All sittings← 2007-02-232007-02-27 →
Monday, February 26, 2007 · sitting No. 118
Commons debates extension of anti-terrorism act provisions
The House spent the largest share of the sitting on orders of the day concerning the Anti-terrorism Act. Members considered a government motion to extend for three years the preventive arrest and investigative hearing provisions due to sunset at the end of the month.
Liberal MP Michael Ignatieff said the clauses should expire because they are flawed and have never been used. Conservative MP Pierre Lemieux urged renewal and accused the Liberals of endangering public safety by reversing their earlier position.
In question period the same topic produced repeated exchanges between Liberal MP Stéphane Dion and Prime Minister Stephen Harper over the absence of a full parliamentary review and the government's handling of related security-certificate issues.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2007-02-26
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Criminal Code
Liberal MP Charles Hubbard moved second reading of Senate bill S-213 to increase penalties for cruelty to animals and referred it to committee.
Read the exchangeScouts Canada
Conservative MP Gary Schellenberger paid tribute to Scouts Canada on its 100th anniversary and urged members to recognize local contributions.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
Conservative MP Steven Blaney cited former Liberal strategist Eddie Goldenberg admitting the previous government never intended to meet Kyoto targets.
Read the exchangeAfghanistan
Minister of International Cooperation Josée Verner outlined new funding for microcredit, demining and governance projects in Afghanistan.
Read the exchangeCourt Challenges Program
Liberal MP Marlene Jennings asked why the government had eliminated the program that helped minority groups challenge legislation such as security certificates.
Read the exchangeVisitor Rebate Program
Liberal MP Scott Brison pressed Finance Minister Jim Flaherty on provincial opposition to ending the GST rebate for foreign tourists.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedAnti-terrorism ActStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts to accusing opposition of flip-flopping and proposing compromise instead of addressing the lack of review.
We did so with the support of the Leader of the Opposition until a couple of weeks ago when he abruptly flip-flopped his position on the issue
- misdirectedAnti-terrorism ActStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberal Party over RCMP allegation and demands apology rather than addressing the question on anti-terrorism approach.
This is an attack against the RCMP. It is another attempt by the Liberal Party to discredit the RCMP, and the Liberal Party should apologize to the RCMP.
- misdirectedThe Prime MinisterStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats denial of RCMP leak and attacks the questioner instead of addressing politicization of public service or website press release.
- deflectedThe Prime MinisterMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer pivots to past Liberal legislation and Senate compromise while accusing leader of refusing compromise, avoiding the core issue of ignoring committee recommendations.
I point out that I just offered, in this question period, to adopt the recommendations of the Liberal Party's own Senate report last week.
- deflectedThe Prime MinisterMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer accuses opposition of refusing compromises and threatening caucus instead of committing to new measures replacing expiring provisions.
Up to now, he has refused these compromises and threatened members of his own caucus who wished to protect Canadian citizens against terrorism.
- answeredQuebec ElectionsMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer directly states no intention to intervene in Quebec elections and clarifies non-involvement.
As Prime Minister of Canada, I have no intention of getting involved in Quebec's elections.
- misdirectedQuebec ElectionsMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer changes subject to Bloc leader's past decisions and environmental funding instead of clarifying position on Charest's pension comments.
the leader of the Bloc decided not to run for the leadership of the Parti Québécois.
- deflectedQuebec ElectionsMr. Michel Gauthier (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.Answer addresses fiscal imbalance in general terms but avoids confirming payments to Quebeckers during election period.
this government recognizes the fiscal imbalance between governments in Canada and is committed to rectifying that fiscal imbalance
- deflectedQuebec ElectionsMr. Michel Gauthier (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the upcoming budget without addressing whether two election-based scenarios exist.
It will be a very good budget for Quebec.
- partly answeredSecurity CertificatesMr. Bill Siksay (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer outlines the Supreme Court roadmap and intent to follow it but provides no concrete solution details.
the government will be acting on the recommendations of the Supreme Court
- deflectedSecurity CertificatesMr. Bill Siksay (NDP) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer criticizes the NDP approach and lists existing measures without addressing the requested appointment or negotiations.
rather than the typical approach of the NDP of trying to introduce yet another layer of bureaucracy
- misdirectedCourt Challenges ProgramMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the premise about fairness instead of addressing the program cut and its impact on minorities.
We have the most open and fair judicial system on the face of the earth.
- misdirectedCourt Challenges ProgramMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to attacking Liberals on anti-terrorism instead of addressing the broken promise on security certificates.
