.
- answeredTelecommunications IndustryScott Brison (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.Question asks why rural Canadians should pay more due to deregulation mistake; answer clarifies urban deregulation and notes CRTC appeal process prevents further comment.
For the rural centres, it still will be under the regulations of the CRTC.
- deflectedOil and Gas IndustryMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). loaded question.The answer discusses market conditions and past Liberal plans instead of addressing regulation of prices.
It is very important to note what two economists, Don Drummond and Mark Jaccard, have said.
- partly answeredOil and Gas IndustryMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.Addresses the CRTC decision but ignores the GST promise mentioned.
With respect to the CRTC's decision, it may be appealed before the government. We will comment in due time.
- partly answeredTelecommunications IndustryScott Brison (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.Responds to the CAP funding claim but does not address deregulation or broadband strategy.
We are funding it for another year.
- deflectedService CanadaMs. Louise Thibault (Bloc) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). substantive question.Offers to receive information instead of addressing the management situation directly.
However, with respect to her particular question, I am happy to receive any information that she has and I will get back to her.
- answeredPrivilegeMr. Mario Laframboise (Bloc) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). substantive question.The response indicates willingness to investigate the privilege matter raised.
We would certainly appreciate an opportunity to investigate the matter a bit further before we comment and would like to reserve that opportunity to do so.
- misdirectedPoints of orderMr. Derek Lee (Liberal) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses a privilege question from another member instead of the points of order raised.
I submit that there was no misinformation to the House and no privileges were breached.