After all, this was their agenda.
- deflectedPublic ServiceSue Barnes (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the quote but escalates by adding further partisan attacks rather than explaining the guidelines breach.
I could simply add that the Liberals have voted against their own terrorism legislation.
- misdirectedThe Prime MinisterSue Barnes (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to Air-India families and Liberal leader criticism instead of addressing verification or apology.
it was the Liberal leader who dismissed them as being emotional.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges ongoing work on regulations but does not admit or refute the 179% emissions increase claim.
We are in the process of creating a policy to regulate the industry in Canada
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer promotes general regulations without addressing specific targets or carbon exchange.
That is why we are in the process of formulating the strictest regulations for industry in the history of Canada, for the benefit of the environment.
- deflectedTransportMr. Mario Laframboise (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer quotes a pilot in support but ignores the question on inspector cuts.
We understand that the rationale for the Bill is to enhance the safety of Canada's aviation system...
- deflectedTransportMr. Mario Laframboise (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer asserts committee freedom and system quality without addressing the alleged threat.
the committee is free to call whomever it wants to shed light on the matter.
- misdirectedFinanceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Liberal critic instead of addressing the Ontario gimmicks question.
only a Liberal finance critic could think it is silly to pay down public debt, reduce the interest that has to be paid on public debt, and guarantee tax reductions to Canadians year after year going forward.
- deflectedFinanceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the Ontario record without addressing the federal asset sales concern.
I can assure the member opposite that as the finance minister of Ontario I balanced the budget.
- deflectedFinanceLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to praising the economy instead of addressing the Ontario deficit analogy.
I do not know why the members opposite in the Liberal Party are so depressed about Canada's great economy.
- misdirectedFinanceLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to attacking Liberals via Gomery instead of addressing asset sale mistakes.
It is being returned to families for the benefit of children in Canada and not to the friends of the Liberal Party referred to by Justice Gomery.
- misdirectedAfghanistanMs. Dawn Black (NDP) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). loaded question.The answer accuses the member of misunderstanding rather than addressing Pakistan or aid rebalancing.
clearly, the member does not understand the meaning of our mission in Afghanistan.
- deflectedAfghanistanMs. Dawn Black (NDP) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the specific claims about overheating and armour by offering general assurances instead.
We send to Afghanistan the very best equipment we can for our forces and, yes, we intend to win the arms race with the Taliban.
- deflectedVisitor Rebate ProgramScott Brison (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer sidesteps the accusation of misleading the House and the provincial opposition by discussing program efficiency and future considerations.
It was a relatively inefficient program.
- deflectedVisitor Rebate ProgramScott Brison (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the question about the industry minister championing the position and pivots to general tourism spending.
the Government of Canada, as the member opposite knows, is spending about $350 million this year to promote tourism in Canada.
- deflectedStatus of WomenMs. Johanne Deschamps (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.The answer does not address reversing the office closures and instead contrasts with the previous government.
unlike the previous government, this government will redistribute these administrative savings to projects that help women directly.
- deflectedStatus of WomenMs. Johanne Deschamps (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.The answer rejects the premise of reduced services without engaging the question of office closures leading to that outcome.
- answeredImmigration and Refugee BoardMr. Omar Alghabra (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly confirms the resignation and provides context on the letter received.
on Friday, I received a letter of resignation from Mr. Fleury.
- misdirectedCanada Revenue AgencyMr. David Christopherson (NDP) asked Carol Skelton (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the previous Liberal government rather than addressing the current government's handling of corporate tax investigations.
In 1996, the AG made recommendations to the Liberal minister but it took 10 years and nothing was done.
- partly answeredCanada Revenue AgencyMr. David Christopherson (NDP) asked Carol Skelton (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the staffing issue and states intent to address it but does not specify a timeline for action.
I must reassure my colleague that they are very qualified people and we intend to look after the situation.
- misdirectedImmigration and Refugee BoardMr. Omar Alghabra (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner by demanding an apology instead of addressing IRB fairness or stacking claims.
I believe that the hon. member should apologize to Mr. Fleury for that.
- misdirectedAnti-terrorism ActStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The response shifts focus to accusing the opposition of a flip-flop rather than stating when the analysis will be tabled.
What report did he receive to cause this colossal flip-flop that he has done?
- answeredIntellectual PropertyMr. Robert Vincent (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.The minister directly states he is awaiting detailed committee recommendations before proceeding.
I am waiting for detailed recommendations from the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology in order to continue our study of all the recommendations.